Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
Advertisements

1 Alignment using high Pt tracks 1.Small w.r.t. large barrel chambers 2.BEE w.r.t. EC chambers 3.Endcap – Barrel 4.BIS8 w.r.t. BIS7 5.Inner tracker – Muon.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
19 March 2012Muon Week - Operations1 Muon Week Muon Operations Session Introduction Status and LHC Schedule Detector Readiness + Preparation for Physics.
1 CMS Tracker Alignment and Implications for Physics Performance Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University CMS Collaboration SPLIT
The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.
RPC Cosmic Rays Test in Naples Paolo Iengo Atlas RPC Group Napoli ( M. Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G. Carlino,R. de Asmundis, M. Della Pietra, D. della.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
Javier CastilloLHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 05/09/ Alignment of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Javier Castillo CEA/Saclay.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
Status & Readiness of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer J. Chapman - University of Michigan on behalf of the ATLAS Muon Groups Particular Thanks to C. Ferretti,
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
RPC Timing Results with Final Splitters Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli The Napoli RPC Group: M.Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G.C., R. de Asmundis, M. Della.
Min-DHCAL: Measurements with Pions Benjamin Freund and José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting Max-Planck-Institute, Munich.
1 The ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker commissioning at SR1 APS and JPS joint conference October 30, 2006 Ryuichi Takashima ( Kyoto Univ. of Education ) For.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Atlas Muon Spectrometer: installation and commissioning L. Pontecorvo INFN Roma.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
CGEM-IT project and beam test program G. Felici for the FE-LNF-TO team Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the Program.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
14/02/2008 Michele Bianco 1 G.Chiodini & E.Gorini ATLAS RPC certification with cosmic rays Università del Salento Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN.
HEP 2007 – 20 Jul 2007 · Manchester, England Commissioning with Cosmic Rays of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer F.Petrucci INFN Sezione di Roma Tre and Dipartimento.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
A. Parenti 1 RT 2007, Batavia IL The CMS Muon System and its Performance in the Cosmic Challenge RT2007 conference, Batavia IL, USA May 03, 2007 Andrea.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
Commissioning and Calibration Strategies for Micromegas Vertex Tracker
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Calibration
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Approved Plots from CMS Cosmic Runs (mostly CRUZET, some earlier)
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
for the transition region on behalf of the RPC upgrade group
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
Muon DPG 2012 Camilo Carrillo (INFN Napoli) Tim Cox (UC Davis)
Commissioning of the MUON Spectrometers in ATLAS and CMS
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer and
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
The CMS muon system performance
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
RPC approved plots.
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays D.Orestano Università Roma Tre & INFN On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 25/5/09 D.Orestano

The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer A complex system: 4 different technologies (MDT,CSC,RPC,TGC) Large area (10,000 m2) Many channels (1M) Many degrees of freedom (5300 chambers) 25/5/09 D.Orestano

The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer In a difficult environment: large temperature gradients and magnetic field variations 25/5/09 D.Orestano

The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Built to: Provide an efficient muon trigger and Bunch Crossing (BC) identification Achieve high precision momentum measurement non bending plane bending plane 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Cosmic ray event in ATLAS MUON chambers Hadronic calorimeter Electromagnetic calorimeter Inner Detector 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Straight line 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Cosmic ray event in ATLAS Straight line 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Momentum measurement & MDT resolution 10% resolution at 1TeV dominated by position measurement resolution Sagitta ~500mm Position measurement ~50mm (obtained from 3 or 4 hits with 80-90mm resolution) Systematics must not spoil the overall accuracy Calibrations and alignment better than 30mm! Alignment system: 12232 optical sensors Autocalibration with dedicated data stream 25/5/09 D.Orestano

(plots for simulated single muons) Reconstruction The Muon Spectrometer standalone reconstruction is complemented by the Inner Detector tracking (plots for simulated single muons) (also includes ID+muon segments) 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Cosmic events 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Muon Spectrometer: main source of cosmic triggers High statistics collected in autumn 2008 (full ATLAS) Few high statistics runs studied in great detail Subdetectors runs in 2009: RPC runs in January “muon slice” runs at the end of April RPC Triggers TGC Triggers Solenoid ON Toroid ON Both fields ON 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Cosmic triggers Sources of level 1 muon trigger: Coarse time alignment RPCs in the barrel, TGCs in the endcap Coarse time alignment In the barrel trigger based only on f view, triggers from top sectors artificially delayed by 5BC to favour triggers from lower sectors (5BC=the time of flight from top to bottom of the ATLAS detector) In the endcap both h (bending) and f (non-bending) view 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Trigger chambers 25/5/09 D.Orestano

RPC system performance Dead strips < 2% Noisy channels < 1% In 2008 problems with Synchronzation Gas Temperature (reduced HV in top sectors) Affected the overall efficiency (70% of trigger coverage) Most of the problems were fixed during the winter shutdown, current trigger coverage is 95.5% 25/5/09 D.Orestano

RPC trigger coverage Low-pt trigger coverage Hit maps of the strips involved in Low and High Pt triggers Commisioning ongoing Trigger coverage increased from 70% in 2008 to current 95.5% (better timing) Full detector for 2009 run. High-pt trigger coverage 25/5/09 D.Orestano

RPC trigger timing 25/5/09 D.Orestano

RPC performance Random Trigger Noise = N hits / (Ntrigger x RO-Window)/ strip Surf HV = 9600 V, Vth = 1000 mV (Working Point) Cosmic trigger Random trigger Distribution of RPC hits per event with RPC cosmic trigger (not filled area) and with random trigger (black filled area). HV = 9600 V, Vth = 1000 mV (Working Point) 25/5/09 D.Orestano

RPC performance BM BM Efficiency vs HV Cluster size vs HV 9600V is working point BM Preliminary Preliminary BM 25/5/09 D.Orestano

TGC system performance 99.8% of chambers operational Single dead channels < 0.01% Clustered dead channels <0.1% Noisy channels (>2.5% occupancy) < 0.04% Hit map Hit map Full trigger coverage All sectors read-out, bottom 1/3 used for triggering to increase the fraction of tracks going through the Inner Detector 25/5/09 D.Orestano

TGC performance TGC detector efficiency TGC trigger readout synchronization 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Precision chambers 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Alignment In autumn 2008 : the barrel optical system was fully installed 99.7% of the sensors were functioning correctly 99% of all relevant alignment sensors in the endcaps were functioning only very few failed during the several months of data-taking in 2008. The effect of the missing sensors on the final alignment quality was negligible. 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Alignment system performance BARREL Barrel Optical Alignment: at 200 mm level for large sectors (0.5-1mm for small ones) Track based alignment : improvement to <50 mm level 25/5/09 D.Orestano

sagitta residuals within the design specification ENDCAP Endcap Optical Alignment: sagitta residuals within the design specification 25/5/09 D.Orestano

MDT calibration MDT tubes are calibrated using the muon tracks through the iterative auto-calibration procedure A large number of tracks is needed and a dedicated high rate stream extracted from Level 2 trigger has been foreseen for this purpose for p-p collisions The stream has been regularly extracted and distributed to the 3 Calibration Centers (Ann Arbor, Munich, Rome) during the cosmic data taking to test the full calibration chain But calibrations for cosmic runs were produced from the complete ATLAS events to benefit from the larger statistics of non pointing tracks The space-time relation in the chambers with too low statistics has been obtained from a dedicated chamber located at the surface and connected to the same gas distribution (“gas monitoring chamber”) 25/5/09 D.Orestano

MDT t0 The arrival time of the cosmics is asynchronous with respect to the 40MHz clock of the experiment which gives the time reference for the time digitization The t0 for the MDT should therefore be computed on an event by event basis Either from the time measured by the triggering detector Or extracting it from a fit to the drift times of the hits on a segment The second approach (“global t0 fit”) was adopted in the cosmic analysis to recover also the effect of the not yet optimal time alignment of the trigger detectors To help the fit preliminary rough t0 values were obtained for each chamber from the drift time spectra 25/5/09 D.Orestano

MDT system performance Statistics/chamber in one long 2008 run Endcap C Barrel Endcap A Sector 5 on top Out of 1100 chambers: 2 chambers not yet installed 3 chambers not readout (gas system problems) 2 chambers with HV off 32 chambers with HV off for 1 of the 2 multilayers No data available O(1M) O(100k) O(10M) 25/5/09 D.Orestano

MDT efficiency Tube & segment efficiencies in cosmic ray events 94.5% 99.3% Tube & segment efficiencies in cosmic ray events >95% in the Barrel >93% in the Endcaps 0.1% single dead channels 1% clustered dead channels (being fixed) Noisy channels (> 5% occupancy) < 0.2% 97.6% 25/5/09 D.Orestano

CSC system performance 98.5% of chambers operational Dead channels < 0.1% Calibration data collected ROD firmware problem prohibited full integration in ATLAS DAQ during 2008 Fix on the way for 2009 run 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Correlations 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Muon Spectrometer performance Reconstructed TGC tracks extrapolated to MDT middle layer vs MDT hit Correlation between MDT hits and RPC eta strips 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Tracking (with magnetic field ON) Momentum comparison between “pointing” standalone tracks reconstructed in the top “hemisphere” and in the bottom one (P_top<25GeV) The difference of 6GeV/c corresponds to the expected energy loss of a muon crossing twice the calorimeters, in agreement with the 3GeV/c difference between Muon standalone and Inner Detector momenta. A “Tag&Probe” method to measure efficiencies in one hemisphere when a good track (eventually combined to the Inner Detector one) is present in the opposite one is currently under development. 25/5/09 D.Orestano

MUON – Inner Detector Comparison NB : distributions obtained with very preliminary alignment and no relative MUON-Inner Detector alignment yet! 25/5/09 D.Orestano

Conclusion The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer is alive and ready for beam! The cosmic events collected in 2008, mostly with muon triggers, are used for detailed studies of the Muon Spectrometer detector and standalone reconstruction. Most of the problems observed in the 2008 cosmic runs have been understood and fixed. Cosmic data to be collected next summer, with a full trigger coverage and an improved time alignment, will be used for detailed studies of combined reconstruction perfomance, dead material, alignment with respect to the Inner Detector. The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer is alive and ready for beam! 25/5/09 D.Orestano