Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beneficial synergistic effects of microdose lithium with pyrroloquinoline quinone in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model  Lei Zhao, Neng Gong, Meng Liu,
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Motor Protein KIF1A Is Essential for Hippocampal Synaptogenesis and Learning Enhancement in an Enriched Environment  Makoto Kondo, Yosuke Takei, Nobutaka.
Memory Enhancement by Targeting Cdk5 Regulation of NR2B
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Zinc Dynamics and Action at Excitatory Synapses
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2001)
Masahiro Yasuda, Mark R. Mayford  Neuron 
DAPK1 Mediates LTD by Making CaMKII/GluN2B Binding LTP Specific
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Chromatin Acetylation, Memory, and LTP Are Impaired in CBP+/− Mice
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Hippocampus and Entorhinal Cortex Recruit Cholinergic and NMDA Receptors Separately to Generate Hippocampal Theta Oscillations  Zhenglin Gu, Georgia M.
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Enhanced Learning and Memory in Mice Lacking Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger 2
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
CPEB2 Activates GRASP1 mRNA Translation and Promotes AMPA Receptor Surface Expression, Long-Term Potentiation, and Memory  Wen-Hsin Lu, Nai-Hsing Yeh,
Enhancement of Learning and Memory by Elevating Brain Magnesium
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Expression of Constitutively Active CREB Protein Facilitates the Late Phase of Long- Term Potentiation by Enhancing Synaptic Capture  Angel Barco, Juan.
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Farah D. Lubin, J. David Sweatt  Neuron 
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 129, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages e5 (February 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2018)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Yanghong Meng, Yu Zhang, Zhengping Jia  Neuron 
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Prolonged Rapamycin Treatment Inhibits mTORC2 Assembly and Akt/PKB
Genetic Dissection of Presynaptic and Postsynaptic BDNF-TrkB Signaling in Synaptic Efficacy of CA3-CA1 Synapses  Pei-Yi Lin, Ege T. Kavalali, Lisa M.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 1999)
FMRP Acts as a Key Messenger for Dopamine Modulation in the Forebrain
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
A Cdh1-APC/FMRP Ubiquitin Signaling Link Drives mGluR-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in the Mammalian Brain  Ju Huang, Yoshiho Ikeuchi, Marcos Malumbres,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 832-845 (December 2008) Removal of FKBP12 Enhances mTOR-Raptor Interactions, LTP, Memory, and Perseverative/Repetitive Behavior  Charles A. Hoeffer, Wei Tang, Helen Wong, Arturo Santillan, Richard J. Patterson, Luis A. Martinez, Maria V. Tejada-Simon, Richard Paylor, Susan L. Hamilton, Eric Klann  Neuron  Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 832-845 (December 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 FKBP12 Is Selectively Deleted from the Mouse Hippocampus and Forebrain (A) PCR identification of alleles of Fkpb12fl- and αCaMKII-Cre-driven Cre. (B) Western blot analysis using antibodies to FKBP12 showing elimination of FKBP12 hippocampal area CA1. (C) FKBP12 is primarily localized to cell body layer in area CA1. (CA) In wild-type mice, FKBP12 is highly enriched in the cell body layer. (CB) 40× magnification of cell body layer in wild-type mice. (CC) FKBP12 is largely absent in FKBP12 cKO mice. (CD) 40× magnification of the cell body layer in FKBP12 cKO mice. (D) FKBP12 is present in synaptoneurosomes of wild-type (WT) mice and is reduced in FKBP12 cKO (KO) mice. (E) αCaMKII-Cre-driven Cre disruption of FKBP12 in other regions of the brain. Expression is quantified as percentage of wild-type expression for the tissue and brain region examined. FKBP12 cKO expression: area CA1, 10%; area CA3/DG, 42%; cerebellum, 87%; midbrain, 64%; prefrontal cortex, 22%; amygdale, 21%; diaphragm, 104%; liver, 99%; heart, 102.3%; 20 μg/ lane. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.005, ANOVA. (F) FKBP12 protein levels in KO are expressed at similar levels to those in WT mice in tissues outside the nervous system. Quantification included with Figure 1E, mean ± SEM. Lysates were prepared from tissues extracted from WT and KO mice; 75 μg/ lane, β-actin controls not shown. Neuron 2008 60, 832-845DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 mTOR Phosphorylation, S6K Phosphorylation, and mTOR-Raptor Interactions Are Increased in FKBP12 cKO Mice (A) mTOR phosphorylation is increased in FKBP12 cKO mice. Wild-type (WT), n = 5; FKBP12 cKO (KO), n = 6; ∗∗p < 0.01. (B) Western blot analyses of downstream mTOR targets. Proteins examined: p-4EBP, phospho-4EBP1 (Thr 37/46); 4E-BP; p-S6K1(421), phospho-S6K1 (Thr 421/424); p-S6K(389), phospho-S6K1 (Ser 389); β-Tub, beta-tubulin; FKBP12. n = 4, each genotype. WT, n = 5; KO, n = 6; ∗p < 0.05. (C) Raptor binding to mTOR is increased in FKBP12 cKO mice. IP of protein isolated from hippocampal lysates with antibodies to mTOR (IP:mTOR) and Raptor (IP:Raptor). IP:mTOR, n = 5; IP:Raptor, n = 3. ∗p < 0.05, Student's t test. Neuron 2008 60, 832-845DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 FKBP12 cKO Mice Have Normal Basal Synaptic Transmission and Express Normal E-LTP (A) Input versus output plot indicating that wild-type and FKBP12 cKO mice have comparable fEPSP slopes evoked by increasing stimulation. Wild-type (WT) mice, FKBP12 cKO mice (KO), n = 20 slices, 12 mice per genotype. p > 0.05, Student's t test. (B) FKBP12 cKO mice exhibit normal PPF compared to their wild-type littermates. The percent facilitation, determined by the ratio of the second fEPSP to the first fEPSP, is shown at interpulse intervals from 10 to 300 ms. WT, n = 25 slices; KO, n = 26 slices; 14 mice per genotype. (C) A single train of HFS evoked similar levels of E-LTP in wild-type and FKBP12 cKO mice that decayed to baseline after 80 min. WT, n = 12 slices; KO, n = 13 slices; six to nine mice per genotype. p > 0.05, ANOVA. (D) A single pattern of TBS evoked similar levels of E-LTP in WT and KO mice that decayed to baseline after 80 min. WT, n = 14 slices; KO, n = 15 slices; seven to ten mice per genotype. p > 0.05, ANOVA. Neuron 2008 60, 832-845DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 FKBP12 cKO Mice Express Enhanced L-LTP and L-LTP Induction Stimulates mTOR-Raptor Interactions (A) Representative traces of fEPSPs in slices from wild-type (WT) and FKBP12 cKO (KO) mice that received four trains of HFS. (B) Four trains of HFS elicited L-LTP in FKBP12 KO mice that was enhanced compared with that evoked in WT mice. WT, n = 12 slices; KO, n = 14 slices; five to eight mice per genotype. p < 0.05, ANOVA. (C) Representative traces of fEPSPs from WT and KO slices that received three patterns of TBS. (D) Three patterns of TBS elicited L-LTP in FKBP12 cKO mice that was greater that that evoked in wild-type mice 90 min poststimulation. WT, n = 8 slices; KO, n = 9 slices; four to six mice per genotype. p < 0.05, ANOVA. For both 4× HFS and 3× TBS: WT: a, baseline; c, poststimulation; KO: b, baseline, d, poststimulation. (E) Raptor binding to mTOR increases following L-LTP-inducing stimulation. In FKBP12 cKO mice, Raptor binding to mTOR is near saturation. (F) Following stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals to area CA1, increased Raptor binding is observed in area CA1, but not area CA3. (G) mTORC1 formation increases 10 min after HFS stimulation in wild-type slices, but does not do so in KO slices. mTORC1 levels return to baseline 60 min post-HFS in wild-type slices but remain significantly elevated in KO slices compared with 10 min post-HFS, but not basal (unstimulated), slices. Steady-state Raptor association with mTOR is initially higher in KO slices. No HFS: WT, n = 6; KO, n = 6; HFS + 10′: WT, n = 6; KO, n = 6; HFS + 60′: WT, n = 5; KO, n = 5. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ANOVA. Neuron 2008 60, 832-845DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Enhanced L-LTP in FKBP12 cKO Mice Is Resistant to Rapamycin but Sensitive to Anisomycin (A) Representative fEPSP traces in slice from wild-type (WT) and FKBP12 cKO (KO) mice that received four trains of HFS in the presence of rapamycin or vehicle. (B) Four trains of HFS in the presence of rapamycin elicited enhanced L-LTP in FKBP12 cKO mice but blocked L-LTP in wild-type mice. WT+vehicle, n = 8 slices; KO+vehicle, n = 8 slices; WT+rapamycin, n = 12 slices; KO+rapamycin, n = 19 slices; five to eight mice per genotype and treatment. p < 0.05, ANOVA. (C) Representative fEPSP traces from WT and KO slices that received four trains of HFS in the presence of either anisomycin or vehicle. (D) Four trains of HFS in the presence of anisomycin blocked L-LTP in both FKBP12 KO mice and WT mice. WT+vehicle, n = 9 slices; KO+vehicle, n = 14 slices; WT+anisomycin, n = 11 slices; KO+anisomycin, n = 11 slices; six to ten mice per genotype. p < 0.05, ANOVA. For both rapamycin and anisomycin treatments: (WT) a, baseline, c, post stimulation+drug. (KO) b, baseline, d, post stimulation+drug. Neuron 2008 60, 832-845DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 FKBP12 cKO Mice Display Enhanced Contextual Associative Fear Memory, Altered Novelty Interaction, and Increased Perseverative/Repetitive Behavior (A) Mean freezing behavior of wild-type (WT) and FKBP12 cKO (KO) mice. Both genotypes performed similarly during training and had similar freezing behavior in both STM contextual and cued memory tests. FKBP12 KO mice display enhanced freezing during LTM contextual fear memory testing but no difference in cued associative fear memory. ∗p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (B) FKBP12 cKO mice display enhanced contextual LTM in the absence of STM testing. ∗p ≤ 0.05, one-way ANOVA. (C) mTORC1 levels increase in WT mice following fear conditioning. mTOR immunoprecipitate complexes were isolated from untreated mice (naive), mice with training environment exposure only (con), and fear conditioned mice (context+shock, FC) allowed to recover 15 or 60 min (FC 15′ or FC 60′). mTORC1 levels compared with naïve WT control are shown. Naive levels: KO, 179% ± 21%. Context: WT, 156% ± 28%; KO, 208% ± 30%. FC 15′: WT, 172% ± 23%; KO: 214% ± 31%. FC 60′: WT, 104% ± 9%; KO: 176% ± 18%. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ANOVA. WT, n = 5; KO, n = 4 for each time point. (D) FKBP12 cKO mice display greater repetitive behavior as determined by marble burying during 30 min test period. Marbles buried: WT: 10.9 ± 1.9; KO: 15.3 ± 0.9. ∗p < 0.05, ANOVA. (E) FKBP12 cKO mice display preference for the familiar object during object recognition analysis. Dashed line represents PI = 0.5, or neutral preference. WT mice, n = 11; KO, n = 10. ∗p < 0.05, +p < 0.05, ++p < 0.01, ANOVA. Neuron 2008 60, 832-845DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 FKBP12 cKO Mice Have Normal Spatial Learning, Reference Memory, and Working Memory Following RAP MWM and Y-Maze Reversal Training but Enhanced Perseveration for Former Escape Location and Initial Y-Maze Escape Arm (A) Escape latency times during initial 9 days of RAP training. (B) Previous testing day platform crossings (∗p < 0.05). For RAP MWM: WT, n = 11; KO, n = 9; ∗p < 0.05, ANOVA. The mean time spent in each maze quadrant during the probe test is shown. (C) Percent correct arm choice by trial block number during training, testing, and reversal phases of Y-maze experiment. FKBP12 KO mice perseverate more for the original training arm than their wild-type littermates. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ANOVA. (D) The number of correct arm choices during training phase (20 trials) of Y-maze reversal task; WT = 17.3 ± 0.5, KO = 17.6 ± 0.5. The number of trials needed to reach criterion (9/10 correct) during reversal phase of Y-maze reversal task (WT = 18.5 ± 1, KO = 23.3 ± 1.4) is also shown. For Y-Maze: WT, n = 13; KO, n = 12. ∗p < 0.05, ANOVA. Neuron 2008 60, 832-845DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Models for FKBP12 Modulation of mTOR-Raptor Interactions to Promote mTOR Signaling (A) One of the known mTOR-binding proteins (Raptor is used for this example) exists in two states mediated by FKBP12 binding and/or FKBP12 isomerase activity. One state, Raptor-i, represses mTOR signaling; the other state, Raptor-a, promotes mTOR signaling. Following upstream activation, Raptor-i is shifted to Raptor-a, which has greater affinity for mTOR, and mTOR signaling is promoted. (B) FKBP12 serves as the intracellular scaffold for an mTOR inhibitory factor or factors or directly competes with Raptor for the mTOR FRB site. In either scenario, FKBP12 represses mTOR activity by blocking Raptor interaction with mTOR. In the FKBP12 cKO mouse, Raptor interaction with mTOR is increased. Increased mTORC1 levels result in enhanced S6K, but not 4E-BP, phosphorylation, preventing translational initiation. Protein-synthesis-inducing stimulation (i.e., L-LTP) either (1) signals the displacement of inhibitory factor or factors interacting with FKBP12 or (2) sequesters FKBP12 from mTOR, allowing Raptor access to the FRB. Protein-synthesis-inducing signaling in either wild-type or FKBP12 mutant neurons promotes mTOR access to 4E-BP, possibly through activation of additional mTORC1-associated scaffolds (i.e., PRAS40), allowing translational initiation. Rheb, Ras-homolog enriched in the brain; PRAS40, proline-rich Akt/PKB substrate-40 kd; FRB, FKBP12-binding domain; KIN, mTOR kinase catalytic domain; NRD, domain site of serine-2448 phosphorylation. Neuron 2008 60, 832-845DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.037) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions