Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Our Future:
Advertisements

Economics of Nitrogen and Water Quality Anthony Dvarskas Stony Brook University May 19,
Harris Creek Case Study: Oyster Restoration and GIT Collaboration Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board August 2, 2012 Peyton Robertson Fisheries Goal.
Defining Restored Bay and Tidal Tributary Water Quality  Round Two  Draft Revised Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophyll Criteria.
Wetland Environments By, Janet Hooks : ). ECOSYSTEM- All of the BIOTIC (living) things and all of the ABIOTIC (non-living) factors in an environment.
Wetlands  Wetlands contain fresh water for part of the year -trap and filter sediments and pollutants -protect shorelines from erosion -spawning grounds.
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Habitat Product Development: On-Screen Digitizing and Spatial Analysis of Core Sound Chelsea Vick, Patrina Bly, Michael JeffersonMentors:
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
The Importance of Coastal Waters - Recent Reports National Coastal Condition Report National Coastal Condition Report Heinz Center’s State of the Nation’s.
Bay Barometer: A Health and Restoration Assessment of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed in 2009 Factors Impacting Health Factors Impacting Bay.
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation W HAT I S I T AND W HY I S I T I MPORTANT? Image provided by Ronald C. Phillips.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Koel Ghosh, James S. Shortle, and Carl Hershner * Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,
Being Accountable/Communicating Assessment Information to the Public in 2012 Update to the Management Board April 2012 Margaret Enloe, ACB CBPO and Nita.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
Water Quality ESI Stream Water Mass after collecting by filtration Evaporate water after filtering, determine mass of residue TDS by conductivity since.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Chesapeake Bay: An Introduction to an Ecosystem Section 4: Habitats II-1D View this quiz as a slide show from “the beginning” During the slide show, you.
Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) abundance and diversity in the tidal Potomac River and estuary By Nancy Rybicki, Jurate Landwehr, Edward Schenk, and.
An Overview of Barnegat Bay New Jersey Habitats of the Barnegat Bay Ecosystem OCC 2012.
Water Quality and the Chesapeake Bay David O’Brien NOAA Fisheries Service Gloucester Point, VA.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
Sense and Sensibility: Hard choices and the future of Chesapeake Bay Ratana Chuenpagdee St. Francis Xavier University Antigonish, Canada Panel discussion,
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Galveston Bay By Amanda Schaffer. Galveston Bay A subtropical estuary located on the southeastern shore of the upper Texas Gulf Coast A subtropical estuary.
Honors Marine Biology Marine Ecology December 13, 2012.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Ecology Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem Issue: Submerged Aquatic Vegetation.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
What is a watershed  It covers 64,000 square miles between Vermont North Carolina The Chesapeake bay is huge.
Rabbit Island, Alabama Seagrass Restoration Project Alabama Chapter This project focuses on restoration of seagrass beds contining shoal grass (Halodule.
Chesapeake Bay. Is the largest estuary in the United States The Bay’s watershed is 64,000 square miles (60% forested) and covers parts of 6 states These.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
What “abiotic factors” make up an estuary?
Estuaries Portal DRAFT Mock-up of Fish Content (This is content developed by several CEMW group members and has not been approved)
Chesapeake Bay Program
Watersheds Review Science 8 SOL.
Project Schedule Final SWIM Plans GEBF Funding Request
Tidal Wetlands and Shorelines in the Chesapeake Bay
Wetlands Notes.
Chesapeake Bay Program Updates
Restoration & Protection Efforts
Includes large logs more than 6 inches wide
WETLANDS.
Plant Nutrients Diego and lorenzo.
Restoration and Protection Efforts
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Watershed Implementation Plan
Eutrophication & Management
Mangrove Swamps.
Engineer Research and Development Center
We often celebrate trees…
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S.F.W.S.
2016 – 17 Bay Barometer.
Local Government Advisory Committee
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Biennial Work plan Updates
Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Criteria and their Assessment:
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
Nutrient Limitations.
Ecosystem Services from SAV in the Chesapeake Bay
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Lesson Overview 4.5 Aquatic Ecosystems.
Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research
Chesapeake Bay Problems
Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools
CHESAPEAKE BAY ECOLOGY
Achievement of Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved Data and Methods: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_baygrasses.aspx Percent of Goal Achieved 42% of Goal Achieved Bay Grass Abundance Goal (185,000 acres) Bay Grass Abundance Status: In 2008, there were 76,861 acres of bay grasses throughout the Bay, which was 42 percent of the goal and an increase of 11,984 acres from 2007. In 2008, grasses in the Upper Bay covered about 22,954 acres (97 percent of the area’s 23,630-acre goal). Middle Bay grasses covered 34,521 acres (30 percent of the 115,229-acre goal for the area) and grasses in the Lower Bay covered 19,386 acres (42 percent of the area’s 46,030-acre goal). Additional Information: Importance: Underwater bay grasses serve many essential ecological functions and are among the most closely monitored habitats in the Bay. Grasses provide critical shelter to many key species such as young striped bass and blue crabs, improve water clarity by helping sediment settle to the bottom, add oxygen to the water, and reduce shoreline erosion. Bay grass abundance is an excellent barometer of the health of the Bay because these grasses depend on good local water quality and provide significant benefits to aquatic life. Goal: The goal is to have 185,000 acres of underwater bay grasses in the Chesapeake Bay by 2010, which represents approximate historic abundance from the 1930s to present. Trends: The historic data featured in this indicator changed from that reported in the 2007 assessment. The 2007 data changed due to the finalization of provisional data. What is the long-term trend? (since start of data collection) Bay-wide: 1984-2008: increased from 20.7% to 41.5% goal achievement (38,228 to 76,861 acres). Goal achievement has averaged 34.6% and has ranged from 20.7% to 48.5%. Upper Bay: 1984-2008: Increased from 31.7% to 97% goal achievement (7,498 to 22,954 acres). Middle Bay: 1984-2008: increased from 13.6% to 30% goal achievement (15,643 to 34,521 acres). Lower Bay: 1984-2008: increased from 32.8% to 42% goal achievement (15,086 to 19,386 acres). What is the short-term trend ? (10 year trend) Bay-wide: 1999-2008: increased from 36.8% to 41.5% goal achievement (68,100 to 76,861 acres). Upper Bay: 1999-2008: increased from 37.1% to 97% goal achievement (8,771 to 22,954 acres). Middle Bay: 1999-2008: decreased from 31.8% to 30% goal achievement (36,692 to 34,521 acres). Lower Bay: 1999-2008: no significant change 41.8% to 42% goal achievement (19,254 to 19,386 acres). Change from previous year: Bay-wide: 2007-2008: increased from 35% to 41.5% goal achievement (64,918 to 76,861 acres). Upper Bay: 2007-2008: increased from 80.1% to 97% goal achievement (18,922 to 22,954 acres). Middle Bay: 2007-2008: increased from 26% to 30% goal achievement (29,992 to 34,521 acres). Lower Bay: 1998-2008: increased from 34.8% to 42% goal achievement (16,004 to 19,386 acres). Aside from the water itself, underwater bay grasses are one of the most important habitats in the Chesapeake Bay. As their health is closely related to the quality of local waters, grasses serve as an excellent barometer for the overall health of the estuary. Bay grass abundance has a profound effect on the Bay and its aquatic life, as it provides critical habitat to key species such as striped bass and blue crabs while improving the clarity of local waters. As water clarity improves from nutrient and sediment pollution reductions, bay grass acreage should expand. Bay grasses, or submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), are important to the complex Chesapeake Bay ecosystem because they produce oxygen, supply food for many species (especially waterfowl), offer shelter and nursery habitat for fish and shellfish, reduce wave action and shoreline erosion, absorb excess nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, and trap sediments. Review of photographic evidence from a number of sites dating back to 1937 suggests that close to 200,000 acres of SAV may have historically grown along the shoreline of the Bay. However, by 1984, the SAV community had fallen to a low of about 38,000 acres. Increasing quantities of nutrients, such as phosphorus and nitrogen, as well sediment in the water have choked or eliminated the growth of SAV in many areas, and contributed to declines in SAV acreage throughout the Bay. Bay grasses are a unique yardstick for measuring the progress of Chesapeake Bay restoration efforts because they are not under harvest pressure and their health is closely linked to water quality. Increases in Bay grasses are expected in areas where water quality conditions are improving. In 1993 the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) agreed to work to restore SAV to its historical levels. They set an interim restoration goal of 114,000 acres - the total area vegetated at one time or another since the early 1970s. Based on rates of recovery at that time, the goal was expected to be achieved by 2005. In the Chesapeake 2000 agreement, the CBP recommitted to the existing goal of protecting and restoring 114,000 acres of SAV. They also agreed to “revise SAV restoration goals and strategies to reflect historic abundance, measured as acreage and density from the 1930s to the present. The revised goals will include specific levels of water clarity which are to be met in 2010. Strategies to achieve these goals will address water clarity, water quality, and bottom disturbance.” In 2003, the CBP adopted the Strategy to Accelerate the Protection and Restoration of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay including a new Baywide restoration goal of 185,000 acres by 2010. This acreage represents approximate historic abundance from the 1930s to present. Scientists believe increasing bay grass coverage beyond today’s acreages will result in dramatic improvements throughout the entire Bay ecosystem. The aerial survey is flown from late spring to early fall. The photography is processed in the fall and winter, and preliminary area totals are usually available the following spring. For additional information about the aerial survey and for segment specific survey results, go to www.vims.edu/bio/sav/ Chesapeake Bay Health and Restoration Assessment: Ecosystem Health 031709