ASQ2 Encodes a TBCC-like Protein Required for Mother-Daughter Centriole Linkage and Mitotic Spindle Orientation  Jessica L. Feldman, Wallace F. Marshall 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Advertisements

The Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Is Required for Epithelial Proliferation and Axis Specification in Drosophila  Carine Meignin, Ines Alvarez-Garcia, Ilan.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
CEP120 and SPICE1 Cooperate with CPAP in Centriole Elongation
A Truncating Mutation of CEP135 Causes Primary Microcephaly and Disturbed Centrosomal Function  Muhammad Sajid Hussain, Shahid Mahmood Baig, Sascha Neumann,
Meiosis: Organizing Microtubule Organizers
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages e6 (August 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages (December 2010)
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Yuki Nakazawa, Madoka Hiraki, Ritsu Kamiya, Masafumi Hirono 
Volume 17, Issue 21, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
CDK5RAP2 Regulates Centriole Engagement and Cohesion in Mice
Renzhi Yang, Jessica L. Feldman  Current Biology 
Sequential Protein Recruitment in C. elegans Centriole Formation
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
PXY, a Receptor-like Kinase Essential for Maintaining Polarity during Plant Vascular- Tissue Development  Kate Fisher, Simon Turner  Current Biology  Volume.
Elif Nur Firat-Karalar, Navin Rauniyar, John R. Yates, Tim Stearns 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
Structural and Functional Studies of the 252 kDa Nucleoporin ELYS Reveal Distinct Roles for Its Three Tethered Domains  Silvija Bilokapic, Thomas U. Schwartz 
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
The Centriolar Protein Bld10/Cep135 Is Required to Establish Centrosome Asymmetry in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Priyanka Singh, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Clemens.
Volume 15, Issue 20, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages (July 2009)
Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Doris Bachtrog, Nicholas R.T. Toda, Steven Lockton  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Emergence of a New Gene from an Intergenic Region
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Primary microcephaly: do all roads lead to Rome?
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Sebastian Leidel, Pierre Gönczy  Developmental Cell 
A Novel Class of MYB Factors Controls Sperm-Cell Formation in Plants
The centrosome Current Biology
Carlo Iomini, Linya Li, Wenjun Mo, Susan K. Dutcher, Gianni Piperno 
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 20, Issue 20, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
The Mitotic Arrest in Response to Hypoxia and of Polar Bodies during Early Embryogenesis Requires Drosophila Mps1  Matthias G. Fischer, Sebastian Heeger,
Justin Crest, Kirsten Concha-Moore, William Sullivan  Current Biology 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Localized Products of futile cycle/ lrmp Promote Centrosome-Nucleus Attachment in the Zebrafish Zygote  Robin E. Lindeman, Francisco Pelegri  Current.
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages (September 2004)
Drosophila oogenesis Current Biology
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Nicole M. Mahoney, Gohta Goshima, Adam D. Douglass, Ronald D. Vale 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (April 1998)
Jessica L. Feldman, James R. Priess  Current Biology 
Volume 11, Issue 20, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 17, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
David Vanneste, Masatoshi Takagi, Naoko Imamoto, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
Dan T. Bergstralh, Holly E. Lovegrove, Daniel St Johnston 
Hui-Fang Hung, Heidi Hehnly, Stephen Doxsey  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Comparative Genomic Analysis Identifies an ADP-Ribosylation Factor–like Gene as the Cause of Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS3)  Annie P. Chiang, Darryl Nishimura,
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Presentation transcript:

ASQ2 Encodes a TBCC-like Protein Required for Mother-Daughter Centriole Linkage and Mitotic Spindle Orientation  Jessica L. Feldman, Wallace F. Marshall  Current Biology  Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages 1238-1243 (July 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.071 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 ASQ2 Encodes the Conserved Protein Tbccd1 (A–D) Cells were stained with DAPI (blue) and antibodies against centrin and acetylated α-tubulin (green) and Bld10p (red). (A) Wild-type cells have two centrioles that each make a flagellum at the apical end of the cell. Each centriole recruits centrin and acetylated α-tubulin (green) and Bld10p (red). (B–D) asq2 mutants make variable numbers of flagella as a result of their variable numbers of centrioles. (B) asq2 cell with one centriole nucleating one flagellum. (C) Biflagellate asq2 cell with two unpaired centrioles at a distance from one another. (D) Triflagellate asq2 cell with a pair of centrioles at the apical surface of the cell and one lone centriole off to the side. (E–H) Cells expressing HA-tagged Vfl1p labeled with antibodies against HA (red), acetylated α-tubulin (green), and DAPI (blue). (E′-H′) show only HA localization. (E) Wild-type cells expressing HA-tagged Vfl1p have an existing centriolar pair that localizes acetylated α-tubulin (green) and two new procentrioles forming nearby that localize Vfl1p (red). (F and G) asq2 cells expressing HA-tagged Vfl1p have newly forming procentrioles forming near (F, arrow) and at a distance from (G, arrow) older centrioles (green and red staining). (H) Newly forming centrioles can also appear in the absence of existing centrioles (arrow). (I) asq2 maps to a <0.3 cM region on linkage group IX (gray box defines the genetic interval constrained by recombination events). The hygromycin cassette (HYG) was inserted on scaffold 22; the asq2 mutation maps to scaffold 23. Both scaffolds are part of the same chromosome (linkage group IX). Within the genetic interval containing ASQ2 is the previously unannotated gene TBCCD1, which encodes a conserved protein named for its TBCC domain. (J and K) PCR across the exon-intron boundary of exon 8 (arrow in I) demonstrates that asq2 cells have an insertion in genomic TBCCD1 (J) and in the cDNA (K) between exon 8 and 9. (L) Tbccd1 is contained within a family of proteins that is divided into three clades as described previously [18]: canonical TBCC (blue box), retinitis pigmentosa 2 (RP2, green box), and Tbccd1 (yellow box). TBCC domains from mutual best-hit proteins were aligned and organized into a phylogenetic tree with ClustalW. The following abbreviations are used: CR, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; VC, Volvox carteri; HS, Homo sapiens; TB, Trypanosoma brucei; AT, Arabidopsis thaliana. Current Biology 2009 19, 1238-1243DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.071) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Tbccd1 Localizes to a Region Subproximal to Centrioles (A) Cartoon of Tbccd1 protein. Tbccd1 is a 681 aa protein with a predicted glycine-rich domain (blue box) and a TBCC domain (purple box). An antibody was raised against an N-terminal 200 aa fragment of the protein. (B) Cartoon of Tbccd1 localization pattern. Acetylated microtubule bundles (AcMT) called rootlets are shown in gray. Rhizoplasts (R) that join the centrioles (C) to the nucleus (N) are shown in black. Tbccd1 (red) localizes to the region between the rhizoplasts and below the centrioles. Some of the protein can be seen at centrioles. (C–F) Cells are labeled with DAPI (blue) and antibodies against Tbccd1 (red) and centrin (C), which marks the centrioles and the rhizoplasts, or acetylated α-tubulin (D–F, green), which marks the centrioles and rootlets. (C and D) In wild-type cells, Tbccd1 localizes to the region between the rhizoplasts and to the centrioles. (E) In asq2 cells, Tbccd1 localization at or near the centrioles is absent. (F) In vfl2 cells, Tbccd1 localization is present near the centrioles but is sometimes mispositioned. Current Biology 2009 19, 1238-1243DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.071) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Centriole Linkage Is Necessary for Proper Spindle Orientation (A) Cartoon of a metaphase Chlamydomonas spindle. During mitosis in wild-type cells, a pair of centrioles (green) migrates to each pole to form a bipolar spindle (red). Rootlet microtubules (one two-membered pair shown in gray and one in black) are connected to each pair of centrioles through an interaction with one of the centrioles at each pole. (B) Cartoon depiction of θspindle measurement. To measure the position of the spindle in Chlamydomonas cells, we use the pyrenoid (blue) center of mass (yellow) and the cell center of mass (purple) to define the central axis of the cell. We then picked a point at each end of the spindle (black) to define the spindle axis. θspindle was defined as the angle at which the spindle axis intersects the central cell axis. (C, D, F, G, I, J, L, and M) Differential interference contrast (DIC) images (C, F, I, and L) and immunofluorescence images (D, G, J, and M) labeled with antibodies against α-tubulin (red), acetylated α-tubulin (green), and DAPI (blue) of dividing Chlamydomonas cells were used to determine θspindle. (E) Wild-type cells have a mean θspindle of 94.5° ± 17.2° (n = 12) with a mean deviation of 14.9° ± 8.7°. (H) asq2 cells have a mean θspindle of 78.9° ± 36.4° (n = 36) and a mean deviation of 29.0° ± 24.2°, which differs significantly from wild-type (F test on the variance, p < 4.6e−4). (K) vfl2 cells have a mean θspindle of 80.5° ± 41.3° (n = 54) and a mean deviation of 33.4° ± 25.6°, which differs significantly from wild-type (F test on the variance, p < 2.3e−4). (N) vfl1 cells have a mean θspindle of 90.3° ± 38.2° (n = 33) and a mean deviation of 32.7° ± 20.0°, which differs significantly from wild-type (F test on the variance, p < 2.7e−3). Current Biology 2009 19, 1238-1243DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.071) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Centrioles May Be Required at the Poles for Proper Spindle Orientation (A) Distance from each centriole to the nearest pole was measured in fixed cells. Wild-type cells have a mean centriole-to-pole distance of 0.80 ± 0.19 μm (black bars; n = 40). asq2 cells have a mean distance of 1.51 ± 0.96 μm (blue bars; n = 96), which differs significantly from wild-type (p < 1.9e−10 by one-tailed t test). vfl2 cells have a mean distance of 1.68 ± 1.07 μm (red bars; n = 193), which differs significantly from wild-type (p < 4.7e−22 by one-tailed t test). (B–E) Immunofluorescence images of fixed cells labeled with DAPI (blue) and antibodies against acetylated α-tubulin (green), α-tubulin (red), and phosphorylated histone H3 (CY5, not shown). (B′–E′) DIC images of cells shown in (B)–(E). The majority of asq2 cells (B) or vfl2 cells (D) do not have centrioles (green) at both poles (distance is greater than one standard deviation from wild-type mean). (F and H) These cells have severe defects in spindle positioning (F, asq2 mean = 77.1° ± 33.4°, n = 31; H, vfl2 mean = 78.5° ± 45.3°, n = 44). A small subset of asq2 and vfl2 cells have centrioles at both poles (C and E, respectively; distance is less than one standard deviation from the wild-type mean distance). (G and I) In these cases, the spindles are correctly positioned (asq2: G, mean = 90.4° ± 11.2°, n = 5; vfl2: I, mean = 89.5° ± 9.7°, n = 10). Current Biology 2009 19, 1238-1243DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.071) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions