Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Metal Import through Microbial Membranes
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Decoy Strategies: The Structure of TL1A:DcR3 Complex
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Structural Basis for the EBA-175 Erythrocyte Invasion Pathway of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum  Niraj H. Tolia, Eric J. Enemark, B. Kim Lee.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein FhuA: A Comparative Study of the Ferrichrome-Free and Bound States  José D. Faraldo-Gómez,
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein FhuA: A Comparative Study of the Ferrichrome-Free and Bound States  José D. Faraldo-Gómez,
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Oxygen Sensor in Bacillus subtilis
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Crystal Structure of Hyaluronidase, a Major Allergen of Bee Venom
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Presentation transcript:

Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor Kaspar P Locher, Bernard Rees, Ralf Koebnik, André Mitschler, Luc Moulinier, Jurg P Rosenbusch, Dino Moras  Cell  Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages 771-778 (December 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81700-6

Figure 1 Overall Structure of the Free and Liganded FhuA Protein In both conformations, a plug (brown) is located in and snugly fits a barrel formed by 22 antiparallel β strands (green). The top of the molecule is exposed at the cell surface, while the bottom faces the periplasm, as assigned on the basis of topological studies (Koebnik and Braun 1993). The ligand, ferrichrome, is depicted in yellow, with the complexed iron atom shown in red. Note that in the liganded form, one α helix (bottom) is unfolded. Cell 1998 95, 771-778DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81700-6)

Figure 2 Schematic Domain Structure (A) Sequence alignment of N termini and plug domains of five TonB-dependent receptors, with the first residue indicated. E. coli FhuA (EMBL accession code M12486), Pantoea agglomerans FhuA (Y14026), Yersinia enterocolitica FoxA (X60447), Y. enterocolitica FcuA (X67331), and E. coli FepA (M13748). Conserved residues are indicated in bold and are shaded. The assignments of helices (H1 to H5) and strands (S1 to S6) are based on our X-ray structure of the FhuA protein. The dashed line indicates disordered residues. Residues mentioned in the text (W22, R81, G99, and Y116) are labeled. (B) Bar showing the three main regions of the FhuA protein: an N-terminal segment (white), containing the TonB-box (purple), a plug domain (orange), and a barrel domain (green). (C) Topology of the barrel. L and T refer to extracellular loops and periplasmic turns, respectively. Residues are framed according to their secondary structure: β strands (diamonds), α helices (rectangles), loops or turns (circles); thick frames indicate residues that are exposed to the lipid bilayer (gray shading). The two disulfide bridges (in L4 and L11) are shown in black. Residues involved in ferrichrome binding are surrounded by spikes, and a highly conserved sequence motif near the C terminus is indicated by an asterisk. (D–E) Folds of the plug (in the unliganded form) and the barrel domains. A belt of aromatic residues at the membrane boundaries is shown in the ball-and-stick representation, and the peptide segment connecting the plug to the barrel is indicated in red (lower left in [D] and [E]). Cell 1998 95, 771-778DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81700-6)

Figure 3 Ferrichrome in Its Binding Site (A) Stereo view of the molecule (yellow) in the aromatic binding pocket. The electron density (blue net) is a ferrichrome omit map contoured at 3σ level. (B) Chemical structure of ferrichrome. FhuA protein residues involved in hydrogen bonding are indicated, with distances in angstroms. Cell 1998 95, 771-778DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81700-6)

Figure 4 Stereo Diagrams of Bound Ligand and Signal Transduction (A–C) Comparison of the structures of the apo-protein (blue) and of the complex (red) after superimposing the Cα atoms of the β barrel. (A) Local conformational changes in the binding pocket upon binding of ferrichrome (shown in ball-and-stick). (B) Conformational changes propagated through the plug domain. A side view of the FhuA protein, with a part of the barrel (residues 478–657) removed for clarity, shows that the resulting signal transmission is asymmetrical (more pronounced on the left side of the panel). The backbone displacements are about 2 Å. (C) View onto the channel entrance from the periplasmic side, emphasizing the unfolding of helix 1. Residues 18–30 (red) and 20–30 (blue) are shown in ball-and-stick representation. The Cα atom of W22 is displaced by 17 Å. Cell 1998 95, 771-778DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81700-6)