Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA
Crystal Structure of LexA
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Gregory J. Miller, James H. Hurley  Molecular Cell 
Alec E. Hodel, Paul D. Gershon, Florante A. Quiocho  Molecular Cell 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Stanley J Watowich, John J Skehel, Don C Wiley  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA Yan Wu, Yujiong He, Ignace A Moya, Xinguo Qian, Yu Luo  Molecular Cell  Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 423-435 (August 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.014 Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 ATPase Activity of RadA in the Presence of PEG (A) The initial turnover rates of the ATPase reaction are plotted against PEG concentration. (B) Phosphate release over time in the presence of 35% PEG 400 or 15% PEG 3350. Results of parallel experiments at room temperature and 37°C are shown. Molecular Cell 2004 15, 423-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.014) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sequence Alignment and Architecture of RadA (A) Sequence alignment of RadA homologs from M. voltae (MvRadA), P. furiosus (PfRad51), H. sapiens (HsRad51 and HsDMC1), S. cerevisiae (ScRad51 and ScDMC1), M. smegmatis (MsRecA), M. tuberculosis (MtRecA), and E. coli (EcRecA). The three RecA sequences and the six non-RecA sequences were aligned in separate groups by ClustalW (Pearson and Lipman, 1988). The two groups of recombinases were aligned by CE (Shindyalov and Bourne, 1998) using the representative structures of EcRecA and MvRadA. The non-RecA recombinases have similar N-terminal domains. The C-terminal domain and extra sequences upstream of a conserved polymerization motif of the three RecA proteins have been removed for clarity. Sequences, secondary structures, and sequence numbers of MvRadA and EcRecA are colored in red and blue, respectively. The N-terminal domain and the ATPase core are labeled in salmon and cyan, respectively. The polymerization motif and its interaction partner are labeled as “zip” (beet). The Walker A and B motifs and a newly identified ATP cap are highlighted in green. The L1 and L2 regions are highlighted in gold and cornflower blue, respectively. The HhH motif is highlighted in blue. This alignment figure is generated by Alscript (Barton, 1993). (B) Subunit architecture of MvRadA in stereo. Each subunit has two half-sites for binding to the AMP-PNP (magenta). Molecular Cell 2004 15, 423-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.014) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ATP-Mediated Subunit Interface (A) Electron density maps at the ATP binding site in stereo. The refined model of the AMP-PNP, Thr-112, and the magnesium site are shown. A 2.0 Å resolution omit difference electron density map is contoured at 3.0 σ (purple). A 2.6 Å resolution anomalous difference map were generated using model phases retarded by 90 degrees. The anomalous map is contoured at 6.0 σ (red). The peak in the anomalous map supports the location of a divalent cation. (B) The solvent-filled subunit interface. Each subunit is shown in alternating light blue and lavender. Red and yellow spheres are solvent molecules and magnesium ions, respectively. The helical axis is shown in cyan. Solvent molecules are concentrated at the subunit interface. (C) A ball-and-stick model of the ATP binding site. Oxygen, nitrogen, and phosphorous atoms are shown in red, blue, and yellow, respectively. Carbon atoms from the two adjacent subunits of MvRadA and the AMP-PNP are colored in green, lavender, and yellow, respectively. The magnesium ion and the solvent molecules are shown in gold and purple spheres, respectively. The putative hydrolyzing water is shown in a larger sphere. Selected hydrogen bonds are shown in dashed brown lines. The Walker A motif interacts with the triphosphate, while the ATP cap interacts with the base and ribose moieties of the ATP analog. Molecular Cell 2004 15, 423-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.014) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structural Comparison of RadA and Rad51 Recombinases The nucleotide is shown in ball-and-stick model. (A) Superimposed structures of MvRadA and PfRad51. MvRadA is colored by domain. PfRad51 is colored in lavender. Both proteins have two similar domains with noticeably different disposition. (B) A conserved polymerization motif. The solvent accessible surface of MvRadA with green-colored hydrophobic patches is generated by GRASP (Nicholls et al., 1991). Cα trace of residues 63-68 and stick model of side chain atoms of Phe-64 of MvRadA (beet) and their counterparts in PfRad51 (blue), BRCA2 (gold), and EcRecA (cyan) are shown. The 6-residue fragments in the four known structures were superposed by structural alignment of their noncovalently associated ATPase cores. (C) Comparison of the two interacting ATPase cores of MvRadA and those of PfRad51. The bottom ATPase cores are superimposed. MvRadA has a closed ATP binding site. The disposition of adjacent L2 regions is different between the two homologs. Molecular Cell 2004 15, 423-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.014) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Subunit Interface of RecA Models Two interacting ATPase cores of EcRecA models are shown in ribbons along with ball-and-stick models of the AMP-PNP. (A) EM model of the EcRecA active filament. (B) Model of the EcRecA active filament based on the crystal structure of MvRadA. (C) Crystal structure of EcRecA. The EM and MvRadA-based models resemble each other in the ATP-mediated interface and the disposition of adjacent L2 regions. The crystal structure of EcRecA is distinctive from the other two models. Molecular Cell 2004 15, 423-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.014) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Comparison between Filamentous Structures of MvRadA and EcRecA The L1 and L2 regions are highlighted in yellow and red, respectively. The L2 regions in both proteins and the L1 region in EcRecA are disordered in their respective crystal structures. These loops are modeled based on the crystal structure of MsRecA using ordered elbow regions (blue) as guides for rigid-body translocation. (A) Extended filament of MvRadA. The HhH motif is also shown (salmon). (B) Compact filament of EcRecA. In the structure of MvRadA, the L1 and L2 regions are placed closer to the helical axis (vertical line). Molecular Cell 2004 15, 423-435DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.014) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions