G0 Beam Polarization T. Horn, D. Gaskell Jefferson Lab

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMCal Jet Trigger Analysis for ALICE* Christopher Anson Creighton University *Supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Science.
Advertisements

Measuring the Proton Spin Polarizabilities in Real Compton Scattering Philippe Martel – UMass Amherst Advisor: Rory Miskimen TUNL (Triangle Universities.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Relative and (maybe) Absolute RHESSI Detector Efficiency: J.McTiernan 2-dec-2009.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Asymmetry Analysis A. Schälicke, 23 May 2006 Status: independent analyses give similar asymmetries but (significant) different errors.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
LCG Meeting, May 14th 2003 V. Daniel Elvira1 G4 (OSCAR_1_4_0) Validation of CMS HCal V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10, JLab.
MS Calibration for Protein Profiles We need calibration for –Accurate mass value Mass error: (Measured Mass – Theoretical Mass) X 10 6 ppm Theoretical.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated.
What can we learn from η production in proton-proton collisions? Joe Seele MIT and University of Colorado.
K.O. Eyser --- Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region -1- Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the.
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
Recent Charm Measurements through Hadronic Decay Channels with STAR at RHIC in 200 GeV Cu+Cu Collisions Stephen Baumgart for the STAR Collaboration, Yale.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
1 Simulation Update S. Margetis. 2 Issues Since in August most people were gone the action items are the still the same as listed in Jim’s slide for the.
Λ and Σ photoproduction on the neutron Pawel Nadel-Turonski The George Washington University for the CLAS Collaboration.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
SLAC, September 25, 2009 Searching for a U -boson with a positron beam Bogdan Wojtsekhowski Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility  The light.
DIJET STATUS Kazim Gumus 30 Aug Our signal is spread over many bins, and the background varies widely over the bins. If we were to simply sum up.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
PREX Issues. Outline New issue: souce systematics and Aug. 07 run. Update on old issues. Progress at SU.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region September 30, 2006 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting RIKEN, Wako, Japan.
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
15 cm Plots of missing mass spectrum and 90% interval for width of 0.5 and 10 MeV. Color lines show upper limit, lower limit and sensitivity. Search for.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
T. Burnett: Anagroup 5/24/04 1 Latest PSF and Point-source sensitivity prediction status Anagroup meeting Toby Burnett 24 May 04.
1 Exotic States 2005 E.C. Aschenauer The search for Pentaquarks at on behalf of the HERMES Collaboration E.C. Aschenauer DESY.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
 4 He(e,e'p)X, April 13 and April 14, 2011, 16 hours Measured P miss at and GeV/c, x b = 1.24, Q 2 = 2 (GeV/c) 2 Extension of SRC 2 body data.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Paper Committee: Moneti(chair?), Danko, Ehrlich, Galik 1 OCT 21, 2006.
Analysis of    production ► Data taking ► Reaction identification ► Results for double polarization observable F ► Summary Based on data taken in the.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Mott Polarimeter at CEBAF
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
HARPO Analysis.
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
FFT analysis Goal : Energy calibration ( systematic error estimation)
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Hall C – this week Time Period Plans 10/24-10/27 Target cool down
Status of Instrumental Beam Studies and Technical Description of Detectors and DAQ February 24, 2017.
How to optimize the ILC energy for measuring ZH
ADC: Improving fitting
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Current status Minjung Kim
Study of coherent c.s. dependence on Energy, what was done
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

G0 Beam Polarization T. Horn, D. Gaskell Jefferson Lab Absolute Polarization at 362 MeV Mott Analysis and Background Subtraction G0 collaboration meeting October 2007

Mott/Moller Measurements Polarization measured by Moller and Mott except at lowest energy Absolute Polarization at 362 MeV? Systematic difference between Moller/Mott Seems to have increased from ~2% to ~4% since 2001 Energy Time Period Type 687 Sp 2006 F2006 Sp2007 Mott Moller 362 Su 2006 Mott only

Mott Analysis – Issues Asymmetries determined from ADC spectrum Mott spectra for detectors used in polarization calculation Asymmetries determined from ADC spectrum No gain calibrations Coarse binning Resolution of one detector worse by ~50% compared to the rest Increased sensitivity to potential background contribution Got worse over time

Mott Analysis Method Checks Event selection depends on the elastic peak location Mott Analyzer:channel with maximum number of counts Improved method: determine from a fit to the data for each run Not a very large effect on the consistency still coarse binned

Mott Analysis Method Checks Asymmetry typically calculated from an integration from centroid location to infinite sigma Another test: restrict integration to ±1σ around peak Here, fit driven by a few outliers

Mott Background Contribution Asymmetry under elastic peak suggests background contribution may be significant How to quantify?

Mott Background Contribution Introduce a simple, but stable model that under-predicts the background, but is consistent between detectors with good and bad resolution “No background subtraction” model Estimate an “upper limit” of what a full background subtraction would give Straight line background subtraction One scenario – not final

Mott Background Determination To determine the absolute background subtracted polarization use a GEANT simulation of the Mott In progress Other cross check with elastic data from Hall A/LEDEX Results expected earliest next year