Simultaneous Beam Training

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SubmissionSlide 1 Proposed Addition to Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Avinash JainQualcommSan Diego858.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Doc.: IEEE /492r02 Submission Orange Labs Date: Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz May 2010 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0090r0 SubmissionMartin Jacob, TU Braunschweig January 2010 Slide 1 Modeling the Dynamical Human Blockage for 60 GHz WLAN Channel.
doc.: IEEE /0496r2 Submission A Flexible Beam Training Protocol for 60GHz mm-Wave Communication (TGad) Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.:IEEE /0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in ac Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1314r2 November 2015 Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 I/Q Imbalance Impact to TGax OFDMA Uplink Reception Date:
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /492r00 Submission Orange Labs Date: Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz May 2010 Slide 1 Authors:
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2013
Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO in TGac
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
Enhanced SLS BF flow for efficient AP-STA access in dense environment
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
PHY-Level Security Protection
Proposal for TGad Evaluation Methodology
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Preamble design aspects for MU-MIMO support
OFDMA Performance Analysis
TGad Channel Model Update
MU-MIMO channel access flow for 11ay
Scheduled Spatial Reuse with Collaborative Beamforming
Preamble Design for WUR WLAN
Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Preamble Design for WUR WLAN
OBSS issue and simulation scenarios in TGac
Enhanced Beam Tracking Against Blockage: Resolution to CID 145
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence
MU-MIMO codebook based transmission flow in IEEE802.11ay
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
Hybrid Multiple Access in ax
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
(60GHz New Technique Proposal)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Record and Playback PHY Abstraction for n MAC Simulations
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Proposed Addition to Evaluation Methodology
Proposal for TGad Evaluation Methodology
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz
Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Performance aspects of Multi-link operations
Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence
Comparison of Coordinated BF and Nulling with JT
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Performance aspects of Multi-link operations
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Power Consideration for Multi-link Transmissions
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Enhanced Beam Tracking Against Blockage: Resolution to CID 145
Presentation transcript:

Simultaneous Beam Training Month Year March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Simultaneous Beam Training Date: March 2010 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Email M. Hossein Taghavi Qualcomm San Diego 858 651-6373 mtaghavi@qualcomm.com Avinash Jain 858 651-5964 avinashj@qualcomm.com Hemanth Sampath 858 658-1848 hsampath@qualcomm.com

March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Background Beamforming is necessary to achieve multi-Gbps throughput in 60 GHz band. Necessary to overcome severe path loss & directionality in 60 GHz. For a robust 60 GHz network: STAs needs to beam-train periodically to account for blockage, movement, change of orientation, etc. STAs need to use dedicated service (time) periods to beam-train, to prevent traffic disruption to other 60 GHz devices. The beam training overhead can be significant for 60 GHz network with multiple STAs.

Example Beam-Training Overhead Calculation March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Example Beam-Training Overhead Calculation Consider a conference Room scenario with 4 pairs of STAs communicating: Assume beam training uses 15.3c long preamble (4.7μs) Beam training by 4 pairs of STAs using separate dedicated times can lead to significant overhead. This significantly reduces perceived network throughput Training Overhead Beam Training Periodicity (ms) (% of Total Channel) 5 10 20 40 60 Total # of Tx/Rx Beams or Directions 16 15.04 7.52 3.76 1.88 1.25 32 30.08 2.50 64 60.16 5.01 128 120.3 10.02 256 240.6 20.05

Solution: Simultaneous Beam Training March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Solution: Simultaneous Beam Training Allow multiple pairs of STAs to perform beam training simultaneously Each pair of STAs uses a different training sequence in order to mitigate interference The different training sequences may be based on different Golay codes It is easy to generate multiple Golay codes using the same hardware with good cross-correlation properties Example: Two complementary Golay sequences of length 128 with good correlation properties Simultaneous training of even 2 pairs of devices can reduce the beam training overhead by 50%

Conference Room Simulation Setup March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Conference Room Simulation Setup We will demonstrate performance of simultaneous Tx beam training of 2 pairs & 3 pairs of STAs Channels generated using the TGad Conference Room channel model, and as defined in the TGad evaluation methodology Transmitter parameters: Training sequence is transmitted across each of Tx beams in a random order 19 Tx beams total of 60o HPBW, covering the half-space z>0 Receiver parameters: Training sequence is received in an omni-directional mode (covering z>0) and using a simple correlator detector Receiver selects the best Tx beam by comparing the strength of the received training sequences across all beam directions. A random delay of 0-20 chips has been added to model in-room propagation delays. Performance results are averaged over 100 channel realizations, and 10 noise realizations and beam-ordering per channel realization.

Case #1: Simultaneous Training of 2 Pairs of STAs March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Case #1: Simultaneous Training of 2 Pairs of STAs Assume STA2STA1 training uses Golay code a128 from 802.15.3c Assume STA7STA8 training uses Golay code b128 from 802.15.3c To illustrate benefit of interference suppression using distinct Golay codes, performance is compared to the case where every STA uses a128 as the training sequence 50% reduction of training overhead with no performance degradation Training of 2 pairs PBest PFailure STAs using the same training sequence STA2→STA1 6.8% 88.% STA7→STA8 100% 0.0% STAs using different training sequences   PBest = Probability of correctly selecting the best beam PFailure = Probability of selecting a wrong beam that is at least 3 dB worse compared to the best beam.

Case #2: Simultaneous Training of 3 Pairs of STAs March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Case #2: Simultaneous Training of 3 Pairs of STAs Assume STA2STA1 and STA7 STA8 trainings use Golay codes a128 and b128 respectively, from 802.15.3c. The third pair STA6STA3 training uses concatenation of Golay codes a64 and b64 from 802.15.3c Note: Failure events can be readily flagged as they correspond to low measured SINR of the selected beam. 67% reduction of training overhead with minimal performance degradation. Training of 3 pairs PBest PFailure STAs using the same training sequence STA2→STA1 10.3% 84.2% STA7→STA8 100% 0.0% STA6→STA3 5.9% 87.9% STAs using different training sequences 98.6% 0.3%   PBest = Probability of correctly selecting the best beam PFailure= Probability of selecting a wrong beam that is at least 3 dB worse compared to the best beam.

Enabling Simultaneous Beam Training in TGad March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Enabling Simultaneous Beam Training in TGad The Simultaneous Beam training concept can be overlayed on any beam training protocol: Standard specifies a few Golay based training-sequences with good cross-correlation properties. AP allocates the same service (time) period to more than one pair of STAs for beam training. AP allocates distinct training sequences to these pairs of STAs Alternately, STAs pseudo-randomly pick a distinct training sequence (e.g: based on STA-ID). STAs can re-use existing HW to generate and detect these additional Golay based training-sequences. Each STA needs to generate or detect only one Golay based training sequence, at any given time.

March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Conclusion Enabling simultaneous beam training of multiple pairs of STAs using different Golay-based training sequences can significantly reduce network overhead Presented examples from the Conference Room Scenario where 3 pairs of STAs can simultaneously perform beam training, resulting in 67% training overhead reduction. The additional Golay-based training sequences can be generated and detected without change to existing hardware We are open to comments/suggestions to incorporate this concept in TGad.

March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad References [1] A. Maltsev et al., “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems,” 802.11-09/0334r6, 01-20-2010. [2] E. Perahia, “TGad Evaluation Methodology,” 802.11-09/0296r16, 01-20-2010.

March, 2010 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10-0252-00-00ad Straw Poll Do you support inclusion of the technique,     - Simultaneous Beam Training as described in 10/0252r0 in the TGad draft amendment? Y: N: A: