Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transmembrane Domain Targeting Peptide Antagonizing ErbB2/Neu Inhibits Breast Tumor Growth and Metastasis Alexia Arpel, Paul Sawma, Caroline Spenlé, Justine.
Advertisements

A Novel Cinnamide YLT26 Induces Breast Cancer Cells Apoptosis via ROS-Mitochondrial Apoptotic Pathway in Vitro and Inhibits.
Corresponding author:
Knockdown of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Type 1a Receptor (BMPR1a) in Breast Cancer Cells Protects Bone from Breast Cancer-Induced Osteolysis by Suppressing.
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Tumor-Derived Jagged1 Promotes Osteolytic Bone Metastasis of Breast Cancer by Engaging Notch Signaling in Bone Cells  Nilay Sethi, Xudong Dai, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Knockdown of secretory phospholipase A2 IIa reduces lung cancer growth in vitro and in vivo  Jessica A. Yu, MD, David Mauchley, MD, Howard Li, MD, Xianzhong.
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
A Novel IMP1 Inhibitor, BTYNB, Targets c-Myc and Inhibits Melanoma and Ovarian Cancer Cell Proliferation  Lily Mahapatra, Neal Andruska, Chengjian Mao,
Ming Hong Shen, Paulina Samsel, Louise L
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Modulation of K-Ras-Dependent Lung Tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Mutant IDH1 Promotes Glioma Formation In Vivo
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Combined PLX3397 and PTX treatment inhibits metastasis in a CD8-dependent manner. Combined PLX3397 and PTX treatment inhibits metastasis in a CD8-dependent.
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
a b MCF-7 TR2 MCF-7 TR2 (Fold change) MTT Assay , (Fold change)
Optimizing EphA2-CAR T Cells for the Adoptive Immunotherapy of Glioma
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2011)
AKT1 Activation Promotes Development of Melanoma Metastases
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 13, Pages e2 (December 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (July 2018)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Myeloma cell–derived Runx2 promotes myeloma progression in bone
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Melissa L. Ehlers, Barbara Celona, Brian L. Black  Cell Reports 
Marta Vilalta, Marjan Rafat, Amato J. Giaccia, Edward E. Graves 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance  Valeria R. Fantin, Julie St-Pierre,
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (March 2017)
ULK1 Phosphorylates and Regulates Mineralocorticoid Receptor
Optimizing EphA2-CAR T Cells for the Adoptive Immunotherapy of Glioma
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
MiR-409 Inhibits Human Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Progression by Directly Targeting SPIN1  Qi Song, Quanbo Ji, Jingbo Xiao, Fang Li, Lingxiong Wang, Yin.
Marijn T.M. van Jaarsveld, Difan Deng, Erik A.C. Wiemer, Zhike Zi 
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Gemcitabine-Incorporated G-Quadruplex Aptamer for Targeted Drug Delivery into Pancreas Cancer  Jun Young Park, Ye Lim Cho, Ju Ri Chae, Sung Hwan Moon,
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Repulsive Guidance Molecule-a Is Involved in Th17-Cell-Induced Neurodegeneration in Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis  Shogo Tanabe, Toshihide Yamashita  Cell.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 1714-1721 (September 2014) Transmembrane Domain Targeting Peptide Antagonizing ErbB2/Neu Inhibits Breast Tumor Growth and Metastasis  Alexia Arpel, Paul Sawma, Caroline Spenlé, Justine Fritz, Lionel Meyer, Norbert Garnier, Inés Velázquez-Quesada, Thomas Hussenet, Samia Aci-Sèche, Nadège Baumlin, Monique Genest, David Brasse, Pierre Hubert, Gérard Crémel, Gertraud Orend, Patrice Laquerrière, Dominique Bagnard  Cell Reports  Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 1714-1721 (September 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.044 Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2014 8, 1714-1721DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.044) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Demonstration of the Peptide-Based Inhibition of NeuNT/ErbB2 Receptor (A) Analogy-based model of the nearly full-length monomeric and dimeric ErbB2 receptor illustrating the interaction between native transmembrane domains (TMDs) or with a peptide mimicking the TMD. (B and C) Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase Two-Hybrid System demonstrating the specificity and capacity of positive (B) or negative (C) homo- or heterodimerization of NeuNT TMD. (D) Demonstration of the dose-dependent antiproliferative effect of MTP-NeuNT in NT193 cells derived from MMTV-NeuNT tumor-bearing mice using a MTT assay. (E) Demonstration of the prolonged and intensified antiproliferative effect of the peptide over time. (F) Proliferation assay (MTT) respectively from left to right on 4T1, MCF7, SKBR3, MDA-MB-231 cell lines treated with MTP-NeuNT or vehicle (LDS) at 10−7 and 10−6 M for 24 hr. Only cells expressing ErbB2 exhibit reduced proliferation when treated with the therapeutic peptide. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from triplicate experiments. p values were determined by Mann-Whitney test in comparison to control LDS at 10−7 and 10−6 M for 24 hr. ∗∗∗p < 0.0001, ∗∗p < 0.001 compared to vehicle. n.s., not significant. Scale bars, 50 μm. See also Table S1. Cell Reports 2014 8, 1714-1721DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.044) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Characterization of MTP-NeuNT Inhibitory Effect (A) We were able to generate two different clones of MCF7 cells partially knockdown for ErbB2. These clones showed reduced sensitivity to MTP-NeuNT almost proportional to the level of knockdown. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from triplicate experiments. (B) To better confirm the link between cell sensitivity and expression level of ErbB2, we performed gain-of-function experiments in MDA-MB231 cells (lacking ErbB2 expression) becoming sensitive to MTP-NeuNT when expressing ErbB2. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from triplicate experiments. (C) Demonstration of the inhibition of ErbB2 phosphorylation (ELISA assay). Data are presented as mean ± SEM from triplicate experiments. (D) Akt phosphorylation (western blot) in NT193 cells treated with 10−6 M of MTP-NeuNT. (E) Demonstration of the sustained inhibition of Akt phosphorylation after 2 days treatment also accompanied by significant reduction of Erk1/2 phosphorylation. Cell Reports 2014 8, 1714-1721DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.044) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effect of MTP-NeuNT In Vivo (A) Demonstration of the inhibitory effect of NeuNT peptide on primary tumors volumes between day 21 and day 28 of treatment. The Waterfall graph represents the percent change in tumor volume of individual treated animals (gray bars, n = 9) compared to the averaged tumor volume increased determined in the control group (dark bar, n = 10). This demonstrates that 100% of the treated animals responded to the treatment with 30% stable disease and 70% partial response. (B) Kaplan-Meyer survival curve demonstrating a significant increased survival of the treated animals compared to the control animals. (C) Representative example of lung metastases seen from μCT 3D surface rendering or single sagittal and axial sections of the lungs in a control animal (left panel) and in a treated animal (right panel). Lung metastases are surrounded in red, heart in dashed yellow, and orange arrowheads point to ribs. (D) Waterfall graph representing the percentage change in metastases volume of individual treated animals (gray bars, n = 5) compared to the averaged metastases volume increase determined in the control group (dark bar, n = 5) between weeks 7 and 8 of treatment. (E and F) (E) Regression curves indicating that MTP-NeuNT treatment decreases the number of lung metastasis over time and (F) the cumulated volume of lung metastases. Cell Reports 2014 8, 1714-1721DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.044) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Histological Analysis of Lung Metastases (A) Representative microphotographs illustrating extravasating metastasis and pure intravascular metastasis in the control and treated group, respectively. Systematic quantification of the number of metastasis reveals a 2-fold reduction in MTP-NeuNT-treated animals. (B) Demonstration of the antiproliferative activity of the peptide by systematic counting of Ki67-positive cells. (C) Demonstration of the proapoptotic effect of the peptide using the TUNEL method. (D) Demonstration of the inhibition of the Akt pathway by systematic counting of phospho-Akt-positive cells in metastasis. In (B)–(D), the left part is showing representative images of Ki67, TUNEL, or phospho-Akt-positive cells (immunocytochemistry, scale bars, 50 μm). The right parts are presenting the corresponding quantitation, p values are determined by Mann-Whitney test, ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2014 8, 1714-1721DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.044) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions