Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1441r0 Submission Simulation Setting of Box5 Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies) Nov 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Verifying 11ax’s PAR by UL MU-MIMO
TG ax Indoor Enterprise Scenarios, Color, DSC and TPC
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
Improve Scanning for Identifying Transmitted BSSID
Simulation results for
PHY abstraction and performance for outdoor channel models
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Station Group Management for ah
Simulation Results for Box5
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
System Capacity Evaluation in OBSS Environment at 5 GHz band
Simulation Results of Box5
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Outdoor Channel Model Simulation Follow-up
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
RBIR-based PHY Abstraction with Channel Estimation Error
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
Further Discussions on PHY Abstraction
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Marvell Semiconductor
Simulation results for
Simulation Results for Box5
Overview on RBIR-based PHY Abstraction
Simulation Results of Box5
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
System Capacity Evaluation in OBSS Environment at 5 GHz band
HARQ Feasibility for EHT
Box 5 Calibration Result
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Box 5 results for Single BSS Calibration Case
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction Date: 2014-11-02 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Yakun Sun Marvell Semiconductor 5488 Marvell Ln, Santa Clara, CA 95054 1-408-222-3847 yakunsun@marvell.com Jinjing Jiang Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell) John Doe, Some Company

Introduction Basic procedure of PHY abstraction in [1] is open to how to model time-varying interference. Different models have been studied in [2], among which a block-wise PER model has been shown to be more accurate. Some further studies on the time-varying interference are presented here. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Concerns on Time Varying Interference Modeling There have been concerns regarding the necessity of modeling time-varying interference. How often a MPDU sees time-varying interference? How large the interference level changes? We collected the statistics of interference through integrated system level simulation. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Simulation Assumptions Residential (Scenario 1) 4 STAs per apartment 2.4GHz, each AP in an apartment uses a randomly selected 20MHz channel (out of 3 non-overlapping 20MHz channels). UL only Fixed MCS7 CCA at -82dBm for the associated AP, and -82/-72/-62dBm for OBSS. Other simulation assumptions are based on [3] Interference collection: A subframe sees many interference events (too many BSS’s around) Many of them do not matter (negligible interference levels change for far-away BSS) Only count interference change over 0.5dB. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Interference Statistics If a subframe sees an interference change: More than 50% of subframes under a 5dB interference rise, and 20% or more under a 10dB interference rise More than 30% of strong interference are less than 1/3 of subframe length. As inter-BSS CCA threshold increases, stronger interference changes for a subframe Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Interference Statistics (2) Inter-BSS CCA (dBm) -82 -72 -62 2 interference levels in a subframe 8.4% 18.8% 43.9% More than 2 interference levels in a subframe 13.5% 27.8% 59.1% 5dB interference rise for less than 1/3 of subframe length 2.7% 5.6% 10.2% 10dB interference rise for less than 1/3 of subframe length 1.7% 2.9% 4.5% [2] shows weakest link underestimate PER for a short and strong interference rise. Time varying interference experienced by a subframe is not negligible. The issue becomes more significant if spatial reuse is under consideration. It is important to handle the time-varying interference accurately. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Recap of Potential Solutions Whole packet average T0=1, T=L-1 Simulation shows it severely underestimate the PER under time varying interference. Weakest link T0=argmin_t SINR(t), T=0 PER estimation is improved but it still can overestimate PER for the short and strong interference rise. Block-wise PHY abstraction For each event n, T0=Tk , T=0  PERk , k=1…K, and Most accurate and robust to time varying interference [2]. A simplified version of block-wise PHY abstraction to balance the performance and complexity. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Proposed Text Change in [1] Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Conclusion System level simulation shows interference change within a subframe is not negligible. More significant interference change for spatial reuse. An accurate PHY abstraction is needed to handle time-varying interference Block wise PHY abstraction or the simplified model Proposed text change in [1] to complete the PHY abstraction procedure. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Reference [1] 11-14-0571-03-00ax-evaluation-methodology [2] 11-14-1174-00-00ax-PHY-abstraction-for-time-varying-interference [3] 11-14-0980-04-00ax-simulation-scenarios Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)