A Proposed Structure for Transmembrane Segment 7 of G Protein-Coupled Receptors Incorporating an Asn-Pro/Asp-Pro Motif  Karel Konvicka, Frank Guarnieri,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Advertisements

Structure and Dynamics of the Membrane-Bound Form of Pf1 Coat Protein: Implications of Structural Rearrangement for Virus Assembly  Sang Ho Park, Francesca.
Retinal Conformation Changes Rhodopsin’s Dynamic Ensemble
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Β-Hairpin Folding Mechanism of a Nine-Residue Peptide Revealed from Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Explicit Water  Xiongwu Wu, Bernard R. Brooks  Biophysical.
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Christopher Wostenberg, W.G. Noid, Scott A. Showalter 
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Levels of Protein Structure
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
How Does Protein Architecture Facilitate the Transduction of ATP Chemical-Bond Energy into Mechanical Work? The Cases of Nitrogenase and ATP Binding-Cassette.
Structural and Dynamic Properties of the Human Prion Protein
Opioid Receptor Three-Dimensional Structures from Distance Geometry Calculations with Hydrogen Bonding Constraints  Irina D. Pogozheva, Andrei L. Lomize,
Ching-Ling Teng, Robert G. Bryant  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 137, Issue 7, Pages (June 2009)
Molecular model of the PTH(1–34)•PTHR1 complex.
Coupling of Retinal, Protein, and Water Dynamics in Squid Rhodopsin
Sanguk Kim, Aaron K. Chamberlain, James U. Bowie  Biophysical Journal 
On the Distribution of Protein Refractive Index Increments
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
The Signaling Pathway of Rhodopsin
Andrew E. Blanchard, Mark J. Arcario, Klaus Schulten, Emad Tajkhorshid 
Tzur Paldi, Michael Gurevitz  Biophysical Journal 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Jan Saam, Emad Tajkhorshid, Shigehiko Hayashi, Klaus Schulten 
Crystal Structure of the E. coli Peptide Transporter YbgH
Simone Furini, Carmen Domene  Biophysical Journal 
Ligand Control of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activity: New Insights
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
E. coli Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Reveals Structural and Functional Distinctions between Different Classes of Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenases  Sofie.
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Jan Saam, Emad Tajkhorshid, Shigehiko Hayashi, Klaus Schulten 
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Investigating Lipid Composition Effects on the Mechanosensitive Channel of Large Conductance (MscL) Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Donald E. Elmore,
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
What Does It Take to Bind CAR?
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Tsuyoshi Terakawa, Shoji Takada  Biophysical Journal 
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein FhuA: A Comparative Study of the Ferrichrome-Free and Bound States  José D. Faraldo-Gómez,
Structural Models of the KtrB, TrkH, and Trk1,2 Symporters Based on the Structure of the KcsA K+ Channel  Stewart R. Durell, H. Robert Guy  Biophysical.
On Hydrophobicity and Conformational Specificity in Proteins
Structural Basis for Dimerization of ICAM-1 on the Cell Surface
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein FhuA: A Comparative Study of the Ferrichrome-Free and Bound States  José D. Faraldo-Gómez,
Timothy A. Isgro, Klaus Schulten  Structure 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Yinon Shafrir, Stewart R. Durell, H. Robert Guy  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

A Proposed Structure for Transmembrane Segment 7 of G Protein-Coupled Receptors Incorporating an Asn-Pro/Asp-Pro Motif  Karel Konvicka, Frank Guarnieri, Juan A. Ballesteros, Harel Weinstein  Biophysical Journal  Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 601-611 (August 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4 Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Helical net representation of the 5HT2a receptor sequence, indicating conserved residues (in bold) and the computed ends of TMSs used in the construction of the three-dimensional model. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 601-611DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Plots of ϕ and ψ backbone dihedral angles of structures retrieved from the database search. Data are given for the 14 NP-containing structures and the 15 DP-containing structures retrieved from the search, in the region of residues i−6 to i+4, where i denotes the position of Pro. Note the nonhelical values of ψ dihedral angles of Ni−1 or Di−1 that show a spread around 100°. (A an B) Distribution of ϕ dihedral angles of structures containing (A) the NP sequence and (B) the DP sequence. (C and D) Distribution of y dihedral angles of structures containing (C) the NP sequence and (D) the DP sequence. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 601-611DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A representative structure selected from the largest structural family resulting from the MC procedure. The angle between the extracellular and intracellular helical parts of this putative TMS 7 would not permit spanning of the membrane and reasonable packing with other TMSs. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 601-611DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The model structure of TMS 7 resulting from the MC procedure and used in the 5HT2a receptor transmembrane bundle. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 601-611DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Schematic representation of the transmembrane (TM) region of GPCRs that is incompatible with all experimental data. Transmembrane segments (TMSs) are represented by ideal α-helices incorporating Pro-kinks around conserved Pro positions. The view is from the extracellular side. TMS 7 shows residues from various receptors that help position the TMS 7 according to the proposed interactions and proximities. Thr 7.36 was proposed to interact with TMS 1 (Liu et al., 1995), and Phe 7.38 and 7.39 were proposed to interact with TMS 3 and/or 6 and TMS 1 and/or 2, respectively (Mizobe et al., 1996). Trp 7.40 needs to face the interior of the TM bundle, because it was labeled by photoaffinity-activated ligand (Wong et al., 1988). Lys 7.43 connects the retinal molecule in rhodopsins through the Schiff base and is neutralized by counterions in either TMS 3 (wild type) (Oprian, 1992) or TMS 2 (Rao et al., 1994). Asn 7.49 was proposed to interact with Asp 2.50 in 5HT2a (Sealfon et al., 1995), GnRH (Zhou et al., 1994), and TRH (Perlman et al., 1997) receptors. Note that when the interactions above the Asn 7.49 are satisfied, the Asn 7.49 in the ideal α-helix model of TMS 7 is too distant from TMS 2 to engage in the proposed interaction. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 601-611DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Model structure of the TM part of the 5HT2a receptor incorporating the model of TMS 7 resulting from the MC procedure. Note that the interactions and proximities discussed in Fig. 5 can be incorporated simultaneously without a conflict. The TM helices are represented with a ribbon, and some of the key residues in TMS 7 are shown as they are in other receptors to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed interactions in these receptors (see legend of Fig. 5 for specific references). Thus residues Asn 7.36, Val 7.39, and Tyr 7.43 were replaced with Thr, Phe, and Lys, respectively, for this illustration. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 601-611DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The H-bond network between the conserved Asn 1.50, Asp 2.50, Asn 7.49, and Tyr 7.53 established in the 5HT2a receptor model. Note the H-bond saturation of the conserved residues, which was made possible by the perturbation in TMS 7. Also note that the perturbation causes a rotation of the position of the Tyr 7.53 with respect to the intracellular helical part of TMS 7; the rotation makes possible the H-bond interaction of the Tyr 7.53 with Asn 1.50. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 601-611DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 The cluster of hydrophobic residues is screening the H-bond network established by TMS 7 from the intracellular polar environment. The view is from the extracellular side. Biophysical Journal 1998 75, 601-611DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77551-4) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions