Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Advertisements

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
SLAC Accelerator Department Super-B-Factory John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department Caltech Meeting.
MAC Review December 13-15, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee meeting December 13-15,
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Beam pipes M. Sullivan 1 Detector Beam Pipe Diameter Discussion M. Sullivan Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
1 Optics and IR design for SuperKEKB Y.Ohnishi 1/19-22, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
SuperKEKB Vacuum System - for the positron ring - Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Outline Design and production status of key components Beam pipes for arc.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
August 4-5, 2004 PEP-II Post Run 4 Review 1 M. Sullivan PEP-II Post Run 4 Review August 4-5, 2004 IR Summary and Issues.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
Joint Belle SuperB Background Meeting Feb 9 – 10, 2012 SuperB SR bkgds 1 SR Backgrounds in SuperB M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni,
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
Further SR Studies for the Electron Polarimeter M. Sullivan for the JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2016.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
M. Sullivan SuperB General Meeting Perugia, Italy June 15-20, 2009
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
SuperB General Meeting XI
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
2nd Workshop on a Super B-Factory INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
The IR beam pipe M. Sullivan For
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
IR Design Update M. Sullivan For
Overview of SRF system of Ring and Linac (1)
PEP-II Status and Plans e+e- Factories Workshop
The design of interaction region
Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Comparison of the final focus design
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Design of Interaction Region
IR Summary M. Sullivan For
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Super-B Accelerator Overview
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
IR Beam Transport Status
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
SR Background Update for JLEIC
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the International Committee for Future Accelerators e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003 1

Outline General B-factory parameters and constraints Present B-factory IRs Super B-factory IRs Summary 2

Some Issues and Constraints There is always some local synchrotron radiation from bending magnets PEP-II generates a large amount of local SR in order to make head-on collisions. KEKB also generates a lot of SR even though they have a large crossing angle because they designed for on-axis incoming beams. This shifts all of the bending SR to the downstream side and consequently increases the power levels of the fans striking the nearby vacuum chambers. 3

Constraints... The Q1 magnet is always going to be shared At least one beam is always bent in this magnet generating SR bending fans. The Q2 magnet must be a septum magnet If this magnet is shared by both beams then one loses most of the beam separation because it is x-focusing. Making this magnet a septum magnet forces a certain amount of beam separation at the face of the Q2 magnet (about 100 mm between beam center lines). 4

5

6

Detector requirements Maximum solid angle Try to keep all accelerator components far enough away from the IP to maximize the detector acceptance This conflicts with accelerator requirements to minimize the spot size by pushing in the final focus magnets Adequate shielding from local SR The collision beam pipe (usually Be) must be shielded from locally generated SR and lost beam particles at least well enough to avoid swamping the detectors. 7

More detector requirements Minimum amount of material in the detector beampipe This conflicts with having enough SR shielding (usually a thin coating of Au) to keep detector occupancy at acceptable levels Minimum radius for the beam pipe This must be balanced with the requested thinness of the beam pipe. The smaller the beam pipe the more power it must be able to handle (kW). 8

Still more detector requirements Large high-field solenoid This forces the final shared magnet (Q1) to be either permanent magnet or super-conducting (maybe also Q2) Adequate shielding from beam backgrounds Collimators and shield walls are needed to protect the detector from backgrounds generated around the ring Low pressure vacuum system near the IP This minimizes lost beam particles generated near the IP that can not be collimated out 9

Machine Parameters that are Important for the IR PEP-II KEKB LER energy 3.1 3.5 GeV HER energy 9.0 8.0 GeV LER current 1.55 1.38 A HER current 1.18 1.05 A  y* 12.5 6.5 mm x* 25 60 cm X emittance 50 20 nm-rad Estimated sy* 5 2.2 mm Bunch spacing 1.89 2.4 m Number of bunches 1034 1284 Collision angle head-on 11 mrads Beam pipe radius 2.5 2.0 cm Luminosity 6.61033 10.61033 cm-2 sec-1 10

Beam Parameters for a PEP-III 11036 Luminosity Accelerator 11

PEP-III Super B Now Projected Upgrade Super B LER energy 3.1 3.1 3.1? 3.5 GeV HER energy 9.0 9.0 9.0? 8.0 GeV LER current 1.8 3.6 4.5 22.2 A HER current 1.0 1.8 2.0 9.7 A y* 12.5 8.5 6.5 1.5 mm x* 28 28 28 15 cm X emittance 50 40 40 70 nm-rad Estimated sy* 4.9 3.6 2.7 1.7 mm Bunch spacing 1.89 ~1.5 1.26 0.63 m Number of bunches 1034 1500 1700 3400 Collision angle head-on head-on 03.25 12 mrads Beam pipe radius 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.5-2.0? cm Luminosity 6.61033 1.81034 3.31034 11036 cm-2 sec-1 12

13

14

15

16

17

18

2 cm radius and 1 cm radius beam pipes The 1 cm radius beam pipe intercepts about 5 kW of power from the LER and nearly the same amount of power from the HER 19

Further optimization possibilities Lower the amount of upstream SR at the expense of increasing the downstream SR (more like KEKB) Offset the Q1 magnets as shown in the drawing (B. Parker’s suggestion) ….. 20

KEKB Upgrade Plans Now Upgrades SuperKEKB LER energy 3.5 3.5 3.5 GeV HER energy 8.0 8.0 8.0 GeV LER current 1.38 2.0 9.4 A HER current 1.05 1.1 4.1 A y* 6.0 6.0 3.0 mm x* 58 58 15 cm X emittance 20 20 33 nm-rad Estimated sy* 2.2 2.2 2 mm Bunch spacing 2.4 2.4 0.6 m Number of bunches 1284 1284 5018 Collision angle 11 crab 15 (crab) mrads Beam pipe radius 2.0 1.5 1-2 cm Luminosity 1.061034 2-31034 2-61035 cm-2 sec-1 21

22

Summary The Interaction Region of a B-Factory has many conflicting requirements. The very high beam currents challenge the IR design in the areas of backgrounds, HOM power, SR power, … The trick is to achieve a kind of best balance between these requirements that maximizes the luminosity for a given B-factory design. 23