Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Advertisements

R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Modular Recognition of RNA by a Human Pumilio-Homology Domain
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Bent out of Shape: RNA Unwinding by the DEAD-Box Helicase Vasa
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

The Crystal Structure of the Exon Junction Complex Reveals How It Maintains a Stable Grip on mRNA  Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell  Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages 713-725 (August 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.006 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sequence Conservation and Interactions in the EJC Structure-based sequence alignment. The secondary structure elements are shown below the sequences (h for α helices, b for β strands, and dots for extended/loop regions). Conserved residues are colored according to sequence alignments including orthologs from H. sapiens (Hs), D. melanogaster (Dm), and C.elegans (Ce) (shown), and also from X. laevis (Xl) and D. rerio (Dr) (not shown). (A) In the eIF4AIII alignment, conserved sequence motifs shared by all DEAD-box helicases are boxed in gray and labeled (Cordin et al., 2006; Sengoku et al., 2006). Highlighted in yellow are residues that are conserved specifically in eIF4AIII orthologs (Hs, Dm, Ce, Xl, Dr) and not in eIF4AI (Hs and Sc included in the alignment, and also Dm, Ce, Xl, Dr and Sc, not included). Above the sequences, fully colored circles identify residues involved in the interaction with ATP (gray circles), with RNA (black circles), with Mago (blue circles), with Y14 (magenta circles), and with Btz (red circles). Residues shown by mutagenesis studies to affect protein-protein interactions or NMD are surrounded by a black square or circle, respectively (Oberer et al., 2005; Shibuya et al., 2006). (B–D) Btz (MLN51), Mago, and Y14 alignments. Conserved residues are highlighted in red (Btz), blue (Mago) and magenta (Y14). Fully colored circles above the sequences are as in panel (A). Yellow circles identify the interaction sites for eIF4AIII. Other interactions known from previous structural studies are indicated as colored empty circles above the sequences. In panels (C) and (D), empty orange circles identify residues of Mago-Y14 interacting with PYM (Bono et al., 2004), while empty blue and magenta circles identify residues involved in the interaction between Mago and the N-terminal helix of Y14 (Fribourg et al., 2003) that is missing in the EJC construct crystallized. Residues shown by mutagenesis studies to affect protein-protein interactions or NMD are surrounded by a black square (panel B [Ballut et al., 2005] or a circle in panels C and D [Fribourg et al., 2003]). Cell 2006 126, 713-725DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.006) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of EJC View of the human EJC in two orientations related by a 180° rotation about a vertical axis. In the complex, Btz (shown in red) stretches around the DEAD-box helicase eIF4AIII (in yellow). Both proteins interact with RNA (in black), which is bound at a cleft formed between the two RecA-like domains of eIF4AIII. ATP (in gray) binds at an interface between the two domains of eIF4AIII, distinct from the RNA binding cleft. The other two protein components of the EJC, Mago (blue), and Y14 (magenta), bind mainly to domain 2 of eIF4AIII, but the interaction surface also extends over to the interface with domain 1. The dotted line in red shows the approximate path of a portion of Btz not present in the electron density (residues 198–213; Figure 1). The helix at the C-terminal stretch of Btz is present in the 3.2 Å resolution structure (shown), while it is partially disordered in the 2.2 Å structure. The two EJC structures are otherwise virtually identical. All ribbon drawings were rendered using PyMOL (DeLano, W.L., 2002, http://www.pymol.org). Cell 2006 126, 713-725DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.006) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ATP and RNA Bind at the Interface of the Two Helicase Domains of eIF4AIII and Are Flanked by Mago and Btz (A) ATP (shown in stick format) is sandwiched between conserved helicase motifs from both domain 1 of eIF4AIII (motifs Q, I, II, and III, shown in green) and domain 2 (motifs V and VI, shown in orange). The rest of eIF4AIII is shown in gray, Mago is in blue. The molecule is viewed in a similar orientation and colors as in Figure 2B (as are all other panels in this figure). (B) A six-nucleotide-long RNA (shown in stick format) binds with the 3′ end to domain 1 of eIF4AIII and with the 5′ end to domain 2, where it is contacted by Btz (in red). eIF4AIII is shown in gray, with the helicase motifs from domains 1 and 2 highlighted in green and orange, respectively, and labeled. (C) Overlay of the structure of eIF4AIII when in the EJC (yellow, with RNA and ATP in black) with the structure of Vasa (light blue, with RNA and ATP in cyan). The two DEAD-box proteins assume a similar conformation, have a similar mode of ATP binding, and a similar bend of the RNA. The other components of the EJC are also partially visible in this view. (D) Schematic drawing of the interactions that mediate RNA binding within the EJC. Residues boxed in green belong to domain 1 of eIF4AIII, residues boxed in orange belong to domain 2, and in red to Btz. (E) Close-up view of the ATP binding site (same view as panel A), showing a subset of conserved residues recognizing the phosphates, ribose, and adenine moieties of ATP (shown in sticks), or the magnesium ion (shown as a yellow sphere) and associated water molecules (shown as light blue spheres). A dotted line identifies the water molecule likely to carry out the nucleophilic attack on the ATP γ-phosphate. Colors are as in Figure 1. Ile146 of Mago is highlighted in blue. See also Figure S1. (F) Close-up view showing the contacts between RNA and a subset of conserved residues of eIF4AIII (in yellow) and of Btz (red) (same view as panel B). Cell 2006 126, 713-725DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.006) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interaction Networks between the Protein Components of the EJC (A) The C-terminal stretch of Btz (red) is anchored to domain 1 of eIF4AIII (yellow). The close up is in a similar orientation as Figure 2A. It shows a subset of Btz residues contacting a region of the DEAD-box protein that is conserved in eIF4AIII orthologs but not in paralogs such as eIF4AI. (B) Group of interactions between Mago (blue), Btz, and eIF4AIII. Mago and Btz protrude into the cleft that is formed between the two domains of eIF4AIII. (C) The C-terminal helix of eIF4AIII engages in a cluster of interactions between Y14 (magenta) and Mago. (D) Interactions of Mago-Y14 with the eIF4AIII linker (residues 241–250, in yellow) connecting the two RecA-like domains (in gray). The linker is wedged into Mago-Y14. It interacts on one side with the loops of Mago shown in panel (B) and on the other side with Y14 and with the C-terminal region of Mago (see Ile146 in Figure 3E). Cell 2006 126, 713-725DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.006) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Large Conformational Change of eIF4AIII (A) The structure of eIF4AIII in the EJC (eIF4AIII in yellow, Btz in red, and Mago-Y14 in light gray) is overlayed to the structure of the eIF4AIII-Btz subcomplex (eIF4AIII in green and Btz in purple). The two structures are shown with domain 1 superposed. Domain 2 is swiveled away from its position in the complex. (B) On the left is the structure of the EJC bound state of eIF4AIII and on the right of the Btz bound subcomplex. The molecules are viewed in the same orientation of panel (A). A subset of eIF4AIII residues are involved in different interactions in the EJC bound conformation (on the left) and in the Btz bound subcomplex (on the right). Cell 2006 126, 713-725DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.006) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions