LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Advertisements

Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
FCC-ee - Lepton Collider For the TLEP Lattice and Optics Design Team: B. Haerer, R. Martin, H. Garcia, R. Tomas, Y. Cai and many colleagues Optics Challenges.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
11 Overview of the Tevatron Collider V.S. Morozov Old Dominion University Muons, Inc. Collider Review Retreat, Jefferson Lab, February 24, 2010.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Comparison between NLC, ILC and CLIC Damping Ring parameters May 8 th, 2007 CLIC Parameter working group Y. Papaphilippou.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23,
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S. Tepikian, B. Parker, E. Pozdeyev, Y. Hao, D. Kayran, J. Beebe-Wang, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, and V. Litvinenko eRHIC and MeRHIC.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Muon Collider Physics Workshop FNAL November 10-12, 2009 Muon Collider Lattice Design FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY f Y.
Optics considerations for PS2
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
100km CEPC parameter and lattice design
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Accelerator and Interaction Region
CEPC optics and booster optics
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA

Parameters Type: Synchrotron Circumference: 26.659 (82.944) km Proton energy: 7.7 (20) TeV Bunch length: 7.5 (6 to 7.5) cm Energy spread: 1.05e-4 (0.5e-4) Transverse emittance: 3.75 (1.0) µm Longitudinal emittance: 2.5 (0.233) eV-s

continued Protons per bunch: 1.0e11 (7.3e9) Average beam current: 850 (73) mA Number of bunches: 4725 (17100) RF frequency: 400.8 (374.74) MHz RF voltage: 16 (20) MV Synchrotron tune: 0.00157 (0.0019) Momentum compaction: 2.94e-4 (2.23e-4)

continued Nominal full crossing angle: 200 (75) µrad Bunch spacing: 15 (16) ns Beta star: 50 (50) cm Beam-beam tune shift: 0.0032 (0.00084) Luminosity (/cm^2-s ): 1.65e34 (1.0e33) Number of interaction points: 3 (4) Synchrotron radiation power (per beam): 9.1 (9.1) kw

Injectors (LHC) 50 MeV proton linac (180 mA for 7 µs), injected into 4 PS booster rings PS booster: accelerated in one bunch up to 1.4 GeV, PS accepts eight 200 ns long bunches 26 GeV PS (1/11 of SPS): debunched and rebunched at 26 GeV to 1.0e11 protons per bunch (emittance = 3 µm, bunch length = 9 ns) 450 GeV SPS (7/27 of LHC): 36 SPS beam pulses to fill one LHC channel.

Injectors (SSC) 600 MeV H- linac: 125 m, RF Freq = 49.5 MHz (RFQ), 445 MHz (DTL), 1336 MHz (SCL) 8 GeV LEB: 250 m, RF Freq = 49.5-62.0 MHz 100 GeV MEB: 1.9 km, RF Freq = 62.5 MHz 1 TeV HEB (Superconducting): 6 km, RF Freq = 62.5 MHz Average current (mA): 3.9 (Linac), 99 (LEB), 92 (MEB), 87 (HEB)

Collider ring (LHC) Built on top (1.21 m) of LEP and has eightfold symmetry Two beam channels in the same magnet 10 Tesla dipole field (4 to 6 Tesla available) Can be used to collide ions Number of arcs: 8 Number of interaction regions: 8 (3 collision and 2 utility)

Collider ring (SSC) Two rings separated vertically (0.7 m) Dipole field: 6.6 T Quad in arcs: 212 T/m Interaction regions (IR) are arranged in 2 clusters (East and West) for cost effectiveness 4 IRs in each cluster and each IR is 2.4 km long Clusters are joined by arcs of 11.7 km radius

Lattice (LHC) Two beam channels in the same plane (18 cm separation in arcs) and cross at eight points. Eight 25 FODO cells (98 m long and phase advance of 90 deg per cell) per ring Four 9 m long dipoles and one 3 m quad in a half cell Beta in arcs: max 166 m, min 29 m Dispersion in arcs: max 1.86 m, min 0.9 m

continued Working point: (71.28, 70.31) Insertion: 886 m long and phase advance in each plane by 2.5 units Chromaticity correction: sextupoles next to the main quads, powered in 2 families Linear aperture: 4 mm

Lattice (SSC) FODO cell: 192 m long and phase advance of 60 deg Five 16.5 m long dipoles and one 3.3m arc quad in each half cell Eight 42 cells per ring Beta in arcs: max 332 m, min 111 m Dispersion in arcs: max 3.92 m, min 2.36 m Natural chromaticity: -204

continued Working point: (78.27, 78.28) Chromaticity correction: sextupoles next to the main quads, powered in 2 families Linear aperture: 5 mm

Collision IR (LHC) 40 m free space between final quad triplets Beta star: can be tuned from 0.5 m to 15 m Beta max: 4 km Beam radius at IP: 15 µm Beam divergence at IP: 30 µrad

Collision IR (SSC) 40 m free space between final quad triplets Beta star: 0.5 m Beta max: 8 km Beam crossing angle at IR: 75 µrad, but can vary from 0 to 150 µrad

Collective Effects (LHC) Beam lifetime: 26.5 h Luminosity lifetime: 11 h IBS emittance growth time: 100 h (horizontal), 60 h (longitudinal) Longitudinal microwave and transverse mode coupling instability are potential dangers. Coupled bunch instabilities require active feedback systems to control.

Collective Effects (SSC) Beam lifetime: 39000 h Luminosity lifetime: 24 h IBS emittance growth time: 126 h (horizontal), 277 h (longitudinal) Relatively safe from single bunch instabilities. Coupled bunch instabilities require active feedback systems to control.