Think, pair, share A: What is meant by the term soul deciding? B: What is meant by the term soul making? A: Give one criticism of Augustine's theodicy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What caused this?.
Advertisements

Misconceptions of Philosophy
To get you thinking... Why is free will important? – As an explanation for evil? – Helps to reach out divine potential? – It’s what elevates us above animals?
The Cosmological Argument (Causation or ‘first cause’ theory)
EXISTENCE OF GOD You need to be able to…
Irenaean Theodicy Irenaeus ( CE) A soul-making solution, earlier than that of Augustine, and less dependent on biblical traditions.
Augustine of Hippo ( AD) Catholic priest We know a great deal about his life from his Confessions and Revisions; from a recent biography and from.
130 – 202 AD Irenaeus Bishop of Lyons 130 – 202 AD.
Irenaeus’ theodicy No pain no gain!. Useful ideas ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.’ (Genesis 1:26) ‘How if we had no knowledge of the.
Evil and a God of Love: the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine’s Theodicy.
Religious Studies RELIGIOUS STUDIES OCR Specification 4. Challenges to Religious Belief.
The free will defence Peter Vardy (The Puzzle of Evil) suggests a parable. “Imagine a king falls in love with a peasant girl. He could simply demand her.
Key Words Theist Atheist Natural Evil Moral Evil Omnipotent Omniscient Omnibenevolent Inconsistent Triad Theodicy Privation Epistemic distance.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
Do you have a response to Stephen Fry?
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil
Augustinian Theodicy Learning Objectives
Religious responses to the verification principle
What is Philosophy?.
The Cosmological Argument
Key words on Good and Evil
Think, Pair, Share The universe is a series of hooks hanging one below the other from a fixed point on the wall. If the wall was taken away the chain would.
Think, pair, share A: Privation B: The Fall of Man A:Seminally B: Free will.
Moral evil came from the knowledge of good and evil which humanity had discovered through their disobedience.
INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
Body and Soul Key Words! In your group, write as many key words and definitions on this topic as possible!
Rapid Recall! Fill in the table with what you remember from memory! Prizes for the first correctly filled in one! 1) What are William James’ four qualities.
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SUFFERING.
2)What is soul-deciding?
4D Religious concepts of free will, with reference to the teachings of: Pelagius: The role of original sin, humanity maturing in God’s image and accepting.
- Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov
A: What would Anselm say. B: What would Gaunilo say
The analogy of the Arrow
Think pair share What type of argument is the cosmological argument?
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SUFFERING.
Do Religious Experiences prove God exists? Discuss in pairs.
Moral or Natural evil?.
Odd one out? Theodicy Vale of Soul making Summum Bonum Qualia Original Sin Freewill Christ Likeness.
EVIL AND OMNIPOTENCE J.L.MACKIE.
Think, pair, share A: What is the principle of sufficient reason? B: What does empiricism mean? A: What did Hume say about the cosmological argument? B:
What is the difference between a sign and a symbol?
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
The Free Will Defence Discuss: Imagine a parent does everything for a child. - Would the parents be acting responsibly? - What type of adult might the.
The Problem of Evil An Ethical Argument Against the Existence of God, and the Defense from that Argument.
Clarify key ideas Evil challenges the qualities of God
Miracles and the problem of evil
In pairs, attempt to describe an object in the room by saying what it is not…. It is not red…..
The Problem of Evil An Ethical Argument Against the Existence of God, and the Defense from that Argument.
How do you know something is real?
2) Who said ‘you can’t cross the same river twice?’
Think, pair, share A: Explain Hick’s analogy of the celestial city B: Explain Swinburne’s analogy of the toy’s in the cupboard. A: Explain Hare’s analogy.
Michael Lacewing The Problem of Evil Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Describe this object: Does it help describe it further by saying it exists?
LO: To be able to explain what is meant by the terms ‘body’ and ‘soul’
Challenges to the Augustinian theodicy AO1 and AO2
Summary Tasks Summarise the theodicy in five points
The Battle at Kruger What is your reaction to this?
Think, Pair, Share Swinburne says a world without free will would be like ‘a toy world’. What do you think he means by this?
Think, pair, Share The paradox of the stone Can God make a stone that is too heavy for him to lift? Discuss in pairs.
Revision Beliefs about God
Think, pair, Share ‘Conscience is a reliable guide to moral decision making.’ Discuss in pairs.
Challenges against Inductive arguments
What has this got to do with religious language?
Recap task Think of fifteen key terms associated with analogy Choose nine and add to the bingo grid Play bingo.
EVIL AND OMNIPOTENCE J.L.MACKIE.
Key words on Good and Evil
Answering A level Questions.
The Problem of Evil & Suffering
Explanations for the Origins of
Presentation transcript:

Think, pair, share A: What is meant by the term soul deciding? B: What is meant by the term soul making? A: Give one criticism of Augustine's theodicy. B: Give one criticism of Irenaeus’ theodicy.

The problem of evil

Learning Outcomes To be able to explain the key differences between Augustine and Irenaeus. To be able to evaluate the issues around the problem of evil.

Key differences between Augustine and Irenaeus Augustine blames it on the Fall Augustine sees free will as responsible for the Fall Augustine sees God judging people for heaven or hell Augustine sees suffering only as a privation (or lack) of good Irenaeus makes God responsible for evil Irenaeus allows free will so humans can grow Irenaeus sees all people as being prepared for heaven Irenaeus sees suffering as real However: They both trace evil back to human free will When humans use their freedom to disobey God, they cause suffering.

Other views on the problem of evil If God is all-powerful why doesn’t he prevent evil? Forwarded by J.L. Mackie - called the ‘logical problem’, because religious believers must try to justify their belief in God, while evil still happens. Mackie says why would God not stop evil when he has the power over everything? Bertrand Russell: the existence of evil is just a “brute fact” that has to be lived with. God is merely a smoke screen – a distraction, which clouds the issues of life. This does not mean Russell accepts God’s existence – quite the contrary. Russell just means that we USE God as an excuse Dostoyevsky “The Brothers Karamazov” suffering of innocent children is too high a price to pay for the gift of freedom = cannot deal with the responsibility.

Possible conclusion – the Ant and the Carpet analogy. Humans do not fully understand the purpose behind suffering. Because God’s knowledge transcends beyond ours it’s possible he allows the suffering because he knows something more about it. E.g. an Ant is crawling through an Arabian rug, the ant thinks that the different coloured threads are causing it unnecessary suffering. Job? But the carpet maker, who looks from outside of the world of the ant and knows more than the ant, knows the real purpose of this carpet. No one can truly know what God has in his plan, it is easy to understand things from a human understanding, but to understand God’s actions is another new science, which only he can master.

Complete the worksheet... Stretch yourself: Can you research and include the story of Job as a strength or weakness on your sheet.

The problem of evil Using the revision notes to help you complete your revision resource! You need to pay attention to the modern thinkers. Stretch yourself: Have you included philosopher’s views?

Think, pair, share What did these thinkers say about evil/free will? A: Swinburne B: J.L Mackie A:Russell B:Hume

Complete and essay plan on the problem of evil. Homework Complete and essay plan on the problem of evil.