© Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Darcy’s law in heterogeneous medium - Introduction Averages
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Kapitel 21 Astronomie Autor: Bennett et al. Galaxienentwicklung Kapitel 21 Galaxienentwicklung © Pearson Studium 2010 Folie: 1.
Chapter 6 Cost and Choice. Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley LongmanSlide 6- 2 Figure 6.1 A Simplified Jam-Making Technology.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Visualization Tools for Vorticity Transport Analysis in Incompressible Flow November IEEE Vis Filip Sadlo, Ronald CGL - ETH Zurich Mirjam.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
and 6.855J Cycle Canceling Algorithm. 2 A minimum cost flow problem , $4 20, $1 20, $2 25, $2 25, $5 20, $6 30, $
Chapter 3: Top-Down Design with Functions Problem Solving & Program Design in C Sixth Edition By Jeri R. Hanly & Elliot B. Koffman.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 5 Q 6Q 16Q 11Q 21 Q 7Q 12Q 17Q 22 Q 8 Q 13 Q 18 Q 23 Q 9 Q 14 Q 19Q 24 Q 10 Q 15 Q 20Q 25 MagnetismTermsElectricityPioneersCircuits.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
BALANCING 2 AIM: To solve equations with variables on both sides.
ZMQS ZMQS
Solve Multi-step Equations
Copyright 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Solve two-step equations.
ABC Technology Project
Flow in porous media: physical, mathematical and numerical aspects
Rejuvenation of a mature oil field: Underground Gas Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery, Schönkirchen Tief Field, Austria IEA-EOR Conference 2009 Torsten.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
1 Application of for Predicting Indoor Airflow and Thermal Comfort.
Lecture 2 Properties of Fluids Units and Dimensions 1.
VOORBLAD.
1 4 Square Questions B A D C Look carefully to the diagram Now I will ask you 4 questions about this square. Are you ready?
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Do you have the Maths Factor?. Maths Can you beat this term’s Maths Challenge?
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1 Atlantic Annual Viewing Trends Adults 35-54, Total TV, By Daypart Average Minute Audience (000) Average Weekly Reach (%) Average Weekly Hours Viewed.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use Testing the Predictive Value of Image-Based Computation of Relative Permeability Yildiray CINAR The 2 nd KFUPM workshop.
Introduction to Capillary Pressure Some slides in this section are modified from NExT PERF Short Course Notes, However, many of the slides appears.
Introduction to Effective Permeability and Relative Permeability
Geometry Group Summer 08 Series Toon Lenaerts, Bart Adams, and Philip Dutre Presented by Michael Su May
ON NUMERICAL UPSCALING FOR STOKES AND STOKES-BRINKMAN FLOWS
Introduction to Effective Permeability and Relative Permeability
Presentation transcript:

© Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore Morphology and Flow Simulations to Determine Two-Phase Properties of 3D Tomograms

© Fraunhofer ITWM 2 Case Study Input: Tomogram of Palatine Sandstone (Pfälzer Buntsandstein) Aim: Determine (saturation dependent) permeability Steps: Segmentation Pore size distribution Capillary pressure curve Permeability (fully saturated) Relative permeability (partially saturated)

© Fraunhofer ITWM 3 Tomogram F. Enzmann, Inst. for Geosciences, Uni Mainz Pfälzer Buntsandstein resolution 0.7 µm 1024³ voxels

© Fraunhofer ITWM 4 Segmentation Porosity 25.7 % Downscaled to 512³ voxels

© Fraunhofer ITWM 5 Pore Size Distribution Pore space : X Opening of radius r : Volume of pores with radius : dark grey: light grey:

© Fraunhofer ITWM 6 Pore Size Distribution (Sandstone)

© Fraunhofer ITWM 7 Capillary Pressure / Pore Morphology Method Young – Laplace equation (pore radius cap. pressure) => Pore size distribution gives saturation at given cap. pressure But: connectivity of pores ? Pore Morphology Method: adds connectivity checks to Young-Laplace low numerical cost non-wetting fluid wetting fluid r

© Fraunhofer ITWM 8 Drainage Hilpert / Miller 2001 Guarantees connectivity of NWP to reservoir Idea: move in spheres Start: completely wet Start: large radius (i.e. small p c ) Steps: smaller radius (higher p c ) No residual water Non-wetting phase (air) reservoir Wetting phase (water) reservoir

© Fraunhofer ITWM 9 Drainage (+) Ahrenholz et al Additionally: WP must be connected to reservoir Residual water (orange) Non-wetting phase (air) reservoir Wetting phase (water) reservoir

© Fraunhofer ITWM 10 Drainage (Sandstone Sample) Drained pores ( r = 8.4 µm)Drained pores ( r = 14 µm)

© Fraunhofer ITWM 11 Drainage - Sandstone Sample Slice of the 3D result Residual water: 8.6 % black: air red: residual water white: matrix material

© Fraunhofer ITWM 12 Capillary Pressure Curve (Drainage, Sandstone) Drainage Model (incl. residual water) contact angle 0° Water Saturation Cap. Pressure [Pa]

© Fraunhofer ITWM 13 (Imbibition) Hilpert / Miller 2001 No connectivity checks No residual air Start: completely dry Start: small radius (i.e. large p c ) Steps: larger radius (smaller p c ) Distribution by pore radius (Young-Laplace)

© Fraunhofer ITWM 14 Imbibition Non-wetting phase (air) reservoir Wetting phase (water) reservoir Ahrenholz et al WP must be connected to reservoir No residual air

© Fraunhofer ITWM 15 Imbibition (+) Non-wetting phase (air) reservoir Wetting phase (water) reservoir Ahrenholz et al WP must be connected to reservoir NWP must be connected to NWP reservoir Residual air (orange)

© Fraunhofer ITWM 16 Drainage & Imbibition (Sandstone) Water Saturation Cap. Pressure [Pa] small pores are connected large pores are not connected

© Fraunhofer ITWM 17 Permeability Macroscopic description (homogenized porous media model) Darcys law : u : average flow velocity : permeability tensor unknown : viscosity p : pressure Microscopic description (pore structure model) Stokes equation: Boundary conditions: no-slip on surface, pressure drop can be determined from the solution!

© Fraunhofer ITWM 18 Permeability (Sandstone) Result: e-12 m²

© Fraunhofer ITWM 19 Relative Permeability Idea: Combine phase distributions from pore morphology single-phase flow Advantage: low computational costs stability

© Fraunhofer ITWM 20 Relative Permeability (Sandstone) Choose saturation level, choose wetting model Use PM to find air distribution (here: yellow) Solve Stokes equation in remaining pore space

© Fraunhofer ITWM 21 Relative Permeability (Sandstone)

© Fraunhofer ITWM 22 Summary: Case Study Input: Tomogram of Palatine Sandstone (Pfälzer Buntsandstein) Calculated properties: Pore size distribution Capillary pressure curve Permeability Relative permeability Software used:

© Fraunhofer ITWM 23 Other Options Virtually generated 3D models instead of tomograms Fibrous nonwovens Wovens Sintered ceramics Consider relative diffusivity instead of relative premeability

© Fraunhofer ITWM 24 Other Industrial Applications Fuel cell: gas diffusion layer Diapers and hygiene products Filtration Paper dewatering felts Sintered ceramics Woven metal wire meshes

© Fraunhofer ITWM 25 Thank You ! Geometry generator, property predictor and virtual material designer