Structural Design of Highway

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subsurface exploration and sampling
Advertisements

SOIL CLASSIFICATION Sarik Salim.
Material Strength Local subgrade settlement failure (from NHI Highway Materials Engineering course)
Objectives Be able to use basic volume weight equations
Material Properties.
Know the factors considered in the AASHTO design method
Pavement Design.
Transportation Engineering II
Chapter 3 Compaction. To improve the density and other properties of soil Increases the solid density improves strength Lowers its permeability Reduces.
Engineering Classification of Soils
An – Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department.
Lecture (4). The presence of clay minerals in a fine-grained soil will allow it to be remolded in the presence of some moisture without crumbling. If.
CLASSIFICATION OF ROAD MATERIALS AND IDENTIFICATION OF INDEGINOUS QUARRIES CPD SEMINAR ON CLASSIFICATION OF ROAD MATERIALS AND IDENTIFICATION OF INDEGINOUS.
ENCI 5791 Compaction In-situ soils used as: –Bases for the construction of highway pavements –embankments or leveling material for construction projects.
Pavement Design CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
A SEMINOR ON SOIL STABILISATION Prepared by D.ARUNA.
5. Soil Consistency (Plasticity)
III. Soil Classification
Earthwork: Use of Fine Grained & Granular Material.
Soil Compaction and Pavement Design
CHAPTER TWO SOIL COMPRESSION.
6. Soil Classification (Das, chapter 5) Sections: All except 5.1.
1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION. 2 According to their particle sizes, soils are divided into two: Coarse grained soils: Gravel » Sand Fine grained soils: Silt &
THE NATURE OF SOIL By Sarik Salim. The nature of Soil Soil is defined as a collection of mineral particles that was formed due to the weathering process.
Chapter (4) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
Copyright February 22, Index Properties of Soils Prof. Basuony El-Garhy Geotechnical Engineering and Foundations Civil Engineering Department Faculty.
Soil Classification Prof. Basuony El-Garhy
DCS-1 PPT Submitted By- Amandeep Singh Roll No
Submitted By- Amandeep Singh Roll No
SOIL CHARACTERISTIC II
The Engineering of Foundations
California Bearing Ratio
Chapter 7 Confidence Interval Estimation
An –Najah National University
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Pavement Design Al-Balqa’ Applied University
Transportation Engineering-II
Effect of Removing the Amelioration Period on Design & Construction of Lime Stabilised Subgrades in Local Government Scott Young BE (Hons), RPEng (Civil),
California Bearing Ratio Test
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
Structural Design of Highway
Structural Design of Highway
Structural Design of Highway
Structural Design of Highway
Structural Design of Highway
7. CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS
Structural Design of Highway
AASHTO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
SUBGRADE HOW TO DEAL WITH SOFT SPOTS
CONSTRUCTION METHODS & TECHNOLOGY
Soil Presentation Group member : 1)Husna bt Abdul Halim
Motion Along a Straight Line
Flexible pavement design
Chapter 7 Estimation: Single Population
Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo
Mechanical Properties of Metals
Structural Design of Highway
Structural Design of Highway
Pavement Structural Analysis
Pavement materials: Soil
Pavement Structural Analysis
Pavement Structural Analysis
Pavement Structural Analysis
Pavement Structural Analysis
Pavement Structural Analysis
SOILS PRESENTATION ACPA PIPE CLASS By: Colin A. Franco, P.E.
Chapter 7 Estimation: Single Population
Presentation transcript:

Structural Design of Highway Third Stage Lecture 6 Lecture. Dr. Rana Amir Yousif Highway and Transportation Engineering Al-Mustansiriyah University 2017

References: 1. Nicholas J. Garber and Lester A. Hoel.”Traffic and Highway Engineering”, Fourth Edition. 2.Yoder; E. J. and M. W. Witczak, “Principles of Pavement Design”, A Wiley- Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons Inc., U.S.A., 1975. 3. Yaug H. Huang, “Pavement Analysis and Design”, Prentic Hall Inc., U.S.A., 1993. 4.“AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures 1993”, AASHTO, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, U.S.A., 1993. 5. Oglesby Clarkson H., “Highway Engineering”, John Wiley & Sons Inc., U.S.A.,1975.

To evaluate the quality of a soil as a highway subgrade material, one must also incorporate a number called the group index (G1) with the groups and subgroups of the soil. This index is written in parentheses after the group or subgroup designation. The group index is given by the equation. GI = ( 𝐹 200 -35)[0.2+0.005(𝐿𝐿−40)]+0.01( 𝐹 200 -15)(PI-10) (4.1) Where: 𝐹 200 = percentage of passing through the No. 200 sieve LL = liquid limit PI = plasticity index

The first term of Eq. (a. 1)-that is, ( 𝐹 200 -35)[0. 2+0 The first term of Eq. (a.1)-that is, ( 𝐹 200 -35)[0.2+0.00(𝐿𝐿−40)]- is the partial group index determined from the liquid limit. The second term - that is, 0.01( 𝐹 200 -15) (PI-10) - is the partial group index determined from the plasticity index. Following are some rules for determining the group index: If Eq. (4.1) yields a negative value for G1, it is taken as 0. The group index calculated from Eq. (4.1) is rounded off to the nearest whole number (for example, GI: 3.4 are rounded off to 3; GI: 3.5 are rounded off to 4). There is no upper limit for the group index. The group index of soils belonging to groups A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2- 5 and, A-3 is always 0. When calculating the group index for soils that belong to groups A-2-6 and A-2-7, use the partial group index for PI, or GI= 0.01( 𝐹 200 -15) (PI-10) (4.2) In general, the quality of performance of a soil as a subgrade material is inversely proportional to the group index.

Example: 1 The results of the particle-size analysis of a soil are as follows: Percent passing through the No. 10 sieve: 100 Percent passing through the No. 40 sieve: 80 Percent passing through the No. 200 sieve: 58 The liquid limit and plasticity index of the minus No. 40 fraction of the soil are 30 and 10, respectively Classify the soil by the AASHTO system Solution: Using Table4 .1,s ince5 8% of the soil is passing through the No. 200 sieve, it falls under silt- clay classifications- that is, it falls under group A-4, A-5, A-6, or A-7. Proceeding from left to right, it falls under group A-4. From Eq. (4.1), GI = ( 𝐹 200 -35)[0.2+0.005(𝐿𝐿−40)]+0.01( 𝐹 200 -15)(PI-10) GI = ( 𝐹 200 -35)[0.2+0.005(30−40)]+0.01(58 -15)(10-10) =3.45≈ 3 So the soil will be classified as A -4(3).

Example: 2 Ninety-five percent of a soil passes through the No Example: 2 Ninety-five percent of a soil passes through the No. 200sieve and has a liquid limit of 60 and plasticity index of 40. Classify the soil by the AASHTO system Solution: According to Table 4.1, this soil falls under group A-7. (Proceed in a manner similar to Example 4.1.) Since 4 0 > 6 0 - 3 0 PI LL This is a 4-7-6 soil. Hence GI = ( 𝐹 200 -35)[0.2+0.005(𝐿𝐿−40)]+0.01( 𝐹 200 -15)(PI-10) GI = (95 -35)[0.2+0.005(60−40)]+0.01(95-15)(40-10) =42 So, the classification is A-7-6(42).

LOAD DISTRIBUTION CONCEPTSOIL The load (from a vehicle) is transferred to the pavement through loadbearing axles and pressurized tires. The resulting pressure or stress on the pavement, at any depth, is dependent on many factors, such as total load, the number of axles and tires, and the condition of the tires. The stress on the surface of the pavement gets distributed in an inverted V form from the surface downward. In other words, the stress intensity decreases along the depth of the pavement.

Figure: Concept of Distribution of Stress in the Inverted Form.

SPECIAL TESTS FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN 1- California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Test This test is commonly known as the CBR test and involves the determination of the load-deformation curve of the soil in the laboratory using the standard CBR testing. The test is conducted on samples of soil compacted to required standards and immersed in water for four days, during which time the samples are loaded with a surcharge that simulate the estimated weight of pavement material the soil will support. The objective of the test is to determine the relative strength of a soil with respect to crushed rock, which is considered an excellent coarse base material. This is obtained by conducting a penetration test on the samples still carrying the simulated load and using a standard CBR equipment. The CBR is defined as the penetration resistance of a subgrade soil relative to a standard crushed rock.

The unit load for 0.1 piston in standard crushed rock is usually taken as 1000 lb/in2, which gives the CBR as Load a piston (area = 3 in2) at a constant rate (0.05 in/min) Record Load every 0.1 in penetration Total penetration not to exceed 0.5 in. Draw Load-Penetration Curve.