IPTF Regional Update SIA in Chinese Taipei

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Latest Developments in Ukraines Intellectual Property Laws and Data Protection.
Advertisements

For Improvement of IP Infrastructure For Improvement of IP Infrastructure Japan Patent Office.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – IP5 Foundation Projects: why are they necessary for work sharing and what challenges are IP5.
Effective and Efficient Search and Examination of Patent Applications in Small and Medium Size IP Offices Effective and Efficient Search and Examination.
PCT REFORM: Why It Is Needed and What Lies Ahead Charles A. Pearson Director Office of PCT Legal Administration.
The International Patent System Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2014.
1 Patent Practice and Litigation in China John Huang Partner of AllBright Law Offices.
By: Vihar R. Patel VRP Law Group, 201 E. Ohio Street, Suite 304, Chicago, IL P: , F: , Web:
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Introduction to the Albanian Public Procurement System Central Asia Regional Public Procurement.
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
The Newest Development of the Intellectual Property System of the Macao SAR December 11 th – 12 th, Beijing.
Applications for Intellectual Property International IP Protection IP Enforcement Protecting Software JEFFREY L. SNOW, PARTNER NATIONAL SBIR/STTR CONFERENCE.
Intellectual Property Overview for the Academic Researcher AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP December 9, 2008 Kenneth George.
Intellectual Property (IP) GE 105 Introduction to Engineering Design.
Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) Automobile Insurance Rate Filing Process Presentation for OCCA December 6, 2006.
Patents and trade secrets 6 6 Chapter. Patents  Grant of property rights to inventors  Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)  Permits.
How to operationalize the disclosure requirement at the national level in a manner supportive to the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD? Dr. N.S. Gopalakrishnan,
© 2010 Hodgson Russ LLP IEEE Southern Area Entrepreneur’s Day Overview Of The Patent Process R. Kent Roberts Hodgson Russ LLP (716)
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Expedited Examination Programs from the PTO February 12, 2012.
Chinese Utility Model and Design Patents as Shields … and Swords Chinese Utility Model and Design Patents as Shields … and Swords Managing Intellectual.
Medicines & Related Substances Amendment Bill: Protecting the Nation’s Health “The State must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
I DENTIFYING AND P ROTECTING I NTELLECTUAL P ROPERTY Tyson Benson
Professor Peng  Patent Act (2008) ◦ Promulgated in 1984 ◦ Amended in 1992, 2000, and 2008.
February 19-21, 2008 Hazim Dawood Telecommunications Engineering and Certification Canadian Update on MRA Implementation.
PPH in APAA Countries i. Status of PPH agreement and Statistics. ii. Benefits for Entering PPH Agreements. iii. Advantages of PPH compared to Other Accelerated.
Utilizing The Madrid Protocol Todd S. Bontemps, Esq. Cooley Godward LLP Christian Larsen Cooley Godward LLP Legal Texts regarding the Madrid System:
TRS/TRAQS Updates.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
QualityDefinition.PPACMeeting AdlerDraft 1 1 Improving the Quality of Patents Marc Adler PPAC meeting June 18, 2009.
SDOs and Patent Offices : Towards a better interface Dr Michel Goudelis, Director Telecommunications, EPO GSC-14, July 2009 Geneva, Switserland.
PCT PATENT COOPERATION TREATY By: Nico Reyes & Keziah Tan.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda November 14, 2012 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DIRM Vendor Management.
1 Worksharing n Facilitated in the long-term by: –Legal harmonization –Systems harmonization n Current programs, projects and pilots aimed at worksharing:
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
Accelerated Patent Examination: Green Technology A Summary of Global Initiatives, with specific discussion of the US Speaker: Matt Prater Preparation help.
Wang, Mei-hua Director General of TIPO September 8, 2008 TIPO: Our Work and Our Visions Our Visions.
Copyright Protection in Indonesia: General Information on the Implementation of Copyright Law in Indonesia; policies and planning Seoul, November 2007.
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
February 2016Patent Procedures Management PCT Direct Cost effective strategy for global patenting.
Unit 3 Seminar International Issues in IP Law. Unit 3 – International Issues in IP Law Unit 3 will focus on Chapters 8, 16 & 21 –Make sure to download.
Japan’s activities for achieving the world’s fastest and highest quality examination system Atsushi Kimura Assistant Director International Cooperation.
IP PROTECTION IN HONG KONG AND MAINLAND CHINA
Patent information from China and Taiwan
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Patenting innovative products
PATENT Designed and Developed by IP Laboratory, MNNIT Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh, India.
Patent Quality Improvement: Proposed WIPO Discussion Topics
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
International Arbitration in Russia under the new legislative framework Dmitry Davydenko Ph.D. in Law (Russian Federation), Executive Secretary of Maritime.
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
Of Counsel Polsinelli, LLP
Accelerating your Patent Prosecution in Mexico
Intellectual Property Rights: Practice and Process
Summary of Previous IPTF Meeting Millennium HongQiao Hotel Shanghai
PPH at the Israel Patent Office
Milena Lonati PD Quality Management DG2, European Patent Office
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Fifth Session Madrid February 21 to 23, 2018.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Fourth Session Reykjavík February 8 to 10, 2017.
Economic Development Department Annual Financial Statements 2011/12
Export and/or Import Regulatory Restrictions Report to JSTC
IPTF Presentation to JSTC
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
Regional Updates in China
Summary: 38th JSTC Meeting Sep 15 & 17, 2010 Kobe, Japan
SIA in US Legislative Update Shanghai, China
What are the types of intellectual property ?
What are the types of intellectual property?
Presentation transcript:

IPTF Regional Update SIA in Chinese Taipei Shanghai February 23, 2011

Taiwan-China Mutual Recognition Regarding IP Rights Starting November 22, 2010: Taiwan will accept priority claims based on applications filed (after September 12, 2010) with SIPO in China; China will accept priority claims based on applications filed with TIPO in Taiwan but the applicant must be a Taiwan entity or person (non-Taiwan entities or persons are not entitled to claim Taiwan priority dates); Since December 16, 2010, Taiwan Association for Copyright Protection (TACP) has been recognized by TIPO in Taiwan and National Copyright Administration in China as a body for copyright registration; Source: TIPO, Lee & Li bulletin

Progress in Clearing Backlog of Patent Applications To increase overall patent examination efficiency, TIPO in 2010 has pushed for greater productivity; in 2010, 28,526 cases have been concluded, which is an increase of more than 5,000 cases over 2009 figures (23,382), and more than 12,000 cases over 2008 (16,445); The Executive Yuan has through a patent application backlog clearance project obtained approval from the Legislative Yuan to fill 39 existing headcounts and to add 170 contractors (5-year contracts); 97 prior art search specialists have been added to the corp of examiner after fourth months of training; In effort to improve patent examination quality, external contract examiners have been reduced from 780 to 80 people; at the same time, the number of patent application has more than doubled in the last 10 years (22,161 in 1999, 51,909 in 2008), and the number of regular examiners have not kept pace; hence there are 153,691 cases yet to be concluded by the end of 2010, with an average examination time of 41 months; The target for backlog reduction is to halve the unconcluded cases to 76,000 and to halve the average examination time to 22 months by 2015 through various programs and efforts; Source: TIPO

Expedited Patent Examination (Accelerated Examination Program AEP) Established in 2009; total of 1437 cases 2010 (increase of 543 cases from first year); bases for accelerated examination are: (1) foreign patent office has completed substantive examination and has issued approval; (2) EU, US and Japan patent office has issued search report but has not issued approval; (3) expedited exam required for commercial reasons; Average examination times are: 75.2, 61.5 and 107.4 days for the each of the three bases claimed by the applicant; Of the applications based on foreign patent office approval, 44.5% are based on US Patent Office examination, 34.2% are based on SIPO examination in China, followed by examination completed in Japan (11.7%) and EU (6.3%); Breakdown by technology of the accelerated applications: optoelectronics & liquid crystals (19%), electrical, measurement, optical & storage (17%), mechanical (13%); semiconductors applications take up 6%; In 2010, approval rate for ordinary utility applications are 61%; AEP applications have approval rate of about 84%; Source: TIPO

Changes to Copyright Collective Management Organizations Amendment to Copyright Intermediary Organization Act; “Copyright Intermediary Organization” is changed to “Copyright Collective Management Organization”; Newly established Collective Management Organizations must apply for regulatory approval; if regulator deems the existence of sufficient Royalty rates must be published and submitted to competent copyright authority (TIPO) for review; users are to raise objections if any with the copyright authority; If two or more collective management organizations overlap in their coverage of certain copyrights, the organizations are required to agree on a single collection window method; Source: Lee & Li bulletin