Technosphere® Insulin Inhalation Powder (TI) Displays Earlier Onset and Shorter Duration than Insulin Lispro (Lispro) Robert A. Baughman1, PharmD,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nallasamy K, Jayashree M, Singhi S, Bansal A
Advertisements

American Conference on Pharmacometics –San Diego, CA; April Population PK modeling incorporating enzyme induction mechanism to guide the design.
New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2-1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine.
Pharmacokinetics of Drug Absorption
The GARFIELD Registry is funded by an unrestricted research grant from Bayer Pharma AG Case discussion The patient caught between.
PK and PD Studies for Systemic Exposure of Locally Acting Drugs Industry View Lester I. Harrison, PhD Division Scientist 3m Pharmaceuticals.
Suhyla Alam (Eastern Virginia Medical School), Amy West, Maura Downey, Jane EB Reusch, Kristen Nadeau University of Colorado Denver and Children’s Hospital.
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Afrezza® – inhaled human insulin
Lan Shen, MD; Bimal R. Shah, MD, MBA; Eric M. Reyes, Ph.D.; Laine Thomas, Ph.D.; Peter Diem, MD; Lawrence A. Leiter, MD; Bernard Charbonnel, MD; Viacheslav.
Inhaled Human Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Matthew Faiman.
Bioavailability of Drugs with Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics (PK) Can be Approximated by the Ratio of Doses that Provide Equal Areas under the Concentration-Time.
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
PK/PD Modeling in Support of Drug Development Alan Hartford, Ph.D. Associate Director Scientific Staff Clinical Pharmacology Statistics Merck Research.
New Insulin Formulations
10 May 2005 CASES - Original article available at CASES (Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study) The CASES Investigators.
A Randomized Placebo- Controlled Trial of Metformin for the Treatment of HIV Lipodystrophy Rakhi Kohli MD MS, Christine Wanke MD, Sherwood Gorbach MD,
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
Issues in Generic Substitution: Safety/Efficacy, Cost Savings and Supply Robert J. Herman, MD, FRCPC Professor, Department of Medicine University of Calgary.
1 ORALLY INHALED AND NASAL DRUG PRODUCTS FOR LOCAL ACTION Current FDA BA/BE Background and Issues Wallace P. Adams, Ph.D. OPS/CDER/FDA OINDP Subcommittee.
Objective: To utilize preclinical and phase I PK/PD data from a new quinolone (Q) and relevant public domain data to develop an exposure-response model.
INJECTAFER Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) Christy S. John, Ph.D Division of Clinical Pharmacology V Office of Clinical Pharmacology Division.
Pramlintide – An analog of amylin that overcomes the tendency of human amylin to: Aggregate, form insoluble particles Adhere to surfaces – Pharmacokinetic.
Rivaroxaban Has Predictable Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) When Given Once or Twice Daily for the Treatment of Acute, Proximal Deep Vein.
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS OF LIDOCAINE
Tresiba- insulin degludec
1 The Role of Exposure-Response Evaluation in Drug Development and Regulatory Decisions Case Study: Rosuvastatin Hae-Young Ahn, Ph.D. Office of Clinical.
Journal Club 亀田メディカルセンター 糖尿病内分泌内科 Diabetes and Endocrine Department, Kameda Medical Center 松田 昌文 Matsuda, Masafumi 2008 年5月1日 8:20-8:50 B 棟8階 カンファレンス室.
ــــــــــــــ February 17 th, PHT - LECTURE Mathematical Fundamental in Pharmacokinetics Dr. Ahmed Alalaiwe.
1 Pharmacokinetic Information Submitted to Support Valganciclovir Use in Maintenance Therapy for CMV Retinitis Robert O. Kumi, Ph.D. Reviewer, Pharmacokinetics.
Insulin Therapy-What’s New
Introduction Subcutaneous insulin absorption is not reproducible and insulin entry directly into the circulation is not linked to glucose sensing Basal.
Source: Frank M. Balis Concentration and Effect vs. Time Conc./ Amount Effect [% of E MAX ] Time Central Compartment Peripheral Compartment Effect Compartment.
A Telemedicine System for Modeling and Managing Blood Glucose David L. Duke October 26, 2009 Intelligent Diabetes Assistant.
Screening for hypertension and diabetes at the time of HIV testing in Umlazi Township, Durban, South Africa Ingrid V. Bassett, Ting Hong, Paul Drain, Sabina.
Key publication slides
CAN WE IMPROVE POSTPRANDIAL GLUCOSE CONTROL WITH FAST-ACTING INSULINS?
Maximum exogenous insulin concentrations were highest for PO insulin (625360 U), followed by DU (453436 U) and SC (10145.7 U) insulin. Peak absorption.
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Encenicline, a Selective α7 Nicotinic Receptor Partial Agonist, in Single Ascending-dose.
Key publication slides
Safety and tolerability
Nallasamy K, Jayashree M, Singhi S, Bansal A
Temocillin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers
Classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD):
Key publication slides
Applications of Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacokinetics of a novel nasal spray in development in Europe
Moderator Stephen Atkin, MBBS, MD, PhD Professor of Medicine
Doyle M. Cummings, Pharm.D.,FCP, FCCP
Patient Case 1 Peggy Peggy Interactive Case Question.
Faster-Acting Insulins
with type 2 diabetes without heart failure?
Figure 1: Patient inhaling Afrezza
T1DM: Insulin Initiation
Technosphere® Inhaled Human Insulin has a More Rapid Onset of Action Than Subcutaneous Insulins - Meta Analysis of Clamp data From Three Clinical Studies.
Cardiovascular outcomes
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Novel Concentrated Insulins: What Benefits and for Which Patients?
Acknowledgments and Disclosures
Figure 2 Pharmacokinetic action profiles of rapid-acting insulins
Selected Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetic Calculations
Younger Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Can We Optimize Their Insulin Therapy?
Poster available online at:
Yang Liu, Anne Chain, Rebecca Wrishko,
INSULINS Dr.R.Sajjad december INSULINS Dr.R.Sajjad december 2018.
Within-Subject Variability of Insulin Exposure and Metabolic Activity Following Replicate Doses of Technosphere® Insulin Inhalation Powder (TI) in Patients.
A: Pharmacokinetic (plasma insulin concentration) response to administration of an oral insulin formulation (uninterrupted line) and subcutaneous regular.
Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value
Causes and predictors of short, intermediate and long-term mortality in patients with coronary artery disease M. Zeitouni, N. Procopi, O. Barthélémy, Q.
Presentation transcript:

Technosphere® Insulin Inhalation Powder (TI) Displays Earlier Onset and Shorter Duration than Insulin Lispro (Lispro) Robert A. Baughman1, PharmD, PhD; Tim Heise2, MD; Marshall L. Grant1, PhD; Philippe Grosjean3, PhD; Laurent Perrin3, MS; Youssef Hijazi4, PhD; Britta Goebel4, PhD; Raphael Dahmen4, MD 1 Mannkind Corporation, Danbury CT, USA; 2 Profil, Neuss, Germany; 3 Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France; 4 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, R&D, Frankfurt, Germany Abstract Clinical Study Pharmacodynamic Dose-Response Onset and Duration Pharmacokinetics The dose-response curve of TI (4, 12, and 48 U doses) was compared to that of Lispro (8, 30, and 90 U doses) in a cross-over hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp with 30 T1DM patients. Key parameters: PD – onset, time to 50% max GIR (T50%-GIRmax), max effect (GIRmax), duration (T100%-GIR-AUC0-end), total effect (GIR-AUC0-end). PK – max insulin conc (INS-Cmax), time of max conc (Tmax) and exposure (INS-AUClast). Study Design A randomized, controlled, 6-treatment, 6-sequence, 6-period crossover dose-response study of 3 single doses of Afrezza® (Technosphere ® Insulin) inhalation powder and 3 single doses of subcutaneous (SC) insulin lispro in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 using the euglycemic clamp technique (NCT02470637). Thirty patients enrolled; all completed the study. Cmax and AUC for Afrezza and Lispro were approximately dose-proportional over the dose range studied Each 4 unit Afrezza cartridge provides approximately the same insulin exposure as 3.1 U Lispro GIR AUC Mean GIR AUC0-end for both treatments was fit to a model with common Emax and Hill coefficient (γ) but with separate ED50 The PD response of 4 U Afrezza and 1.6 U Lispro are equivalent (e.g., 20 units Afrezza produces the same GIR AUC as 8 U Lispro) No criteria have been established to define onset and duration of insulin action, so both GIR AUC and GIR/GIRmax were examined. For comparison, two dose pairs in the therapeutic range were chosen to give the same GIR AUC0-end (20 U Afrezza, 8 U Lispro) and (48 U Afrezza, 20 U Lispro) GIR AUC0-end = Emax (Dose/ED50)γ 1+(Dose/ED50)γ GIR AUC Cumulative GIR AUC curves for Afrezza are left-shifted from Lispro curves. Afrezza’s action begins (t10%GIR AUC) ~ 0.6 h before Lispro’s Afrezza’s action ends (t90%GIR AUC) ~ 0.8 h before Lispro’s Pharmacodynamic Response: [mean (SD)] Insulin - Dose “Onset” T50%-GIRmax (min) GIRmax (mg/min) “Duration” T100% of GIR-AUCend (hr) GIR-AUC0-end (g) TI- 4 U 15.6 (10.2) 182 (84.9) 1.83 (1.03) 8.8 (5.7) TI – 12 U 21.4 (7.10) 491 (218) 3.13 (1.30) 32.1 (14.9) TI – 48 U 18.9 (3.32) 905 (236) 6.43 (2.23) 131.2 (37.5) Lispro – 8 U 52.4 (16.6) 423 (198) 5.03 (1.30) 59.7 (29.7) Lispro – 30 U 51.3 (17.1) 898 (243) 7.24 (1.39) 191.9 (55.6) Lispro – 90 U 44.5 (11.2) 1194 (273) 9.78 (1.98) 372.7 (85.5) Demographics (N = 30) Characteristic Mean±SD N (%) Age (yr) 42.4±11.5 Sex Male: 29 (96.7%) Female: 1 (3.3%) Height (cm) 180.13±6.52 Race Caucasian: 29 (96.7%) Black: 1 (3.3%) Weight (kg) 83.1±8.73 BMI ≤ 29 m2/kg 30 (100.0%) BSA (m2) 2.03±0.13 90% of linear response Afrezza Lispro ED50 133 U 51 U Emax 562 g γ 1.17 Linear response 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time (h) 10% 20% 50% 100% 30% 40% 90% 80% 70% 60% 0% Cumulative normalized GIR AUC 48 U Afrezza 20 U Lispro 20 U Afrezza 8 U Lispro Δ=0.56 h Δ=0.84 h Conclusions 30 U Lispro Lispro doses up to 30 U produce approximately linear GIR AUC response (within 10% of linear response) From the Emax model for dose-GIR AUC0-end, the corresponding dose for Afrezza is ~ 80 units Nonlinearity in GIR AUC occurs above these doses For matched doses providing the same GIR AUC: Every quantile of Afrezza’s GIR and GIR AUC curves occurs before the corresponding point on the Lispro curves Afrezza’s onset of action is faster than Lispro’s Afrezza’s duration is shorter than Lispro’s Afrezza’s labeled dose over-estimates its effect A single conversion factor does not fully describe Afrezza’s effect relative to SC insulin For safety, initial conversion to Afrezza tends to under-estimate dose Titration to appropriate dose is essential Key Pharmacokinetics Parameters Insulin - Dose Cmax (μU/mL) [mean (SD)] Tmax (min) (median) AUClast (μU·hr/mL) TI – 4 U 43.9 (21.2) 10 59.5 (66.2) TI – 12 U 123 (67.2) 15 150 (124) TI – 48 U 597 (259) 20 673 (340) Lispro – 8 U 62.9 (19.1) 68 210 (65.2) Lispro – 30 U 167 (48.3) 75 543 (158) Lispro – 90 U 551 (251) 90 1760 (515) Glucose Clamp Summary Clamp system: ClampArt® Clamp level: 5.5 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) ±10% Duration: up to 20 h or until BG > 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) for 30 minutes with no glucose infusion GIR smoothing: LOESS, smoothing factor 0.06 Clamp performance: RSD < 6.3% Utility: >85% in 171 out of 176 profiles (97%) t90%-GIR AUC0-end GIRmax Mean GIRmax for both treatments was fit to a model with common Emax but separate ED50 To elicit the same GIRmax, ~40% more Afrezza is required (e.g., a 4 unit cartridge of Afrezza and 2.8 U Lispro produce the same GIRmax) t10%-GIR AUC0-end GIRmax = Emax (Dose/ED50) 1+(Dose/ED50) Cmax and AUC were dose proportional for TI but slightly sublinear for Lispro; saturable GIRmax was obtained over the dose range for both insulins. Onset of activity for TI occurred ca. 25-35 minutes earlier than for Lispro. TI duration of action is about 2 hours shorter than an equivalent dose of Lispro. Dose-response was almost linear up to 48U TI and 30 U Lispro. PK/PD Profiles GIRmax GIRmax occurs an hour earlier than Lispro. Afrezza’s onset (initial t10%GIRmax) occurs at ~ 7 min vs. ~25 min for Lispro Afrezza reaches terminal t10%GIRmax faster than Lispro and the difference increases with increasing dose Afrezza Lispro Afrezza Lispro ED50 25.7 U 18.2 U Emax 1427 mg/min Background & Objective Insulin (µU/mL) Insulin (µU/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10% 20% 50% 100% initial terminal GIR/GIRmax 20 U Afrezza 8 U Lispro 48 U Afrezza 20 U Lispro time (h) Technosphere® insulin (TI), an inhaled insulin with a fast onset of action, provides a novel option for the control of prandial glucose [1]. A euglycemic clamp study comparing 4 doses of Afrezza to a single dose of regular human insulin suggested the relationship between Afrezza dose and GIR AUC0-240min was less than dose-proportional. The US FDA requested a post-marketing PK/PD euglycemic clamp study in Type 1 patients to compare the dose-response of Afrezza with a SC rapid-acting analog (SC RAA). Specifically, the study was to identify the doses of Afrezza and RAA where the PD response becomes non-linear. References & Disclosures terminal t10%GIRmax End of effect On a dose basis, the effect of Afrezza ends 2 h before Lispro [1] Boss AH, Petrucci R, Lorber D. Coverage of prandial insulin requirements by means of an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(4):773-9. Disclosures Clinical study was performed and funded by Sanofi. MG and RB are employees of Mannkind. PG, LP, YH, BG and RD are employees of Sanofi. TH is an employee of Profil, Germany and is a member of advisory panels for Novo Nordisk; received travel funds and honoraria from Eli Lilly, Mylan, and Novo Nordisk; conducted research sponsored by Adocia, Astra Zeneca, Becton Dickinson, Biocon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dance Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Grünenthal, Gulf Pharmaceuticals, Johnson&Johnson, Marvel, Medimmune, Medtronic, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Senseonics, Zealand Pharma Afrezza®, Technosphere®, the Afrezza symbol and the MannKind logo are registered trademarks of MannKind Corporation 2h 4 8 12 30 48 90 GIR (mg/min) GIR (mg/min) initial t10%GIRmax 100-LB / 12-C Clinical Therapeutics/New Technology-Insulin Delivery Systems / Robert Baughman / RBaughman@mannkindcorp.com