Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Crystal Structure of Activated HutP
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Engineering a Protein Scaffold from a PHD Finger
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
X-Ray Structures of Myc-Max and Mad-Max Recognizing DNA
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Barbie K. Ganser-Pornillos, Anchi Cheng, Mark Yeager  Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
Structure of the Tetrahymena Ribozyme
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (March 2016)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
The Path of Messenger RNA through the Ribosome
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The DnaK Chaperone System Facilitates 30S Ribosomal Subunit Assembly
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Lutz Riechmann, Philipp Holliger  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1-12 (April 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages (September 1997)
Hammerhead ribozyme structure: U-turn for RNA structural biology
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
The AXH Domain Adopts Alternative Folds
Caroline M. Groft, Stephen K. Burley  Molecular Cell 
Protein–Protein Communication: Structural Model of the Repression Complex Formed by CytR and the Global Regulator CRP  Birgitte H Kallipolitis, Mads Nørregaard-Madsen,
Bacteriophage DNA Packaging
The Structure of the GGA1-GAT Domain Reveals the Molecular Basis for ARF Binding and Membrane Association of GGAs  Brett M. Collins, Peter J. Watson,
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (May 2004)
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 141-147 (July 1998) Function of Hexameric RNA in Packaging of Bacteriophage φ29 DNA In Vitro  Feng Zhang, Sébastien Lemieux, Xiling Wu, Daniel St.-Arnaud, Cynthia T. McMurray, François Major, Dwight Anderson  Molecular Cell  Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 141-147 (July 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80123-9

Figure 1 Secondary Structure and Sequence Alignment of pRNAs (a) Secondary structure of the 120-base form of wild-type pRNA (Bailey et al. 1990; Reid et al. 1994c). The line shows the proposed tertiary interaction. Helices are designated A, C, D, E, and G. The prohead binding domain (Reid et al. 1994a) is marked by shading. (b) Phylogenetic sequence alignment of φ29 and related phage pRNAs that includes the sequence of domain I for each RNA (Bailey et al. 1990; Reid et al. 1994c). Helical regions are boxed and designated by capital letters. The tertiary interaction is shaded and designated by G and G′. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 141-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80123-9)

Figure 2 Mutagenesis, Gel Electrophoresis, and DNA Packaging to Test and Characterize the G Helix Interaction (a) Sequence changes of mutants F6, F7, and F6/F7 are boxed, and the line shows the tertiary interaction. (b) In vitro DNA–gp3 packaging activity of RNA-free proheads reconstituted with wild-type or mutant pRNAs. Lane 1 shows the DNA–gp3 added to each reaction (Input DNA). Lanes 2–7 show DNA–gp3 packaged by proheads reconstituted with the designated pRNA(s). Unpackaged DNA was digested with DNase; then, the packaged, DNase-resistant DNA–gp3 was extracted from filled heads and quantified following agarose gel electrophoresis. (c) Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of wild-type (wt) or mutant pRNA(s) at room temperature. The lanes contained 0.9 μg total of the designated pRNA(s). (d) In vitro DNA–gp3 packaging activity of proheads reconstituted with wild-type or mutant pRNAs. Lane 1 shows the DNA–gp3 added to each reaction. Lanes 2–15 show DNA–gp3 packaged by proheads reconstituted with the designated pRNA(s). F6,F7 and F7,F6 refer to F6 followed by F7 or vice versa. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 141-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80123-9)

Figure 3 Molecular Mass of the Wild-Type and Mutant pRNAs in Solution Determined by Analytical Ultracentrifugation (a) A representative concentration gradient formed from the wild-type (steep slope at the bottom of the cell) and the F6 and F7 mutants (superimposed curves) at 8,000 rpm, 4°C, and a sample concentration of 0.4 μM. A260 is the absorbance at 260 nm; R (cm) is the distance in centimeters from the solution/air meniscus toward the bottom of the cell. (b) Results of the best fit to the data. The 4k, 8k, and 12k rpm speeds represent optimal equilibrium conditions for the hexamer, dimer and monomer, respectively; superscript (a), each concentration gradient was fit to both a single and a double component model. The best fit to the data is listed. In all cases, the data fit well to a single component or a double component but not both; superscript (b) (---) indicates that the data could not be fit. The F6 + F7 mixture contained equal concentrations (0.2 μM) of each RNA to obtain a final concentration of 0.4 μM. (c) Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of wild-type (wt) or mutant pRNA(s) at 4°C. The lanes contained 0.45 μg total of the designated pRNA(s). The fast, intermediate, and slow forms are hypothesized to be monomers (M), dimers (D), and hexamers (H), respectively. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 141-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80123-9)

Figure 4 Secondary Structure and Three-Dimensional Model of the pRNA Hexamer (a) Secondary structure of the pRNA hexamer. The nucleotides of a construction subunit are shown in the shaded area. The transformation matrices, computed between the G37 bases, are indicated by the arrows. Watson-Crick base pairs are indicated by lines, and the wobble base pairs by dots. The residues required for intermolecular base pairing are boxed. Only residues 16–101, 5′ to 3′, of each 120-base molecule are shown. (M) designates the transformation matrix that links two consecutive monomers. (b) Stereo view of the three-dimensional structure of the pRNA monomer. The intermolecular G stems are represented in red. The upper G stem connects monomers i and i+1. The lower right G stem connects monomers i-1 and i. All other stems are drawn in cyan. The incomplete lower right D stem is part of the monomer i-1. Single-stranded and unconstrained regions are shown in green. The Watson-Crick and wobble stem base pairs are indicated by small cylinders. (c) Stereo view of the pRNA hexamer. A different color is assigned to each monomer. The four intermolecular Watson-Crick base pairs are represented by small cylinders. The images were generated by the program Ribbons, version 2.45, by Mike Carson at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Center for Molecular Crystallography. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 141-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80123-9)

Figure 4 Secondary Structure and Three-Dimensional Model of the pRNA Hexamer (a) Secondary structure of the pRNA hexamer. The nucleotides of a construction subunit are shown in the shaded area. The transformation matrices, computed between the G37 bases, are indicated by the arrows. Watson-Crick base pairs are indicated by lines, and the wobble base pairs by dots. The residues required for intermolecular base pairing are boxed. Only residues 16–101, 5′ to 3′, of each 120-base molecule are shown. (M) designates the transformation matrix that links two consecutive monomers. (b) Stereo view of the three-dimensional structure of the pRNA monomer. The intermolecular G stems are represented in red. The upper G stem connects monomers i and i+1. The lower right G stem connects monomers i-1 and i. All other stems are drawn in cyan. The incomplete lower right D stem is part of the monomer i-1. Single-stranded and unconstrained regions are shown in green. The Watson-Crick and wobble stem base pairs are indicated by small cylinders. (c) Stereo view of the pRNA hexamer. A different color is assigned to each monomer. The four intermolecular Watson-Crick base pairs are represented by small cylinders. The images were generated by the program Ribbons, version 2.45, by Mike Carson at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Center for Molecular Crystallography. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 141-147DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80123-9)