Constrained Distributed MU-MIMO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0626r1 Submission Feedback Element Compression for ax May 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
Polling for MU Measurements
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Protected LTF Using PMF in SU and MU Modes
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
Considerations on AP Coordination
AP Coordinated Beamforming for EHT
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
Discussions on Multi-AP Coordination
Considerations on AP Coordination
Feedback Element Compression for ax
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Discussion on HARQ for EHT
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Regarding UL MU protection
Discussion on HARQ for EHT
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
Terminology for AP Coordination
Terminology for AP Coordination
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Joint Processing MU-MIMO
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Initial Distributed MU-MIMO Simulations
Terminology for AP Coordination
Reducing Channel Dimension in MU-MIMO CSI Feedback
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
EHT Feature Discussion
Joint Processing MU-MIMO – Update
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
Joint Processing MU-MIMO – Update
Sounding-only Support During Ranging
Distributed MU-MIMO and HARQ Support for EHT
Performance Investigation on Multi-AP Transmission
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Joint Transmissions: Backhaul and Gain State Issues
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Performance Investigation on Multi-AP Transmission
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Comparison of Coordinated BF and Nulling with JT
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
Virtual BSS For Multi AP Coordination
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
EHT Multi-AP Feature Discussion
Consideration on Joint Transmission
Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Consideration on Multi-AP Ack Protocol
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Multi-AP backhaul analysis
Sounding for AP Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Constrained Distributed MU-MIMO Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2018 Constrained Distributed MU-MIMO Date: 2018-09-04 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Ron Porat Broadcom   ron.porat@broadcom.com Srinath Puducheri Ron Porat (Broadcom) John Doe, Some Company

September 2018 Abstract In the July meeting contribution number 1116 we introduced the topic of constrained distributed MU-MIMO In this presentation we provide a more detailed description of how this scheme works using building blocks we have in 11ax Ron Porat (Broadcom)

Constrained Distributed MU-MIMO - Reminder September 2018 Constrained Distributed MU-MIMO - Reminder Distributed MU-MIMO means MU-MIMO running jointly on multiple distributed APs. Constrained – we propose that we study this topic with a constraint that all AP participating can hear one of the APs (which we call the master AP). Note this doesn’t necessarily mean all AP can hear all AP Proposal aims to enhance current mesh AP deployments or any other deployments that can share data among several APs (wirelessly or through a wired backhaul). Typical configuration may consist of a 4-antenna master AP and two 2-antenna slave APs (total 8 antennas). A more advanced configuration may consist of 3-4 4-antenna APs (total of 12-16 antennas) Main problem – APs are not synchronized and drift independently from time of CSI feedback and that drift needs to be corrected at time of joint AP transmission Ron Porat (Broadcom)

Proposed Design Framework - Concept September 2018 Proposed Design Framework - Concept Leveraging the concept of 11ax trigger frame, the Master AP sends a frame which we here call a ‘slave trigger’ to enable slave APs to initially sync and subsequently re-sync their timing, CFO and phase. The slave trigger enables a fresh accurate estimate of the current value of the phase relative to the initial value. This is easy to do based on e.g. the legacy preamble. Slave APs pre-compensate for the total phase drift and for the CFO/SFO offsets (as is done in 11ax TB PPDU) and join the master in joint transmissions. The slave trigger is transmitted in each part of the process – sounding and every joint MU-MIMO transmission thereafter. The reason/benefit of transmitting the slave trigger before every joint transmission is threefold Tells slave AP that this is going to be a joint transmission Allows slave AP to calculate exact total phase rotation from time of sounding due to oscillator drift Allows slave AP to calculate impact of new timing synchronization and apply a phase correction Ron Porat (Broadcom)

Proposed Design Framework – Sounding September 2018 Proposed Design Framework – Sounding The diagram shows the sequence of transmissions building on 11ax sounding process with joint transmissions highlighted in green. A slave trigger starts the process and enables slave APs to jointly transmit the NDPA for maximum reach Not necessary if the master AP can reach all STA. A second slave trigger is transmitted to enable fresh sync and storage of a reference H after which the master and slaves jointly transmit an EHT NDP. Transmission of NDP resembles how LTFs are modulated in 11ax UL MU-MIMO Note that storage of H (e.g. from L-LTF) is for illustration purposes, we may store only some phase related parameters Note as described in slide 4 that slave APs pre-compensate CFO/SFO before all joint transmissions Master Slave Trigger SIFS NDPA SIFS EHT NDP Slaves EHT NDP   Estimate CFO Estimate H_ref, CFO Ron Porat (Broadcom)

Proposed Design Framework – CSI Feedback September 2018 Proposed Design Framework – CSI Feedback This stage is similar to 11ax as a joint master-slave trigger will follow to collect CSI feedback from all STA using UL OFDMA/MU-MIMO Master and slave APs now have access to the entire CSI from all participating APs to all participating STAs. They can now independently compute precoding vectors for joint MU-MIMO transmission. Some STA feedback may not be heard by some AP (although with UL OFDMA that is less likely) but this is OK as we may assume that those AP anyway don’t benefit/impact those STA in the subsequent DL transmission Ron Porat (Broadcom)

Proposed Design Framework – Joint MU-MIMO Transmission September 2018 Proposed Design Framework – Joint MU-MIMO Transmission The diagram shows the sequence of transmissions The slave trigger precedes the joint MU-MIMO transmission and enables an estimation of the total phase drift by comparing H_new to H_ref Slave APs then join the master in transmission after initially correcting for the phase and timing drift and subsequently correcting for CFO/SFO during the joint transmission Note that slave APs also transmit the preamble for maximum reach. What if the packet is so long that slave AP clocks drift reduces performance? We can leverage the 11ax concept of midambles except in here these will enable the slave AP to re-sync (so not intended for STA and only transmitted by the master AP). Slave AP may hear the master AP enough to drive the residual CFO to very low levels. Master Slave Trigger SIFS EHT preamble Joint MU-MIMO Data Slaves   Estimate H_new, CFO Ron Porat (Broadcom)

Further Notes September 2018 For simplicity and similarity with 11ax concepts we assumed a separate slave trigger is always transmitted but it may also be combined into one larger preamble e.g. the second slave trigger on slide 5 may be combined with the EHT NDP preamble Payload data needs to be shared with the slave APs. In here we primarily build on mesh-AP deployments currently being sold by many vendors. The advantage lies in improving the second stage of mesh deployments whereby instead of each AP separately sends data to its own STA a much more efficient and robust stage can take place with joint MU-MIMO transmissions to all STAs (including the master AP STAs) However we are not restricting ourselves necessarily to mesh deployments. Several deployments e.g. enterprise and hot spots can leverage a wired backhaul to transfer payload to multiple AP or alternatively use mmW. All these cases can leverage the design here. Ron Porat (Broadcom)

September 2018 Summary We provided a framework solution for joint distributed MU-MIMO transmissions that solves the synchronization problem between APs by leveraging and enhancing 11ax design concepts such as the trigger frame, TB PPDU and UL MU-MIMO channel estimation. We recommend inclusion of this topic in EHT as it provides a direct extension of 11ac based DL MU_MIMO into future generations of connected APs to provide best performance/coverage. Ron Porat (Broadcom)