LEGISLATIVE REVENUE PACKAGE ‘FLASH CARD’ FACTS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
0 Economic Crisis Update How Reduced State School Funding Is Effecting North Santiam School District Dr. Jack Adams Update to Staff
Advertisements

1 Cleveland Municipal School District Five Year Financial Forecast October 2010 The primary goal of the Cleveland Municipal School District is to become.
0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PROGRAM UPDATE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONFERENCE MAY 20, 2009.
0 Economic Crisis Update How Reduced State School Funding Is Effecting North Santiam School District Dr. Jack Adams October 15, 2009.
The School Finance Outlook for and Beyond Legislative Revenue Office April 2010.
The Government Finance Officers Association of South Carolina Fiscal Year Outlook Mike Shealy, Senate Finance Committee Staff.
2005 Idaho Legislature Property Tax Interim Committee Jason Hancock Legislative Services Office.
Forest Lake Area Schools Truth in Taxation Hearing for Taxes Payable in 2010 December 3, 2009 Presented by: Larry Martini Director of Business Services.
TABOR Rebates: Just the Facts. What are TABOR Rebates? When state revenues (Fiscal Year Spending) exceed a voter approved cap (rate of change in CPI plus.
CORPORATE / INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX BALLOT MEASURES ELECTION DATE: JANUARY 26, 2010 LEGISLATIVE REVENUE PACKAGE ‘FLASH CARD’ FACTS.
Tax Planning and Strategies
December 2009Office of Governor Janice K. Brewer1 Arizona Budget Status FY 2010 and 2011.
Legislative Update OSBA/COSA Thursday, November 12, 2009 OASBO Fall Conference.
Taxes and Spending Chapter 14. SECTION 1 Taxes Three Major Federal Taxes The government collects three major federal taxes: personal income tax, corporate.
Michael Wiltfong Oregon Department of Education Office of Finance and Administration School Finance and Pupil Transportation, Director.
Wisconsin Public Schools Revenue Limits. History 1949 –State adopted a system to address property- wealth differences among districts, which provided.
Measures 66 and 67 FACTS: HOW THESE MEASURES EFFECT OREGONIANS AND K-12 EDUCATION.
Florida’s Property Tax Revisions Adopted by the Florida Legislature Special Session “D” October 12-29, 2007 A presentation to the Florida PTA Daytona Beach.
0 Economic Crisis Update How Reduced State School Funding Is Effecting North Santiam School District Dr. Jack Adams Update to Classified Staff
League of Women Voters® of Colorado Supports Amendment 66.
Orange County Property Tax Reform Summary June 26, 2007 Board of County Commissioners.
Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Ryan Woolsey, Fiscal and Policy Analyst CSDA/CWDA Policy Symposium March 4, 2015.
Dick Anastasi Lydia Sellie Board Study Session December 8, 2009.
Supplemental Levy Election Tuesday, March 11, 2014.
NOCCCD Townhall Presentation November 13, 2012 Presented by: Fred Williams – Vice Chancellor, Finance & Facilities.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance September 25, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
BALLOT ISSUES 2013 League of Women Voters of Colorado Education Fund.
1 Tax Restructuring Proposal FY 2008 Budget Robert J. Kleine State Treasurer February 8, 2007.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction K-12 Financial Resources Slide 1 10/4/2015 K-12 Financial Resources Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Taxes & Government Spending Chapter 14 Section 2 Federal Taxes.
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST OCTOBER 2011 Cleveland Municipal School District The primary goal of the Cleveland Municipal School District is to become.
A Fair and Simple Tax System for Our Future: A Progressive Approach to Tax Reform January 2005.
State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Update to Arizona Association of School Business Officials July 22, 2009 Arizona Office of Economic Recovery Janice K.
1 LAUSD State of the Budget Understanding the District’s Budget Challenges 10/9/12.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance August 20, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Special Session 2007-B Overview Presentation to the Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission June 26, 2007.
WASA 2014 Superintendent Workshop The McCleary Decision: Implications for State Revenue May 6, 2014 Dr. Bill Keim WASA Executive Director.
The Federal Funding Outlook: A Colorado State Budget Perspective Presentation to the Colorado Counties Inc. Summer Conference Amanda Bickel Chief Legislative.
School Funding: Facts and Figures A library of PowerPoint slides compiled by the Association of Metropolitan School Districts Kevin Sampers, Research Director.
January Cal Poly Budget Presentation UPBAC January 2009.
Weed and Fee’d A TABOR story in two parts By Tim Hoover Communications Director Colorado Fiscal Institute.
Budget Presentation D P A C May 24,  Provide a broad overview of the status of school funding in the legislature  Look at the District’s
LAO Propositions 30 and 38 Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Alameda County Office of Education September 12, 2012.
Texas Impact Advocacy Camp Revenue Background January 13, 2009 Dick Lavine
Funding for PK-12 Education in the State of Nebraska.
Finance and Fiscal Policy Chapter 13. Learning Objectives 13.1 Assess the fairness of Texas’s budgeting and taxing policies. 13.2Describe the sources.
Taxes & Government Spending Chapter 14 Section 2 Federal Taxes.
Recapture: Purchasing Attendance Credits vs. Detachment
The Conundrum of School Finance 2017 Action Summit April 21, 2017
FY 2017 Budget Presentation
Principles of Business, Marketing and Finance
Property Tax Reform The League of Oregon Cities is committed to assisting with the passage of legislation that will enhance local decision-making, provide.
Octorara Area School District
Chapter 7 Sect 3 Mr. Plude.
The School Finance Outlook for and Beyond
Budget Update for Oklahoma ASBO April 26, 2018
How are schools funded since Proposal A
State Legislatures Ch. 7 Sec. 2 Pp
Budget Update nd Interim Assumptions
1 in 4 Arizona children live in poverty.
Tax law Updates Every Nonprofit Needs to Know June 22, 2018
LEGISLATIVE REVENUE PACKAGE ‘FLASH CARD’ FACTS
The Big Picture about Kids Texas Center for the Judiciary F
Trumponomics Stephen Moore.
It’s Time to Reinvest in Education
California Budget Update March 5, 2009
California Budget & Propositions
Welcome and introductions.
K-W Public Schools Revoke & Replace Operating Levy November 5, 2019
Presentation transcript:

LEGISLATIVE REVENUE PACKAGE ‘FLASH CARD’ FACTS Corporate / individual income tax ballot measures ELECTION DATE: january 26, 2010 GREET AUDIENCE/INTRODUCE SELF SCRIPT: I’m here today to share some basic information about the Legislative Revenue Package.

What is the revenue package? #1 What is the revenue package? Along with reducing the state budget, the 2009 Oregon Legislature passed two bills that would increase some corporate and personal income taxes. SCRIPT: What is the legislative revenue package? Included in the 2009-11 biennial budget, the 2009 Oregon Legislature made reductions to many state services, including schools, and passed two bills that would increase some corporate and personal income taxes. The two bills are House Bill 2649 and House Bill 3405, and they make up the revenue package.

What is the revenue package? #2 What is the revenue package? These bills are expected to raise $733 million in revenue, which is included in the 2009-11 state budget to prevent further cuts to schools, healthcare and public safety. SCRIPT: These bills – House Bills 2649 and 3405 – are expected to raise $733 million in revenue. That revenue is included in the 2009-11 state budget to prevent further cuts to schools, healthcare, public safety and other state services.

What is the revenue package? #3 What is the revenue package? Legislative actions taken to fill the projected 2009-11 state budget gap of $4.028 billion were: Budget Cuts $1,994 million Federal Stimulus $978 million Additional State Revenue $801 million State Reserves $255 million SCRIPT: Legislative actions taken to fill the projected 2009-11 state budget gap of $4.028 billion were: 1) making state budget reductions of $1.994 billion, 2) using $978 million in American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA, also known as “federal stimulus”) funding, 3) approving measures that would raise $801 million in new State General Fund revenue, including the $733 million from the revenue package bills, and 4) tapping $255 million in state reserves. 1 1Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 5, September 2009 Source: Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 5, September 2009

#4 When is the vote? The legislature has set a January 26, 2010 election date. A yes vote will confirm the legislature’s passage of the bills. A no vote will prevent the bills from becoming law. SCRIPT: The legislature has set a January 26, 2010 election date. The election will be held if the Secretary of State finds that enough valid signatures have been collected to place the measures on the ballot. A yes vote will confirm the legislature’s passage of the bills. A no vote will overturn the legislature’s vote and prevent the bills from becoming law.

How would personal income taxes be affected? #5 How would personal income taxes be affected? For 97.5% of Oregonians – single people making less than $125,000, or couples making less than $250,000 – personal income taxes would not change. SCRIPT: How would personal income taxes be affected? For about 97.5%2 of Oregonians – single people making less than $125,000, or couples making less than $250,000 – they would not be affected. According to the Legislative Revenue Office, an estimated 37,795 of 1,541,576 Oregon personal income tax filers (2.5%) would be affected. 2Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 12, September 2009 Source: Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 12, September 2009

How would personal income taxes be affected? #6 How would personal income taxes be affected? For individuals with annual incomes above $125,000 or couples with annual incomes above $250,000, it raises the state income tax rate by 1.8%-2.0% – but only on income above those amounts. SCRIPT: House Bill 2649 contains three policies. The first would provide a 2009 exclusion from state income taxes of up to $2,400 of unemployment compensation, which aligns with a recent federal change.3 The second would phase out the deduction of federal income taxes on Oregon income tax returns for single filers with an Adjusted Gross Income of at least $125,000 and for joint filers with an Adjusted Gross Income of $250,000. 3 The third policy in HB 2649 would increase top marginal tax rates for some Oregonians. For individuals with annual incomes above $125,000 or couples with annual incomes above $250,000, HB 2649 would raise the state income tax rate by 1.8%-2.0% on income above those amounts.3 For example, a couple making $260,000 per year would pay no additional tax on the first $250,000 of their income, and 1.8% (or $180) on the $10,000 of income above $250,000. The increase would be reduced to .9 % (or $90), in 2012.3 3HB2649 and Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 7, September 2009 Source: Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 7, September 2009

How would corporate income taxes be affected? #7 How would corporate income taxes be affected? Corporate Income Tax: Corporations would pay an additional 1.3% on profits over $250,000 in 2009 and 2010. That would be reduced to 1.0% in 2011 and 2012. Starting in 2013, the additional tax will be reduced to 1.0% on profits over $10,000,000. SCRIPT: How will corporate income taxes be affected? In two main ways. First, with the corporate income tax, which will require corporations to pay an additional 1.3% on profits over $250,000 the next two years. That would be reduced to an additional 1.0% in 2011 and 2012. Starting in 2013, the additional tax rate would drop to 1.0% on profits over $10,000,000.4 The first $250,000 in taxable income is exempted from the corporate income tax until 2012. Thereafter, the first $10 million in taxable income is exempted. These exemptions were added to help minimize the impact of the revenue package on small businesses.4 According to the Oregon Department of Revenue, 75 percent of the corporate income tax would be paid by corporations headquartered out of state.5 4HB 3405 and Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 10, September 2009 5”Characteristics of Corporate Taxpayers,” 2008 edition, Oregon Department of Revenue, pages 3-8 Sources: HB 3405 and Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 12, September 2009

How would corporate income taxes be affected? #8 How would corporate income taxes be affected? Corporate Minimum Tax: Two-thirds of corporations doing business in Oregon now pay an annual minimum tax of $10. This bill would raise the corporate minimum tax to $150 for corporations with revenues of less than $500,000. Those with revenues of more than $500,000 would pay about one one-thousandth of their Oregon revenues in taxes. SCRIPT: The second way corporate incomes would be affected is with the corporate minimum tax. Two-thirds of corporations doing business in Oregon now pay an annual corporate minimum tax of $10.6 The corporate minimum tax hasn’t been raised since 1931.7 This bill would raise the corporate minimum tax to $150 for corporations with revenues of less than $500,000. Corporations that have revenues of more than $500,000 would pay about one one-thousandth of their Oregon revenues in corporate minimum taxes.8 What’s would be the affect on small businesses? Most – those with annual revenues of less than $500,000 – would experience a corporate minimum tax increase from $10 to $150. Those that have more than $500,000 in annual revenues would instead pay based on their revenue. For example, a corporation with annual revenues of $1 million would pay about $1,000 in corporate minimum taxes.8 6”Oregon Corporate Excise and Income Tax”, 2008 Edition, Oregon Department of Revenue, pages 3-14 7”2009 Oregon Public Finance Basic Facts,” Legislative Revenue Office, page C-13 8HB 3405 and Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 9, September 2009 Sources: Oregon Corporate Excise and Income Tax”, 2008 Edition, Oregon Department of Revenue, pages 3-14 and Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 12, September 2009

How do Oregon’s bsuiness taxes compare? #9 How do Oregon’s bsuiness taxes compare? Oregon’s business taxes are currently at $3.7% of gross state product, which ranks 3rd lowest among the 50 states. If the revenue package would be affirmed by voters, Oregon’s corporate taxes would go up to 3.9% of gross state product, which would rank as 5th lowest. SCRIPT: How do Oregon’s corporate tax rates compare? Oregon’s corporate taxes are currently at $3.7% of gross state product, which is third lowest among the 50 states, according to the Council on State Taxation and the Legislative Revenue Office.8 If the revenue package is affirmed by voters, Oregon’s corporate taxes would increase to 3.9% of gross state product.8 8”Total State and Local Business Taxes,” Council on State Taxation, Ernst & Young, 2009 and Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 18, September 2009 Sources: ”Total State and Local Business Taxes,” Council on State Taxation, Ernst & Young, 2009 and Legislative Revenue Office Research Report #6-09, “Referendum 301 & 302 Revenue Measures,” Page 18, September 2009

How do Oregon’s corporate taxes compare? #10 How do Oregon’s corporate taxes compare? By comparison, Washington’s corporate taxes are at 5.5% of gross state product, California and Nevada at 4.6%, and Idaho at 4.7%. SCRIPT: By comparison, Washington’s corporate taxes are at 5.5% of gross state product, California and Nevada at 4.6%, and Idaho at 4.7%.8 8”Total State and Local Business Taxes,” Council on State Taxation, Ernst & Young, 2009 Source: ” Total State and Local Business Taxes,” Council on State Taxation, Ernst & Young, 2009

What would this mean for Oregon’s schools? #11 What would this mean for Oregon’s schools? Of the $733 million raised by the revenue package, about 40% – some $285 million – would be targeted for schools. This amount would be included in the $6.0 billion allocated to schools for 2009-11. SCRIPT: What would all this mean for schools? Of the $733 million raised by the revenue package, about 40% – an estimated $285 million – would be targeted for schools.10 This amount would be included in the $6.0 billion allocated to schools for 2009-11. If the revenue package is not approved, alternative funding would be addressed in the February 2010 legislative special session. Schools and the rest of state government would experience mid-biennium reductions. For Oregon’s schools, this would likely mean some combination of teacher and staff layoffs, shortened school years, higher class sizes and other reductions. 10” 2009-10 Distribution of Formula Revenue to Districts,” Oregon Department of Education Source: ” 2009-10 Distribution of Formula Revenue to Districts,” Oregon Department of Education

What would this mean for local schools? #12 What would this mean for local schools? [Your information here] SCRIPT: What would this mean for local schools? [YOUR INFORMATION HERE]

The End