Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jeffrey T Wigle, Guillermo Oliver  Cell 
Advertisements

Why is gastrulation so important?
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
Dynamic Expression of Erbb Pathway Members during Early Mammary Gland Morphogenesis  Olivia Wansbury, Heena Panchal, Michelle James, Suzanne Parry, Alan.
Katherine Joubin, Claudio D Stern  Cell 
Jeffrey T Wigle, Guillermo Oliver  Cell 
Iain Patten, Marysia Placzek  Current Biology 
Jolanta E. Pitera, Virpi V. Smith, Peter Thorogood, Peter J. Milla 
A Somitic Compartment of Tendon Progenitors
Gabrielle Kardon, Brian D Harfe, Clifford J Tabin  Developmental Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Distinct Origins of Adult and Embryonic Blood in Xenopus
Smoothened Mutants Reveal Redundant Roles for Shh and Ihh Signaling Including Regulation of L/R Asymmetry by the Mouse Node  Xiaoyan M. Zhang, Miguel.
Mechanisms of Left-Right Asymmetry
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Anterior Visceral Endoderm Directs Ventral Morphogenesis and Placement of Head and Heart via BMP2 Expression  Mary Madabhushi, Elizabeth Lacy  Developmental.
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages (March 1998)
Jan Schlueter, Takashi Mikawa  Cell Reports 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
David Stafford, Victoria E. Prince  Current Biology 
Robert G. Kelly, Nigel A. Brown, Margaret E. Buckingham 
Axis Development and Early Asymmetry in Mammals
Sara C. Ahlgren, Marianne Bronner-Fraser  Current Biology 
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Jolanta E. Pitera, Virpi V. Smith, Peter Thorogood, Peter J. Milla 
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
Helge Amthor, Bodo Christ, Miguel Weil, Ketan Patel  Current Biology 
Nick R. Leslie, Xuesong Yang, C. Peter Downes, Cornelis J. Weijer 
Nodal Signaling in Early Vertebrate Embryos
Volume 19, Issue 16, Pages (August 2009)
Kathleen S. Christine, Frank L. Conlon  Developmental Cell 
BMP4 Plays a Key Role in Left–Right Patterning in Chick Embryos by Maintaining Sonic Hedgehog Asymmetry  Anne-Hélène Monsoro-Burq, Nicole M. Le Douarin 
A molecular pathway leading to endoderm formation in zebrafish
Tbx5 and Tbx4 Are Not Sufficient to Determine Limb-Specific Morphologies but Have Common Roles in Initiating Limb Outgrowth  Carolina Minguillon, Jo Del.
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Zebrafish pea3 and erm are general targets of FGF8 signaling
Brian A Hyatt, H.Joseph Yost  Cell 
Satoko Nishimoto, Susan M. Wilde, Sophie Wood, Malcolm P.O. Logan 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (June 2002)
Specification of Motor Neuron Identity by the MNR2 Homeodomain Protein
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Guidance Cues at the Drosophila CNS Midline: Identification and Characterization of Two Drosophila Netrin/UNC-6 Homologs  Robin Harris, Laura Moore Sabatelli,
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
The Chick Transcriptional Repressor Nkx3
Åsa Apelqvist, Ulf Ahlgren, Helena Edlund  Current Biology 
Mapping vertebrate embryos
Jeffrey D Amack, H.Joseph Yost  Current Biology 
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
The REF-1 Family of bHLH Transcription Factors Pattern C
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Autonomous Modes of Behavior in Primordial Germ Cell Migration
Cell Movement Patterns during Gastrulation in the Chick Are Controlled by Positive and Negative Chemotaxis Mediated by FGF4 and FGF8  Xuesong Yang, Dirk.
Pharyngeal arch patterning in the absence of neural crest
Antagonistic Signaling by Caronte, a Novel Cerberus-Related Gene, Establishes Left– Right Asymmetric Gene Expression  Yuji Yokouchi, Kyle J Vogan, Richard.
Shadow Enhancers Foster Robustness of Drosophila Gastrulation
Ectodermal Syndecan-2 Mediates Left-Right Axis Formation in Migrating Mesoderm as a Cell-Nonautonomous Vg1 Cofactor  Kenneth L. Kramer, H.Joseph Yost 
Lefty-Dependent Inhibition of Nodal- and Wnt-Responsive Organizer Gene Expression Is Essential for Normal Gastrulation  William W. Branford, H.Joseph.
The Anterior-Posterior Axis Emerges Respecting the Morphology of the Mouse Embryo that Changes and Aligns with the Uterus before Gastrulation  Daniel.
Katsuhiko Ono, Yukihiko Yasui, Urs Rutishauser, Robert H Miller  Neuron 
Novel Functions for Integrins in Epithelial Morphogenesis
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (February 1996)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 307-317 (August 1998) The Transcription Factor Pitx2 Mediates Situs-Specific Morphogenesis in Response to Left-Right Asymmetric Signals  Malcolm Logan, Sylvia M Pagán-Westphal, Devyn M Smith, Laura Paganessi, Clifford J Tabin  Cell  Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 307-317 (August 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81474-9

Figure 1 Pitx2 Amino Acid Alignment Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of Pitx2 from chick (cPitx2, this report), mouse (mPitx2, Genbank accession number U80010), and human (hPITX2, Genbank accession number U69961). The characteristic paired-type homeodomain (underlined) is 100% conserved between chick, mouse, and human. Outside the homeodomain a high degree of conservation (97%) is maintained between the chick, mouse, and human sequences. Cell 1998 94, 307-317DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81474-9)

Figure 2 Expression of Pitx2 Suggests at Least Two Distinct Roles during Embryogenesis (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization and (B) section in situ hybridization of a stage 25 chick embryo with a Pitx2 probe showing expression in the epaxial myotome (EM) and in the migrating myoblasts (MM) in the limb buds (indicated by arrows in [B]). (B) is a transverse section at the level of the wing bud; the dorsal surface points toward the top of the page. (C–J) Comparison of expression of Pitx2 (C–G) and Nodal (H–J) between stages 7 and 10. Whole mount in situ hybridization shows that both genes are expressed in a broad asymmetric domain in the left lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) (seen in ventral view in [C–E] and [B–J]). At stage 7, Pitx2 is not yet asymmetric and is expressed bilaterally in the cephalic mesoderm (CM), (C) Pitx2 is induced in the left LPM at stage 8 (D) but remains bilaterally symmetric in the cephalic mesoderm and ectoderm (F). Through heart fusion stages, this expression pattern persists at which time expression is strongest in two distinct anterior and posterior domains (E). Pitx2 is also expressed bilaterally in the extraembryonic tissue (C–E). Expression outside of the embryo is restricted to the extraembryonic endoderm (EE) as shown in a section of a stage 8 embryo (G); note that the left-sided extraembryonic endoderm was lost during processing this example. The onset of Nodal expression precedes that of Pitx2, initiating in two discontinuous domains in the paraxial mesoderm and LPM adjacent to Hensen’s node (H). The expression of Nodal expands throughout the LPM as Pitx2 expression is initiated (I), but then retracts caudally to a domain at the level of the tail bud, corresponding to the posterior domain of strong Pitx2 expression (J). Cell 1998 94, 307-317DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81474-9)

Figure 3 Asymmetric Gene Expression during Heart Morphogenesis Ventral (A–G) and lateral (H) views of the developing heart. (A) Prior to the fusion of the heart tubes, at stage 8, whole-mount in situ hybridizations show that the left-sided domain of Nodal expression extends into the caudal region of the cardiac primordia. (B) Sections of embryos after the whole-mount in situ hybridizations show that Nodal expression is in the forming myocardial layer. This expression is transient and is not seen at subsequent stages. (C, E, G, and H) Whole mount in situ hybridizations show that Pitx2 expression extends through the entire left-side precardiac mesoderm at stage 8+, prior to fusion of the heart primordia (C), in the linear heart tube at stage 10 (E), during heart looping at stage 12 (G) and subsequently at stage 17 (H). Sections of stage 9 (D) and stage 10 (F) whole mounts shows that Pitx2 is expressed in the left myocardium as well as bilaterally in the cephalic mesoderm. Cell 1998 94, 307-317DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81474-9)

Figure 4 Pitx2 Is Expressed along the Entire Length of the Gut Tube, Exclusively on the Left Ventral views of the stomach (A) and lower gut tube (C) of a stage 18 embryo following whole-mount in situ hybridization. In situ hybridizations on transverse sections of stage 20 embryos at the level of the stomach (B) and intestine (D). Pitx2 is expressed in both the somatopleural and splanchnopleural mesodermal layers (B and C), but Pitx2 expression is strictly unilateral in the splanchnopleura, which contributes the visceral mesoderm to the gut (A–D). As the somatopleura forms, the ventral body wall Pitx2 is strongly expressed in the left side, while significantly weaker expression is detected on the right (C). Plus and minus signs indicate tissue expressing and not expressing Pitx2, respectively. Cell 1998 94, 307-317DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81474-9)

Figure 5 Pitx2 Is Regulated by the Shh-Nodal Signaling Cascade Ventral views of whole-mount in situ hybridizations showing Pitx2 expression. Implanting control beads to the left of Hensen’s node at stage 5 have no effect on the expression of Pitx2 in the left LPM (black arrows) or cephalic mesoderm (red arrows) at stage 8 (A). In contrast, similar treatment with beads soaked in anti-Shh antibody results in lack of Pitx2 expression in the left LPM at stage 8, although it has no effect on expression in the cephalic mesoderm (B). Beads soaked in Shh protein implanted to the right of Hensen’s node results in bilateral expression of Pitx2 in the LPM at stage 8 (C). Infection of the right side of the embryo at stage 4 with a retrovirus expressing nodal also results in bilateral expression of Pitx2 in the LPM and developing heart tube (E). This is in contrast to embryos infected with an alkaline phosphatase virus, which showed no alteration in the expression of Pitx2 (D). Embryos in (D) and (E) were harvested at later stages to allow sufficient spread of viral infection. Pitx2 expression in the LPM is indicated by a plus sign, and lack of Pitx2 expression is indicated by a minus sign. Cell 1998 94, 307-317DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81474-9)

Figure 6 Pitx2 Regulates Left-Specific Morphogenesis of the Heart and the Direction of the Body Rotation Using a protocol designed to target viral infection unilaterally to the cardiac mesoderm, virus was injected into the right side of stage 4 blastoderm in an area depicted in schematic (A). A retrovirus encoding GFP was targeted to this region; infection can be seen in dark field at stage 8 throughout the right cardiac region as well as scattered elsewhere on the right side, in ventral view (B). The same embryo in bright field confirms that the right heart tube is uniformly infected (C). A similar targeting of the Pitx2 virus resulted in a range of infections, as detected by whole-mount in situ hybridization to a viral-specific probe. Many embryos showed a very low level of infection (D); however, 20% were heavily infected throughout the right side of the heart tube (E), as with the GFP virus. Note that the embryo in (E) has a reversed left-looped heart (shown in ventral view). The Pitx2 virus resulted in several distinct heart morphologies, including heart looped to the right, to the left, and apparently isomeric hearts that were bilaterally symmetrical and remained in the midline (F). Pitx2 infections also resulted in some reversals in the direction of body rotation; see in ventral views of stage 13+ embryos (G). Direction of rotation can be noted by the direction the head curves (red arrows); the side to which the eyes are facing and the angle at which the caudal heart meets the midline (pink arrows). The direction of body rotation following Pitx2 infection is independent of the direction of heart looping (blue arrows). Cell 1998 94, 307-317DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81474-9)

Figure 7 Pitx2 Regulates Situs during Gut Morphogenesis Virus carrying Pitx2 was targeted at stage 10 in ovo to the right visceral mesoderm of the foregut and the resulting phenotypes examined at stage 27. This resulted in two cases of complete situs inversus of the foregut derivatives, including the orientation of the crop, proventricularis, and gizzard (A). The small intestine, which forms from the midgut, and more caudal regions, which were not infected, developed with normal situs. In other cases only single organs, such as the crop, showed reversed situs, while the rest of the GI tract appeared normal (B). Cell 1998 94, 307-317DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81474-9)