BLM changes HV software interlock (SIS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DS Quench TEST 2  MOTIVATION and METHOD: 1. Achieve 500kW on beam 1 – TCP7 collimators.(so far 500kW with beam 2 and 235kW over 1s with beam 1 were reached.
Advertisements

BLM thresholds for MQW magnets V. Raginel, B. Auchmann, D. Wollmann BLM Threshold Working Group meeting, 24/02/2015.
Sat/Sun 26/27 th March Sat 18h20: Stable beams. Fill #1653. Sun 10h02: Stable beams continued. vdM scans. Length calibrations. 16h59: Beam dump. Delivered.
21/05/2012LHC 8:30 meeting Overview Week 20 Injectors, LHCb polarity, Beam-Beam Coordinators: Bernhard Holzer, Jan Uythoven.
● 08:30 Loaded by mistake squeeze function to 2 m  Dumped beams ● 10:30-13:00 Test of new algorithm for long. Emittance blow-up to minimize oscillations.
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
RF voltage and frequency interlocks A. Butterworth MP review 17/6/2010.
LHC 8:30 meetingEBH 1  Cryogenics recovery in point 8  Meanwhile a couple of accesses:  MKI investigation on noise in IP2  Insulation Vacuum.
B. Auchmann, O. Picha, Joint CWG/BLMTWG Meeting August
D. Still-FNAL/Tevatron HALO '03 Tevatron Collider II Halo Removal System Dean Still Fermilab Tevatron Department 5/21/2003 Motives for the Collider Run.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
Eva Barbara Holzer July 16, LHC MPP Eva Barbara Holzer for the BLM team LHC MPP CERN, July 17, 2010 Proposal on Threshold Corrections for RC Filters.
Last night Lhc closed 15:00 Beam on Ti 8 /Ti2 Prepulse check synchronisation ok with LHCb /RF 17:00 Open Point 4 PC’s and RF 19:00 LBDS energy tracking.
Simulations and BLM Scaling Studies for the Collimation Quench Test (with protons) A. Mereghetti CWG Meeting, CERN, 22 nd Oct 2015.
Collimator settings for 2012 R. Bruce, R. Assmann for the collimation team
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
Eva Barbara Holzer LHC Machine Protection ReviewSeptember 6, Eva Barbara Holzer LHC Machine Protection ReviewSeptember 6, Eva Barbara Holzer.
:30 meetingEBH 1  No beam during the morning:  4:15 – 9: V distributor: Recovery after electrical interruption  access for TI services.
Overview of LHC Beam Loss Measurements
Results of the 2007 BLM hardware tests in LSS5
The TV Beam Observation system - BTV
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
RF interlocks for higher intensities (LMC 15 June)
Saturday 24 March 2012.
Injection region BLMs – ECR
Halo scraping and loss rates at collimators
LHC BLM system: system overview
Disabling Rules.
Monday fill with 1092 bunches (6 h stable beams)
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
Wednesday 17th August Rocky, short fills, initial luminosities are good LHCb polarity change to negative seems ok 18/08/2011 LHC 8:30 meeting.
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
External Review on LHC Machine Protection, B.Dehning
Saturday 09:40 Stable beams #1369 (56 bunch scheme)
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Tue :25 Beams dumped due to RF vacuum interlock
Wednesday /Thursday 09-11:00 Verification of the LSS6 interlocked BPMs: took longer to fill due to some problems with RF cavities in the PS. In the mean.
Saturday 12:00 Fill 1992 in stable beams.
Thursday morning – optics correction
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010
Monday – recovery from MKI flashover
Wednesday Morning 8: :30 end of fill study - octupole polarity inversion (Elias, Tatiana, Alexey, Georges, …): Goal: study the effect of the.
Thursday 17th May 01:11 Fill #2633 dump in squeeze arc circulator load channel Ad1B 03:16 Fill #2644 Stable beams, lumi 5.2e33 cm-2s-1 04:38 Dumped by.
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
C.Octavio Domínguez, Humberto Maury Cuna
Sensitivity tests of BLM_S chamber in PSB dump
Thursday 10th May - morning
Saturday – Morning 7:36 beams dumped
Finally.... We had to wait a long time.... We had many problems....
Sunday
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Wednesday 09 March …:09:00: beta* measurement (1.5 m) by K-modulation and with AC-dipole excitation. 1/17/2019 LHC 8:30 meeting.
Tuesday Access for RF & QPS (others in the shadow) until ~18:00.
Sunday/Monday & :30 Stable beams. Fill #1851.
Summary of week 19 Machine Coordinators: G. Arduini, M. Lamont Main aim: Luminosity production.
Warm Magnet Thresholds
Report on Beam Loss Monitors
Scrubbing progress - 08/12/2012
Monday 8th December Morning used for RF work (IP z, injection), damper noise checks. Stable beams period with LHCb spectrometer OFF – lost beam after.
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2011
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
Monday 6th 07:39 Dump fill #1854, RQ6.L2 tripped, followed by access
Thursday 17/3 Morning: evaluation of the origin of the timing problem occurred over night and the implication on machine protection 09:00 – 12:00 Dry ramp.
Tunnel hardware installation
MD Planning Fri – Sat (1. – 2.7.)
Tuesday 20 September 2011.
Fri :52 Stable beams fill #2536
Tuesday 24/5 Fill # :00 Stable beam fill # bunches
Saturday 28th 08:17 Fill #1812: Stable beams, peak luminosity ~1.1x1033 cm-2s-1 19:00 Go to adjust for RF-checks; Record fill lumi of 31.7 pb-1 for CMS.
Saturday Luminosity production 1380 bunches
Presentation transcript:

BLM changes HV software interlock (SIS) TCTVB.4L8 monitor factor (MF) change TCSG in IP7 master threshold change

HV interlock HV BLM SIS interlock protects against: power converter failure (1 redundant power supply per IP) disconnection of power cable (several HV cables per crate) If HV is disconnected the BLM system holds HV for minutes (at least) BLM HV = 1500V: The BLM signal does not change significantly when the voltage drops to ~800V Interlock chain: HV drop of ≥10% detected by BLM hardware (tunnel)  error signal sent FESA concentrates error signal, and if it lasts for 10 seconds (1 minute)  beam abort by SIS

IP7 and IP3 Central Crates 22.7. 23:00 BLM high voltage software interlock SIS: changed the delay time before beam dump from 10s to 1 minute for the two central crates in IP3 and IP7  no more disabling when going into collision Crates cfv-sr3-blmc and cfv-sr7-blmc: BLM of Collimators Deployment of new FESA class Not all monitors in LSS 3 and 7 have this longer delay time: Crates cfv-sr7-blml and cfv-sr7-blmr (cfv-sr3-blml and cfv-sr3-blmr) also hold the quadrupoles in LSS (plus DS and arc magnets) – still on 10 s delay time

TCTVB.4L8: Vacuum activity left side of IP8 BLM monitor factor on BLMEI.04L8.B1E10_TCTVB.4L8 changed from 0.1 to 0.2 to allow for higher losses (vacuum activity - 2 dumps on 1.3 s integration time). The monitor factor for the adjacent BLMEI.04L8.B1E10_TCTH.4L8. B1 was already at 0.2 9.6.2011 UFOs at MKI Injection losses + delay filter 14.10.2011 21.4.2011 ‘LHCb lumi debris’ Vacuum activity 24.7.2011 9.6.2011 UFOs at MKI

TCSG IP7 threshold changes 25.7.2011: Change of BLM thresholds for monitors protecting TCSGs in IP7 in order to avoid beam dumps in the long running sums due to high beam losses. Previously, all TCSGs were set to a factor 10 lower than TCPs for integration times 82ms and above. Due to secondary particle showers from the TCPs the BLM signal on 5 (out of 11) TCSG per beam are very close to the TCP signals (within a range of approximately a factor of 2-3 above and below the highest TCP signals). After the threshold change the TCSG BLMs give about the same limit to beam losses as the most limiting TCP BLMs (up to a factor of 2-3 higher or lower depending on loss details).

Moved 5 TCSG per beam to TCP family TCP and TCSG 450 GeV and 3.5 TeV thresholds [Gy/s] vs integration time [s] 450 GeV 3.5 TeV 6 TCSGs /beam 3 TCP + 5 TCSGs /beam Moved 5 TCSG per beam to TCP family 6 TCSG per beam stayed with previous thresholds

Names of the TSCGs moved Skew Horizontal

1.3 sec IP7 Signal / Threshold in Collision after Change Green: Magnets: thresholds for local magnet protection Light blue: Collimators: thresholds according to operation scenarios – mostly (far) below protection limit – on few TCLAs close/above local protection limit 6 TCPs 10 TCLA

Collimator Thresholds IP7 Design values: T … loss duration t … lifetime Design Values Current limits (measurements from MD) by thresholds on Loss duration Loss rate [p/s] Power TCP (approx.) TCSG (approx.) TCLA (approx.) ≈ 1 s 2E12 (scaled 3.5TeV) 1200 kW 1.3 s 330 kW 170 kW cont. 1.6E11 (scaled 3.5TeV) 97 kW 84 s 48 kW 10 s 8.6E11 (scaled 3.5TeV) 487 kW 21 s 194 kW