Hate crime statistics: gaps, progress and challenges ahead

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Commission Justice 26 October 2011 Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia.
Advertisements

Hate Crime All Wales Hate Crime Research Project Mair Rigby, Project Officer.
STATEMENT BY THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR ETHICS AND INTEGRITY, OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT UGANDA AT THE 4 TH IAACA ANNUAL SEMINAR DALIAN, CHINA 25 TH TO 28.
Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans Module 2 The Biodiversity.
Minority Rights and Cultural Rights 10 February 2011.
Minorities in social and economic life discrimination and victimisation Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social.
“MONITORING, EVALUATING AND REPORTING ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI- TRAFFICKING LEGISLATION AND POLICIES.“ MAY 23-24, 2013 Ms. ANTOANETA VASSILEVA, BULGARIA.
THE EUROPEAN FUND FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THIRD COUNTRY NATIONALS European Commission - DG HOME Nadège Monnot 28 October 2010.
EU responses to hate crimes and support to the victims Linda Maria Ravo DG Justice – European Commission Unit C1.
Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) Open Briefing to Member States 27 July 2010 Conference Room 2 NLB.
Workshop 24 Input by ILGA-Europe (policy and coalition opportunities) Joël Le Déroff – Senior Policy & Programmes Officer – 19 October.
The PROGRESS program Luk Zelderloo EASPD Project Development Workshop Sofia, Bulgaria.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON POLICING RACIST CRIME AND VIOLENCE Dr Robin Oakley Independent Consultant.
1 11 Combatting Trafficking in Persons (CTiP) Regional Support Office – The Bali Process 27 September 2013.
Tackling homophobic and transphobic hate crimes: how case and data collection can support campaigning and advocacy work Veronica Scognamiglio, Amnesty.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP JUSTICE
VICTIMS’ RIGHTS New EU Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime 20 September 2012 CABVIS Conference.
Best practices in combating hate crime on the ground osce.org/odihr.
Disability Rights Promotion International: A Holistic monitoring methodology for evidence-based data collection on human rights violations Radoš Keravica.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
Monitoring the Implementation of New Domestic Violence Laws By Mirjana Dokmanovic, Serbia Regional Conference on Domestic Violence Legal Reform Sofia,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Senior Regulators’ Meeting 2013 Radiation Safety Infrastructure in Non- Nuclear Countries Pil Soo Hahn Director.
Serving our communities, protecting them from harm West Midlands Police Hate Crime.
Cje Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of Wrocław Lecture Harmonisation.
EU measures combating hate speech ERIO Conference on combating hate speech against Roma and the role of Equality bodies Brussels 16/10/2015 DG JUSTICE.
Hate Crime – What is it? Seamus Carroll Senior Community Officer Derbyshire County Council Updated June 2015.
1 LGBT hate crime and fundamental rights in the European Union Joining forces to combat homophobic and transphobic violence A conference on law enforcement.
Delegation of the European Commission to Turkey Delegation of the European Commission to Turkey Brussels, 4 May 2009 EU Action for Human Rights in a Candidate.
POLICING RACIST VIOLENCE AND CRIME IN THE EU Sofia - CSD September 2006 Dr. Jo Goodey Programme Manager – Research EUMC.
Hate crime and hate speech: protection in place at EU level Joël Le Déroff – Senior Policy & Programmes Officer – 18 June 2013.
The fundamental rights of LGBT citizens in Europe – EU legislation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Promoting Equality and Non-Discrimination for Persons with Disabilities ____________________________________________ Report written by Professor Lisa.
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
Priorities and coordination of capacity building in Azerbaijan
Normative content of the right to freedom from
EU policy on combating hate speech online
Hard Data: Data Collection Mechanisms on Human Trafficking in the Baltic Sea Region Expert Conference on Forced Labour Exploitation and Counter.
Croatian experience: from ‘no disability hate crime’ to a policy measure Branka Meić Salie Office of the ombudswoman for persons with disabilities.
African Centre for Statistics
Monitoring social and economic rights
How does the UK Government promote Community Cohesion?
Implementation of the Strategic engagement for gender equality
The role of the EUMC and EU policies
SDG Global Indicator Framework
Managing the migration crisis How statistics can help
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights Update on activities Eurostat – March 2016 Dr. Joanna Goodey Head of Freedoms & Justice Department.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
FRA survey data collection
  The Second Consultative Meeting on Strengthening Partnerships with National Rapporteurs on Trafficking in Persons and Equivalent Mechanisms Wednesday.
Providing Technical assistance on data collection on organized crime
Scanning the environment: The global perspective on the integration of non-traditional data sources, administrative data and geospatial information Sub-regional.
Combatting Trafficking in Persons (CTiP)
Providing Technical assistance on data collection on organized crime
Objective of the workshop
“MONITORING, EVALUATING AND REPORTING ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-TRAFFICKING LEGISLATION AND POLICIES.“ MAY 23-24, Ms. ANTOANETA.
United Nations Statistics Division
European Standards for Equality Bodies An Equinet journey
Marleen De Smedt Geoffrey Thomas Cynthia Tavares
Fostering Cooperation between National Rapporteurs and Equivalent Mechanisms and Cooperation with International and Regional Organizations Consultative.
Lessons learned during the Country Analytical Report preparation
Session 5. Effective M&E systems for the SDGs
Framework Decision on combating racism and xenophobia
7th Environment Action Programme to 2020 Living well, within the limits of our planet Evaluation - COM (2019) May 2019.
Inclusion of Muslim communities and prevention of discrimination in cities E U R O C I T I E S W O R K I N G G R O U P M I G R A T I O N & I N T.
International Standards for Compilation of Statistics: The Gap between Standards Adoption and Standards Implementation Katherine K. Wallman Chief Statistician.
National action plans to combat forced labour and trafficking:
Objective of the workshop
Inclusion of Muslim communities and prevention of discrimination in cities E U R O C I T I E S W O R K I N G G R O U P M I G R A T I O N & I N T.
UNODC and CYBERCRIME October 2009.
SDG Indicators Framework: Tool for Implementing the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action Nicolas Fasel, OHCHR 6th Session of the Group of Independent.
Presentation transcript:

Hate crime statistics: gaps, progress and challenges ahead DG JUSTICE and CONSUMERS Unit C.2: Fundamental Rights Policy

Introduction People across the EU continue to be targeted by hate crimes – i.e. illegal hate speech or other criminal offences motivated by hatred on grounds of the victim's personal characteristics, be it their race, religion, national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation or gender identity, their disability, social status, or other characteristics.

The EU addresses hate crimes by: monitoring relevant EU legislation providing for common minimum standards to combat hate crime and rules on the support and protection of victims a variety of EU policy measures to improve responses of national authorities and other actors on the ground, including expert discussions and funding

Legal framework Minimum standards on racist hate crime and penalties: Framework Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (2008) Minimum standards on rights, support and protection of victims of crime (including specific attention to hate crime victims, and a specific provision on statistics): Victims' Rights Directive (2012)

Policy framework Building on the existing legal framework, a broad range of measures support national authorities in stepping up efforts to prevent and counter more effectively the spread of intolerance and hatred, better enforce hate crime laws and provide victims with the necessary support and assistance. Improving the monitoring of trends and responses at national and EU level is key to support these efforts.

The Commission set up in 2016 a EU High Level Group on combating racism, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance, which: Gathers regularly Member States, international organizations, civil society, EU agencies Fosters discussions on gaps, challenges and responses, promotes best practice exchange, develops guidance. The follow up/implementation of this work is supported by targeted financial support.

In this context, thematic work is carried out on improving national methodologies on recording and collecting data on hate crimes. This is done through a sub-group on recording and data collection methodologies led by the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). The sub-group was established in 2016 with an initial mandate of two years.

Why is progress on hate crime data collection needed? Research shows that persistent gaps exist in the collection of data on the incidence of hate crimes in EU MS. This includes the collection of data on hate speech including online hate speech. COM already stressed the importance of reliable, comparable and systematically collected hate crime data as a means to contribute ensuring effective implementation of existing EU legislation on the ground, in its report on the Framework Decision on racism adopted in 2014.

Hate crime statistics should ideally provide accurate information on: 1) recorded hate crimes, to assess the extent of the phenomenon (this could also be complemented by experience-based surveys); 2) levels of prosecution and sentencing, to monitor criminal justice responses; 3) the way hate crime victims accessed their rights to monitor support and protection to victims. Data should, as far as possible, be disaggregated by type of offence and bias motivation.

Relevant progress achieved so far The FRA-led sub-group on recording and data collection methodologies started its work focusing on ways to improve the recording of hate crime by law enforcement officers, i.e. the way police systematically identifies and records crimes reported by victims as hate crimes. This work has been carried out with national experts from Justice and Interior Ministries/law enforcement agencies.

The sub-group compiled key guiding principles on hate crime recording, including operational principles, which are now being tested and implemented through country workshops. This should lead to an improvement in the recording of hate crimes by law enforcement authorities in a number of Member States (i.e. more data recorded). The sub-group will also compile this year a report on “Practices on recording and collecting data on hate crime in the EU”, which will provide an overview of practices for all 28 MS.

Challenges ahead In the coming years, the progress achieved should be built upon and followed up by efforts to improve the way recorded data can be turned into hate crime statistics (> to assess the extent of the phenomenon). Ways to collect data on prosecution and sentencing (> to monitor criminal justice responses) and on the way hate crime victims accessed their rights (> to monitor support and protection to victims) could also be explored.

Focus should be put on improving methodologies at national level, also building on existing practices in some MSs, in order to improve, in the long run, the comparability of data at EU level. Main challenges are likely to relate to: - real or perceived barriers to disaggregation of data; - difference in how hate crimes are defined in national law (for the purpose of comparability); - coordination between statistics services, law enforcement and judicial authorities.

Way forward?