T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Advertisements

Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
Near detectors for long baseline neutrino experiments T. Nakaya (Kyoto) 1T. Nakaya.
Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%)
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
F Axis Off Axis Physics Potential Cambridge Off-Axis Meeting 12 January 2004 Gary Feldman.
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林 貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
Background Understanding and Suppression in Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments with Water Cherenkov Detector Chiaki Yanagisawa Stony Brook.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
LBL neutrinos; looking forward to the future Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
Fermilab, May, 2003 Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U. Tokyo ・ Introduction ・ JHF-Kamioka neutrino project -overview- ・ Physics in phase-I ・ Phase-II ・ Summary Outline.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
1 The JHF-Kamioka Neutrino experiment 1.Introduction 2.Overview of the experiment 3.Physics sensitivity in Phase-I 4.Physics sensitivity in Phase-II 5.Summary.
Long Baseline Neutrino Beams and Large Detectors Nicholas P. Samios Istanbul, Turkey October 27, 2008.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Extrapolation Neutrino Flux measured at Near Detector to the Far Detector Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler, Andrew Laing.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Getting the most in neutrino oscillation experiments Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
The earth matter effect in T2KK Based on work with K. Hagiwara, N. Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies &KEK.
Water Cherenkov detector - brief status report - Kenji Kaneyuki Research Center for Cosmic Neutrinos, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo.
1 Study of physics impacts of putting a far detector in Korea with GLoBES - work in progress - Eun-Ju Jeon Seoul National University Nov. 18, 2005 International.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
T2K neutrino oscillation results Kei Ieki for the T2K collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute 2014/2/22 1 ν T okai K amioka.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Proposal for the 2 nd Hyper-K detector in Korea Sunny Seo Seoul National University Mark Hartz (IPMU), Yoshinari Hayato (ICRR), Masaki Ishitsuka (TIT),
Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.
T2K : New physics results
IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg
CP violation and mass hierarchy at medium baselines in the large 13 era A large value of 13 is a major opportunity for precision neutrino physics: what.
LBL Oscillation H. Minakata (Tokyo Metropolitan U.)
Neutrino Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
Prospects of J-PARC Neutrino Program
Report of the T2KK Workshop
High g Li/B b-Beam Enrique Fernández-Martínez, MPI für Physik Munich
Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?)
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
T2KK (without reactor) solves 8-fold degeneracy
Fine-Grained Near Detector(s) at JHF: Purpose and Thoughts
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Determination of Neutrino Mass Hierarchy at an Intermediate Baseline
Atmospheric n’s in a large LAr Detector
Conventional Neutrino Beam Experiment : JHF – Super-Kamiokande
Will T2KK see new physics?
Presentation transcript:

T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2 Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR Univ. of Tokyo) 2nd International Workshop on a Far detector in Korea for the J-Parc Neutrino Beam

Introduction Merit of Korea detector: larger CP phase effect by a factor of 3 large energy dependence of P(nmne) vs P(nmne) Distance from the target (km) SK/HK 295km Korea ~1000km JPARC 2.5deg.off-axis beam @Kamioka K. Hagiwara Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 137 84 (2004) Off-axis angle

Expected physics for T2KK Ishitsuka et al. PRD72 033003 (2005) Mass hierarchy CP violation 4MW 2.5deg OA beam 4yr for n Kamioka only 0.54Mton Kam+Korea 0.27+0.27Mton Mass hierarchy can be determined for sin22q13>0.055 (3s) for any d Sensitivity for CP violation is kept or enhanced for sin22q13>~0.01

T2KK sensitivity study We have investigated optimized conditions for mass hierarchy and CP violation sensitivities: Previous studies: detector mass ratio of Kamioka and Korea detectors  1:1 neutrino & anti-neutrino running time  4yr + 4yr uncertainties due to matter density, detector systematic error, sin2q23 Updates for this conference: baseline length (L) uncertainty due to Dm232  beam off-axis angle  this talk  Fanny’s talk

Improvement of analysis method      Analysis method is based on that used in previous analysis, but some improvements has been added: detector energy response (Eture  Erecon) using matrix method flux spectrum shape for Korea detector energy-dependence in ne CC non-QE interaction

Calculation of P(nmne) signal spectrum CC QE CC non-QE f(En) : neutrino beam spectrum s(En) : cross section e(En) : event selection efficiency S(En, Enrecon) : detector response function Analytical calculation is adopted with consideration of selection efficiency and energy response of SK

Energy response function ne CCQE ne CCnQE Reconstructed Neutrino Energy True neutrino Energy (GeV) True neutrino Energy (GeV) Energy response of detector is precisely introduced using matrix method for CCQE and CC non-QE respectively

Procedure of making signal spectrum nm  ne oscillation probability X efficiency X neutrino flux X cross section event spectrum w/o smearing detector response CC QE event spectrum w/ smearing CC non-QE binning analysis histogram

c2 calculation nm CC and NC background events are considered five energy binning for spectral analysis 400-500, 500-600, 600-700, 800-900, 900-1200MeV systematic error 5% signal&BG normalization, 5% energy spectrum

Sensitivity as a function of baseline length Tested points: L = 1000~1250 km 50km interval 6 points beam off-axis angle is fixed to 2.5 degree for both Kamioka and Korea Dm122=8.0x10-5eV2 Dm232=2.5x10-3eV2 sin2q12=0.31 sin2q23=0.5 4MW, 4yr for n + 4yr for n 0.27 + 0.27 Mton fiducal

baseline dependence of mass hierarchy and CP violation 3s contour mass hierarchy CP violation Preliminary normal true:normal Kamioka only Inverted true:inverted baseline length dependence of mass hierarchy is small for large fraction of d

baseline dependence of mass hierarchy and CP violation mass hierarchy Preliminary Inverted normal mass hierarchy normal Inverted CP violation

2.5deg OA beam neutrino run normal hierarchy spectrum @ Korea 4MW 4year 0.27Mton 2.5deg OA beam neutrino run normal hierarchy sin22q13=0.02 d=0 sin22q13=0.02 d=p Oscillation Probability signal spectrum (w/o detector response) signal spectrum (w/ detector response) Neutrino energy (MeV) Neutrino energy (MeV)

Sensitivity as a function of Dm2 Tested points: 6 points in 2.0~3.0 10-3 eV2 3.010-3 eV2 2.010-3 eV2

Dm2 dependence of mass hierarchy and CP violation Preliminary mass hierarchy CP violation 3s contour normal normal Inverted Inverted

CP violation: little dependence Dm2 dependence of mass and CP violation sensitivity normal Inverted mass hierarchy: sensitivity at Dm2=2.010-3eV2 is best. difference is within factor of 3 CP violation: little dependence normal Inverted Preliminary

2.5deg OA beam neutrino run Dm232=2.5x10-3eV2 sin22q13=0.02 d=p Korea 4MW 4year 0.27Mton 2.5deg OA beam neutrino run Dm232=2.5x10-3eV2 sin22q13=0.02 d=p Oscillation Probability signal spectrum (w/o detector response) signal spectrum (w/ detector response) Neutrino energy (MeV)

Summary Mass hierarchy and CP violation sensitivities in T2KK were investigated as a function of baseline length and Dm2 parameter Dependence in baseline length is small for math hierarchy sensitivity for large fraction of d. Difference of sensitivity due to Dm2 is within factor of 3 for 2.0~3.010-3 eV2. For CP violation sensitivity, there is little dependence of Dm2 and baseline length.