Open public consultation on the FEAD FEAD Evaluation Partnership Meeting 28 April 2017 Jiri POLASEK Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion

Content Timing Responses What next…

Timing Launched 06 February 2017 Open until 05 May 2017 Report mid 2017

Partner organisations Responses – by country and role   TOTAL No role Partner organisations MA/IB/CA Similar Non FEAD Advocacy groups End-recipient Austria 4 1 2 Belgium 20 11 3 Bulgaria Croatia 5 Czech Republic Cyprus Denmark Estonia Finland France 101 25 68 Germany 200 8 65 33 40 49 Greece 17 7 Hungary Ireland 15 6 Italy 23 Latvia 56 Lithuania 13 Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovak Republic Spain Sweden 10 UK Other Total 513 80 189 71 69 81

Responses – Relative distribution by type of FEAD assistance the respondent is involved in

Responses – Knowledge of FEAD   Role in FEAD Doesn’t know FEAD Detailed knowledge General knowledge Total Individuals receiving support FEAD (n=19) 11% 26% 63% 100% Individuals receiving support not FEAD (n=4) 50% 25% Org representing most deprived (n=81) 5% 32% No role (n=80) 24% 13% 64% FEAD MA/IB (n=54) 0% 69% 31% C&A authorities (n=7) PO delivering FEAD support to individuals (n=189) 1% 74% Other organisation involved in FEAD (n=11) 36% Org engaged with most deprived, no FEAD (n=68) 4% 19% 76% 6.0% 29.4% 64.5%

Responses – Qualitative Do you think FEAD support is useful to:   Agree Disagree No opinion Alleviate food deprivation 84% 7% 9% Alleviate severe material deprivation 69% 14% 17% Contribute to social inclusion of the most deprived persons 80% 12%

What next… Promote Mainly in countries with low response rate Focus on PO Response on behalf of MA is needed Link to OPC: https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/FEADmid- term

Thank you