Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journées Instrumentation du GDR Nucléon 8-9 Avril 2008, CEA Saclay Polarized Positrons at the Jefferson Laboratory (i) Physics motivations (ii) Principe.
Advertisements

Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
5 MeV Mott Measurement for CEBAF Operations group Joe Grames, Marcy Stutzman February 14 th, 2007 Sir Nevill F. Mott at the ceremony with his Nobel Prize.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
K. LaihemE166 collaboration LCWS06 Bangalore March 12th 2006 The E166 experiment Development of a polarized positron source for the ILC. Karim Laihem on.
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) K.T. McDonald, J.C. Sheppard, Co-Spokespersons SLAC Experimental Program Advisory.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
CEBAF Polarized Electron Source: Outlook & Horizon Operations Group Meeting May 13 th & 20 th, 2009 Joe Grames M. Poelker, P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames,
AESOP: Accurate Electron Spin Optical Polarimeter Marcy L. Stutzman, Matt Poelker; Jefferson Lab Timothy J. Gay; University of Nebraska.
The Linear Collider – accelerator design A particle beam accelerator is a microscope – the resolution is inversely proportional to the energy of the beams.
PosiPol June 23-26, 2009, Lyon Polarized Electrons for Polarized Positrons JLabe + (i) Physics motivations (ii) JLab (iii) Technical challenges.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
Generation and Characterization of Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC Photogun for MEIC Cooler Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
1 st October Linear Collider workshop The CLIC/ILC common work plan progress J. Clarke and L. Rinolfi.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Strained Superlattice.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
1 The Longitudinal Polarimeter at HERA Electron Polarization at HERA Laser System & Calorimeter Statistical and Systematic Precision Laser Cavity Project.
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 1/20 ILC Polarized e- source RDR Overview A. Brachmann.
ILC/CLIC e + generation working group Jim Clarke, STFC Daresbury Laboratory and Louis Rinolfi, CERN.
The CEBAF 200kV Inverted Gun P. Adderley, M. BastaniNejad, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, J. McCarter, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman, K. Surles-Law.
Progress at BNL Vitaly Yakimenko. Polarized Positrons Source (PPS for ILC) Conventional Non- Polarized Positrons: In our proposal polarized  -ray beam.
Validation of EM Part of Geant4
Polarized Positrons at the Jefferson Laboratory Idaho State University, Idaho Accelerator Center, Jefferson Lab, LPC Clermont-Ferrand, LPSC Grenoble, Old.
Polarized Positrons at the Jefferson Laboratory Idaho State University, Idaho Accelerator Center, Jefferson Lab, LPC Clermont-Ferrand, LPSC Grenoble, Old.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Polarized Electron Footprint at JLab P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Dumas ǂ, A. Freyberger, J. Hansknecht, J. Grames, M. Poelker, K. Surles-Law, M. Stutzman,
Workshop on Precision Electron Beam Polarimetry for the Electron Ion Collider, University of Michigan, Aug 23-24, 2007 An EIC-like Polarized Electron Injector:
Round-to-Flat Beam Transformation and Applications Yine Sun Accelerator System Division Advanced Photon Source Argonne Nation Lab. International Workshop.
4 th Electron-Ion Collider Workshop, Hampton University, Monday May 19 th, 2008 CEBAF Load-Lock Polarized Electron Photogun Joe Grames & Matt Poelker (Jefferson.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
Page 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Linear Colliders October, 2010 A. Brachmann, J. C. Sheppard, F. Zhou SLAC SLAC October 18-22, 2010.
? Users Town MeetingNewport News, March 16, 2012 Polarized Positrons for Nuclear Physics at Jefferson Lab (i) Electromagnetic form factors (ii) Generalized.
Development of High Current Bunched Magnetized Electron DC Photogun MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 October 5 – 7, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
CEBAF Source and Injector Status PREx-II Collaboration Mtg Feb. 26, 2016 Matt Poelker and Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources.
Round-to-Flat Beam Transformation and Applications
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Precision Electron Beam Polarimetry Workshop - June , Jefferson Laboratory Accelerator Tools.
Dollan, Laihem, Lohse, Schälicke, Stahl 1 Monte Carlo based studies of polarized positrons source for the International Linear Collider (ILC)
PEPPo a Proof-of-Principle Experiment
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
LDRD Brainstorming Session
PIs: Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Test of Hybrid Target at KEKB LINAC
Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources
Polarized Electrons for Polarized Positrons
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
Progress with Spin Tracking in GEANT4
G0 Backward Angle Accelerator Preparations
CEBAF Injector Overview
Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC High Voltage Photogun
5 MeV Mott Measurement for CEBAF Operations group
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
E166 - LEPOL - Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC
Magnetized Electron Beam for Ion Cooling at JLEIC
Electron Source Configuration
ELIC Injector Working Group High-P, high-I source issues (DC)
Production of Magnetized Electron Beam from a DC High Voltage Photogun
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker October 12, 2018
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker September 29, 2016
PIs: Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
PEPPo : Polarized Positron Production
Presentation transcript:

Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab Jonathan Dumas (JLab/LPSC), Joe Grames (JLab), Eric Voutier (LPSC) Outlook The Experiment We investigate the idea of generating polarized positrons using the CEBAF polarized electron photoinjector. - low energy (e- beam energy ≤ 8.5 MeV) - bremsstrahlung photons - low radiation level - thin LOW/HIGH power target A polarized positron source is intended for the ILC. E166 has demonstrated feasibility of a polarized positron source by pair creation: - high energy e- beam (≈50 GeV) - synchrotron photons - thin low power target Electron Beam Energy Electron Driver The goal is to measure electron momentum with precision better than 0.5%. Magnetic field map and operational range increased to 8.5 MeV to support this goal. The design goal for the electron driver is to produce a high average current (1 mA), high polarization (85%) with energy up to ~ 10 MeV electron beam. The CEBAF photoinjector provides the necessary characteristics: Electron Gun GaAs/GaAsP superlattice photocathode High QE ~1% at 780 nm (~6 mA/mW) Test surface charge limit High Polarization ~85% at 780 nm => Test polarization at high current 1.5 GHz fiber laser (500 mW @ 780 nm) Test new 1.5GHz rf control module 100kV DC Load Lock Electron Gun demonstrated lifetime >250 C at 1 mA (J. Grames et al., in Proc. of the 2007 Particle Accelerator Conference, THPMS064, p. 3130.) => Field emission is limiting lifetime Photoinjector “G0” high bunch charge demonstrated 1.3 pC @ 31 MHz  ~2 mA at 1.5 GHz Restore G0 setup Test pulsed mode DF~0.1% Consider 200 kV gun option? Normal & SRF cavities => ~8.5 MeV Target spot size set by quadrupoles 2008: Develop simulation tools and design experiment 2009: Build and install experiment beam line, demonstrate e+ production 2010: Characterize e+ (polarization, yield, energy and angular distributions) Goal = Deliver simulation tools, experimental data, baseline design for e+ source Electron Polarimetry High precision (~1%) Mott measures electron polarization (at higher current) and calibrates positron polarimeter. Transfer polarization from e- to e+ Positron Polarimetry - Transmission Compton - Well suited for low momentum - Rapid relative monitor Successfully used, e.g., E166 (P.Schuler et al., in Proc. of the 17th international spin physics symposium, p. 1095.) In a material, e- radiate gs (Bremsstrahlung). gs (>1.022MeV) can create a e+/e- pair. Bremsstrahlung e- longitudinal g circular Pair creation g circular e+ longitudinal Polarization transfer depends on: -e- energy Ee- -g energy Eg -Target atomic number: Z -g scattering angle Polarization transfer depends on: - g energy Eg -e+ energy Ee+ -Target atomic number: Z -e+ scattering angle Electromagnetic shower : -Bremsstrahlung - Pair creation The target: a Tungsten foil Particle Distributions Particle distributions (scattering angle vs energy) after the foil for: Tungsten foil: - Thickness: 0.25 mm Electron beam: - 1 bunch (0.67 pC-1 mA at 1.5 GHz) - energy of 5 MeV - transverse size of 1 mm Polarization transfer calculation for both interactions. Olsen & Maximon, Phys. Rev. 114 (1957) Use tungsten because: High Z => greater EM shower Low power target => Low cost Thin target => better beam quality Good thermal properties => extends deposited power limit Considerations: Positron yield (foil thickness optimization) Power deposition (melting foil) Geant4 simulation: polarization distribution at the creation vertex Ee-= 5 MeV e- longitudinal = 100% Z=74 (Tungsten) g scattering angle=all Eg= 5 MeV g circular= 100% Z=74 (Tungsten) e+ scattering angle=all at the exitof the foil Electron distribution e- momentum ~ 4.7 MeV/c Scattering angle < 30o Photon distribution Large amount of photons Low energy Positron distribution Low momentum (0.5->2 MeV/c) ~58% at 2 MeV Eg= 5 MeV g circular= 100% Z=74 (Tungsten) e+ scattering angle=all Target thickness=0.25mm Ee-= 5 MeV e- longitudinal = 100% Z=74 (Tungsten) scattering angle=all Target thickness=0.25mm Ee-= 5 MeV e- longitudinal = 85% Z=74 (Tungsten) e+ scattering angle=all Target thickness=0.25mm Fig.7: Positron yield after the foil and power deposit in the target.