Where and when should one hope to find added value from dynamical downscaling of GCM data? René Laprise Director, Centre ESCER (Étude et Simulation du.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The effect of indiscriminate nudging time in regional climate modeling of the Mediterranean basin Tamara Salameh, Philippe Drobinski, Thomas Dubos and.
Advertisements

Some questions on convection that could be addressed through another UK field program centered at Chilbolton Dan Kirshbaum 1.
Atmospheric waves from the point of view of a modeler Alexander Medvedev.
The Canadian Climate Impacts Scenarios (CCIS) Project is funded by the Climate Change Action Fund and provides climate change scenarios and related information.
The Canadian Climate Impacts Scenarios (CCIS) Project is funded by the Climate Change Action Fund and provides climate change scenarios and related information.
Coastal Downscaling: Can CESM fields successfully force regional coastal ocean simulations with strong freshwater forcing? (YES) Parker MacCready (U. of.
Implementation of lakes in the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM): towards CRCM 5 Andrey Martynov, Rene Laprise, Laxmi Sushama University of Quebec.
An Evaluation of the Surface Radiation Budget Over North America for a Suite of Regional Climate Models Student: Marko Markovic Director: Colin Jones Université.
CONSORTIUM SUR LA CLIMATOLOGIE RÉGIONALE ET L’ADAPTATION AUX CHANGEMENTS CLIMATIQUES ET L’ADAPTATION AUX CHANGEMENTS CLIMATIQUES 2m Temperature interannual.
Fog Forecasting at Roissy Airport (Paris) with 1D model Thierry Bergot and Joël Noilhan Météo-France 1) Methodology Cobel : 1D model of boundary layer.
A comparison of North Atlantic storms in HiGEM, HadGEM and ERA-40 Jennifer Catto – University of Reading Supervisors: Len Shaffrey Warwick Norton Acknowledgement:
Hans von Storch, Frauke Feser, Ralf Weisse and Matthias Zahn Institute for Coastal Research, GKSS Research Center, Germany and KlimaCampus, U of Hamburg,
Delayed onset of the South American Monsoon during the Last Glacial Maximum Kerry H. Cook and Edward K. Vizy, Cornell University I. INTRODUCTION Climate.
WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management Akm Saiful Islam Lecture-4: Module- 3 Regional Climate.
WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Based in part on … Some Scale Considerations for Predicting/Projecting Extreme Precipitation William.
Factors that drive atmospheric processes
Current and planned Project with the Regional Climate Model Regional climate simulations over southern South America and sensitivity experiments Silvina.
Simulations of Floods and Droughts in the Western U.S. Under Climate Change L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory US CLIVAR/NCAR ASP Researcher.
IPRC Lunch Time Seminar, 12. March 2002 Hans von Storch Inst. Coastal Research GKSS Research Center Geesthacht Germany Issues in regional atmospheric modelling:
Added Value Generated by Regional Climate Models H. von Storch, F. Feser Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Germany 29 May 1.
The case of polar lows Hans von Storch 13 and Matthias Zahn 2 1. Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Germany. 2. Environmental.
RCM sensitivity to domain size in summer and winter With the collaboration of: Jean-Philippe Morin (simulations) and Mathieu Moretti (diagnostics) By Martin.
Köppen, Hadley and Dethloff Zwei Seiten einer Medaille: Vom Globalen und vom Regionalen.
Workshop on Theory and Use of Regional Climate Models, ICTP, Trieste, 26 May - 6 June ARIAL PROGRAMME ON REGIONAL CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CHANGE.
10th International Congress of the Hellenic Geographical Society, Thessaloniki 23 October 2014 A high resolution regional climate simulation for Greece.
Key Questions to Answer on Storm Simulation Xiangdong Zhang International Arctic Research Center University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA.
Dynamical Downscaling Developing a Model Framework for WRF for Future GCM Downscaling Jared H. Bowden Tanya L. Otte June 25, th Annual Meteorological.
Dynamical Downscaling: Assessment of model system dependent retained and added variability for two different regional climate models Christopher L. Castro.
Regional Climate Models Add Value to Global Model Data H. von Storch, F. Feser, B. Rockel, R. Weisse Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht,
June, 2003EUMETSAT GRAS SAF 2nd User Workshop. 2 The EPS/METOP Satellite.
NERC Centre for Global Atmospheric Modelling Department of Meteorology, University of Reading The role of the land surface in the climate and variability.
Preliminary Results of Global Climate Simulations With a High- Resolution Atmospheric Model P. B. Duffy, B. Govindasamy, J. Milovich, K. Taylor, S. Thompson,
CIRCE project RL5 WP1 Task 1 TAU group Prof. Pinhas Alpert Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel-Aviv University,
Sara Vieira Committee members: Dr. Peter Webster
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS J28 Earth Science for National Action on Climate Change Canada Water Accounts AET estimates for.
June 16th, 2009 Christian Pagé, CERFACS Laurent Terray, CERFACS - URA 1875 Julien Boé, U California Christophe Cassou, CERFACS - URA 1875 Weather typing.
West African Monsoon Modeling and Evaluation (WAMME) Project Yongkang Xue, Bill Lau, Kerry Cook With contributions from many collaborators C20C Workshop.
Tropical Domain Results Downscaling Ability of the NCEP Regional Spectral Model v.97: The Big Brother Experiment Conclusions: Motivation: The Big Brother.
Dynamical downscaling of future climates Steve Hostetler, USGS Jay Alder, OSU/USGS Andrea Schuetz, USGS/OSU Environmental Computing Center, COAS/OSU.
Part I: Representation of the Effects of Sub- grid Scale Topography and Landuse on the Simulation of Surface Climate and Hydrology Part II: The Effects.
1) What is the variability in eddy currents and the resulting impact on global climate and weather? Resolving meso-scale and sub- meso-scale ocean dynamics.
The role of Mediterranean mesoscale eddies on the climate of the Euro-Mediterranean region by A. Bellucci 1, S. Gualdi 1,2, E. Scoccimarro 2, A. Sanna.
Possible North Atlantic extratropical cyclone activity in a warmer climate Lanli Guo William Perrie Zhenxia Long Montreal 2012 Bedford Institute of Oceanography,
Data and Methods Introduction Northern hemisphere winter mid-latitude atmospheric variability in CMIP5 models Atmospheric variability with NH mid-latitudes.
LASG/IAP Collaboration between CLIVAR/AAMP and GEWEX/MAHASRI A proposal to foster interaction l Coordinated GCM/RCM Process study on Monsoon ISO l Multi-RCM.
© Crown copyright Met Office Downscaling ability of the HadRM3P model over North America Wilfran Moufouma-Okia and Richard Jones.
Institut für Küstenforschung I f K Numerical experimentation with regional atmospheric models Hans von Storch and Ralf Weisse 8IMSC, Lüneburg, 15. March.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and the Department.
Large-Scale Control in Arctic Modelling – A suggestion for a Reconstruction of the Recent Past Hans von Storch Institute for Coastal Research GKSS Research.
Arctic climate simulations by coupled models - an overview - Annette Rinke and Klaus Dethloff Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Does nudging squelch the extremes in regional climate modeling?
Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment:
Global Circulation Models
9th Annual Meteorological Users’ Meeting
Overview of Downscaling
Dynamical downscaling of ERA-40 with WRF in complex terrain in Norway – comparison with ENSEMBLES U. Heikkilä, A. D. Sandvik and A.
Climate Change Results National Center for Atmospheric Research
Mesoscale “Surprises” in Complex Terrain Revealed by Regional Climate Simulations Cliff Mass, Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results
The Water Cycle Daily Starter Get Your Textbook (Open to Page 23-25)
On HRM3 (a.k.a. HadRM3P, a.k.a. PRECIS) North American simulations
Leo Separovic, Ramón de Elía, René Laprise and Adelina Alexandru
Application of the ensemble technique to CRCM simulations
Hydrologic response of Pacific Northwest Rivers to climate change
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
Climate Change and Projection for Asia
Influence of large-scale nudging on RCM’s internal variability
CHAPTER 3 LESSON 2 SYSTEM INTERACTIONS.
Orographic Influences on Rainfall Associated with Tropical Cyclone
Presentation transcript:

Where and when should one hope to find added value from dynamical downscaling of GCM data? René Laprise Director, Centre ESCER (Étude et Simulation du Climat à lÉchelle Régionale) Professor, UQAM (Université du Québec à Montréal) WCRP Regional Climate Workshop: Facilitating the production of climate information and its use in impact and adaptation work Lille (France), June 2010

Potential added value of RCM A resolution increase by about 10x… – CGCM coarse mesh: T30 (6 o, 675 km) – T90 (2 o, 225 km) – RCM fine mesh: 60 km – 10 km Higher resolution allows to… – Resolve some finer scale features, processes, interactions – Reduce numerical truncation: Mesoscale Eddy resolving Vs Eddy permitting

In a T32-CGCM simulation Simulated by 45-km CRCM Instantaneous field of 900-hPa Specific Humidity, on a winter day…

700-hPa Relative Humidity (Summer) NCEP reanalyses driving 45-km CRCM

Potential added value of RCM: R e s o l u t i o n i n c r e a s e p e r m i t s t o r e s o l v e s o m e f i n e r s c a l e f e a t u r e s – Clear to the naked eye in the time evolution of RCM-simulated fields – But what about climatological (time- mean) fields?

Winter precipitation [mm/da] T32-CGCM 45km-CRCM Obs. (Willmott and Matsuura)

Mean Sea level pressure (black) and 500-hPa Geopotential (red dotted) [Summer] T32-CGCM 45km-CRCM

Potential added value of RCM: R e s o l u t i o n i n c r e a s e p e r m i t s t o r e s o l v e s o m e f i n e r s c a l e f e a t u r e s – Clear to the naked eye in the time evolution of RCM-simulated fields – But what about climatological (time-mean) fields? Yes for fields strongly affected by local, stationary forcings, such as mountains, land-sea contrast, etc. Usually not for other fields But there are exceptions…

Winter precipitation [mm/da] T32-CGCM 45km-CRCM Obs. (Willmott and Matsuura) Shadow effect downstream of the Rocky Mountains

Potential added value of RCM: R e s o l u t i o n i n c r e a s e p e r m i t s t o r e s o l v e s o m e f i n e r s c a l e f e a t u r e s – Clear to the naked eye in the time evolution of RCM- simulated fields – But what about climatological (time-mean) fields? Yes for fields strongly affected by local, stationary forcings, such as mountains, land-sea contrast, etc. Usually not for other fields But on occasion there are detectable large-scale effects resulting from fine-scale forcing: A sort of indirect effect of reduced truncation

Transient-eddy and time-mean (stationary) Kinetic Energy spectra (for January) (taken from OKane et al. 2009, Atmos-Ocean) Transient Stationary (time-mean) 5,000 km Typical scale range of RCM 2 x 100x Transient Stationary (time-mean) 100x Large scales Fine scales Spectral decay rates differ with variables: Pressure & temperature decay faster than winds; Winds decay faster than moisture Spectral decay rates differ with variables: Pressure & temperature decay faster than winds; Winds decay faster than moisture

Potential added value of RCM: R e s o l u t i o n i n c r e a s e p e r m i t s t o r e s o l v e s o m e f i n e r s c a l e f e a t u r e s – Clear to the naked eye in the time evolution of RCM- simulated fields – But what about climatological (time-mean) fields? Yes for fields strongly affected by local, stationary forcings, such as mountains, land-sea contrast, etc. Usually not for other fields: – Time-averaged (stationary-eddy) fields variance mostly contained in large-scale part of the spectrum; well resolved by coarse-mesh GCM – The small-scale part of the spectrum (added by hi- res RCM) is dominated by transient eddies (not seen in time-mean fields)

Scale separation For most atmospheric fields, the variance spectrum of time-averaged (climatological) fields is dominated by large scales:For most atmospheric fields, the variance spectrum of time-averaged (climatological) fields is dominated by large scales: –This hides the potential added value of increased resolution contained in fine scales Scale separation is a useful (sometimes necessary) tool to identify RCM potential added valueScale separation is a useful (sometimes necessary) tool to identify RCM potential added value

GCM and RCM resolved scales RCM added scales

Spatial scale decomposition Fields can be decomposed in terms of spatial scales as follows where X L are large scales (L > 800 km) X S are small scales (L < 800 km) (here using Discrete Cosine Transform)

mm/j Vertically integrated atmospheric water budget Winter Climatology (CRCM simulation) Total fields Large scales L > 800 km Small scales L < 800 km 1) Balance between P, E and Div Q 2) Climate tendency is small (note scale of 100) 1) Balance is dominated by large scales 2) Small scales play a negligible role in time-mean budget, except locally near mountains and coast lines

mm 2 /j 2 Transient-Eddy Variability Vertically integrated atmospheric water budget Winter Climatology (CRCM simulation) Total fields Large scales L > 800 km Small scales L < 800 km <- Special scale for E Time variability is equally important in small and large scales Time variability is equally important in small and large scales 1) Time variability is dominated by Div Q and water vapour tendency, followed by P. 2) Variability in E is negligible (note special scale below)

Influence of space and time scales on distributions and extremes Idealised upscaling experiment: Use CRCM data as reference Aggregate it in space (and time) as a virtual GCM Analyse the lost value with low resolution

RCM AND REANALYSIS DATA 6 RCMs from NARCCAP (North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program; Mearns, 2005; ). All RCMs are driven by NCEP-DOE reanalysis for the period NARR (North American Regional Reanalysis; Mesinger, 2005). Iowa UniversityMM5I Scripps, U. of California at San DiegoECPC/RSM Pacific North West National Lab, WAWRFP/WRF U. of California at Santa CruzRCM3/RegCM3 Hadley Center, Exeter, UKPRECIS/HADRM3 Ouranos, MontréalCRCM (version 4.2.0)

5 spatial scales: 0.375, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0° ( virtual GCM) 8 temporal scales: 3, 6, 12, 24, …, 16 days Aggregating data to different spatio-temporal resolution Time series in each grid point: Percentiles in each grid point:

RCMs Variable: 3-hrs MEAN 95th PERCENTILE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL SCALE on precipitation WARM SEASONCOLD SEASON o Potential added value measure: Virtual GCMs

WARM SEASONCOLD SEASON o Warm season rPAV larger than cold season rPAV o Some datasets indicate more/less rPAV… Influence of surface forcing: Cross-section through the continent

Conclusions The main potential added value (PAV) of high-resolution RCM is contained in the fine scalesThe main potential added value (PAV) of high-resolution RCM is contained in the fine scales –Although some large-scale effects may be felt as a result of small-scale processes affecting large scales Do not look for PAV in time-averaged, climatological quantities:Do not look for PAV in time-averaged, climatological quantities: –Except where there is strong local stationary forcing (e.g. mountains, land-sea contrast), time averaging tends to remove small scales –Scale separation is a useful, sometimes necessary, tool to identify PAV Look for PAV in variability statistics:Look for PAV in variability statistics: –Transient-eddy variability –Extremes in distributions References: Laprise, R., R. de Elía, D. Caya, S. Biner, Ph. Lucas-Picher, E. P. Diaconescu, M. Leduc, A. Alexandru and L. Separovic, 2008: Challenging some tenets of Regional Climate Modelling. Meteor. Atmos. Phys. 100 Bresson, R., and R. Laprise, 2009: Scale-decomposed atmospheric water budget over North America as simulated by the Canadian Regional Climate Model for current and future climates. Clim. Dyn Di Luca, A., R. de Elía and R. Laprise: Assessment of the potential added value in multi-RCM simulated precipitation (in preparation)

Summer precipitation [mm / da] T32-CGCM 45km-CRCM Obs. (Willmott and Matsuura)

925-hPa Specific Humidity Variance (from Denis et al. 2002, MWR)

From: Nastrom and Gage 1985, JAS

ò Data: NARR ( ) ò Temporal scale: 3 hrs INTENSITY-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS WARM SEASONCOLD SEASON o Low- and high-precipitation events are more frequent in higher resolution datasets o High-precipitation events are more sensitive to changes in the horizontal resolution

ò NARR data WARM SEASONCOLD SEASON o PAV increases with the order percentile and for short time scales o WARM season PAV is larger than COLD season PAV INFLUENCE OF TEMPORAL SCALES AND PERCENTILES

WARM SEASONCOLD SEASON Relative Potential Added Value (PAV) o PAV increases with the order percentile and for short time scales o WARM season PAV is larger than COLD season PAV ò NARR data