CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anti-CD40 and CpG induce activation of T cells in draining lymph nodes
Advertisements

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells efficiently cross-prime naive T cells in vivo after TLR activation by Juliette Mouriès, Gabriel Moron, Géraldine Schlecht,
Cheng-Ming Sun, Edith Deriaud, Claude Leclerc, Richard Lo-Man  Immunity 
SIV-specific CD8+ T cells express high levels of PD1 and cytokines but have impaired proliferative capacity in acute and chronic SIVmac251 infection by.
William H. D. Hallett, Weiqing Jing, William R. Drobyski, Bryon D
Peptide Immunization Indicates that CD8+ T Cells are the Dominant Effector Cells in Trinitrophenyl-Specific Contact Hypersensitivity  Stefan Martin, Michael.
Identification of CD3+CD4−CD8− T Cells as Potential Regulatory Cells in an Experimental Murine Model of Graft-Versus-Host Skin Disease (GVHD)  Fumi Miyagawa,
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Induction and role of regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells in tolerance to the transgene product following hepatic in vivo gene transfer by Ou Cao, Eric Dobrzynski,
Human NK cell development in NOD/SCID mice receiving grafts of cord blood CD34+ cells by Christian P. Kalberer, Uwe Siegler, and Aleksandra Wodnar-Filipowicz.
by Silke Huber, Reinhard Hoffmann, Femke Muskens, and David Voehringer
William H. D. Hallett, Weiqing Jing, William R. Drobyski, Bryon D
Following the Development of a CD4 T Cell Response In Vivo
by Norman Nausch, Ioanna E
by Daniel L. Barber, Katrin D. Mayer-Barber, Lis R. V
Macrophages from C3-deficient mice have impaired potency to stimulate alloreactive T cells by Wuding Zhou, Hetal Patel, Ke Li, Qi Peng, Marie-Bernadette.
Hans-Peter Raué, Carol Beadling, Jennifer Haun, Mark K. Slifka 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
by Éric Aubin, Réal Lemieux, and Renée Bazin
Simple conditioning with monospecific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells for bone marrow engraftment and tolerance to multiple gene products by David-Alexandre.
Antigen targeting to endosomal pathway in dendritic cell vaccination activates regulatory T cells and attenuates tumor immunity by Mikael Maksimow, Mari.
by Jamie Honeychurch, Alison L. Tutt, Thomas Valerius, Ingmar A. F. M
IL-21 inhibits T cell IL-2 production and impairs Treg homeostasis
Regulatory T cells differentially modulate the maturation and apoptosis of human CD8+ T-cell subsets by Maria Nikolova, Jean-Daniel Lelievre, Matthieu.
by Bindu Varghese, Adam Widman, James Do, Behnaz Taidi, Debra K
Vaccination regimens incorporating CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides and IL-2 generate antigen-specific antitumor immunity from T-cell populations undergoing.
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Virally infected and matured human dendritic cells activate natural killer cells via cooperative activity of plasma membrane-bound TNF and IL-15 by Lazar.
Minor Antigen Distribution Predicts Site-Specific Graft-versus-Tumor Activity of Adoptively Transferred, Minor Antigen-Specific CD8 T Cells  Jessica C.
Lymphopenia-induced spontaneous T-cell proliferation as a cofactor for autoimmune disease development by Armelle Le Campion, Marie-Claude Gagnerault, Cédric.
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ananda W Goldrath, Michael J Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
NKT Cells Inhibit the Onset of Diabetes by Impairing the Development of Pathogenic T Cells Specific for Pancreatic β Cells  Lucie Beaudoin, Véronique.
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
In Situ Activation and Expansion of Host Tregs: A New Approach to Enhance Donor Chimerism and Stable Engraftment in Major Histocompatibility Complex-Matched.
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Incorporation of the B18R Gene of Vaccinia Virus Into an Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus Improves Antitumor Activity  Xinping Fu, Armando Rivera, Lihua.
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Louise J. McHeyzer-Williams, Michael G. McHeyzer-Williams  Immunity 
CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells Induce Relapsing Colitis in Normal Mice
T Cell–Mediated Elimination of B7.2 Transgenic B Cells
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Eric A Butz, Michael J Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
CTLA-4 Regulates Induction of Anergy In Vivo
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
CD44 Regulates Survival and Memory Development in Th1 Cells
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Susan M. Kaech, Scott Hemby, Ellen Kersh, Rafi Ahmed  Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Notch 1 Signaling Regulates Peripheral T Cell Activation
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Sindbis Viral Vectors Transiently Deliver Tumor-associated Antigens to Lymph Nodes and Elicit Diversified Antitumor CD8+ T-cell Immunity  Tomer Granot,
Oncolytic Virus-initiated Protective Immunity Against Prostate Cancer
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Epicutaneous Immunization with Autoantigenic Peptides Induces T Suppressor Cells that Prevent Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis  Margaret S. Bynoe,
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Memory CD8+ T Cells Undergo Peripheral Tolerance
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
CD38 regulates tumor growth and metastasis by adenosine-mediated CD8+ T-cell suppression. CD38 regulates tumor growth and metastasis by adenosine-mediated.
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Presentation transcript:

CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells by Ainhoa Perez-Diez, Nathalie T. Joncker, Kyungho Choi, William F. N. Chan, Colin C. Anderson, Olivier Lantz, and Polly Matzinger Blood Volume 109(12):5346-5354 June 15, 2007 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology

In vitro characterization of the MataHari and Marilyn T cells and the MB49 tumor. In vitro characterization of the MataHari and Marilyn T cells and the MB49 tumor. (A) TCR, CD8, and CD4 expression of MataHari (Vβ8) and Marilyn (Vβ6) T cells. Numbers represent the percentage of transgenic cells in the mixed population of spleen and mesenteric lymph node cells used in the adoptive transfer experiments. (B) H-Y expression of the MB49 tumor. PCR using specific primers for the sequences of Dby and Uty that code for the peptide epitopes seen by Marilyn and MataHari, respectively. Spleens from female and male B6 mice were used as negative and positive controls. (C) Expression of MHC Class I (Db) and MHC Class II (Ab) by in vitro-grown MB49 tumor cells that were either untreated (−) or incubated for 2 days with 500 IU/mL of IFN-γ (+IFN-γ) or by tumor cells growing subcutaneously in a female B6 mouse, 7 days after inoculation (ex vivo). Unshaded area is staining seen with a control antibody (specific for Kd.) (D) In vitro antitumor activity. Eighteen-hour JAM test to measure killing activity of MataHari cells (left panel) or Marilyn cells (right panel) against MB49 (circles) or B16 (squares) tumor targets that had been incubated with IFN-γ as in C (filled symbols) or not (open symbols). R/T = responder to target ratio. (E) Proliferation of Marilyn CD4 cells in vitro. Proliferation of Marilyn cells either alone (asterisk) or in presence of mitomycin treated MB49 (circles), B16 (squares), male spleen (diamonds), or female spleen (triangles) as described in “Materials and methods.” The highest number of stimulators were 1.5 × 104 for the tumor cells and 5 × 105 for the splenocytes. D and E show one experiment that is representative of 3. Ainhoa Perez-Diez et al. Blood 2007;109:5346-5354 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology

Marilyn CD4 cells reject MB49 tumor in vivo better than MataHari CD8 cells. Marilyn CD4 cells reject MB49 tumor in vivo better than MataHari CD8 cells. (A) Survival of RAG.KO mice (dashed line), MataHari mice (circles) or Marilyn mice (triangles) after challenge with MB49 tumor cells. (B) Survival of RAG.KO mice that were infused one day after tumor challenge with 106 MataHari cells (circles) or 105 Marilyn cells (triangles) or no cells (dashed line). Ainhoa Perez-Diez et al. Blood 2007;109:5346-5354 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology

Both helpless and helped MataHari CD8 cells are effective killers but cannot reject the MB49 tumor. Both helpless and helped MataHari CD8 cells are effective killers but cannot reject the MB49 tumor. (A) Concanavalin A supernatant (CAS), as a source of helper factors, improves killing activity of MataHari. MataHari cells were cultured without (open circles) or with (filled circles) CAS and then tested in vitro (one representative experiment out of 3) against MB49 or B16 tumor targets (solid or dashed lines, respectively) in a 4-hour P-JAM Test (“Materials and methods”). (B) In vivo activity of “helped” MataHari cells. MataHari cells were stimulated in vitro in the presence of CAS and then adoptively transferred into RAG.KO recipients that had been challenged with MB49 tumor cells one day previously. Data are from 2 pooled experiments, of which one is the same experiment as shown in A. (C) Presence of the MB49 tumor does not inhibit the in vivo killing activity of MataHari. In vivo killing activity was measured, at day 20 or 28, in tumor-bearing RAG.KO recipient mice (closed symbols) and in non—tumor-bearing controls (open symbols) that had been infused with either CAS-MataHari cells or naive Marilyn cells at day 1 after tumor challenge. To assess the male-specific killing activity, equal numbers of CFSE-labeled male and female target splenocytes were given, and the remaining target cells in SPL (squares), inguinal and axillary TDLN (triangles) and non—tumor-draining contralateral LN (circles) analyzed 18 to 24 hours later. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments. (D and E) Analysis of MHC expression and MataHari trafficking in the tumor. MB49 tumors were collected 20 days after challenge, from untreated or CAS-MataHari treated RAG.KO (as in A) and analyzed by FACS, gating on 7-AAD− cells. (D) Presence of MataHari. Number represents the percentage of CD8 cells, found at the tumor site in one representative mouse. (E) Class I (Db) staining of tumor cells (gating on CD45.2− cells). Data in D and E are each from 2 mice representative of 10 analyzed. (F) Tumors growing in the presence of MataHari cells are not escape variants. Large tumors growing in RAG.KO mice (420 mm3), or in RAG.KO into which MataHari CD8 cells had been transferred (500 mm3), were excised when required by Animal Care and Use Committee protocols (19 days after adoptive transfer of the CD8 cells). Tumors were labeled with [3H]thymidine overnight and used as targets for previously in vitro activated MataHari cells in a 24-hour JAM Test. (G) Presence of anti-H-Y CD8 cells in normal B6 mice. Db/Uty tetramer staining in blood of a naive female B6 mouse (left panel) and of a moribund tumor-bearing female B6 mouse (right panel). Numbers represent the percentage of CD8 cells that bind to the tetramers. Two mice representative of 16. Ainhoa Perez-Diez et al. Blood 2007;109:5346-5354 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology

Role of MHC Class II on tumor cells. Role of MHC Class II on tumor cells. (A) shRNA-mediated down-regulation of MHC class II expression by MB49. Three RAG.KO mice per group were challenged (day 0) with each of the tumor cell lines, MB49mock, MB49-LacZ(i), and MB49-Ab(i). On day 5, they received 8 × 105 Marilyn cells to induce the up-regulation of class II molecules and on day 13 the tumors were taken for analysis (gating on the CD45.2− and 7-AAD− population to exclude immigrating immune cells and dead cells). Histograms represent class II (Ab) staining of the tumor cells from one mouse from each group. Empty line is the isotype control. Bar graph represents the averages of the mean fluorescence of the 3 mice per group (gray area) compared with that of the isotype controls (white). (B) Marilyn cells reject tumors with knocked-down Ab: RAG.KO mice were challenged with either 105 MB49 mock cells (no symbol), or MB49-∅ (circles), MB49-LacZ(i) (squares), or MB49-Ab(i) (diamonds) cells. One day later, half of the mice in each group received 106 Marilyn cells (closed symbols). The average tumor size (10-20 mice total per group), from 3 individual experiments is shown. (C) Marilyn mice reject tumors that do not express Ab. Percentage of tumor free RAG.KO (broken line), MataHari (circles), or Marilyn (triangles) mice after challenge with 5 × 106 βTC-tet (H-2k) pancreatic tumor cells. Data were pooled from 2 experiments. Ainhoa Perez-Diez et al. Blood 2007;109:5346-5354 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology

H-Y antigen is cross-presented in vivo to both MataHari and Marilyn T cells. H-Y antigen is cross-presented in vivo to both MataHari and Marilyn T cells. CFSE dilution of MataHari (A) or Marilyn (B) T cells 4 days after transfer into either H-2bRAG.KO tumor free (top panels) or H-2k-tumor bearing (bottom panels) mice. Histograms are gated on TCRαβ and CD8 or CD4, for MataHari or Marilyn, respectively. Cells are from the inguinal and axillary lymph nodes (the tumor-draining lymph nodes in the tumor-bearing mice). Numbers represent the percentage of TCR transgenic cells that divided more than 6 times. Ainhoa Perez-Diez et al. Blood 2007;109:5346-5354 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology

Role of host MHC class II, and of host NK cells, in CD4-mediated tumor rejection. Role of host MHC class II, and of host NK cells, in CD4-mediated tumor rejection. (A) Role of host MHC class II. RAG.KO (H-2b) mice (squares) and CD3KO/γcKO H-2b (circles) or H-2k (triangles) mice were challenged with MB49 cells. Approximately half of the mice per group were either untreated (left panel) or received 106 Marilyn cells 1 day later (right panel). To overcome the need for class II (Ab) for initiating and maintaining CD4 T-cell activation, mice receiving Marilyn cells were immunized with male splenocytes at days 2, 5, 7, 9, 13, and 17 after tumor challenge. The average tumor size (6-12 mice per group) from a total of 3 individual experiments is shown. (B) Role of NK cells. Percentage of RAG.KO/γcKO recipient mice (left panel) or RAG.KO mice (right panel) alive after receiving MB49 challenge and left untreated (broken line) or treated with 106 Marilyn cells (triangles). Some of the RAG.KO mice received Marilyn cells that had been depleted of NK cells (to deplete donor NK cells only [closed diamonds]), Marilyn cells plus either anti-NK monoclonal antibodies (to deplete both host and donor NK cells [closed circles]), or control antibodies (open circles) as described in “Materials and methods.” Data pooled from 3 independent experiments. (C) NK cells are present in the tumor. MB49 tumors were collected from Marilyn-treated RAG.KO mice 49 days after challenge and analyzed for the presence of various cell populations by FACS, gating on living 7-AAD− cells. Numbers represent the percentage of CD4 or NK cells within the CD45− population found at the tumor site. For comparison, tumors growing in untreated RAG.KO mice were stained for NK in the same way cells, 28 days after tumor challenge. Data are representative of 1 of 2 mice. Ainhoa Perez-Diez et al. Blood 2007;109:5346-5354 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology

CD4 antitumor effect is generalizable. CD4 antitumor effect is generalizable. (A) Rachel, another anti-H-Y CD4 TCR Tg mouse, also rejects MB49. Percentage of RAG.KO mice alive after being challenged with MB49 tumor cells and receiving, 1 day later, either nothing (broken lines), 106 Marilyn cells (triangles), or 106 Rachel cells (an anti-H-Y CD4 transgenic mouse with a different TCR from that of Marilyn). Data from 3 pooled experiments. (B and C) Marilyn's superiority to MataHari is seen with other tumors: percentage of RAG.KO (broken line), MataHari (circles), or Marilyn (triangles) mice that survived challenge with either (B) H-2b carcinomas: 3 × 105 of WR21 (left panel, a salivary gland carcinoma), 3 × 106 of TRAMP-C2 (right panel, prostate carcinoma), or (C) H-2k endotheliomas: IP2-E4 (left panel), 3B-11 (middle panel), or H-Y–negative 2F-2B (right panel), 2 × 105 of each. Ainhoa Perez-Diez et al. Blood 2007;109:5346-5354 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology