Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure S1 A MRC5 Control Chk1 TdR(h): γH2AX Cleaved casp3 RPA34
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2014)
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Anthony J. Cesare, Makoto T. Hayashi, Laure Crabbe, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Supplemental Figure 1 Li Fraumeni (087) 5C tankyrase1 actin Mock
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes,
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Decreased Growth Inhibitory Responses of Squamous Carcinoma Cells to Interferon-γ Involve Failure to Recruit cki Proteins into cdk2 Complexes  Beth L.
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
The Tumor Suppressor MIG6 Controls Mitotic Progression and the G2/M DNA Damage Checkpoint by Stabilizing the WEE1 Kinase  Mari Sasaki, Takeshi Terabayashi,
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Oncogenic Ras-Induced Expression of Noxa and Beclin-1 Promotes Autophagic Cell Death and Limits Clonogenic Survival  Mohamed Elgendy, Clare Sheridan,
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
New Histone Incorporation Marks Sites of UV Repair in Human Cells
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (January 1998)
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
DNA Damage Foci at Dysfunctional Telomeres
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Lindsey A. Allan, Paul R. Clarke  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 18, Pages (September 2014)
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages (October 2006)
Prolonged Rapamycin Treatment Inhibits mTORC2 Assembly and Akt/PKB
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (October 2009)
SYCE2 potentiates the steady-state ATM activity.
SIRT1 Regulates the Function of the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Protein
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Ultraviolet-B-Induced G1 Arrest is Mediated by Downregulation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 in Transformed Keratinocytes Lacking Functional p53  Arianna.
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 327-339 (August 2009) Cdk1 Participates in BRCA1-Dependent S Phase Checkpoint Control in Response to DNA Damage  Neil Johnson, Dongpo Cai, Richard D. Kennedy, Shailja Pathania, Mansi Arora, Yu-Chen Li, Alan D. D'Andrea, Jeffrey D. Parvin, Geoffrey I. Shapiro  Molecular Cell  Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 327-339 (August 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.036 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cdk1 Depletion Impairs S Phase Checkpoint Activation after DNA Damage (A) NCI-H1299 cells expressing shRNA targeting cdk1 were treated in the absence or presence of doxycycline prior to cisplatin (5 μg/ml) for the indicated times, fixed, and stained with propidium iodide. (B) Cells were grown as in (A), prior to IR (10 Gy). (Left) BrdU incorporation was measured 4 hr post-IR; the percent BrdU-positive cells is indicated for each condition. (Right) Percent of cells with S phase DNA content (determined by propidium iodide staining) that are BrdU positive or negative. (C) Cells were grown as in (A) and treated with cisplatin for 72 hr prior to collection for assessment of phosphohistone H3 staining by flow cytometry. (Left) Representative flow cytometry panels for cells treated with anti-FITC-conjugated phosphohistone H3 and counterstained with propidium iodide. (Right) Mean percent of phosphohistone H3-positive cells ± standard error (SE) over three experiments. (D) NCI-H1299 were treated as in (C) and subjected to a flow cytometry-based TUNEL assay. (Left) Representative flow cytometry panels for cells incorporating fluoresceinated dUTP in the presence of TdT, counterstained with propidium iodide. (Right) Mean percent of TUNEL-positive cells in G1, S, and G2/M ± SE over three experiments. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 327-339DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.036) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 After DNA Damage in Cdk1-Depleted Cells, Cdk2 Remains Active, and Phosphorylation of a Subset of ATR/ATM Substrates Is Compromised (A) NCI-H1299 cells inducibly expressing shRNA targeting cdk2 or cdk1 were grown with or without doxycycline and treated with 0, 2, or 5 μg/ml cisplatin for 24 hr prior to the preparation of lysates analyzed by western blotting. (B) (Left) Cells inducibly expressing shRNA targeting cdk1 were grown as in (A) and treated with vehicle or cisplatin. Lysates were subjected to mock or anti-cdk2 immunoprecipitation; immunoprecipitates were subjected to kinase assays using histone H1 as substrate and western blotting to monitor cdk2 recovery. (Right) Phosphorylated histone H1 was quantified with levels in vehicle-treated cells considered to represent 100% cdk2 activity. (C) (Left) Cells treated as in (B) were harvested and cyclin B1 immunoprecipitated. Cyclin B1-dependent kinase activity was measured by kinase assay using histone H1 as substrate and cyclin B1 and associated cdk1 and cdk2 levels measured by western blot. (Right) Quantification of phosphorylated histone H1, with levels in vehicle-treated cells considered to represent 100% kinase activity. (D) NCI-H1299 cells or A549 cells engineered to inducibly express shRNAs targeting cdk2 or cdk1 were treated as in (A), and lysates were analyzed by western blotting. (E) (Upper panel) Cells were grown as in (A) and left untreated or treated with 1 mM HU for 24 hr. (Lower panel) MCF7 and HeLa cells were treated with either scrambled (Sc) or cdk1 (K1) siRNA for 3 days. Cells were then left untreated or treated with 1 mM HU for 24 hr prior to the collection of lysates for western blotting. (F) NCI-H1299 cdk1 cells were grown as in (A) and left untreated or exposed to 10 Gy IR. Eight hours later, lysates were collected for western blotting. (G) Parental NCI-H1299 cells were treated with cisplatin for the indicated times and cell lysates analyzed by western blotting. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 327-339DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.036) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cdk1 Depletion Does Not Affect DNA End Resection (A) NCI-H1299 cdk1 cells were grown in the absence or presence of doxycycline and treated with IR (10 Gy). Cells were fixed 6 hr post-IR and subjected to immunofluorescence and DAPI staining. (Left) Representative foci-containing cells. (Right) Mean number of cells containing at least five phospho-ATM foci ± SE over three experiments. (B) Cells were treated as in (A). (Left) Representative foci-containing cells at 6 hr post-IR. (Right) Mean number of cells containing at least five BRCA1 or RPA32 foci at the indicated times post-IR ± SE over three experiments. (C) Cells were treated and fixed as in (A). (Left) Representative foci-containing cells. (Right) Mean number of cells containing at least five ATR foci ± SE over three experiments. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 327-339DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.036) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cdk1 Depletion Reduces BRCA1 Focus Formation (A) NCI-H1299 cdk1 cells were treated with cisplatin (5 μg/ml for 24 hr) and subjected to immunofluorescence and DAPI staining. (Left) Representative foci-containing cells. (Right) Mean number of cells containing at least five ATR foci ± SE over three experiments. (B) Cells were grown and treated as in (A) and stained for BRCA1 (FITC), γ-H2AX (Texas Red), and DAPI. (Left) Representative foci-containing cells. (Right) Mean number of cells with at least five BRCA1-containing foci ± SE over three experiments. ∗p < 0.05 in the presence compared to the absence of doxycycline. (C) NCI-H1299 cdk1 cells were grown as in (A) and treated with vehicle (−) or cisplatin (+) for 24 hr, after which cells were fractionated and soluble (S) nuclear and chromatin fractions (pellet, P) isolated and subjected to western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (D) Parental NCI-H1299 cells were treated with DMSO or 2 μM RO-3306 either with vehicle or 5 μg/ml cisplatin for 24 hr, fixed, and stained with propidium iodide. (E) Parental NCI-H1299 cells were treated with DMSO (0 μM) or RO-3306 at the indicated concentrations and where indicated with 5 μg/ml cisplatin. Lysates were subjected to western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (F) Parental NCI-H1299 cells were treated as in (A) and stained with anti-BRCA1 antibody (FITC) or DAPI. Representative cells containing foci are shown. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 327-339DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.036) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cdk1 Phosphorylates BRCA1 at S1497 and S1189/1191 and Promotes Formation of Foci (A) NCI-H1299 cdk1 cells were grown in the absence or presence of doxycycline and treated with vehicle or 5 μg/ml cisplatin. Whole-cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation for BRCA1 followed by western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (B) Recombinant BRCA1-BARD1 protein was incubated with (+) or without (−) recombinant cyclin B1-cdk1 and kinase assay performed. (C) Overlapping GST-tagged BRCA1 fragments F1-6 were incubated with recombinant cyclin B1-cdk1 and phosphorylation assessed by kinase assay. Arrows indicate molecular weight and location of fragments. (D) Wild-type, S1497A, T1658N, and combined S1497A/T1658N double mutant (DM) GST-tagged F6 fragments were incubated with recombinant cyclin B1-cdk1 and kinase assay performed. Western blotting demonstrated equivalent amount of the F6 substrates in the respective kinase assays. (E) NCI-H1299 cdk1 cells were treated as in (A), and lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-phospho BRCA1 pS1497 followed by western blotting with anti-BRCA1 antibody. (F) Wild-type, S1189A/S1191A GST-tagged F5 fragments were incubated with recombinant cyclin B1-cdk1 and kinase assay performed. Coomassie blue staining of protein demonstrated equivalent amount of the F5 substrates in the respective kinase assays. (G) Parental MBA-MB-436 cells or those expressing the indicated construct were left untreated or treated with 10 Gy IR. Six hours post-IR, cells were fixed and stained for BRCA1 (FITC), RPA32 (Texas Red), and DAPI. (Left) Representative images. (Right) Mean number of cells with at least five foci ± SE over three experiments. ∗p < 0.05 in the BRCA1 triple mutant compared to wild-type-expressing cells. In a separate experiment, ATR foci were also quantified. (H) Cells were treated as in (G) and lysates prepared at the indicated times and subjected to western blotting. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 327-339DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.036) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cdk1 Depletion Sensitizes Cells to DNA Damage (A) Western blots demonstrate NCI-H1299 engineered to inducibly express shRNA targeting cdk1 or cdk2. (Upper graphs) Cells were assessed for colony formation after vehicle or cisplatin treatment in the absence or presence of doxycycline. Mean survival from three experiments is expressed as a percentage of colonies formed ± SE relative to vehicle-treated cells in the absence (solid lines) or presence (broken lines) of doxycycline. (Lower panels and graphs) Representative plates are shown and mean survival is graphed after vehicle or 0.25 μg/ml cisplatin exposure, expressed as a percentage of colonies formed ± SE compared to vehicle-treated cells in the absence of doxycycline. (B) Similar experiments in A549 cells. (C) NCI-H1299 cdk1 cells were grown in the absence or presence of doxycycline and concomitantly transfected with either scrambled or BRCA1 siRNA for 3 days. Cells were subsequently treated with vehicle or 0.25 μg/ml cisplatin for 24 hr and replated for colony formation. Survival is expressed as a percentage of colonies formed ± SE compared to the corresponding vehicle-treated control over three experiments. (D) MDA-MB-436 cells as in Figure 5G were treated with vehicle or the indicated concentrations of cisplatin for 24 hr, replated for colony formation, and assessed 2 weeks later. Mean survival from three experiments is expressed as a percentage of colonies formed ± SE relative to vehicle-treated cells. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 327-339DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.036) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Cdk1 Depletion or Inhibition Protects Nontransformed Cells from S Phase-Specific DNA-Damaging Agents (A) (Left) RPE and NCI-1299 cells were treated with cdk1 siRNA and cell-cycle profiles measured at the indicated times; the percentage of cells with G2/M DNA content is shown. (Right) Lysates were collected after siRNA transfection for 3 days to confirm knockdown of cdk1 expression by western blot. (B) RPE and NCI-1299 cells were treated with scrambled (Sc) or cdk1 (K1) siRNA and cell growth measured. Cell number was counted every day starting at day 0 (3 days posttransfection). (C) RPE and NCI-1299 cells were treated with scrambled or siRNA for 3 days prior to treatment with cisplatin for 24 hr followed by replating for assessment of colony formation after 14 days. Mean survival from three experiments is expressed as the percentage of colonies formed ± SE relative to vehicle-treated cells after treatment with scrambled siRNA (solid lines) or cdk1 siRNA (broken lines). (D) RPE and NCI-1299 cells treated as in (C). Bar graph shows cells treated with 0.5 μg/ml cisplatin and colony formation expressed as a percentage of the relative scrambled treated control. (E) Parental NCI-H1299, MCF7, and RPE cells were treated with 0.25 μg/ml cisplatin either alone (cis) or in combination with 2 μM RO-3306 (cis/RO) for 24 hr, replated, and assessed for colony formation after 14 days. Results represent the mean percentage ± SE of colonies formed relative to vehicle-treated cells over three experiments. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 327-339DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.036) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions