Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Advertisements

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Hongbo Zhu, Qinglei Xiu, Xinchou Lou (IHEP) On behalf of the CEPC study group ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop: Higgs Factory (HF2014) 9-12 October.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
100km CEPC parameter and lattice design
The Studies of Dynamic Aperture on CEPC
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
The Interaction Region
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
The 13th Symposium on Accelerator Physics
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
Lattice design for CEPC PDR
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
The design of interaction region
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
Comparison of the final focus design
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
CEPC advanced partial double ring scheme
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design of Interaction Region
CEPC DA optimization with downhill Simplex
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
Parameter Optimization in Higgs Factories Beam intensity, beam-beam parameters, by*, bunch length, number of bunches, bunch charge and emittance.
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
CEPC parameter and DA optimization
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
CEPC Partial Double Ring Parameter Update
CEPC optics and booster optics
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
Lattice design for double ring scheme of CEPC main ring
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
Lattice Design of the Collider Ring toward TDR
Lattice design for CEPC PDR
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
CEPC Parameter /DA optimization with downhill Simplex
Presentation transcript:

Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group Radiation Backgrounds for Future High Energy Electron Positron Colliders Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group Workshop on the Circular Electron Positron Collider – EU edition, 24 – 26 May, Rome

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Outline Interaction Region Layout Radiation Backgrounds Summary 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Interaction Region ILD Preliminary layout of the interaction region: extremely limited space for several critical components → trade-offs Optimizations required in the forward region and installation scheme to be developed → toward a more realistic design 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds Important inputs in to detector (+machine) designs, e.g. detector occupancy, radiation tolerance … Have investigated the most important sources of radiation backgrounds, including Pair production Beam lost/off-energy particles Synchrotron radiation … Extending into other less critical sources 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Machine Parameters   Higgs W Z(3T) Z(2T) Number of IPs 2 Beam energy (GeV) 120 80 45.5 Circumference (km) 100 Synchrotron radiation loss/turn (GeV) 1.73 0.34 0.036 Crossing angle at IP (mrad) 16.5×2 Piwinski angle 2.58 7.0 23.8 Number of particles/bunch Ne (1010) 15.0 12.0 8.0 Bunch number 242 1524 12000 (10% gap) Bunch spacing (ns) 680 210 25 Beam current (mA) 17.4 87.9 461.0 Synchrotron radiation power (MW) 30 16.5 Bending radius (km) 10.7 Momentum compaction (10-5) 1.11  function at IP  x* /  y* (m) 0.36/0.0015 0.2/0.0015 0.2/0.001 Emittance x/y (nm) 1.21/0.0031 0.54/0.0016 0.18/0.004 0.18/0.0016 Beam size at IP sx /sy (m) 20.9/0.068 13.9/0.049 6.0/0.078 6.0/0.04 Beam-beam parameters x /y 0.031/0.109 0.013/0.106 0.004/0.056 0.004/0.072 RF voltage VRF (GV) 2.17 0.47 0.10 RF frequency fRF (MHz) 650 Harmonic number 216816 Natural bunch length sz (mm) 2.72 2.98 2.42 Bunch length sz (mm) 3.26 5.9 8.5 Damping time tx/ty/tE (ms) 46.5/46.5/23.5 156.4/156.4/74.5 849.5/849.5/425.0 Natural Chromaticity -493/-1544 -520/-1544 -520/-3067 Betatron tune x/y/s 363.10 / 365.22 / 0.065 HOM power/cavity(2cell) (kw) 0.54 0.75 1.94 Natural energy spread (%) 0.1 0.066 0.038 Energy acceptance requirement (%) 1.35 0.40 0.23 Energy acceptance by RF (%) 2.06 1.47 1.70 Photon number due to beamstrahlung 0.29 0.35 0.55 Lifetime _simulation (min) Lifetime (hour) 0.67 1.4 4.0 2.1 F (hour glass) 0.89 0.94 0.99 Luminosity/IP L (1034cm-2s-1) 2.93 10.1 16.6 32.1 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Pair Production Estimated as the most important background at Linear Colliders, not an issue for lower energy/luminosity machines Charged particles attracted by the opposite beam emit photons (beamstrahlung), followed by electron-positron pair production (dominate contributions from the incoherent pair production) Most electrons/positrons are produced with low energies and in the very forward region, and can be confined within the beam pipe with a strong detector solenoid; However, a non-negligible amount of particles can hit the detector → radiation backgrounds Hadronic backgrounds much less critical 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Event Generation Pair production process simulated with the GuineaPig program and the output fed into Geant4 detector simulation Long time for colliding bunches to cross each other (e.g. Higgs operation with bunch length ~3.6 mm) CEPC Caveat: charged particles travelling over certain distance without seeing the solenoidal field, which unfortunately introduces bias to the hit positions → To implement external field in the GuineaPig, feature request sent to the author (to be followed up) ILC 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Pair Production @ W/Z More prominent at W/Z because of event longer bunch sizes and charged particles traveling over even longer distances 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Background Levels S. Bai, W. Xu and X. Wang Using hit density, total ionizing dose (TID) and non-ionizing energy loss (NIEL) to quantify the radiation background levels Adopted the calculation method used for the ATLAS background estimation (ATL-GEN-2005-001), safety factor of ×10 applied 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Higgs, W and Z NIEL per year Hit density, TID and NIEL at the 1st VXD layer (r = 1.6 cm) for operation at different energies Bunch spacing: 680 (H)/210 (W)/25 (Z) ns Hit density (per bunch crossing) TID per year 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Beam Lost Particles Beam particles losing energies (radiative Bhabha scattering, beam-gas interaction, beam-gas interaction, etc.) larger than acceptance kicked off their orbit → lost in the interaction region Two sets of collimators placed upstream to stop off-energy beam particles, sufficiently away from the beam clearance area (aperture size subject to optimization) What shape? SuperKEKB Type (PEP-II as reference) 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Effectiveness of Collimators Suppression of detector backgrounds, close to a factor of 100 in reduction → remaining backgrounds smaller than that from pair production and there is room for further tuning 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Combined Backgrounds 2×1012 1MeV neq/cm2 per year Radiation backgrounds from pair production, radiative Bhabha scattering + beamstrahlung Most significant contributions from the pair production 2.5 hits/cm2 per bunch crossing 1 MRad per year 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Synchrotron Radiation K. Li & M. Sullivan (SLAC) Beam particles bent by magnets (last bending dipole, focusing quadrupoles) emit SR photons → important at circular machines BDSim to transport beam (core + halo) from the last dipole to the interaction region and record the particles hitting the central beryllium beam pipe Large amount of photons scattered by the beam pipe surface between [1, 2 m] into the central region Collimators made with high-Z material must be introduced to block those SR photons. 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Mask Tips 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu With Collimation Three masks at 1.51, 1.93 and 4.2 m along the beam pipe to the IP to block SR photons → shielding to the central beam pipe Number of photons per bunch hitting the central beam pipe dropping from 40, 000 to 80; power deposition reduced considerably 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu

Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu Summary Preliminary interaction region design that requires further optimization Investigated the main radiation backgrounds that are important for detector design (pair production to be re-visited shortly); more sources of backgrounds to be included Hit density: 2.5 hits/cm2 per bunch crossing TID: 1 MRad per year NIEL: 2×1012 1MeV neq/cm2 per year 24-26 May 2018 Radiation Backgrounds, H. Zhu