Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bendamustine + Rituximab (BR) Chemoimmunotherapy and Maintenance Lenalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small.
Advertisements

Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Roberts AW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 325.
1 Baz R et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Lacy MQ et al.
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Final Analysis of a Phase 2 Study of Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) 1 Lenalidomide.
Final Results of a Phase 1 Study of Idelalisib (GS-1101), a Selective Inhibitor of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase p110 Delta (PI3K), in Patients with Relapsed.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide as Initial Treatment of Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Xavier Badoux, William Wierda, Susan O'Brien,
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
Byrd JC et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6508.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus Chlorambucil (Clb) versus Rituximab plus Clb in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Increased Incidence of Therapy- Related Myeloid Neoplasia (t-MN) After Initial Therapy for CLL with Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide (FC) vs Fludarabine (F):
Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Shows Superior Efficacy in Comparison to Bendamustine.
ClaPD (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Mark TM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 77.
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (IO; CMC544), a CD22 Monoclonal Antibody Attached to Calicheamycin, Produces Complete Response (CR) plus Complete Marrow Response.
Safety and Efficacy of Abbreviated Induction with Oral Fludarabine (F) and Cyclophosphamide (C) Combined with Dose-Dense IV Rituximab (R) in Previously.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Phase II Trial of 5-Day Decitabine as Front-Line Therapy for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Cashen.
Geisler C et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 290.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
Reeder CB et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster)
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
DiNardo C et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 327.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Ibrutinib plus Rituximab in Treatment-Naive Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: Results from a Multicenter, Phase 2 Study1 Phase I Study of Rituximab,
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
WHAT IS THE BEST Front-Line REGIMEN for Patients With CLL
Attal M et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8018.
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
Jakubowiak AJ et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 862.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Ansell SM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 798.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 99.
Salles GA et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8004.
Faderl S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6503.
What is the best frontline regimen for CLL patients
Seymour JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 872.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Pollyea DA et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6505.
Zaja F et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 966.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Wiestner A et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 008.
CLL : Integrating novel therapies into frontline and salvage regimens
Presentation transcript:

Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508. A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide as Initial Treatment of Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.

Introduction Median age of diagnosis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is 72 years. Elderly patients with CLL are under-represented in clinical trials and have increased toxicity with immunochemotherapy. Lenalidomide is an oral immunomodulatory drug that has activity in relapsed CLL (J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5343, Blood 2008;111:5291). Current study objective: To evaluate the activity of lenalidomide as initial treatment in elderly patients with CLL. Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.

Phase II Study of Lenalidomide in Elderly Patients with CLL Eligibility (N = 60) Untreated and symptomatic CLL Age ≥ 65 years PS 0-2 Lenalidomide 5 mg/day x 2 cycles (56 days) Increase by 5 mg/cycle (28 days) to maximum 25 mg/day Treatment continued until progression Allopurinol 300 mg PO QD days 1-14 cycle 1 Response assessed at the end of cycle 3 and then every 6 cycles No mandated antibiotic, antiviral, DVT or tumor flare prophylaxis Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.

Response at Assessment Times Efficacy Results Clinical Parameter NCI Response* (N = 60) Patients, n % Complete response (CR) 6 10 CRi 3 5 Nodular partial response Partial response 25 42 Overall response rate (ORR) 37 62 Response at Assessment Times 3 cycles 9 cycles 15 cycles 21 cycles ORR, n (%) 24 (40) 34 (57) 36 (61) 30 (57) * 2008 NCI-WG criteria used; CRi = CR with incomplete blood count recovery. Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.

Efficacy by Patient Pre-Treatment Characteristics Patient Characteristic n ORR Age, years 65-74 43 72% ≥75 17 35%* IGHV genes mutated 22 50% unmutated 33 73% FISH hierarchy del13q 15 negative 12 trisomy 12 13 92% del 11q 14 57% del 17p 6 0%* * p < 0.05 Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.

Adverse Events (N = 60) Neutropenia 38% Thrombocytopenia <14% Grade ≥3 Neutropenia 38% Thrombocytopenia <14% Neutropenic fever 5% Pneumonia/bronchitis 3% Fatigue Sepsis 2% Tumor flare* 0% * 50% of patients had Grade 1/2 tumor flare. Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.

Conclusions Lenalidomide as a single agent induces clinical responses in the front-line treatment of elderly patients with CLL. ORR: 62% 2-year overall survival: 90% (data not shown) 2-year progression-free survival: 60% (data not shown) Quality of responses improve over time. Myelosuppression is the most common toxicity. No severe tumor flare or tumor lysis syndrome was observed. A Phase II trial of lenalidomide in combination with rituximab as up-front treatment in CLL is ongoing. Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508; Rai K. ASCO 2010;Discussion.

Investigator comment on lenalidomide as initial treatment for CLL in the elderly With lenalidomide in CLL, we don’t use the doses used in myeloma or MDS because patients with CLL get tumor lysis syndrome and tumor flare, in which the lymph nodes become large, swollen, red and painful. In this MD Anderson study of patients with CLL over 65 and requiring treatment, investigators started gingerly with a 5-mg daily dose of lenalidomide for two 28-day cycles, and then if patients tolerated that, they escalated by another five mg every cycle, up to a 25-mg dose. There was a 62 percent response rate and it was relatively nontoxic. There was no Grade III or IV tumor lysis or tumor flare. The presenter also noted that the drug continues to work over time, so you can’t be impatient and stop after the first couple of cycles because best response occurred after nine cycles. A new trial concept in CLL is maintenance lenalidomide — after patients have had a response from FCR, for example. A few years ago we investigated alemtuzumab maintenance but there was too much toxicity from immunosuppression. We need something in CLL for maintenance, similar to the rituximab maintenance in the low-grade lymphomas. Interview with Stephanie A Gregory, MD, June 18, 2010