Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 IEEE MBWA Standard Project Contribution: C xx Date: May RF Performance Evaluation Criteria Dan Gal
Advertisements

Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement.
Doc.: IEEE /286r0 Submission May 2001 Shoemake and Batra, TI Range vs. Rate Comparison of Remaining IEEE g Proposals: PBCC and CCK-OFDM.
Key Technical Provisions of the White Paper and Protections Afforded to ITFS Licensees. National ITFS Association Annual Conference February 16 th – 19.
© Hitachi, Ltd All rights reserved. ICAO ACP WG-S Hitachi Ltd., 2014/3/28 SARPS Validation Discussion material on Web-EX 1 IP01 ACP WG S_28 Mar.
Doc.: IEEE /0229r0 Submission February 2012 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Transmit Mask Correction Date: Authors:
Collocation Interference 1 WRAP 0859G. Collocation Interference WRAP calculates all potentially dangerous frequencies due to: –Intermodulation –IF breakthrough.
Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:
Submission May 2012 Soo-Young Chang (CSUS) Slide 1 doc.: IEEE m May 2012 Soo-Young Chang (CSUS) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working.
EEE440 Modern Communication Systems Cellular Systems.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1446r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Analysis of frequency and power requirements for UL-OFDMA Date:
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
2.4-GHZ RF TRANSCEIVER FOR IEEE B WIRELESS LAN UF# UF#
Usage of OFDM in a wideband fading channel OFDM signal structure Subcarrier modulation and coding Signals in frequency and time domain Inter-carrier interference.
A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG.
700 MHz Interoperability Channel Spacing NCC March 22-23, 2001 Washington, DC.
DMG-12/00 Page 1 April 23, 2002 Digital Communications Basics Dan M. Goebel 4/23/2002.
Doc.: IEEE /1074r0 Submission September 2004 WKFisher/ARINCSlide 1 IEEE p Draft Review Wayne Fisher Broady Cash ARINC, Inc Annapolis, MD.
Wireless Communication Technologies 1 Outline Introduction OFDM Basics Performance sensitivity for imperfect circuit Timing and.
Doc.: IEEE /283 Submission Sept/00 M. Webster and K. HalfordSlide 1 Spectral Mask Considerations for HRb Mark Webster and Karen Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
July 2002doc.: IEEE /420r0 Submission Rishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal) Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products.
IEEE802.11a 指導教授 : 高永安 學生 : 陳穎俊. PLCP preamble.
25 July 1998WTD 1 DTTB Transmitter Ratings Compiled by Wayne Dickson SMIREE MIEAust. CPEng. Member SMPTE This presentation seeks to explain the relationship.
Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Doc.: IEEE m SubmissionSlide 1 September 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission.
QoS Routing and Scheduling in TDMA based Wireless Mesh Backhaul Networks Chi-Yao Hong, Ai-Chun Pang,and Jean-Lien C. Wu IEEE Wireless Communications and.
FMT Modulation for Wireless Communication
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May 1, 2009 Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM Slide 1 Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Simulation Data for Letter Ballot Comments on Quasi-guard Subcarriers and Reverse Link Waveform Lai King (Anna) Tee January 15, 2007.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission 6 July, 2009 Partha Murali, Redpine Signals Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
IEEE n Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:LB93 Comment resolution.
Doc.: IEEE /0039r2 Submission Nov 2010 Raja Banerjea, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Transmit Spectral Mask Changes Date: Authors:
Accurate WiFi Packet Delivery Rate Estimation and Applications Owais Khan and Lili Qiu. The University of Texas at Austin 1 Infocom 2016, San Francisco.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2010 Tim Schmidl (Texas Instruments), Emmanuel Monnerie (Landis & Gyr), Shusaku Shimada (Yokogawa Co.),
1 DCS MANUFACTURERS MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 2006 Peter Woolner Mitretek Systems /300 Auto Detect.
IEEE g Submission Sangsung Choi & Cheolho Shin, ETRI Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D. Anuj Batra, Ph.D.
Validation items and major Conditions
Dr. Yeffry Handoko Putra, M.T
Wireless Communication
A New Technique for Sidelobe Suppression in OFDM Systems
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Channelization for HRb OFDM
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
SC 64-QAM in clause 21 PHY Date: Authors: November 2015
80MHz Tone Allocation Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
PPM Sensitivity of 10 MHz OFDM Channels
Selectivity / Channel Rejection
Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Maximum Input Level in OFDM Mode
2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal)
UWB Receiver Algorithm
OFDM System Performance
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
ETRI Proposal to IEEE TGn
Amateur Extra Q & A Study Pool
6 July, 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: FPP SUN Simulation Results – Redpine Signals.
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
6 July, 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: FPP SUN Simulation Results – Redpine Signals.
White Space Regulatory Issues
TX Mask Shoulders vis-à-vis ACI
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Presentation transcript:

Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement of 11b Blocker when receiving OFDM packets Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Why is Adjacent Channel Rejection of 11b jammer a concern for 11g receiver in OFDM mode ? 11b standard allows large out-of-band transmitter spectral power density. Page 3 shows a possible worst case received 11b jammer spectral plot. -35 dBm adjacent channel blocking level allowed for 11b receiver, at a minimum 25 MHz separation between center frequencies of signal and jammer. The 11b adjacent channel jammer spills about -85 dBm power into the 11g OFDM subcarriers. Assuming above conditions of 11b. Received signal spectrum is plotted on page 4. S/Interference = 23 dB (simulated as average receiver constellation error including 2 dB implementation loss), assuming 11a based OFDM signal of -62 dBm (54Mbits/s, 64-QAM). Graph on page 5 shows simulated OFDM S/Interference ratio as a function of center frequency separation between the OFDM signal and the 11b jammer. For a -62 dBm 54Mbits/s OFDM received signal, the S/Interference ratio should be 30dB or more for a reasonable operating margin. Spreadsheet calculation is shown on page 6. Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

11b jammer OFDM signal Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Double click to activate Excel Spreadsheet Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement of 11b Blocker when receiving OFDM packets: Either of these options (in decreasing preference): Reduce the 11b based jammer level to -45 dBm at 25 MHz or greater frequency offest, keeping the OFDM signal levels as in 11a (e.g. -62 dBm for 54 Mbits/s) Use -35 dBm “clean” (linear PA) 11b jammer at 30 MHz or greater frequency offset for 11a based OFDM signal levels (e.g. -52 dBm for 54 Mbits/s) Increase the 11b based adjacent channel jammer center frequency separation to 40 MHz, keeping its level at -35 dBm, and the OFDM signal levels as in 11a (e.g. -62 dBm for 54 Mbits/s) Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM