COURSE ASSESSMENT RECORD DATABASE (CARD) WORKSHOP Wendy Marley, Ph.D. Research Analyst Institutional Effectiveness and Planning Spring 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National Connection for Local Public Health Model Practice Reviewer Guide April - May 2010.
Advertisements

State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 2 – New Event Entry.
Integrify 5.0 Tutorial : Creating a New Process
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.
Course Registration Overrides SLCM_WP_220 1SLCM_WP_220 Overrides.
Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.
Microsoft Access.
Implementing an Electronic Annual Reporting System for Evaluating Faculty Performance T. P.Mack, P. Robinson, R.C. Woods, J. Mitchell, and T. McAnge. College.
Assessment What is it? Why should we do it? Haven’t we been through this before? Why now? For the Instructional Learning Outcomes Council (I-LOC)Created.
Benchmark Series Microsoft Excel 2013 Level 2
WRITING Educational Objectives, Learning Outcomes Mi-Suk Shim, Ph.D. Spring 2006 DIIA.
Chapter 5 Microsoft Excel 2007 Window
INTRODUCTORY MICROSOFT WORD Lesson 7 – Working With Documents
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
Computer Concepts BASICS 4th Edition
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
August 2014 Liver quest User Demo: Liver Quality Enhancement Service Tool (QuEST)
LCCC AQIP Action Project No 3 Cycle 1- Fall 2002/2005 Cycle 2- Fall 2005/2008 Presented by Assessment Design Team.
Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
© 2010 Blackboard Inc. All rights reserved. Blackboard Learn 9.1 SafeAssign.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Faculty Performance Evaluation (FPE) Plan
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
Phillips Andover Academy 2/23/2006 – 4:00-5:00 Darek Sady Blackboard Learning System (Release 6.3) e-Portfolios.
Kathy WilkinsLes Janis Montana University SystemGeorgia State University NACTEI Conference May 12, 2011 The proposed cut of 13 percent from Perkins Title.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
Advance and the Electronic Packet Advance and the Electronic Packet April 5,
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
INSTRUCTOR & FACULTY ORIENTATION Blackboard 9.1. What is Online Learning? The term online learning is used interchangeably with e-learning or electronic.
Academic Year.  Still working well 17 reports submitted, 1 missing  9 of 18 departments expressed concerns about assessment 4 departments reported.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate.
FACULTY CREDENTIALING Academic Affairs May OVERVIEW What you will learn: Introduction to Credentialing Palm Beach State’s Credentialing Criteria.
AY Year  The administration period runs for two weeks in the 14 –weeks sessions (fall and spring) and six calendar days in other sessions. 
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
Scheduling and Staffing System: How to Set-Up a New Academic Year As of 12/05/2003.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
TrackIt Tool TrackIt a new tool for tracking class activities PRESENTERS Chérie Dodd, Katy Wigley, David Goodrum.
Electronic Annual Review Files A Guide for Faculty Members.
ACADEMIC COURSE SCHEDULE Assigning Multiple Instructors to a Section Using SSASECT.
Arizona Western College Assessment Workshop 2 Workshop Objectives Enter collected evidence of assessments and notate the findings in your assessment plan.
Arizona Western College Assessment for Administrative Departments Part 2 Workshop Objectives Enter collected evidence of assessments and notate the findings.
T3/Tutorials: Data Submission
Arizona Western College Assessment for Administrative Departments Part 2 Workshop Objectives Enter collected evidence of assessments and notate the findings.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Update – January 2016
Partnership Data Collection Manual
Arizona Western College Assessment Workshop 2
Academic Year Overview
Course Evaluation Committee
Team members and Institution(s)
Team Purpose Statement Copy this from your team web page
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
UL Student Employee Rubric + Blackboard Organization Tutorials
IEP REPORT OF PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT K-12
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
One sentence executive summary of your team’s goals
SLO Assessment and Program Review
Presentation transcript:

COURSE ASSESSMENT RECORD DATABASE (CARD) WORKSHOP Wendy Marley, Ph.D. Research Analyst Institutional Effectiveness and Planning Spring 2007

Why is the CARD important? The CARD provides valuable information that is used in a number of ways: Data from CARDs provided by all academic divisions is entered into a centralized database (also called the CARD) that provides an institutional perspective on the assessment of student learning. The CARD serves as the basis for an annual report with longitudinal comparisons including The number of assessments of each general education outcome, and The percent of assessments where the criteria for success was achieved. This information is shared with LCCCs AQIP-Assessment Design Team, faculty, administration, and program review committees as well as the Colleges regional accreditation and state quality award committees. For a copy of the CARD report, go to CampusNet, select IEP under Departments and then click on Reports.

When is the CARD due and to whom does it go? Each year, CARDs completed by the various Divisions are due June 15. They are to be sent as an attachment to Wendy Marley in Institutional Research and Planning

What semesters/terms are included in the annual CARD? All terms comprising a single academic year are included in a Divisions annual CARD. Note: an academic year begins with the summer terms and includes the following fall and spring semesters. For example, the 2006 academic year includes summer 2006 (CMDS code ), fall 2006 ( ), and spring 2007 ( ).

Changes in the CAR and CARD Forms The Course Assessment Record (CAR) and CARD forms have been revised for spring The revised forms can be accessed at Please remind your faculty to use the revised forms.

Why revisions? To Close the Assessment Loop The revised CAR and CARD forms ask faculty members to indicate whether they made the changes they suggested for continuous improvement and, if yes, what the results were. This information will allow us to better assess the extent of student progress and then develop strategies to further improve student learning.

The Revised CAR

The Revised CARD

ColumnEntry #1:DivisionDivision code (see column header) #2:CourseCourse prefix and number; add I after the number for Internet courses #3: Faculty MemberFaculty members first and last name #4: F/T P/T Status1 = Full Time, 2 = Part Time (see next page)

When an instructor is emeritus or does not teach a full load in your division: When completing the CARD, faculty who are not teaching a full load in your Division should be considered adjunct, even if they are full-time in another Division or are emeriti. Note: this is for purposes of the CARD only.

ColumnEntry #5:CMDS CMDS year and term code Year & TermNote: an academic year begins with the summer term and includes the following fall and spring semesters. #6:Course From the Course Description & Specific OutcomeOutcomes document; place an X in the column if a course specific outcome is assessed on the CAR #7-17: Gen EdsPlace an X in the appropriate column(s)

A Practical Suggestion The Challenge: As you complete more rows and move down the CARD form, the column headings disappear. One possible solution: Freeze the headings by clicking on the cell in the first column below the listing of the Division codes (i.e., click on cell A8) and then, from your Excel toolbar, select Freeze Panes under Windows.

ColumnEntry #18: Performance1=yes, 2=no, 3=partially Criteria Achieved?achieved (see next page)

How do you determine if the performance criteria was achieved? You must make the judgment by comparing entries in the CARs Expected Outcomes/Performance Evaluation Criteria column with the Assessment Data Analyses column. Often more than one assessment method will have been used and you must decide if, overall, the criteria were achieved (i.e., success), partially achieved, or not achieved. (See next page.)

Example of CAR with Multiple Assessment Methods

ColumnEntry #19-26:Assessment Enter an X under every method used Methods/Tools Used(e.g., ) #27:Summary of Summarize the faculty members Faculty Recommendationsrecommendation(s) for continuous improvement #28: Summary ofSummarize changes resulting from Results of Implementingimplementation of recommendation(s) Recommendationsin column #27 (if available) #29: Division(Optional) Director Comments

When there are multiple entries on the CAR, how should they entered on the CARD?

Each line on the CARD corresponds to one line on a CAR form. The first two lines on this CARD illustrate how to complete the form when two lines are reported on a single CAR. Please note that the first line corresponds to a new CAR and the following line is indented to indicate that these assessments are reported on the same CAR. When a single CAR lists assessments of two or more different course outcomes (i.e., two or more lines on the CAR):

When a CAR reports assessments of the same outcome in several sections of the same course, how are they recorded? When a CAR reports assessments of the same outcome in several sections of the same course, each of these assessments should be reported on a separate line of the CARD.

Example of a Completed CARD from 2005/06

Questions or Concerns? Contact Wendy Marley at x7743 or This presentation will be available as a Power Point tutorial on CampusNet at