Compact and Spherical Range Design, Application and Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stratagem EH4 Field Evaluation of Data Quality.
Advertisements

EPOCH 1000 Series Procedure Conventional Angle Beam Calibration
P. M. Livingston (Presentation from a few years back) An 80 meter Aerostat-borne Phased Array for Field-Day.
1. Introduction.
NOAA’s National Weather Service
Miniature Tunable Antennas for Power Efficient Wireless Communications Darrin J. Young Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Case Western Reserve.
6935 Oakland Mills Road, Suite G
Faculty of Computer Science & Engineering
Plane wave reflection and transmission
Intermediate Course (5) Antennas and Feeders Karl Davies East Kent Radio Society EKRS 1.
Chapter 3 – Radio Phenomena
RFMTC11 GÄVLE OCTOBER 4–5th 2011 Industrial radar sensor arrays and their applications October 04, 2011 P. Vainikainen, V. Mikhnev, Ye. Maksimovitch, M.-K.
1 Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Intermediate Licence Course Carl Thomson G3PEM Slide Set 9: v1.2, 31-May-2009 Antennas & Feeders Chelmsford Amateur.
Antenna Design Progress
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
Chapter Fifteen: Radio-Wave Propagation
Using a DPS as a Coherent Scatter HF Radar Lindsay Magnus Lee-Anne McKinnell Hermanus Magnetic Observatory Hermanus, South Africa.
Ray Tracing A radio signal will typically encounter multiple objects and will be reflected, diffracted, or scattered These are called multipath signal.
Flat-Panel Grid Antenna R Struzak. This antenna offers ~18 dBi gain, VSWR
Compact and Spherical Range Design, Application and Evaluation Walter D. Burnside and Inder J. Gupta The Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory.
Simulation of Anechoic Chamber
Chapter 6 Antennas Antenna Basics
Antennas Lecture 9.
OEIC LAB National Cheng Kung University 1 Ching-Ting Lee Institute of Microelectronics, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University.
Wireless Communication: Overview of basic concepts Narayan Mandayam.
Polytechnic University© 2002 by H. L. Bertoni1 III. Spherical Waves and Radiation Antennas radiate spherical waves into free space Receiving antennas,
Electromagnetic Wave Theory
DESIGN OF MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT ANTENNA ARRAYS
Technician License Course Chapter 2 Radio and Electronics Fundamentals
1 THINGS STUDENTS DO AT THE OSU ESL ERIC K. WALTON 2011 AMTA DENVER The Ohio State University ElectroScience Lab Electrical.
FAA/NASA Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research Jeff Dickman Chris Bartone June 20, 2003 A New Anechoic Chamber for Nearfield Antenna.
ECE 1100: Introduction to Electrical and Computer Engineering David R. Jackson Professor, ECE Dept. Notes 12 Antennas Spring 2008.
Fundamental Antenna Parameters
Oct. 16, 2006 Midterm Next Class Assignment #4 is Marked
Antenna Techniques to Optimize Pseudorange Measurements for Ground Based Ranging Sources Jeff Dickman Ohio University Avionics Engineering Center The 29.
ElectroScience Lab Compact and Spherical Range Design, Application and Evaluation Walter D. Burnside and Inder J. Gupta The Ohio State University ElectroScience.
Compact and Spherical Range Design, Application and Evaluation Walter D. Burnside and Inder J. Gupta The Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory.
General Licensing Class Coax Cable Your organization and dates here.
GEOG Fall 2003 Overview of Microwave Remote Sensing (Chapter 9 in Jensen) from Prof. Kasischke’s lecture October 6,2003.
1 Antenna Design Progress Chi-Chih Chen Research Associate Professor Domenic Belgiovane Graduate Student The Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory.
Radio links Seminary 7. Problem 7.1 Free space (one way / line-of-site) propagation a) Calculate the section attenuation of a 10 km long radio link operating.
Antennas -- in 50 Minutes or Less! Cynthia Furse Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Utah State University
UPenn NROTC Unit, dtd Fall 2004 Naval Weapons Systems Energy Fundamentals.
Destructive interference is common when measuring the reflection from a sample. When the microwave radiation encounters the dielectric sample under test,
Wireless Communication Fundamentals David Holmer
ElectroScience Laboratory 1 EM PROPAGATION IN JET ENGINE TURBINES Eric Walton, Jonathan Young, Jim Moore and Kyle Davis The Ohio State University ElectroScience.
Remcom Inc. 315 S. Allen St., Suite 416  State College, PA  USA Tel:  Fax:   ©
WINTER 01 Template.
ElectroScience Laboratory 1 EM PROPAGATION IN JET ENGINE TURBINES Eric Walton, Jonathan Young, Jim Moore and Kyle Davis The Ohio State University ElectroScience.
Microwave Devices.
1 Antennas for Emergency Communications. Emergency Antennas VHF / UHF - FM HF – Voice, CW, or Digital 2.
Antenna II LN09_Antenna Measurements 1 /10 Antenna Measurements.
1 Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Intermediate Licence Course Carl Thomson G3PEM Slide Set 9 Antennas & Feeders Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Intermediate.
1 A TECHNICAL BRIEFING FOR AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS “SLOT ANTENNAS: WIRE RECIPROCITY” PRESENTED TO: ARASWF NAPLES, FL FEBRUARY 2016 PRESENTED BY:
RADAR ANTENNA. Functions of Radar Antenna Transducer. Concentrates the radiated energy in one direction (Gain). Collects echo energy scattered back to.
DCS & LRIT LTE In-Band Interference Study Microcom Design, Inc. April 2016.
KTM KTM Technology Co, Ltd. Over-the-Air Performance Test System for Mobile Station ㈜케이티엠테크놀로지 KTM.
1 NEAR-FIELD DIRECT ANTENNA MODULATION PRESENTED BY NABEEL SALAM NO.44 S7 EC GUIDED BY Mr AJAYAN K.K Lecturer ECE Dept.
Antennas -- in 50 Minutes or Less! Cynthia Furse Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Utah State University
Antennas/Antenna Arrays
ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS Measurement of Radiation Pattern Gain
C-Band Feed Design and Prototype Tests
60 GHz Cubicle Wall Reflectivity
Technician Licensing Class
Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
Microstrip Patch Antennas S.Mahendrakumar Asst. Prof. (Sl. Gr.) / ECE VCET.
A Compact Patch Antenna for Ultrawideband Application
Near Field Probe Configuration
ANTENNA’S MURRAY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB – KJ7HRI PRESENTS
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
Presentation transcript:

Compact and Spherical Range Design, Application and Evaluation Walter D. Burnside and Inder J. Gupta The Ohio State University ElectroScience Laboratory 1320 Kinnear Road Columbus, Ohio 43212 (614) 292-5747 and (614) 292-5951 Presented on September 21-22, 2005 for Raytheon (Tucson, AZ).

Course Outline First Full Day Second Half Day Basic Range Design Guidelines (Burnside) Compact Range Reflector Design (Gupta) Absorber Design and Layout (Burnside) Critical Range Evaluation (Gupta) Second Half Day R-Card Fences for Outdoor Ranges (Gupta) Summary of Range Design Issues (Burnside)

R-card Fences to Suppress Ground Bounce Term in Outdoor Facilities Inder (Jiti) Gupta ElectroScience Laboratory Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University 1320 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212 Phone: (614) 292-5951 Fax: (614) 292-7297 Email: gupta.11@osu.edu

Introduction(1) In outdoor facilities, the ground bounce term can be a limiting factor. The ground bounce term can destructively interfere with the direct path term reducing the signal level in the quiet zone.

Introduction(2) The transmit antenna height is adjusted so that the direct ray and the ground bounce term add in phase. Narrowband solution Alternatively, metallic fences are used to steer the ground bounce term away from the quiet zone.

R-card Fences R-card fences have varying resistance where the resistance varies smoothly from a very low value (purely conductor) to very high values. Metallic fence can be replaced with a R-card fence. Transmit signal through the fence can end up in the quiet zone.

Outdoor Facility with R-card Fences Multiple R-card fences can be used to eliminate the ground bounce term in the quiet zone. OSU-ESL has designed and built R-card fences for outdoor facilities.

Experimental Outdoor Test Range 30 meters long Radar antenna height is 60 cm Center of target zone is 3 meters above ground 6-18 GHz frequency band Six R-card fences Fences are tilted 20° towards the feed.

30 Meter Outdoor Test Range

30 Meter Outdoor Test Range

R-card Fences Each fence is 60 cm tall. Bottom one third of a fence is pure metal. Resistance increases smoothly from pure metal to 1150 ohms. Built using ten layers of flat resistively coated thin films. Resistive taper on both sides, too.

An R-card Fence

Field Probe Data Radar – HP8510 network analyzer Radar Antenna – SA 8-12 GHz standard gain horn Probe Antenna – AEL 2-18 GHz horn LNA behind the AEL horn to compensate for the cable loss Horizontal and vertical polarization A vertical scan (center 3 meters above ground) A horizontal scan (3meters above ground)

Range with Linear Scanner

Field Probe Data - Horizontal Scan Vertical Pol No fences With fences

Field Probe Data - Horizontal Scan Horizontal Pol No fences With fences

Field Probe Data - Vertical Scan Vertical Pol No fences With fences

Field Probe Data - Vertical Scan Horizontal Pol No fences With fences

Field Probe Data - Vertical Scan Horizontal Pol 8 GHz 12 GHz

Calibrated Field Probe Data – Vertical Scan Horizontal Pol No fences With fences

Backscatter Measurements 1-foot corner reflector Backscattered fields along the boradside direction Corner reflector at various heights 8.5 GHz to 12.5 GHz frequency band in 2 MHz steps Two separate antennas for transmit and receive to perform S12 measurements Time gating (25 point smoothing) to isolate the corner reflector return

Measured Backscattered Fields – Corner Reflector Horizontal Pol No fences With fences

Measured Backscattered Fields – Corner Reflector Horizontal Pol 6 R-card fences

Multilayered R-card Fences The R-card fences discussed until now have strong reflected field term. In some applications, the reflection term is also undesired. Multilayered R-card fences have been designed and built for these applications

The R-card Layout: Layer 1

The R-card Layout: Layer 2

The R-card Layout: Layer 3

The R-card Layout: Layer 4

The R-card Layout: Layer 5

Near Field Data for Single Layer R-Card Fence Design Total Field at Receiver Site Reflected Field at Transmitter Site 3 Fences Plot Convention: #L#C# #L: number of layers per R-Card Fence #C: number of R-Card Fences #: Separation between two adjacent R-Card Fences

Near Field Data for 3 Layer R-Card Fence Design Total Field at Receiver Site Reflected Field at Transmitter Site 3 Fences Plot Convention: #L#C# #L: number of layers per R-Card Fence #C: number of R-Card Fences #: Separation between two adjacent R-Card Fences

Near Field Data for 5 Layer R-Card Fence Design Total Field at Receiver Site Reflected Field at Transmitter Site 3 Fences Plot Convention: #L#C# #L: number of layers per R-Card Fence #C: number of R-Card Fences #: Separation between two adjacent R-Card Fences

Near Field Data for 5 Layer R-Card Fence Design Total Field at Receiver Site Reflected Field at Transmitter Site 1.0” Foam Plot Convention: #L#C# #L: number of layers per R-Card Fence #C: number of R-Card Fences #: Separation between two adjacent R-Card Fences 3 Fences

Near Field Data for 5 Layer R-Card Fence Design Total Field at Receiver Site Reflected Field at Transmitter Site 1.0” Foam Plot Convention: #L#C# #L: number of layers per R-Card Fence #C: number of R-Card Fences #: Separation between two adjacent R-Card Fences 2 Fences

Measurement Setup

Measurement Setup Behind ESL Transmit Antenna Receive Antenna R-card Fences

Measurement Setup Behind ESL Receiving Antenna Transmit Antenna

Probe Field at 1575 MHz

Summary R-card fences can be used for performance enhancement of outdoor facilities. Multi-layered R-card fences can be designed to act like absorber (low-level transmission and reflection).

References Y. Kim and E.K. Walton, “Ground bounce reduction using a tapered resistive sheet fence,” AMTA2000, pp. 222-227, Philadelphia, PA, October 2000. I.J. Gupta and W.D. Burnside, ”Performance of an experimental outdoor RCS range with R-card fences,” AMTA2001, pp.400-405, Denver, CO, October 2001. T.-H. Lee and W.D. Burnside, “Applications of multilayer resistive strips (R-card) in EM measurements,” AMTA2003, pp 420-425, Irvine, CA, October 2003.