Progress of SPPC lattice design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Advertisements

SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
FCC-ee - Lepton Collider For the TLEP Lattice and Optics Design Team: B. Haerer, R. Martin, H. Garcia, R. Tomas, Y. Cai and many colleagues Optics Challenges.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Lattice design for CEPC main ring H. Geng, G. Xu, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, Y. Zhang, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai, Q. Qin,
CEPC Booster Zhang Chuang, Cui Xiaohao September 11,2015.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
Alignment and beam-based correction
FCC-ee - Lepton Collider
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Summary of CEPC pretzel scheme design
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Status and needs of dynamic aperture calculations
CEPC pretzel scheme study
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Optics Development for HE-LHC
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Towards an NMC lattice for PS2
CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Lattice Design of the Collider Ring toward TDR
Lattice design for CEPC
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Rough designs for The LEB and HEB for pCDR-100
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Progress of SPPC lattice design (100 Km - 12 T – 75 TeV) Chen Yukai International workshop on High Energy Circular Electron Positron Collider Nov. 6-8, 2017, IHEP

Outline Background Lattice design(ARC, DS, LSS) DA consideration Summary

General layout of SPPC Use the same CEPC tunnel to build SPPC Maximize the beam energy to 37.5 TeV by using ~12T Iron- based SC magnets 8 arcs, total length 83900 m 2 IPs for pp, 1250 m each 2 IRs for injection or RF, 1250 m each 2 IRs for ep or AA, 1250 m each 2 IRs for collimation( ee for CEPC ), 4300 m each C = 100 km Dipole length needed: 65.45 Km (12 T Dipole, Ep=37.5 TeV) Dipole filling factor: 0.79 ARC length( including DS ): 65.45 Km/0.79=82.9 Km Considering some reserved length, ARC length is chosen as 83.9 Km, left 16.1 Km for long straight section

Consideration of geometry Calculation base on: Parameters Beam energy Strength of Dipole Length of quadrupole Space between Q and B Space between B and B ARC numbers of the ring Number of DS each ARC value 37.5 TeV ~12 T 6 m 3.5 m 1.4 m 8 2 Parameter should be determined: Parameters Number of Dipoles each FODO cell ( N_dipole ) Number of FODO cell each ARC ( N_fodo ) Length of dipole Length of FODO cell Total length of ARC Filling factor value 10 or 12 or 14 ? ? 14 -15 m ? N_fodo each ARC LSS N_fodo each ARC LSS …… DS DS DS DS 8 ARCs

B = 11.8 T

ARC FODO cell of SPPC FODO cell structure β(m) Parameters Value Dipole length 14.452 m Quadruple length 6 m Sextuple length 0.5 Space between dipoles 1.4 m Space between dipole and quadruple 3.5 m Cell length 213.42 m Phase advance 90 degree β+ 363 m Β- 62 m Dx_max 2.4 m Beam stay clear at FOCO cell( When aperture is 1.75 cm) 28 σ β(m) FODO cell structure

Optics of one ARC section β(m) Optics of one ARC section 44 FODO cells ARC length:9390.6 m ARC length with two Dispersion Suppressor: (548.454 m each): 10487.5 m

Dispersion Suppressor β(m) β(m) Half bend DS Full bend DS Half dipole strength (compare to that of ARC) Quadruple is the same as that of ARC Simple, but not flexible May reduce dipole filling factor Full dipole strength Simple Optics functions bump Layout is fixed

DS design of SPPC Left part of DS Right part of DS Length can be changed help to adopt the layout β(m) β(m) Left part of DS Right part of DS Like full bend DS, but flexible in layout Irregular structure FODO Length: 548.454 m ( can be adjusted slightly) 7 quadruples can be use to match optics functions Maximum beta function bigger than that of ARC slightly

Beam separation and combination LSS of IP-pp Final focus triplet Separation dipoles Outer triplet Beam 1 β(m) 30 cm Beam 2 Beam separation and combination LSS_PP( beta*=0.75 m )

εn=2.4 μm βmax=18 km Ep=37.5 TeV εn=2.4 μm βmax=1.3 km Ep=2.1 TeV LSS_PP at collision ( beta*=0.75 m ) LSS_PP at injection ( beta*=10 m ) εn=2.4 μm βmax=18 km Ep=37.5 TeV εn=2.4 μm βmax=1.3 km Ep=2.1 TeV 𝜎 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜀 𝑛 𝛾 ∙ 𝛽 𝑚𝑎𝑥 =1.04 mm 𝜎 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜀 𝑛 𝛾 ∙ 𝛽 𝑚𝑎𝑥 =1.18 mm

Temporary Lattice of other LSSs 1250 m length LSS 4300 m length LSS

Integrated Lattice at injection β(m) β(m) Integrated Lattice at collision (beta*=0.75m Qx =121.28, Qy=118.31) Integrated Lattice at injection (beta*=10 m Qx =119.28, Qy=118.31)

Dynamics Aperture consideration

Source of nonlinear force: Sextuple magnets( for chromaticity correction) Magnet multiple error - ARC bending magnets error (more than 4400 ARC dipoles in total) - Separation dipoles error ( large aperture) - Final focus quadrupoles error( large aperture) - ARC Quadrupoles error Misalignment Beam-beam ……

Dipole error table From LHC From FCC Systematic From LHC From FCC There isn’t a dipole error table for SPPC, we cite the data of FCC to give the first estimation of DA.

DA study with SixTrack

DA at injection σy σy σx σx Adding sextuple without dipole error (chromaticity corrected) Adding sextuple and dipole error (chromaticity corrected) Qx =119.28, Qy=118.31 Normalized rms transverse emittance: 2.4 μm Proton energy: 2.1 TeV σx=0.627 mm, σy=0.250 mm Track 1000 turns

DA at collision σy σy σx σx Adding sextuple without dipole error (chromaticity corrected) Adding sextuple and dipole error (chromaticity corrected) Qx =121.28, Qy=118.31 Normalized rms transverse emittance: 2.4 μm Proton energy: 37.5 TeV σx=0.15 mm, σy=0.065 mm Track 1000 turns

Lots of work need to be done Tune scan Frequency map Resonance analysis Errors and correction …… Tools are under construction: Sixdesk running environment for SixTrack; powerful clusters, and so on.

Summary Preliminary lattice design of the new design scope 100km - 12 T - 75 TeV collider has been done. Integrated Lattice is available for collimation effect study and DA study. DA study has been started. Preliminary DA result is about 8-10 σ (considering ARC dipole error and sextuple). Next to do Optimize the Lattice design - Detail collision section design - Matching section design Make further study of DA. - Massive simulation jobs are needed to do under the Sixdesk platform - Tune scan and resonance analysis.

Thank you for your attention!