Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solution structure of the constant region of nuclear envelope protein LAP2 reveals two LEM‐domain structures: one binds BAF and the other binds DNA by.
Advertisements

Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 3, Issue 8, Pages (August 1995)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
SH3-SH2 Domain Orientation in Src Kinases
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
What Does It Take to Bind CAR?
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structural Determinants of Integrin Recognition by Talin
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
The structure of the complex of plastocyanin and cytochrome f, determined by paramagnetic NMR and restrained rigid-body molecular dynamics  Marcellus.
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Solution Structure of the Proapoptotic Molecule BID
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 763-774 (July 2000) Localization and characterization of the hyaluronan-binding site on the Link module from human TSG-6  Jan D Kahmann, Ronan O’Brien, Jörn M Werner, Dick Heinegård, John E Ladbury, Iain D Campbell, Anthony J Day  Structure  Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 763-774 (July 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00163-5

Figure 1 The apparent molecular weights (Mw), determined from sedimentation equilibrium experiments at 27 000 rpm, for Link_TSG6 in the absence and presence of HA oligosaccharides, plotted against the calculated molecular weights (Mr) for 1:1 complexes. The theoretical molecular weights for 1:1 and 2:1 complexes of HA and Link_TSG6 are indicated by dotted lines. Error bars indicate the statistical errors from the nonlinear least-squares fits. Structure 2000 8, 763-774DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00163-5)

Figure 2 Correlation of thermodynamic parameters (ΔbG, ΔbH and TΔbS) with oligosaccharide length at 25°C. Structure 2000 8, 763-774DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00163-5)

Figure 3 Temperature-dependence of the enthalpy change (ΔbH) for the interaction of Link_TSG6 with HA8. The data for temperatures between 10 and 30°C, which show a good linear correlation, were fit using least-squares linear regression; the values derived at 35 and 40°C were not included (see text). Error bars indicate the standard error for the data included in the fit. Structure 2000 8, 763-774DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00163-5)

Figure 4 Comparison of strip plots derived from HNCA data matrices for residues Arg40 to Ala49 in Link_TSG6 (free protein) and the Link_TSG6–HA8 complex. The backbone amide proton (HN) chemical shift values for a particular amino acid (denoted in single-letter amino acid code) are shown below the corresponding strip. Sequential connectivities between residues are illustrated by lines between equivalent Cα peaks in adjacent strips. Structure 2000 8, 763-774DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00163-5)

Figure 5 Chemical shift differences (Δδ) between free and ligand-bound Link_TSG6 plotted against residue number. These were determined for HN and NH (backbone amide groups), Cα and Cβ atoms from HNCA and CACB(CO)NH spectra of 13C,15N-labelled-Link_TSG6 with or without equimolar HA8. Certain resonances were not detected/identified in either the free or complexed protein (or both) and in these cases a Δδ value could not be calculated (HN and NH: Ile61, Val62, Lys63, Gly69; Cα: Pro60, Ile61, Val62, Lys63 and Pro64; Cβ: Tyr59, Pro60, Ile61, Val62, Lys63, Arg81, Asn94 and Lys98). Dashed lines represent the cut-off levels chosen to indicate a significantly perturbed resonance (HN ≥ 0.2 ppm; NH ≥ 1.0 ppm; Cα and Cβ ≥ 0.5 ppm). Structure 2000 8, 763-774DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00163-5)

Figure 6 The tertiary structure of the TSG-6 Link module showing the position of amino acid residues that are perturbed on HA8 binding. (a,b) The secondary structure of Link_TSG6 consists of two α helices (orange) and six β strands (yellow) (see [24]). The molecules shown in (b–d) are rotated 45° (to the right around a vertical axis) relative to that in (a). The loop (residues 61–74) between the β4 and β5 strands is coloured blue. The β5 strand contains a bulge which is shown in white. (c) Average backbone coordinates of Link_TSG6 (white tube) showing residues with significantly perturbed amide chemical shifts (HN or NH) in red (see Table 2); the molecular surface of the protein is shown as a mesh outline. (d) Atomic (spheres) representation of the Link_TSG6 structure in which amino acids with significant Cα and/or Cβ shifts (Table 2) are colored orange. Ala49 is not visible on the diagram as it is buried in the protein core. Ile75, which is partially solvent exposed, is obscured by the sidechain of Lys72. Structure 2000 8, 763-774DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00163-5)

Figure 7 Comparison of HA-binding sites on Link_TSG6 and CD44. Molecular surface representations of (a) the TSG-6 Link module and (b) the Link module from CD44 modelled on the Link_TSG6 coordinates [6]; the molecules are shown in similar orientations on the basis of their secondary structural elements. (c) An alignment of the corresponding amino acid sequences. Surface-exposed residues on Link_TSG6 that have significantly perturbed chemical shifts are shown in orange. Amino acids of CD44 that are critical or important for HA binding are in single-letter amino acid code and coloured dark blue or light blue, respectively. These residues were determined by site-directed mutagenesis as described by Bajorath et al. [16] and are numbered accordingly. All the HA-binding residues on the CD44 Link module are visible apart from Lys68 which is on the opposite face of the protein. Structure 2000 8, 763-774DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00163-5)