Status of the A=56, 64, and 68 X-ray burst waiting points

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIGS2 Workshop June 3-4, 2013 Nuclear Structure Studies at HI  S Henry R. Weller The HI  S Nuclear Physics Program.
Advertisements

Structure of the ECEC candidate daughter 112 Cd P.E. Garrett University of Guelph TRIUMF Excellence Cluster “Universe”, Technische Universität München.
Testing isospin-symmetry breaking and mapping the proton drip-line with Lanzhou facilities Yang Sun Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China SIAP, Jan.10,
Reaction dynamics of light nuclei around the Coulomb barrier Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud ARIS 2014Alessia Di Pietro,INFN-LNS.
Γ spectroscopy of neutron-rich 95,96 Rb nuclei by the incomplete fusion reaction of 94 Kr on 7 Li Simone Bottoni University of Milan Mini Workshop 1°-
Nuclear Astrophysics II Lecture 7 Fri. June 15, 2012 Prof. Shawn Bishop, Office 2013, Ex
High precision study of the  decay of 42 Ti  V ud matrix element and nuclear physics  Experimental and theoretical precisions  New cases: goals and.
EURISOL workshop, ECT* Trento, Jan Two-component (neutron/proton) statistical description of low-energy heavy-ion reactions E. Běták & M.
Reaction rates in the Laboratory Example I: 14 N(p,  ) 15 O stable target  can be measured directly: slowest reaction in the CNO cycle  Controls duration.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Neutron capture cross sections on light nuclei M. Heil, F. Käppeler, E. Uberseder Torino workshop,
Reaction rates in the Laboratory Example I: 14 N(p,  ) 15 O stable target  can be measured directly: slowest reaction in the CNO cycle  Controls duration.
Reaction rates in the Laboratory Example I: 14 N(p,  ) 15 O stable target  can be measured directly: slowest reaction in the CNO cycle  Controls duration.
Review of PHYSICAL REVIEW C 70, (2004) Stability of the N=50 shell gap in the neutron-rich Rb, Br, Se and Ge isotones Y. H. Zhang, LNL, Italy David.
GRETINA experiments with fast beams at NSCL Dirk Weisshaar,  GRETINA and fast-beam experiments  Some details on implementation at NSCL  Performance.
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
Decay Spectroscopy Working Group Nuclear Structure Theory Morten Hjorth-Jensen – Shell Structure and Interactions Ivan Borzov – Theory of  Decay Applications.
Nuclear Level Densities Edwards Accelerator Laboratory Steven M. Grimes Ohio University Athens, Ohio.
Nucleon: T = ½, m t =  ½. For a nucleus, by extension: m t = ½ (Z - N). If neutrons and protons are really “identical” as far as the strong interaction.
GT (  ) : Important weak process  decay : absolute B(GT), limited to low-lying state CE reactions : relative B(GT), highly Ex region  decay  isospin.
Caroline D. Nesaraja, Michael S. Smith NUCLEAR DATA ACTIVITIES AT OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY.
H. Schatz Michigan State University National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics The rp process in X-ray bursts.
Some aspects of reaction mechanism study in collisions induced by Radioactive Beams Alessia Di Pietro.
Radiochemistry Dr Nick Evans
Β decay of 69 Kr and 73 Sr and the rp process Bertram Blank CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan.
Nuclear Physics in X-ray binaries the rp-process and more Open questions Nuclear physics uncertainties status of major waiting points reaction rates mass.
NS08 MSU, June 3rd – 6th 2008 Elisa Rapisarda Università degli studi di Catania E.Rapisarda 18 2.
Beta decay around 64 Cr GANIL, March 25 th V 63 V 64 V 60 V 61 V 63 Cr 64 Cr 65 Cr 61 Cr 62 Cr 60 Cr 64 Mn 65 Mn 66 Mn 65 Fe 67 Fe 1) 2 + in 64.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Neutron cross sections for reading the abundance history Michael Heil Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe.
CERN-INTC /INTC-P-415 Tackling the s-process stellar neutron density via the 147 Pm(n,  ) reaction Spokespersons: C. Guerrero (U. Sevilla) and.
Reaction studies with low-energy weakly-bound beams Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud NN 2015Alessia Di Pietro,INFN-LNS.
High-precision mass measurements below 48 Ca and in the rare-earth region to investigate the proton-neutron interaction Proposal to the ISOLDE and NToF.
Determining the rp-Process Flow through 56 Ni 56 Ni is a Waiting Point and imposes a delay Decay Lifetime: 2.3x10^4 s ; Burst Time: 10 – 100 s Largest.
Nuclear structure research at ISOLTRAP 17th of November 2008 Dennis Neidherr University of Mainz Outline:  Motivation for our measurements  Xe/Rn results.
Alexander Herlert High-precision mass measurements for reliable nuclear-astrophysics calculations CERN, PH-IS NIC-IX, CERN, Geneva, June 29, 2006.
Technical solutions for N=Z Physics David Jenkins.
Spectroscopy studies around 78 Ni and beyond N=50 via transfer and Coulomb excitation reactions J. J. Valiente Dobón (INFN-LNL, Padova,Italy) A. Gadea.
TRIGA-SPEC: Developement platform for MATS and LaSpec at FAIR Double-beta transition Q-value measurements with TRIGA-TRAP NUSTAR Meeting Christian.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Neutron capture measurements for the weak s-process Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January.
1 EUNPC2015Aug 30 - Sep 4, 2015 LIFETIME MEASUREMENTS TO STUDY THE NATURE OF EXCITED STATES BEYOND N=50 AGATA + GANIL Andrea Gottardo.
Nuclear Physics of NS Shallow Heating/Cooling Zach Meisel Nuclear physics properties driving neutron star shallow heating and cooling Zach Meisel 2016.
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg Zhuang GE RIKEN, Wako, Japan Mass measurements of short-lived nuclides at storage rings in Asia and its.
Isochronous mass measurements of 58 Ni projectile fragments at CSRe Xinliang Yan Precision nuclear spectroscope group Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese.
Beta decay spectroscopy studies of novae and x-ray bursts
Mass Measurements of Short-lived Nuclei at HIRFL-CSR
Nuclear structure through dynamics and correlations
Relativistic Kinematics for the Binding Energy of Nuclear Reactions
In-source laser spectroscopy of mercury isotopes (P-424)
Presented by Hendrik Schatz Michigan State University
Alexander Herlert, CERN (PH-SME-IS)
The role of isospin symmetry in medium-mass N ~ Z nuclei
New proposal for the BRIKEN campaign
Centre de Sciences Nucléaires et de Sciences de la Matière
Chapter 29:Nuclear Physics
A. Casanovas (UPC), C. Domingo-Pardo (IFIC), C. Guerrero (U
Isochronous Mode of the CR
International School of Nuclear Physics 39th Course, Erice-Sicily, Sep
gamma-transmission coefficients are most uncertain values !!!
Decay spectroscopy with LaBr3(Ce) detectors at RIKEN and GSI
Fill in the arrows on the blank periodic table with trends using your graphs made during last class. Periodic Trends.
The N=50 shell closure and beyond
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
Tatsuya Chujo for the PHENIX collaboration
Masses of subatomic particles that may be useful for questions below
Lanzhou.
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
High-precision mass measurements of exotic nuclides:
Search for the onset of baryon anomaly at RHIC-PHENIX
Change of 7Be decay rate under compression
Probing correlations by use of two-nucleon removal
Presentation transcript:

Status of the A=56, 64, and 68 X-ray burst waiting points Zach Meisel 2016 Ohio University Workshop on Experiments for X-ray Burst Nucleosynthesis

rp-process reaction sequence & waiting points W. Lewin et al. SSRv 1993 →rp-process 56Ni →αp-process X-ray counts/second 64Ge 68Se 72Kr 100Sn H. Schatz et al. PRL 2001 Reaction sequence: 3α→HCNO Z N

Waiting point mechanism 120 20 WP Z N Caused by: - low Q-value (easily establish p,γ–γ,p equilibrium) - long half-life (~seconds) Also impacted by p,γ rate on waiting-point proton-capture daughter.

56Ni waiting-point H. Schatz et al. PRL 2001 Courtesy of W. Ong Z N

56Ni waiting-point: Measured key resonance energies S800 Spectrograph (recoil detection) Coupled Cyclotrons (58Ni beam) GRETINA (in-flight γ) A1900 Fragment Separator CD2 target Production Target (Be) C. Langer et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2016) W. Ong et al. Submitted to Phys. Rev. C (2016)

Conclusion: 56Ni stalls the rp-process …but may be bypassed at high ρ,T W. Ong et al. Submitted to Phys. Rev. C (2016)

64Ge waiting-point 64Ge + 2p-capture flow uncertain Calculations by C. Langer 64Ge + 2p-capture flow uncertain 65As mass measured by X.L. Tu et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011 …but relatively large uncertainty (~90keV) remains & systematic bias possibly present Penning trap mass measurement planned M. Eibach & Z. Meisel NSCL approved expt. e15026 (≤10keV uncertainty expected) 66Se mass still needed

68Se waiting-point H. Schatz et al. PRL 2001 Z N

68Se waiting-point: Measured key Q-value Coupled Cyclotrons A1900 Fragment Separator Production Target Radiofrequency Fragment Separator Beta-counting Station M. del Santo, Z. Meisel, et al. Phys. Lett B 2014

Conclusion: 68Se substantially stalls the rp-process M. del Santo, Z. Meisel, et al. Phys. Lett B 2014 Events detected Before expt. After expt. Proton energy [keV] X-ray flux Ep = M69Br - M68Se Events detected *qualitative conclusion agrees with A. Rogers et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011 Proton energy [keV]

Summary of waiting-point nuclei status 56Ni: Flow through 56Ni is weak --> strong waiting point [C. Langer et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032502 (2014)] But, a by-pass is possible (need more nuclear data) W. Ong et al. Submitted to Phys. Rev. C (2016) 64Ge: Flow from 64Ge depends on 65As mass [M. Eibach & Z. Meisel NSCL approved expt. e15026] (Uncertainty will remain from 66Se mass) 68Se: 68Se is a strong waiting-point (<13% flow through) [M. del Santo, Z. Meisel, et al. Phys. Lett. B 2014] (Could be stronger, depending on 70Kr mass) 72Kr: Will be investigated similar to 68Se [A. Rogers NSCL approved expt. e12024] 100Sn: Need t1/2 [D. Bazin et al. PRL 2008] Improved half-life would help H. Schatz et al. PRL 2001 *but other reactions also significantly affect the rp-process flow & therefore XRB light-curve + ash composition (R. Cyburt et al. Submitted to Astrophys. J. 2016) Z N

Thanks to:

The current value for ME(65As) may be systematically incorrect There is some evidence which suggests the previous ME(65As) measurement may have been systematically biased to an over-bound value highest frev reference 65As IMS-SR mass measurement TOF spectra: X.L. Tu et al. NIM A 654, 213 (2011 IMS-SR mass measurement fit residual: Residual for 2012 AME ∝ 𝑓 𝑟𝑒𝑣. 67Se 71Kr X.L. Tu et al PRL 106, 112501

65As half-life also points to more negative proton separation energy (i.e. less-bound 65As)

If ME(65As) were less bound, this could resolve the ‘coulomb-shift anomaly’ Systematic overestimating of binding by Tu et al. could cause fp-shell ‘Coulomb-shift anomaly’ X.L. Tu et al. J. Phys G 41 025104 (2014) Coulomb shift: ∆ 𝐸 𝑐 = 𝑀𝐸 > − 𝑀𝐸 < +782.35 𝑘𝑒𝑉, where > is the neutron-deficient species and < is the mirror Charged sphere, 𝐸 𝐶𝑜𝑢𝑙 = 3 5 𝑍(𝑍−1) 𝑒 2 𝑅 ->∆ 𝐸 𝑐 ∝ 𝐸 𝐶𝑜𝑢𝑙,> − 𝐸 𝐶𝑜𝑢𝑙,< ∝ 𝑍 < 𝑅 ∝ 𝑍 < 𝐴 1 3 Reduced for ellipsoid Even 𝑍 > = all protons-paired -->anti-parallel spin-alignment -->spatially symmetric Therefore, Expect parallel linear trends for ∆ 𝑬 𝒄 vs 𝒁 < 𝑨 𝟏 𝟑 Coulomb shift trend in fp-shell: Superimpose linear trend: (expected from charged-sphere approximation) (540 keV) (shift required to achieve linearity) (480 keV) 75Sr-75Rb 67Se-67As 71Kr-71Br (125 keV) 69Br-69Se 71Kr-71Br (250 keV) 65As-65Ge 67Se-67As 63Ge-63Ga 65As-65Ge 59Zn-59Cu 61Ga-61Zn 57Cu-57Ni X.L. Tu et al. J. Phys G 41 025104 (2014)

Rogers et al. 2011 & del Santo et al. 2014 may agree