Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TCT 2011 | San Francisco, CA | November 10, 2011 Two-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) in Inoperable Patients With Severe.
Advertisements

Types of AVR Examples of replacement aortic valves: a) shows an aortic homograft, b) and c) show a xenograft, d) shows a ball and cage valve, e) shows.
TCT 2014 | September 13, 2014 Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) in “Inoperable” Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis:
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Jeffrey W. Moses, MD Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City The State of TAVR -PARTNER: From Concept to Mortality.
STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Health-Related Quality of Life After Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Results From.
Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of aortic stenosis patients implanted with a self-expending bioprosthesis Sabine Bleiziffer German.
ACC 2015 Jae K. Oh, MD On Behalf of the US CoreValve Investigators Remodeling of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Is Responsible for Regression.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Lessons from TAVR Randomized Trials and Registries E Murat Tuzcu, MD Professor of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Financial disclosures: None PARTNER Executive.
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis Compared with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High Risk.
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
Use of Psoas Muscle Size as a Frailty Assessment Tool for Open and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Raghavendra Paknikar BS Jeffrey Friedman BS David.
University Heart Center Hamburg
A shifting paradigm of care: Advances in transcatheter heart valve procedures Sandra Lauck MSN, RN, CCN(C) Clinical Nurse Specialist, Arrhythmia Management.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis David H. Adams et al (U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators) Journal Club November.
Postoperative Delirium is Associated with Increased Operative and One Year Mortality in Patients Treated with Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
Martin B. Leon, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Investigators TCT 2010; Washington, DC; September 23, 2010 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inoperable.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Howard C. Herrmann, MD on behalf of The PARTNER II Trial Investigators SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable.
2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Aron Goldhirsch, Richard.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Greater New York Geriatric Cardiology Consortium: Valve Disease in Older Adults Allan Schwartz, MD Columbia University Medical Center New York Presbyterian.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
Patients the Surgeon Should Refer for TAVR
The Impact of Preoperative Renal Dysfunction on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Andres M. Pineda MD, J. Kevin.
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
Patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve replacement for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
New Data from The PARTNER Trial
Extending the Boundaries of TAVR: Future Directions
Trans- catheter aortic valve replacement vs
Late breaking news in heart valve disease
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
J. Matthew Brennan, MD, MPH Duke University School of Medicine
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Cardiac Catheterization Conference
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
TAVR in Patients with Chronic Lung Disease
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
TAVI Passed the Exam and is Ready for Clinical Use in Inoperable Patients Disclosures Research Funding and Speaking Honoraria: Edwards Lifesciences.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
University of Pennsylvania
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
Early Recovery of Left Ventricular Systolic Function After CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Harold L. Dauerman, MD; Michael J. Reardon,
David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc. On behalf of The PARTNER Investigators
Latest Data from Balloon Expendable Trials
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Insights from the NCDR® STS/ACC TVT Registry.
TAVR or Surgery for Low Flow (LF) AS – Insights from the PARTNER Trial
University Heart Center Hamburg
Risk Stratification of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Patients
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Nishith Patel Waikato Cardiothoracic Unit
PARTNER 2A Trial design: Intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis (STS PROM score 4-8%) were randomized to undergo either TAVR or SAVR, stratified.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Sildenafil for Improving Outcomes in Patients With Corrected Valvular Heart Disease and Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension: A Multicenter, Double-Blind,
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Vinod H. Thourani, MD, Hanna A
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
Slides courtesy of Dr. Randall Harada
Presentation transcript:

Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) in “Inoperable” Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The PARTNER Trial Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators TCT 2014 | September 13, 2014

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the recommended treatment for “inoperable” patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Long term clinical benefit and valve performance in this population remain unknown. 2

Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis ASSESSMENT: Transfemoral Access PARTNER Study Design Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Inoperable N = 358 Severe Symptomatic AS with AVA< 0.8 cm2 (EOA index < 0.5 cm2/m2), and mean gradient > 40 mmHg or jet velocity > 4.0 m/s Inoperable defined as risk of death or serious irreversible morbidity of AVR as assessed by cardiologist and two surgeons exceeding 50%. ASSESSMENT: Transfemoral Access 1:1 Randomization TF TAVR n = 179 Standard Therapy n = 179 VS Primary Endpoint: All-Cause Mortality Over Length of Trial (Superiority) Primary endpoint evaluated when all patients reached one year follow-up. After primary endpoint analysis reached, patients were allowed to cross-over to TAVR.

Key End-Points for 5 Year Analysis All-Cause Mortality Cardiac Mortality Re-hospitalization Stroke NYHA functional class Echo-derived valve areas, transvalvular gradients, and paravalvular leak. Mortality outcomes stratified by STS score, paravalvular leak and age. 4

Study Flow Inoperable Cohort Randomized Inoperable N = 179 Standard Therapy N = 179 TAVR 10 Patients Withdrew 85 / 85 patients 100% followed at 1 Yr 124 / 124 patients 100% followed at 1 Yr Cross Over 11 pts 19 / 19 patients 100% followed at 3 Yrs 81 / 83 patients 97.6% followed at 3 Yrs Cross Over 9 pts 6 / 6 patients 100% followed at 5 Yrs* 50 / 51 patients 98.0% followed at 5 Yrs* * ± 2 months follow-up window 5

Patient Characteristics TAVR N = 179 Standard Rx p-value Age – yr 83.1 ± 8.6 83.2 ± 8.3 0.95 Male sex (%) 45.8 46.9 0.92 STS Score 11.2 ± 5.8 12.1 ± 6.1 0.14 NYHA I or II (%) III or IV (%) 7.8 92.2 6.1 93.9 0.68 CAD (%) 67.6 74.3 0.20 COPD Any (%) O2 dependent (%) 41.3 21.2 52.5 25.7 0.04 0.38 Creatinine > 2 mg/dL (%) 5.6 9.6 0.23 Frailty (%) 18.1 28.0 0.09 Porcelain aorta (%) 19.0 11.2 0.05 Chest wall radiation (%) 8.9 8.4 1.00

All-Cause Mortality (ITT) Crossover Patients Censored at Crossover 71.8% 93.6% All-Cause Mortality (%) Months HR [95% CI] = 0.50 [0.39, 0.65] p (log rank) < 0.0001 Standard Rx (n = 179) TAVR (n = 179) 30.7% 50.8% 43.0% 68.0% 64.1% 87.5% 53.9% 80.9% * In an age and gender matched US population without comorbidities, the mortality at 5 years is 40.5%.

Median Survival 11.1 Months 29.7 Months Months p (log rank) < 0.0001

All-Cause Mortality (ITT) Landmark Analysis Standard Rx (n = 179) TAVR (n = 179) 30.7% 50.8% 33.4% 61.1% 38.9% 66.7% HR [95% CI] = 0.47 [0.24, 0.94] p (log rank) = 0.028 HR [95% CI] = 0.46 [0.32, 0.66] p (log rank) < 0.0001 HR [95% CI] = 0.50 [0.39, 0.65] Months 0-1 Year 3-5 Years 1-3 Years 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60

Cardiovascular Mortality (%) Cardiovascular Mortality (ITT) Crossover Patients Censored at Crossover 57.3% 85.9% Cardiovascular Mortality (%) Months HR [95% CI] = 0.41 [0.31, 0.55] p (log rank) < 0.0001 Standard Rx (n = 179) TAVR (n = 179) 20.5% 44.6% 30.7% 62.4% 47.6% 80.6% 41.2% 74.5%

Causes of Death 18% vs 34% 48% vs 33% n=179 Percent Patients

All-Cause Mortality Stratified by STS Score (ITT) Months STS < 5 STS 5-15 STS > 15 100% 55.9% 93.3% 73.7% 75.2% 93.4% p (log rank) = 0.0012 p (log rank) = 0.0002 p (log rank) = 0.0749 Standard Rx (n = 123) TAVR (n = 113) Standard Rx (n = 12) TAVR (n = 28) Standard Rx (n = 43) TAVR (n = 38)

Cardiovascular Mortality Stratified by STS Score (ITT) Months 100% 41.1% 91.8% 57.8% 61.6% 82.4% STS < 5 STS 5-15 STS > 15 p (log rank) < 0.0001 p (log rank) = 0.0098 Standard Rx (n = 123) TAVR (n = 113) Standard Rx (n = 12) TAVR (n = 28) Standard Rx (n = 43) TAVR (n = 38)

Repeat Hospitalization (ITT) 87.3% 47.6% Months Rehospitalization (%) Standard Rx (n = 179) TAVR (n = 179) HR [95% CI] = 0.40 [0.29, 0.55] p (log rank) < 0.0001 53.9% 27.0% 72.5% 34.9% 75.7% 43.1% 83.0% 46.3%

NYHA Class Over Time (ITT) Survivors Baseline 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years N = 14.3% 40.0% 30.0% 50.0% 23.7% 60.8% 92.2% 93.9% p = NS p < 0.0001

Competing Risks Analysis (ITT) Death and Stroke Months 14.6% 5.7% Incidence (%)

Paravalvular Leak (AT) Percent of Evaluable Echocardiograms N =

Mortality by Paravalvular Leak None-Mild (n = 142) Moderate-Severe (n = 23) 69.2% 78.3% p (log rank) = 0.510 p (log rank) = 0.043 All-Cause Mortality Cardiovascular Mortality 51.3% 74.6%

Mean Gradient & Valve Area (AT) Mean Gradient (mmHg) Valve Area (cm²) N = EOA Mean Gradient Error bars = ± 1 Std Dev 159 86 70 44 31 15 163 91 71 46 19

Mean Gradient & Valve Area (AT) Restricted to Patients with 5 Year Data Mean Gradient (mmHg) EOA Mean Gradient Valve Area (cm²) N = Error bars = ± 1 Std Dev 15 14 12 13 16 20

Subgroup Analysis All-Cause Mortality Hazard Ratio [95% CI] Interaction p-value Overall (N=358) 0.50 [0.39-0.65] Age < 85 (N=186) 0.46 [0.33-0.66] 0.40 Age ≥ 85 (N=172) 0.56 [0.39-0.79] Male (N=166) [0.32-0.66] 0.34 Female (N=192) 0.55 [0.40-0.78] BMI ≤ 25 (N=170) 0.58 [0.41-0.84] 0.71 BMI > 25 (N=188) 0.44 [0.31-0.63] STS ≤ 11 (N=170) 0.52 [0.36-0.76] 0.65 STS > 11 (N=187) 0.53 [0.37-0.74] EF ≤ 55 (N=173) 0.47 [0.33-0.67] 0.09 EF > 55 (N=171) 0.61 [0.42-0.88] Pulmonary Hypertension No (N=136) [0.37-0.85] 0.87 Yes (N=103) 0.51 [0.32-0.82] Mod / Sev MR No (N=261) [0.43-0.77] 0.03 Yes (N=77) 0.30 [0.17-0.53] Oxygen Dependent COPD No (N=270) [0.35-0.62] 0.14 Yes (N=88) 0.68 [0.42-1.10] Prior CABG or PCI No (N=182) [0.39-0.78] 0.27 Yes (N=176)

TAVR Mortality Stratified by Age (ITT) Months 96.0% 73.5% 91.8% 70.4%

Clinical Observations Mortality benefit was similar in elderly (>85 yr) patients compared to those ≤85 years. Cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality benefit was seen even in patients with high STS score. Patients with O2 dependent COPD may have less mortality benefit. Beyond early procedural risk of stroke there was no persistent risk over 5-year follow up. Moderate and severe paravalvular leak is associated with higher cardiovascular mortality particularly in patients with less comorbidities.

Main Conclusions At 5 years follow-up benefits of TAVR were sustained as measured by: All-Cause Mortality Cardiovascular Mortality Repeat Hospitalization Functional Status Valve durability was demonstrated with no increase in transvalvular gradient or attrition of valve area. 24

Thank You to the Dedicated Study Teams at All PARTNER Investigational Sites 25