OFDMA Performance Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0383r0 Impact of number of sub-channels in OFDMA Date: Slide 1Leif Wilhelmsson, Ericsson March 2015 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1227r3 SubmissionSlide 1 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Sept 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1452r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency selective scheduling in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0647r2 SubmissionSlide 1 PHY abstraction method comparison Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek May 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0868r0 July 2015 Hakan Persson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Impact of Frequency Selective Scheduling Feedback for OFDMA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0818r1 Submission Further Analysis of Feedback and Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA July 2015 Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1057r0 Submission Multiple Resource Unit Allocation for TGax OFDMA Sept 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Doc.: IEEE /0632r1 Submission May 2016 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of Robust Transmission Modes for MIMO in 11ay Date:
2840 Junction Ave, San Jose, CA 95134, USA
OFDMA performance in 11ax
PHY Design Considerations for af
On Waking-Up Multiple WUR Stations
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
On the Suitability of Repetition for ah
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Usage of Doppler Bit in 11ax
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
PHY abstraction and performance for outdoor channel models
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
PHY abstraction method comparison
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
Multi-AP Enhancement and Multi-Band Operations
Follow up on Preamble Design for WUR
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
On Re-discovery Problems in WUR WLAN
OFDMA Performance Analysis
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
Simulation Results for Box5
On Re-discovery Problems in WUR WLAN
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
Multi-AP Enhancement and Multi-Band Operations
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2
Simulation Results for Box5
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
UL MU Random Access Analysis
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
OFDMA performance in 11ax
May 2016 doc.: IEEE /584r1 May 2016 Need of SDU Fragmentation to Reduce Padding Ratio in UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Yu Wang.
Box 5 Calibration Result
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Modulation Scheme for 11bd Range Extension
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Modulation Scheme for 11bd Range Extension Update
Efficient FDMA MU Transmission Schemes for WUR WLAN
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
MAC Efficiency Gain of Uplink Multi-user Transmission
PHY Abstractions Types For HEW System Level Simulations
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
Modulation Scheme for 11bd Range Extension Update
DSC Calibration Result
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Enhanced Resource Allocation Schemes for 11be
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Presentation transcript:

OFDMA Performance Analysis Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/XXXXr0 Sept 2014 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: 2014-09-14 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Email Tianyu Wu MediaTek San Jose, CA, USA tianyu.wu@mediatek.com Jianhan Liu jianhan.liu@mediatek.com Thomas Pare thomas.pare@mediatek.com Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Shoukang ZHENG et. al, I2R, Singapore

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/XXXXr0 Sept 2014 Background OFDMA is a promising technology to increase the area throughput From PHY POV, OFDMA can benefit from diversity gain By assigning each resource blocks (RBs)* to the STA with highest SINR, OFDMA can benefit from multi user diversity and frequency diversity gain. System complexity and OFDMA throughput is a tradeoff: More active STAs participating in the OFDMA transmission will bring higher throughput gain but lead to larger scheduling complexity. On frequency selective fading channels, smaller RB size will bring higher throughput gain but lead to larger signaling and scheduling complexity In this contribution, we study the OFDMA performance on frequency selective fading channels *Note: RB is considered as a number of subcarriers on all symbols of the packet. Do not consider time domain granularity in this contribution. Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Tianyu Wu et. al, MediaTek

OFDMA performance OFDMA PHY throughput depends on: Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/XXXXr0 Sept 2014 OFDMA performance OFDMA PHY throughput depends on: Number of active STAs participating OFDMA transmission Affect the MU diversity gain Size of resource blocks(RB) Affect the frequency diversity gain Channel model Different channel model will have different coherence BW and lead to different RB size requirement Scheduling scheme. Simple throughput maximizing scheduling is used in the analysis Power allocation etc. For simplicity, we do equal power allocation on all RBs. Tianyu Wu, etc. MediaTek Tianyu Wu et. al, MediaTek

Coherence BW for Channel models May 2014 Coherence BW for Channel models Coherence BW can be calculated from RMS delay spread. RB size selected within the coherence BW shall bring little OFDMA throughput loss However, the coherence BW is quite small especially for outdoor channels How RB size affect the OFDMA throughput will be studied in the following simulations. Channel model RMS delay spread (ns) Coherence BW (MHz, 0.5 ) Sub-carriers for 1x OFDMA Sub-carriers for 4x OFDMA B 15 13.3 43 170 C 30 6.7 21 86 D 50 4 13 51 Umi LOS 103 1.9 6 24 Umi NLOS 217 0.9 3 12 Tianyu Wu, etc. MediaTek

Simulation settings Assume 10 active STAs with traffic for a BSS Sept 2014 Simulation settings Assume 10 active STAs with traffic for a BSS Assuming same long term fading (path loss + shadowing 100db) for all STAs Small scale fading between AP and STAs follow channel model D and Umi NLOS Scheduling scheme: AP assign each RB to the STA with highest average SINR Simulation on DL OFDMA with fixed Tx power 20dbm The PHY throughput shall be same for UL OFDMA as long as sum Tx power of all OFDMA STAs are the same. We compare the OFDM throughput averaged over all STAs, OFDM throughput of max AP to STA pair and OFDMA throughput with different size of resource blocks. Genie MCS: MCS to achieve highest throughput 80MHz total BW, LDPC for all links All the sub carriers are treated as data subcarriers for simplicity Tianyu Wu, etc. MediaTek

Performance comparison for Umi channel Sept 2014 Performance comparison for Umi channel With RB = 1sc, 130% throughput gain over OFDM average and 60% gain over OFDM max can be achieved. To achieve over 90% of the optimal throughput, max RB size will be 8 sub carriers (2.5 Mhz). 4x OFDMA symbol has similar results as 1x OFDMA symbol. 1x OFDMA symbol 4x OFDMA symbol Tianyu Wu, etc. MediaTek

Performance comparison for channel D Sept 2014 Performance comparison for channel D With RB = 1sc, 130% throughput gain over OFDM average and 75% gain over OFDM max can be achieved. To achieve over 90% of the optimal throughput, max RB size will be 16 sub carriers (5 Mhz). Tianyu Wu, etc. MediaTek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/XXXXr0 Sept 2014 Observation On Umi channel, the OFDMA performance drops faster that channel D. Within coherence BW, the OFDMA performance is close to the max throughput (> 95%) RB size around 5MHz can achieve >90% throughput for indoor channels and close to 90% for outdoor channel models. Tianyu Wu, etc. MediaTek Tianyu Wu et. al, MediaTek

Sept 2014 Conclusions With 10 active STAs participating in the OFDMA transmission, 90% of MU diversity gain can be achieved RB size shall be selected as a balance of OFDMA throughput gain and overhead. RB size of xx can achieve xx gain on channel D and xx gain on Umi channel From the results we can see that RB size around 5Mhz is already good enough even for outdoor scenarios. If OFDMA is selected, we recommend the RB size to be around 5 Mhz Tianyu Wu, etc. MediaTek