Direct Proof and Counterexample IV

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Division & Divisibility. a divides b if a is not zero there is a m such that a.m = b a is a factor of b b is a multiple of a a|b Division.
Advertisements

Mod arithmetic.
1 In this lecture Number Theory Quotient and Remainder Floor and Ceiling Proofs Direct proofs and Counterexamples (cont.) Division into cases.
Lecture 3 – February 17, 2003.
Remainder and Factor Theorems
Chapter 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof.
1 In this lecture  Number Theory ● Rational numbers ● Divisibility  Proofs ● Direct proofs (cont.) ● Common mistakes in proofs ● Disproof by counterexample.
3.3 Divisibility Definition If n and d are integers, then n is divisible by d if, and only if, n = dk for some integer k. d | n  There exists an integer.
Direct Proof and Counterexample II Lecture 12 Section 3.2 Thu, Feb 9, 2006.
Basic properties of the integers
CMSC 250 Discrete Structures Number Theory. 20 June 2007Number Theory2 Exactly one car in the plant has color H( a ) := “ a has color”  x  Cars –H(
Chapter 4: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof
October 1, 2009Theory of Computation Lecture 8: Primitive Recursive Functions IV 1 Primitive Recursive Predicates Theorem 6.1: Let C be a PRC class. If.
1 Properties of Integers Objectives At the end of this unit, students should be able to: State the division algorithm Apply the division algorithm Find.
(CSC 102) Discrete Structures Lecture 10.
Module :MA3036NI Cryptography and Number Theory Lecture Week 7
Chapter 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof.
The Binomial Theorem Lecture 29 Section 6.7 Mon, Apr 3, 2006.
MAT 320 Spring 2008 Section 1.2.  Start with two integers for which you want to find the GCD. Apply the division algorithm, dividing the smaller number.
Application: Correctness of Algorithms Lecture 22 Section 4.5 Fri, Feb 18, 2005.
Chinese Remainder Theorem Dec 29 Picture from ………………………
Section 2-2 Synthetic Division; The Remainder and Factor Theorems.
Application: Algorithms Lecture 20 Section 3.8 Wed, Feb 21, 2007.
Direct Proof and Counterexample III
Properties of the gcd Theorem: For any two integers a,b there exist integers x,y such that xa + yb = gcd(a,b). A proof will not be given at this point.
1 CMSC 250 Chapter 3, Number Theory. 2 CMSC 250 Introductory number theory l A good proof should have: –a statement of what is to be proven –"Proof:"
Equivalence Relations Lecture 45 Section 10.3 Fri, Apr 8, 2005.
Direct Proof and Counterexample I Lecture 11 Section 3.1 Fri, Jan 28, 2005.
Divisibility and Modular Arithmetic
Lecture 34 Section 6.7 Wed, Mar 28, 2007
Mathematical Induction I Lecture 19 Section 4.2 Mon, Feb 14, 2005.
Direct Proof and Counterexample III Part 2 Lecture 16 Section 3.3 Tue, Feb 13, 2007.
Equivalence Relations
Direct Proof and Counterexample IV: Division into Cases and the Quotient-Remainder Theorem For each of the following values of n and d, find integers q.
Modular Arithmetic with Applications to Cryptography
Direct Proof and Counterexample III: Divisibility
College Algebra Chapter 3 Polynomial and Rational Functions
Direct Proof and Counterexample II
Indirect Argument: Two Classical Theorems
3.7 The Real Zeros of a Polynomial Function
Sullivan Algebra and Trigonometry: Section 5
Remainder Theorem Section 5.5 Part 1.
Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 4: Number Theory
Dividing Monomials: The Quotient Rule and Integer Exponents
Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition
Direct Proof and Counterexample V: Floor and Ceiling
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Direct Proof and Counterexample III
Modular Arithmetic and Change of Base
The sum of any two even integers is even.
Direct Proof and Counterexample II
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra And Zeros of Polynomials
Direct Proof and Counterexample III
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Mathematical Induction I
Lecture 43 Section 10.1 Wed, Apr 6, 2005
Counting Elements of Disjoint Sets: The Addition Rule
Direct Proof and Counterexample I
Lecture 29 Section 6.7 Thu, Mar 3, 2005
Direct Proof and Counterexample IV
Rules for Multiplication and Division
Quotient-Remainder Theorem
Lecture 5 Number Theory & Proof Methods
Counting Elements of Disjoint Sets: The Addition Rule
Numerical Representation of Strings
Equivalence Relations
Mathematical Induction II
Counting Elements of Disjoint Sets: The Addition Rule
Agenda Proofs (Konsep Pembuktian) Direct Proofs & Counterexamples
Presentation transcript:

Direct Proof and Counterexample IV Lecture 14 Section 3.4 Fri, Feb 4, 2005

The Quotient-Remainder Theorem Theorem: Let n and d be integers, d  0. Then there exist unique integers q and r such that n = qd + r and 0  r < |d|. q is the quotient and r is the remainder.

The C Divide and Mod Operators The operators / and % in C are based on this theorem. If a and b are positive integers, then q = a/b and r = a % b, where 0  r < b.

The C Divide and Mod Operators Thus, a = (a/b)*b + (a % b) is true for all positive integers a and b. Therefore, a % b = a – (a/b)*b for all positive integers a and b.

The C Divide and Mod Operators What are a/b and a % b when a or b is negative? Is a = (a/b)*b + (a % b) still true when a or b is negative?

Example: Proof by Cases Theorem: For any integer n, n3 – n is a multiple of 6. Proof: Divide n by 6 to get q and r: n = 6q + r, where 0  r < 6. That is, r = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. Substitute: n3 – n = (6q + r)3 – (6q + r).

Proof continued Expand and rearrange: n3 – n = 6(36q3 + 18q2r + 3qr2 – q) + (r3 – r). Therefore, 6 | (n3 – n) if and only if 6 | (r3 – r).

Proof continued Consider the 6 possible cases: Case 1: r = 0. r3 – r = 03 – 0 = 0 = 60. Case 2: r = 1. r3 – r = 13 – 1 = 0 = 60. Case 3: r = 2. r3 – r = 23 – 2 = 6 = 61. Case 4: r = 3. r3 – r = 33 – 3 = 24 = 64. Case 5: r = 4. r3 – r = 43 – 4 = 60 = 610. Case 6: r = 5. r3 – r = 53 – 5 = 120 = 620.

Proof continued Therefore, 6 | (r3 – r) in general. In every case, 6 | (r3 – r). Therefore, 6 | (r3 – r) in general. Therefore, 6 | (n3 – n) for all integers n.

max(x, y) = ((x + y) + |x – y|)/2. Example: Max(x, y) Theorem: For all real numbers x and y, max(x, y) = ((x + y) + |x – y|)/2. Proof: Either x  y or x < y. Case I: Suppose x  y. Then |x – y| = x – y. So ((x + y) + |x – y|)/2 = ((x + y) + (x – y))/2 = x. Furthermore, max(x, y) = x.

max(x, y) = ((x + y) + |x – y|)/2. Proof Continued Case II: Suppose x < y. Then |x – y| = -x + y. So ((x + y) + |x – y|)/2 = ((x + y) + (-x + y))/2 = y. Furthermore, max(x, y) = y. Therefore, max(x, y) = ((x + y) + |x – y|)/2.

Other Formulas What is a similar formula for min(x, y)? What is a formula for max(x, y, z)?