Inverting Resistivity and Seismic Data to Find Subsurface Faults

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1Niederleithinger BAM VIII.2 Flood Defence 2008 Toronto Evaluation of Geophysical Techniques to Investigate River Embankments E. Niederleithinger.
Advertisements

Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Environmental & Engineering Geophysics “Looking through a dark glass dimly.” Insights into groundwater, runoff and the impact of humankind on the environment.
Subsurface Fault and Colluvial Wedge Detection Using Resistivity, Refraction Tomography and Seismic Reflection Sherif Hanafy King Abdullah University of.
Using 3D Seismic Imaging for Mine and Mineral Exploration G. Schuster University of Utah.
Near-surface Imaging at Meteor Crater, Arizona Soumya Roy, Ph. D. Student Advisor: Dr. Robert R. Stewart AGL Annual Meeting University of Houston, 2 nd.
Raw Data Saturated Ground Less Saturated Ground Transect 3 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BURD-RUN BURIED STREAM CHANNEL IN COLLUVIAL FILL OF THE CUMBERLAND.
Seismic Refraction. Some uses of seismic refraction Mapping bedrock topography Determining the depth of gravel, sand or clay deposits Delineating perched.
Locating Trapped Miners Using Time Reversal Mirrors Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping CaoKim McCarter Gerard T. Schuster November 12, 2008.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Reflection GPH492 By: Jonathan Payne Peter Bernhard Eve Marie Hirt.
Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Variance Analysis of Seismic Refraction Tomography Data By Travis Crosby.
UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby. UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby Very Low Frequency EM Surveys for the Purpose of Augmenting for the Purpose of Augmenting Near-Surface.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Key Result Seismic CAT Scan vs Trenching.
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
Anatomy of Anomalies Total Field Magnetics and Ground Penetrating Radar at a Potential Archaeological Site.
(see also Seismic Methods: Refraction.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
Integrated planning on hydrogeophysical data on a national scale: From processing, interpretation and storage to visualisation Ingelise Møller, Flemming.
Science for Planet Earth Larry Braile SAGE website:
A stepwise approximation for estimations of multilevel hydraulic tests in heterogeneous aquifers PRESENTER: YI-RU HUANG ADVISOR: CHUEN-FA NI DATE:
Application of Near-Surface Geophysics to Agricultural Drainage Pipe Detection.
Problem 7 Time section does not perfectly image depth section Dipping reflectors are incorrectly located Moho displays “velocity pull-down” beneath the.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope Gerard T. Schuster, Sherif M. Hanafy, and Yunsong Huang.
University of Missouri - Columbia
Searching for blind faults: the Haiti subsurface imaging project ERAY KOCEL ERAY KOCEL with with Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, Robert R. Stewart, Paul.
Seismic Radar using Time Reversal Mirrors Sherif M. Hanafy.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Imaging Normal Faults in Alluvial fans using Geophysical Techniques: Field Example from the Coast of Aqaba, Saudi Arabia Sherif M. Hanafy 28 October 2014.
Subwavelength Imaging using Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope Field Data Example G. Dutta, A. AlTheyab, S. Hanafy, G. Schuster King Abdullah University.
Physical Properties of Permafrost: The Impact of Ice in the Ground to Geophysical Surveys Brian Moorman Department of Geology and Geophysics and.
Teaching Near-Surface Geophysics in the Field Sarah Kruse University of South Florida *see notes on Powerpoint file for details.
GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform Progress in understanding the Canterbury Earthquakes Kelvin Berryman Manager, Natural Hazards Research Platform.
COLLUVIAL WEDGE IMAGING USING X-WELL AND CDP TRAVELTIME TOMOGRAPHY MAIKE-L. BUDDENSIEK GERARD T. SCHUSTER RONALD L. BRUHN.
The Geophysical Laboratory at KAUST
Motivation To characterize the shallow subsurface at Wadi Qudaid for its water storage and reuse potential.
Seismic Sources CEE 431/ESS465. Seismic Sources Identification Geologic evidence Field reconnaissance Trench logging Test pits, borings Airphoto interpretation.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Controlled Noise Seismology Sherif M. Hanafy 2015 SEG Annual Meeting New Orleans, October 2015.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
Contributors: University of Ibn Tofail: E. A. Toto, M. El Basri, M. Hafid, M. Benammi CNRST: A. Birouk, A. El Mouraouah, A. Ibenbrahim, M. Kasmi.
Vertical electrical sounding (VES), also known as‘electrical drilling’ or ‘expanding probe’, is used mainly in the study of horizontal or near-horizontal.
Seismic Refraction Interpretation
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Electrical Resistivity Survey of Yosemite Valley, CA
Two New Applications of Time Reversal Mirrors: Seismic Radio and Seismic Radar Sherif M. Hanafy September 2010.
GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION AT LAGOS CENTRAL AREA OF LAGOS STATE, NIGERIA Oyedele, K.F., Adegbola R.B., Abidoye O.E., Titiloye-Ajose.
Processing of KAUST Golf Data
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
Skeletonized Wave-Equation Surface Wave Dispersion (WD) Inversion
Regional and local INSAR displacement maps
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Detection of Qademah Fault using Geophysical Methods
Processing of the Field Data using Predictive Deconvolution
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Dr. P. C. Jha and Dr. H S Venkatesh Presenting by Dr. B. Butchi Babu
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Seismic Radar Sherif M. Hanafy.
Machine Learning and Wave Equation Inversion of Skeletonized Data
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Inverting Resistivity and Seismic Data to Find Subsurface Faults Sherif Hanafy King Abdullah University of science and Technology (KAUST) The 6th International Conference “Inverse Problem and Simulation” 23 May 2012

Outline Motivations Methodology Study Area Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic) Data Processing and Interpretation Resistivity Seismic Summary and Future Work

Outline Motivations Methodology Study Area Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic) Data Processing and Interpretation Resistivity Seismic Summary and Future Work

Motivations Demonstrate the capability of geophysics to detect shallow subsurface faults Is Qademah fault exists? Track the Qademah fault (if exist) trenching and dating ancient earthquakes at Qademah fault to assess size and recurrence intervals

Outline Motivations Methodology Study Area Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic) Data Processing and Interpretation Resistivity Seismic Summary and Future Work

Methodology Ground surface Depth 𝑡= 𝑗=1 𝑁 𝑗 𝑥 𝑗 𝑠 𝑗 𝑡= 𝑗=1 𝑁 𝑗 𝑥 𝑗 𝑠 𝑗 𝑡 𝑖 = 𝑗=1 𝑁 𝑗 𝑥 𝑖𝑗 𝑠 𝑗 t’s are known, x’s are know, and s’s are unknown

Outline Motivations Study Area Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic) Data Processing and Interpretation Resistivity Seismic Summary and Future Work

Study Area KAUST Qadema Fault

(Resistivity and Seismic) Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic)

(Resistivity and Seismic) Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic)

Topography

Outline Motivations Study Area Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic) Data Processing and Interpretation Resistivity Seismic Summary and Future Work

Data Acquisation Seismic Resistivity Equipment: Geometrics (NZXP + Geode) No of Profiles: 1 No. of shots: 109 Shot Interval: 3 m No. of Receivers: 109 Receiver Interval: 3 m Profile Length: 324 m Resistivity Equipment: Syscal R2 No. of Profiles: 2 No. of Nodes: 64 Node Interval: 5 m Profile Length: 315 m Array Type: Wenner

Outline Motivations Study Area Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic) Data Processing and Interpretation Resistivity Seismic Summary and Future Work

Resistivity Results Site # 1 No. of Nodes: 64 Node Interval: 5 m Profile Length: 315 m Array Type: Wenner Raw Data

Resistivity Results Site # 1 S Sabkha CW Colluvial Wedge F Fan SG Sand-silt-gravel LS Limestone Inverted Data

Resistivity Results Site # 2 No. of Nodes: 64 Node Interval: 5 m Profile Length: 315 m Array Type: Wenner Raw Data

Resistivity Results Site # 2 S Sabkha CW Colluvial Wedge F Fan SG Sand-silt-gravel LS Limestone Inverted Data

Outline Motivations Study Area Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic) Data Processing and Interpretation Resistivity Seismic Summary and Future Work

Common Shot Gather CSG # 60 Time (s) X (m) No. of shots: 109 0.25 324 X (m) Time (s) No. of shots: 109 Shot Interval: 3 m No. of Receivers: 109 Receiver Interval: 3 m Profile Length: 324 m No of TT: 11881 TT passes Reci. Test: 9488 No. of TT rejected: 2393 No. of Iterations: 40

Refraction Tomogram

Reflection Stacked Section

Reflection Stacked Section

Result Summary

Outline Motivations Study Area Data Acquisition (Resistivity and Seismic) Data Processing and Interpretation Resistivity Seismic Summary and Future Work

Summary and Future Work Resistivity and seismic methods used to detect the Qademah fault One colluvial wedge is shown on both ERT and refraction tomogram Reflection stacked section shows the Qademah fault and the associated antithetic fault(s)

Summary and Future Work The Qademah Fault will be tracked to the south with Seismic Resistivity EM and possibly GPR A trench will be made at Qademah fault to date the colluvial wedge If more than one colluvial wedge is found, then we will be able to find the fault recurrence.

Thank You