Project Approach and Outreach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
Advertisements

Kevin Morley MBA Head of ICT Policy The Review of the North West Regional Strategy for Information Communication Technology
Kellie DSouza West Virginia University December 10 th, 2011 Increasing Adoption of Out-of-Season Breeding to Enhance Profitability of Sheep Producers in.
A Risk Management Strategy for Sheep Producers: The Benefits of Breeding Sheep Outside Their Normal Breeding Season K.N. DSouza¹*, D. Singh-Knights² and.
Where next for Terminal Sire Recording? Samuel Boon, Signet Manager and EBLEX Breeding Specialist.
I OWA S TATE U NIVERSITY Department of Animal Science U.S – 2012 Pork Industry Productivity Analysis C. E. Abell 1, C. Hostetler 2, and K. J. Stalder.
Introduction to LAMBPLAN for the USA Texel Society.
Ciaran Lynch Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Mellows Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway.
Salary Findings April 25 th, 2011 Faculty Senate Budget Committee.
YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES Integrating Livestock Enterprises into Beginning Farmer and Rancher Operations 2011.
Accountability in Human Resource Management Dr. Jack J. Phillips.
Pilot Test of the Animal Health Network (Formerly known as CASHN)
I OWA S TATE U NIVERSITY Department of Animal Science U.S – 2013 Pork Industry Productivity Analysis J. Stock 1, C. E. Abell 1, C. Hostetler 2, and.
Effects Of Animal Identification On Cattle Market Structure Prepared by: Darrell R. Mark, Ph.D. Asst. Professor & Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist.
Seasonal reproduction of sheep limits the natural breeding season to the short-days of fall and early winter and has framed the conventional management.
TM Goats in Kentucky Ken Andries, Ph.D. CAFSSS Kentucky State University.
LAMP – Linking Agricultural Markets to Producers 1a Linking Agricultural Markets to Producers LAMP Goals, Expected Results, Activities Accomplishments.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
OARI-BARC ANNUAL RESEARCH ACTIVITIES REVIEW FEBRUARY, 2015 BARC Demonstration of Dairy Technologies in Peri-urban areas of Nekemte, Bako and Gimbi towns,
Characterization, Inventory and Monitoring of trends in indigenous livestock Dr. E. D. Ilatsia D. N. Kamiti 23-Oct-15Animal Breeding and Genomics Group1.
S ustainable A griculture R esearch and E ducation.
The effects of continuous suckling and supplementation on growth performance and degree of parasitism of pasture- raised crossbred Katahdin lambs were.
The Role of Advertising in the Growth of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (SNAP) Caseload The views and opinions expressed here do not necessarily.
Measuring and reporting outcomes for BTOP grants: the UW iSchool approach Samantha Becker Research Project Manager U.S. IMPACT Study 1UW iSchool evaluation.
Benchmarking and Passion What the top farmers say about their substantial profits… Graeme McConnell, Peter White, Gerard Obrien 28 February 2012.
0 1 1.Key Performance Indicator Results ( ) KPI Survey Statistics Student Distribution by Year in Program KPI Overall Results Student Satisfaction.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Small ruminant production holds significant potential for increasing the productivity and profitability of small family farms. The small size and docility.
Genetic Evaluations & Decision Support to Improve Feed Efficiency Dorian Garrick Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Mindset 2000 LtdSlide 1 Train to Gain Provider Support Programme October 2007 Self assessment - introduction.
1 Investment Climate Constraints and Thailand Competitiveness Albert G. Zeufack, PhD. The World Bank Seminar on Sustainable Growth, Regional Balance and.
Columbia Basin College Plenary I: Mission and Mission Fulfillment Rich Cummins Melissa McBurney 1.
Socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers in Virginia need increased participation in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs that will.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE INFORMATION NEEDS OF NEOTROPICAL FARMERS IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: AGOUTI PRESENTED BY NKOSI FELIX AUTHORS: N. FELIX, M. SINGH, G. GARCIA.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Suppliers Performance.
KTP Assessment Criteria May Assessment system changes New system in place for May 2016 KTP close Aligns with other Innovate UK assessment systems.
Performance Indicators
Typical farms and hybrid approaches
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
Knowledge Transfer Partnership Project Nottingham Trent University and Nottinghamshire County Council Dr Adam Barnard Rachel Clark Catherine Goodall 19/4/16.
Title I Services For Children Enrolled In Private Schools Molly Little Associate Director, Instructional Services and Federal Programs North Clackamas.
JOINT BRIEFING TO STAKEHOLDERS
Jeremy Bryant NZ Animal Evaluation Ltd Manager
Belfast Boys’ Model School.
Using the time value of money to assess the feasibility of investing into agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) units: An Application of the Net Present Value Presented.
AGM
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Discussion and Conclusion
INTRODUCTION TO ISO 9001:2015 FOR IMPLEMENTATION Varinder Kumar CISA, ISO27001 LA, ISO 9001 LA, ITIL, CEH, MEPGP IT, Certificate course in PII & Privacy.
ASATA PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME (APP)
UC policy states:  "Superior intellectual attainment, as evidenced both in teaching and in research or other creative achievement, is an indispensable.
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Study on the Impact of Authorisation NeRSAP 7 Bilbao, Spain February 2018 Pavel Prokes European Commission DG for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship.
Sixth Power Plan Setting Conservation Targets and Implementation Strategies Jill Steiner, Snohomish Public Utility District Northwest Power and Conservation.
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
Stevenson 5 Capacity Planning.
Attention: Sheep & Meat Goat Seedstock Producers
DEVELOPMENT OF A GENETIC INDICATOR OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FARM ANIMALS
Using EBVs from NSIP Rusty Burgett, NSIP Program Director.
An Investment Perspective of Human Resources Management
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
METHODS FOR ANALYZING AND SUPPORTING A SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Conceptual Foundation on Extension Impact
E. Hare,*H.D. Norman, and J.R. Wright
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
MarketsandMarkets Presents Agrigenomics Market by Application & Region - Global Forecast 2021.
Presentation transcript:

Project Approach and Outreach Our Farms, Our Future Conference - The Next 30 Years of Sustainable Agriculture. St. Louis, Missouri, April 2018 ONE14-223 1D. Singh-Knights and 2M. Knights, 1,2Associate Professor, West Virginia University Enhancing productivity of sheep through greater access and use of genetically evaluated breeding stock Introduction Objectives Project Approach and Outreach Significant increases in productivity due to genetic improvements have been recorded in every other livestock sector in the US, except in the sheep industry. Rams consigned to the WV Ram Test over the last 15 years show that little improvement occurred in key traits, which is partly due to limited availability and use of genetic information. The National Sheep Improvement Program (NSIP) reported some success in attempts to increase the genetic merit of sheep. Lambs born to genetically evaluated rams with an average EPD (Expected Progeny Difference) of +2.6 gained 3.8 lbs. over 120-days than non- evaluated rams, leading to increased revenue by about $650/100 lambs. In an attempt to further improve genetic value of animals and to allow sheep producers faster access to a larger number of economically relevant traits, the NSIP adopted the Lambplan genetic evaluation system, which is capable of providing EBVs (Estimated Breeding Values) for 20 traits and 4 indices. This allows producers to select breeding animals and build a flock suited to their local environment, economic motives and industry requirements. However, low enrollment of flocks in the Lambplan System and limited use of genetically evaluated rams remains an issue in WV and surrounding states, significantly compromising the productivity and profitability of the region’s sheep producers. To address this problem we conducted an educational program to: increase producers’ competence in using genetic information for selection decisions; increase registration of flocks from WV in the NSIP Lambplan system; and increase access to/use off genetically evaluated rams. The aim of this project was to improve productivity and profitability of sheep producers in WV, PA and MD, through: Increasing knowledge on the importance of genetic evaluation in flock management decisions, and of the NSIP Lambplan System as a tool for genetic evaluation; Developing a cadre of producers competent in using genetic information for selection and other management decisions; Increasing the number of flocks enrolled in the NSIP’s Lambplan System to determine their breeding values; and Increasing the availability of breeding animals with known genetic values to commercial producers. Based on increases in weight gain observed in NSIP evaluated rams, using genetically evaluated animals will result in a minimum of $200,000 in additional revenue per year from sale of lambs in the targeted regions, and will lower production costs from using animals better genetically suited for the local environment. These benefits are consistent with productivity goals set by NSIP and the American Sheep Industry. 15 Workshops/Field Days on importance of genetic evaluation and selection, including: Approaches to selection of breeding animals Benefits of knowing the genetic value of animals Developing breeding objectives consistent with economic goals and buyer requirements Understanding economic impacts of traits and indices reported in Lambplan Navigating and enrolling in Lambplan Record-keeping and input of data into Lambplan Benchmarking and interpreting Breeding Values (BVs) of different traits and indices Using BVs to inform selection and management decisions 12 On-Farm Demonstrations to assist with and demonstrate data to be collected and setting up related record-keeping systems, and how to navigate and use the Lambplan software. 47 Consultations on Lambplan, including hands-on computer training to develop appropriate animal IDs, collating and uploading historical flock data, and interpreting results generated from the Lambplan system. 3 Annual Ram Tests, with project support for consigning animals, to allow producers to evaluate their rams’ genetic performance and allow commercial producers greater access to superior rams in the targeted region. Results Key Lessons “I have made significant investments in sheep handling and data recording systems to support genetic evaluations of my animals based on increased buyer interest.” Overall, the project reached 4 agricultural service providers, and 130 farmers who manage more than 3,250 head of sheep. Participants’ evaluations show increased knowledge in potential benefits of genetically evaluated animals, using the Lambplan System, what traits could be improved, what variables need to be measured, what records to keep, and how to keep good records. Six (6) new producers enrolled in Lambplan; 4 more indicated interest in doing so in the very near future. Prior to our project only 4 farms across WV, MD and PA actively assessed the genetic value of their animals. Additionally, over 50 commercial producers indicated that they were interested in getting “the numbers” on the animals in order to inform their selection decisions. Producers were particularly interested in the ability to select for tolerance/resistance to internal parasites, which has been included as part of the 2018 WV Ram Test. More than 25 rams originating from farms enrolled in Lambplan and with known breeding values were tested and made available to producers for purchase. Three (3) producers from within WV purchased animals from flocks enrolled in Lambplan and known to possess premium genetics. Seedstock producers represent a small proportion of sheep producers in WV, and only 2 producers possessed animals with known breeding values prior to the start of the project.  Therefore, getting 6 new producers to enroll, and 4 more to consider using the Lambplan System in the near future to genetically evaluate their animals was a significant achievement. Additionally, a larger number of producers are now aware of the tremendous impact that using genetically evaluated animals can have on the productivity of their animals, and more producers continue to express interest in obtaining and using genetic values in their selection decisions.  One producer who enrolled in the NSIP’s Lambplan System was assessed to possess sheep genetics that ranked in the top 10 percentile in growth traits, which resulted in significant interest in and value of his animals at the WV Ram Sale. The project also contributed to a significant increase in the availability of a wider base of animals with known genetic values. Producers report that there have also been commensurate increase in buyers interested in these animals. The increase in availability of improved animal genetics, and increased knowledge and competence of producers in making better selection and management decisions, will ultimately help enhance productivity and profitability of sheep producers in WV and surrounding states. “I know what questions to ask my suppliers in order to assess the genetic merit of the animals I am purchasing.” This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, through the Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program under sub-award number ONE14-223. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and service provider.