Eric L. Pierce, BS, Andrew W. Siefert, PhD, Deborah M

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric L. Pierce, BS, Andrew W. Siefert, PhD, Deborah M
Advertisements

Clinical Outcomes of Mitral Valve Replacement With the 16-mm ATS Advanced Performance Valve in Neonates and Infants  Jiyong Moon, MD, Takaya Hoashi, MD,
Sternal Stability at Different Negative Pressures During Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy  Arash Mokhtari, MD, Rainer Petzina, MD, Lotta Gustafsson, MS,
Coronary Artery Bypass for Heart Failure in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: 17-Year Follow- Up  Marco Pocar, MD, PhD, Andrea Moneta, MD, Adalberto Grossi, MD,
Development of Off-Pump Mitral Valve Replacement in a Porcine Model
The First Cardiac Operation Using Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Right ventricular papillary muscle approximation as a novel technique of valve repair for functional tricuspid regurgitation in an ex vivo porcine model 
Directed Epicardial Assistance in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Flow and Function Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging  Jeremy R. McGarvey, MD, Norihiro.
Lucas H. A. Sanders, MD, FRACS, Weiwen Chen, MD, Jacques P. A. M
Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction After Mitral Valve Replacement Preserving Native Anterior Leaflet  Kazuma Okamoto, MD, Issei Kiso, MD, PhD, Yoshihito.
Clinical Outcomes of Mitral Valve Replacement With the 16-mm ATS Advanced Performance Valve in Neonates and Infants  Jiyong Moon, MD, Takaya Hoashi, MD,
Tissue Doppler Imaging Predicts Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation  Young Song, MD, Sak Lee, MD, PhD, Young-Lan.
Preoperative Three-Dimensional Valve Analysis Predicts Recurrent Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation After Mitral Annuloplasty  Wobbe Bouma, MD, Eric K. Lai,
Is the Anterior Intertrigonal Distance Increased in Patients With Mitral Regurgitation Due to Leaflet Prolapse?  Rakesh M. Suri, MD, DPhil, Jasmine Grewal,
Mitral annular hinge motion contribution to changes in mitral septal–lateral dimension and annular area  Akinobu Itoh, MD, Daniel B. Ennis, PhD, Wolfgang.
Severe Pulmonary Valve Regurgitation 40 Years After Blunt Chest Trauma
Walter R. T. Witschey, PhD, Francisco Contijoch, MS, Jeremy R
The Influence of Mitral Annuloplasty on Left Ventricular Flow Dynamics
In Vitro Mitral Valve Simulator Mimics Systolic Valvular Function of Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Ovine Model  Andrew W. Siefert, MS, Jean Pierre.
Restricted posterior leaflet motion after mitral ring annuloplasty
Norihiro Kondo, MD, Takashi Shuto, MD, Jeremy R. McGarvey, MD, Kevin J
George Gogoladze, MD, Sophia L
Pranav Loyalka, MD, Kelsey B. Montgomery, BS, Tom C
In-Vivo Dynamic Deformation of the Mitral Valve Anterior Leaflet
Alison M. Pouch, PhD, Benjamin M
Antonio M. Calafiore, MD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
Regional Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Myectomy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy  Jingjin Wang, PhD, Xin Sun, MD, Minghu Xiao, MD, Minghui Zhang,
Andrew W. Siefert, MS, Eric L. Pierce, BS, Madonna Lee, MD, Morten Ø
Posterior Leaflet Augmentation in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Increases Leaflet Coaptation and Mobility  Arminder S. Jassar, MBBS, Masahito Minakawa,
Denton A. Cooley, August 22, 1920, to November 18, 2016
Doreen Richardt, MD, Bence Bucsky, MD, Efstratios I
Regional Annular Geometry in Patients With Mitral Regurgitation: Implications for Annuloplasty Ring Selection  Arminder S. Jassar, MBBS, Mathieu Vergnat,
Andrew W. Siefert, MS, Jorge H. Jimenez, PhD, Kevin J
A Standardized Loop Technique for Mitral Valve Repair
Measurement of Mitral Leaflet and Annular Geometry and Stress After Repair of Posterior Leaflet Prolapse: Virtual Repair Using a Patient-Specific Finite.
Ross Versus Non-Ross Aortic Valve Replacement in Children: A 22-Year Single Institution Comparison of Outcomes  John W. Brown, MD, Parth M. Patel, BS,
Impact of Failed Mitral Clipping on Subsequent Mitral Valve Operations
Injectable Microsphere Gel Progressively Improves Global Ventricular Function, Regional Contractile Strain, and Mitral Regurgitation After Myocardial.
Transmitral Septal Myectomy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy  Brody Wehman, MD, Mehrdad Ghoreishi, MD, Nathaniel Foster, BS, Libin Wang, MD,
Advances in Experimental Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Valve Coaptation Using Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography  Frederick C. Cobey, MD, MPH, Madhav Swaminathan,
Mathieu Vergnat, MD, Melissa M. Levack, MD, Benjamin M
Jorge Sierra, MD, FETCS, Nadia H. Lahlaïdi, MD, Jan T
Paradoxical Neochords to Treat Systolic Anterior Motion in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy  Samer Kassem, MD, PhD, Maurizio Roberto, MD, PhD,
Qingyu Wu, MD, Lufeng Zhang, MD, Rui Zhu, MD 
Tricuspid Leaflet Augmentation to Eliminate Residual Regurgitation in Severe Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation  Jong Bum Choi, MD, Nan Yeol Kim, MD,
Commissural Closure for Repair of Mitral Commissural Prolapse
Muralidhar Padala, BS, Nikolay V. Vasilyev, MD, James W
Tethering Symmetry Reflects Advanced Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Patients With Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Restrictive Mitral.
Real-time recording of annuloplasty suture dehiscence reveals a potential mechanism for dehiscence cascade  Eric L. Pierce, BS, Javier Gentile, MD, Andrew.
Effect of anterior strut chordal transection on the force distribution on the marginal chordae of the mitral valve  Muralidhar Padala, PhD, Lazarina Gyoneva,
Luca Roncati, MD, PhD, Antonio Manenti, MD, PhD 
Bradford B. Smith, MD, Matthew A
Evaluation of a Shape Memory Alloy Reinforced Annuloplasty Band for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair  Molly F. Purser, PhD, Andrew L. Richards,
Tricuspid Valve Repair: How I Teach It
Mitral valve hemodynamics after repair of acute posterior leaflet prolapse: Quadrangular resection versus triangular resection versus neochordoplasty 
Effects of Targeted Papillary Muscle Relocation on Mitral Leaflet Tenting and Coaptation  Jean-Pierre Rabbah, BS, Benjamin Chism, BS, Andrew Siefert,
A saddle-shaped annulus reduces systolic strain on the central region of the mitral valve anterior leaflet  Jorge H. Jimenez, PhD, Shasan W. Liou, BSc,
Morten O. Jensen, PhD, Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, Robert A
Tirone E. David, MD, Carolyn M. David, BN, Cedric Manlhiot, MS 
Use of Barbed Suture in Robot-Assisted Mitral Valvuloplasty
The effect of regional ischemia on mitral valve annular saddle shape
Anirudh Vinnakota, MS, Robert Stewart, MD, Gosta Pettersson, MD, PhD 
Wobbe Bouma, MD, Chikashi Aoki, MD, Mathieu Vergnat, MD, Alison M
Peak Wall Stress Predicts Expansion Rate in Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms  Eric K. Shang, MD, Derek P. Nathan, MD, Shanna R. Sprinkle, BS, Sarah.
Mathieu Vergnat, MD, Arminder S. Jassar, MBBS, Benjamin M
Regional Changes in Coaptation Geometry After Reduction Annuloplasty for Functional Mitral Regurgitation  David G. Greenhouse, MD, Sophia L. Dellis, BA,
Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification  Tomoya Uchimuro, MD, Toshihiro Fukui, MD, Atsushi Shimizu, MD, Shuichirou Takanashi,
Effects of Annular Size, Transmitral Pressure, and Mitral Flow Rate on the Edge-To- Edge Repair: An In Vitro Study  Jorge H. Jimenez, MS, Joseph Forbess,
Masakazu Aoki, MD, Toshiaki Ito, MD, PhD 
Presentation transcript:

How Local Annular Force and Collagen Density Govern Mitral Annuloplasty Ring Dehiscence Risk  Eric L. Pierce, BS, Andrew W. Siefert, PhD, Deborah M. Paul, BS, Sarah K. Wells, BS, Charles H. Bloodworth, BS, Satoshi Takebayashi, MD, Chikashi Aoki, MD, Morten O. Jensen, PhD, Dr.Med, Matthew J. Gillespie, MD, Robert C. Gorman, MD, Joseph H. Gorman, MD, Ajit P. Yoganathan, PhD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 518-526 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.107 Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 Design and implementation of custom suture force transducers, first reported by Siefert and colleagues [17]. (A) Schematic representation of transducer, highlighting (a) suture holes for ring mounting, (b) annuloplasty mattress suture passages, (c) strain gauge for force measurement, and (d) wiring. (B) Each instrumented ring contains four anterior (orange) and six posterior (purple) transducers. (C) Device implantation. (D) Device (arrow) imaged by fluoroscopy after implantation. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2016 102, 518-526DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.107) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 2 Ex vivo suture holding strength testing. (A and B) Mitral valve before and after explantation from ovine heart. (C) Tie-down to custom fixture with the use of two continuous suture loops. Test sutures harnessed until pullout trial (red arrows). (D) Each suture was pulled out independently, at a perpendicular angle to the test plate. (LT = left trigone; RT = right trigone.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2016 102, 518-526DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.107) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 3 Representative coupled in vivo recordings of annuloplasty suture forces and left ventricular pressure (LVP). Each trace corresponds to one mattress suture. The primary contributors to the observed increases in suture tension during systole are (1) constraint of the native annular shape to that of a flat, undersized ring; (2) radial expansion of contracting myocardial fibers; and (3) pressure acting on the valve leaflets, which may further pull the annulus and sutures [22]. Note, baseline pretension (ie, the minimum force in each trace) has been zeroed, to highlight the amplitude differences among the ten sutures. This baseline force is non-zero and positive and is a subject of ongoing investigation. (N = Newton.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2016 102, 518-526DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.107) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 4 Cyclic forces (FCs) on each suture, recorded in vivo after cardiopulmonary bypass (mean ± SE). FC was computed from ten consecutive cycles with peak left ventricular pressure (LVPmax) of 100, 125, or 150 mm Hg. Anterior FC (orange) exceeded posterior FC (purple) by an average of 1.0 to 1.1 N, depending on LVPmax (p < 0.01 at each LVPmax). (Ant = anterior; LT = left trigone; N = Newton; Post = posterior; RT = right trigone.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2016 102, 518-526DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.107) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 5 Analysis of variance plots, reporting 95% confidence intervals for the influence of each suture position on (A–C) cyclic forces or (D) holding strength. Positive or negative contribution to suture force at a given position indicates that position experienced force that was either greater or less than the grand mean force, respectively. Position pairs whose whiskers do not overlap are significantly different (p < 0.05). (LT = left trigone; N = Newton; RT = right trigone.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2016 102, 518-526DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.107) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 6 A) Suture holding strength (HS) at each position, determined by ex vivo suture pullout testing. All Ant (anterior; orange) HSs exceeded all Post (posterior; purple) HSs, including an average differential of 2.5 N (p < 0.0001). (B) Residual strength (RS) at each position, that is, the difference between mean HS and mean cyclic force with peak left ventricular pressure of 150 mm Hg (Fig 3). Ant RS exceeded Post RS by 1.4 N on average (p = 0.10). (LT = left trigone; N = Newton; RT = right trigone.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2016 102, 518-526DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.107) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

Fig 7 A) Normalized mean pixel intensity (nMPI), averaged over five mitral valves (MVs). (B) Collagen density at a given suture position, indicated by nMPI, correlated to residual strength at that position. (C) Representative MV annulus section at site of suture passage, visualized by autofluorescence; nonspecific fibers (red) versus collagen (green). Endocardial surface along right edge; leaflet hinge at lower-right corner. *p < 0.05; †p < 0.005. (Ant = central anterior; LT = left trigone; Post = central posterior; RT = right trigone.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2016 102, 518-526DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.107) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions