Speeding access to therapies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Radioactive Drug Research Committee Approval Process for Tracer Use Anthony F. Shields, M.D., Ph.D. Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State University.
Advertisements

Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
Susan Boynton, VP, Global Regulatory Affairs, Shire
Single-Patient Use of Investigational Drugs and Biologic Products for Treating Cancer Grant Williams, M.D. Medical Team Leader DODP/CDER/FDA.
Rare Diseases and FDASIA
Single Use Expanded Access IND/IDE: FDA and IRB Requirements Before and After Use IRB Webinar October 9,2014.
Clinical Trials Importance in future therapies. What are the Requirements to Produce New Drugs? Drug must work significantly better than a control treatment.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
Have FDA Expedited Programs Shortened Drug Development Timelines? An analysis of newly approved therapies and how FDA expedited programs impacted drug.
Wednesday, December 17, :00pm-4:30pm EST National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship Post-Training Webinar ©2014 National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship.
Expanded Access Programs for Drugs and Biologics _________________________________________________________ Richard Klein Office of Health and Constituent.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
IRB PRESENTATION REGULATORY PATHWAYS HDE – PMA William Hellenbrand MD Director – Pediatric Cardiology Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Special IND/IDE Considerations: Emergency Use of Investigational Product Compassionate Use & Emergency Research July 21,
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Biomarkers and Subparts Rules and Exceptions James Witter MD, PhD Analgesic, Anti-inflammatory, and Ophthalmologic Drug Products HFD-550/ODEV/CDER/FDA.
Cancer Clinical Trials:
Meeting Agenda Presentations on endpoints –Regulatory issues –Scientific issues Pros and cons of end points –Classical end points –Non-classical end points.
Oncology Pediatric Initiatives Richard Pazdur, MD Director, Division of Oncology Drug Products.
Investigational New Drug Application 21 CFR Part 312 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
INVESTIGATIONAL DRUG SERVICES IN THE HOSPITAL Sheree Miller, Pharm.D. University of Washington Medical Center
Stages of drug development
FDA Regulatory Considerations in Launching Products Michael A. Swit, Esq. Vice President, Life Sciences WITI (Women In Technology International) San Diego.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
INDs : Does My Study Need One? Edith Paal UAMS Office of Research Compliance August 22, 2003.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Single Patient Use of Investigational Anticancer Agents: An Industry Perspective Gerard T. Kennealey, MD Vice President, Clinical Research, Oncology AstraZeneca.
History of Pediatric Labeling
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
 Treats a population of < 200,000 in the US  Same review and development standards as for a non- orphan product  Numbers of patients in clinical trials.
Initiatives Drive Pediatric Drug Development January 30, 2002.
HUD and Emergent Use Walter Kraft. Device Classification Significant risk – Often involve an invasive procedure for implantation or use – Requires IDE.
Regulatory Considerations for Endpoints Ann T. Farrell, M.D. FDA/CDER/DODP.
Clinical Trials.
Copyright © 2016, 2013, 2010 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Drug Regulation, Development, Names, and Information.
FDA DRUG APPROVAL FDA’s Lengthy Drug Approval Process in Twelve Steps Overview of the FDA Drug Approval Process Drug Developed June 13, 2016 | Emilia Varrone.
Drug Development Process Stages involved in Regulating Drugs
CLINICAL TRIALS.
Off-label Use.
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Jonathan C. Goldsmith, MD, FACP
The Stages of a Clinical Trial
Conditional IRB Approval
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Industry Perspective: Expanded Access Programs
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look
Expedited Drug Approval Programs
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
Within Trial Decisions: Unblinding and Termination
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
Clinical Trials.
Streamlining IRB Procedures for Expanded Access
Intermediate-Size Patient Populations INDs: What Are They, When Should They Be Used, and Who May Apply for Them?” Richard Klein, Former Director, FDA.
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
IND Review Process Seoul National University
Ramy Abdelrahman, MD Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health (DPMH)
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Ethical Considerations for Pediatric Clinical Investigations
TRTO (Translational Research Trials Office)
Dose setting for a Phase I Clinical Study
Pediatric Drug Development A Regulatory Perspective
EU Regulatory Pathways for ATMPs: Standard, Accelerated and Adaptive Pathways to Marketing Authorisation  Giulia Detela, Anthony Lodge  Molecular Therapy.
Presentation transcript:

Speeding access to therapies Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA smsensabaugh@hw-fda.com

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Suzanne Sensabaugh, MS, MBA Former FDA: Reviewer of hundreds of industry submissions. Committee member who drafted FDA Guidelines: Received numerous awards. Former industry: Drafted submissions for FDA review. Since 2009, assisted in the development of over 120 drugs. 2

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Introduction Access to an investigational drug outside of clinical trials Treatment Use Emergency Use Speeding review and approval Subpart E Fast Track Accelerated Approval Priority Review Not mutually exclusive 3

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Treatment Use Criteria The drug is intended to treat a serious or immediately life- threatening disease There is no comparable or satisfactory alternative The drug is under investigation in a controlled clinical trial under an IND or all clinical trials have been completed The sponsor is actively pursuing marketing approval of the investigational drug with due diligence A drug is made available during Phase III In some circumstances, a drug may be made available for treatment use during Phase II Safeguards Informed consent, IRB, and IND safety reports 4

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Emergency Use Use of an investigational drug in a life-threatening situation where no standard acceptable treatment is available and in which there is not sufficient time to obtain IRB approval Allows FDA to authorize use of an investigational drug in an emergency situation that does not allow time for submission of an IND Also used for patients who do not meet the criteria of an existing study protocol or if an approved study protocol does not exist 5

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Subpart E regulations 21 CFR 312, Subpart E (1988) Life-threatening and severely-debilitating illnesses, especially where no satisfactory therapy exists Life-threatening: diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted and diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the endpoint of clinical trial analysis is survival Severely-debilitating: diseases or conditions that cause major irreversible morbidity Procedures reflect the recognition that physicians and patients are generally willing to accept greater risks or side effects from products that treat life- threatening and severely-debilitating illnesses than they would accept from products that treat less serious illnesses In addition, benefits of the drug need to be evaluated in light of the severity of the disease being treated Meet early on with the Agency to review and reach agreement on the design of necessary preclinical and clinical studies 6

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Accelerated Approval 21 CFR 314, Subpart H, and 21 CFR 601, Subpart E (1992) Drugs to treat serious or life-threatening illnesses and provide meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments Approval based on a surrogate endpoint or an effect on a clinical endpoint other than survival or irreversible morbidity Surrogate endpoint: an endpoint intended to relate to a clinically meaningful outcome, but does not itself measure a clinical benefit – an indirect or substitute measurement that represents a clinically meaningful outcome Can considerably shorten the time for FDA approval Tumor shrinkage in cancer patients reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit Studies must be adequate and well-controlled Post-marketing confirmatory studies must be conducted to verify the anticipated clinical benefit Must be adequate and well-controlled Usually underway when approval is granted If studies do not demonstrate clinical benefit, product removed from market 7

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Priority Review Prescription Drug User Fee Act, 1992 Performance goals for review of BLAs/NDAs Standard: drugs which offer only minor improvement over existing marketed products – 10 month time frame Priority: major advances in treatment or provide a treatment where no adequate therapy exists – 6 months time frame Receive an action letter at the end of this review time frame Major advances may include Increased effectiveness in treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of disease Elimination or substantial reduction of a treatment-limiting drug reaction Enhancement of patient willingness or ability to take the drug according to the required schedule and dose Safety and effectiveness in a new subpopulation, such as children 8

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Fast Track FDA Modernization Act, 1997 Process designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs to treat serious diseases and fill an unmet medical need Serious: matter of judgement that includes such factors as survival, day- to-day functioning, or the likelihood that the disease, if left untreated, will progress from a less severe condition to a more serious disease AIDs, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer Unmet medical need: providing a therapy where non exists or providing a therapy which may be potentially superior to existing therapy Advantages More frequent meetings and written correspondence with/from the Agency Rolling review: company can submit completed sections of the NDA or BLA rather than wait until the entire application is complete 9

Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Any questions? smsensabaugh@hw-fda.com 10