Edgar Dominguez Rosas Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Jet Structure of Baryons and Mesons in Nuclear Collisions l Why jets in nuclear collisions? l Initial state l What happens in the nuclear medium? l.
Advertisements

Minimum bias and the underlying event: towards the LHC I.Dawson, C.Buttar and A.Moraes University of Sheffield Physics at LHC - Prague July , 2003.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Julia Velkovska Selected CMS Results from pp collisions 27th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Winter Park, Colorado Feb 6-13, 2011.
Julia VelkovskaMoriond QCD, March 27, 2015 Geometry and Collective Behavior in Small Systems from PHENIX Julia Velkovska for the PHENIX Collaboration Moriond.
Terence Tarnowsky Long-Range Multiplicity Correlations in Au+Au at Terence J Tarnowsky Purdue University for the STAR Collaboration 22nd Winter Workshop.
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
U N C L A S S I F I E D 7 Feb 2005 Studies of Hadronic Jets with the Two-Particle Azimuthal Correlations Method Paul Constantin.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC P T EFFECTS ON J/  SHADOWING This work, on behalf of E. G. Ferreiro F. Fleuret J.-P. Lansberg A. Rakotozafindrabe Work in progress…
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
The centrality dependence of high p T π 0 production in d-Au collisions Abstract Michael Kordell II, Abhijit Majumder Wayne State University, Detroit,
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model Victor Roy Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Collaborators.
7 th April 2003PHOTON 2003, Frascati1 Photon structure as revealed in ep collisions Alice Valkárová Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
Ridge Formation and Long Range Correlations in pp Collisions at CMS C.B. Yang Institute of Particle Physics Central China Normal University Wuhan ,
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
Francesco Noferini Bologna University Erice, Italy 31 st August 2006 Two-particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC.
The role of hadronization on jet and hadron nuclear modification factors Urs Achim Wiedemann CERN PH-TH QM15, Kobe, Japan, 28 March 2015 Based on: K.C.
First analysis of Long-Range (Forward-Backward) pt and multiplicity correlations in ALICE in pp collisions at 900 GeV G.Feofilov, A.Ivanov, V.Vechernin.
Toward a  +Jet Measurement in STAR Saskia Mioduszewski, for the STAR Collaboration Texas A&M University 1.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, July 5, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 ICHEP 2012 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run.
Two particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC Francesco Noferini Bologna University INFN – sez. Bologna ALICE-TOF Tuesday, May 16th Villasimius (Italy) HOT.
IOPP, Wuhan China1 Reduction of strange quark suppression and strange hadron production in p-p and A-A collisions at RHIC and LHC Sheng-Qin Feng China.
Hadron production and QCD coherence at LEP Marco Cuffiani University of Bologna and INFN (Italy) on behalf of the OPAL Collaboration QCD coherence and.
How to extract physics from ν d y n Peter Christiansen, Lund Work done together with Eva Haslum and Evert Stenlund.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
on behalf of the CDF and DØ collaborations
RBRC & BNL Nuclear Theory
Mark T. Heinz Yale University
Energy Dependence of the UE
A few observations on strangeness production at SPS and RHIC
Is Strangeness production different in the Bulk and in Jets ?
Color Reconnection in Hadronic WW Events at LEP
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Ángel Sierra, Pablo Fierro, Irais Bautista and Antonio Ortiz
Event generators.
Measurement of jet properties with the ATLAS detector
N. ILINA, V. GAVRILOV (ITEP, Moscow)
Collective Dynamics at RHIC
“softQCD” and Correlations Rick Field & Nick Van Remortel
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
MB&UE Working Group Meeting CMS UE Data and the New Tune Z1
Predicting MB & UE at the LHC
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Hard Core Protons soft-physics at hadron colliders
Multi-Parton Interaction (MPI) measurement at LHC
Masanori HIRAI 2006, Nov 9, Tokyo-u
Computing gluon TMDs at small-x in the Color Glass Condensate
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Analysis of <pT>-Nch Correlations in pp and pp Collisions
Effective energy: which analyses in ALICE?
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
“Hard” & “Soft” Interactions in Proton + Proton 200GeV
The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
One PeV Collisions Very successful Heavy Ion run in 2015, with all new detectors in operation 16 GB/s readout/ 6GB/s on disk after HLT compression.
Jet Event Topology as a probe of QGP in heavy-ion collisions
Identified Charged Hadron Production
Multiplicity Dependence of Charged Particle, φ Meson and Multi-strange Particle Production in p+p Collisions at
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event”
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
b-Quark Production at the Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

Forward-Backward multiplicity correlation: a tool to study general properties of the pp events Edgar Dominguez Rosas Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México September 15

Outline Definition of Correlation Motivation Initial Conditions Previous Measurement Multiple Parton interactions and Colour Reconnection Initial Conditions Generated Events Soft and Hard QCD process Multiple Parton Interaction (nMPI) Colour Reconnection (CR) Conclusions September 15

Definition of the F-B Correlation The Correlation is theoretically defined event by event, comparing the integrad density of particles produced in different ranges of pseudorapidity; 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 = 𝑛 𝐹 𝑛 𝐵 − 𝑛 𝐹 𝑛 𝐵 𝑛 𝐹 2 − 𝑛 𝐹 2 η 𝑔𝑎𝑝 δη δη September 15

Motivation: Historical measurements of bCorr Collisions in ISR, PETRA (Phys.Rev. D34 (1986) 3304), “suggests the direct and independent production of hadrons.” Collisions pp in ISR (Nucl.Phys. B132 (1978) 15), “In the framework of the cluster model we interpret the observed correlations as correlations between the clusters.” Collisions in (Phys.Lett. B123 (1983) 361), “We find that the bulk of the charged particles are produced from clusters with the same average size independent of observed multiplicity”. Collisions Au-Au in RIHC (Phys.Rev.Lett. 103 (2009)172301), “ A large long-range correlation is observed in central Au-Au collisions that vanishes for 40–50% centrality ”. Collisions pp in ALICE and ATLAS at CERN (JHEP 05 (2015) 097, JHEP 07, 019 (2012)) 𝑒 + 𝑒 − 𝑝 𝑝 Sp p S September 15

Motivation: Modeling Multiple parton interactions The original idea was proposed by T. Sjostrand and M. Van Zijl, Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 2019: There is a theoretical fact: differential cross section 2→2 diverges as 𝑝 𝑇 →0. The solution is introduce a cut-off ( 𝑝 𝑇0 ) to ensure finite and calculable results. 𝑑σ 𝑑𝑝 𝑇 2 ∝ α 𝑠 2 𝑝 𝑇 2 𝑝 𝑇 4 → α 𝑠 2 𝑝 𝑇 2 + 𝑝 𝑇0 2 𝑝 𝑇 2 + 𝑝 𝑇0 2 2 This solution implies: nMPI independent, which leads to a Poisson process, with minimal 1 interaction . All event generators use this model, but they differ in the choice of 𝑝 𝑇0 and also in the subsequent shower. arXiv:1410.3012 September 15

Motivation: Modeling Colour Reconnection There is an experimental fact: We can not explain the behavior of 𝑝 𝑇 𝑣𝑠 𝑁 𝐶ℎ . Solution? Many solutions, one of them is CR! Phys.Lett. B209 (1988) 90-94 Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 371-380 September 15

Motivation: Modeling Colour Reconnection Models of Color Reconnection: There are different models of CR, one of them is based in the scheme of parton interaction. They are classified by which nMPI system they belong to in function of the transverse moment. The strength of reconnection is defined by, arXiv:1310.8073 𝑃 𝑟𝑒𝑐 𝑝 𝑇 = (𝑅 𝑟𝑒𝑐 𝑝 𝑇 ) 2 (𝑅 𝑟𝑒𝑐 𝑝 𝑇 ) 2 + 𝑝 𝑇 2 𝑝 𝑇 ↓ ⟹ 𝑃 𝑟𝑒𝑐 ↑ Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 371-380 September 15

Motivation: Modeling Colour Reconnection There are two more CR models that we use. One is based in QCD and the other in Gluon-move, the idea from this two models is to reduce the string length (𝜆). 𝜆 ~ 𝑛 ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑠 CR-QCD model takes into account the hadronization based in the colour rules of SU(3) to determine if two strings are colour compatible using a junction structure. Gluon-move is a Toy Model, in which it is tried to reduce 𝜆 by moving a gluon between a pair. arXiv1507.02091 arXiv1407.6653 September 15

PYTHIA event generator PYTHIA is a package program based on QCD process. In this case we use the perturbative QCD for higher 𝑝 𝑇 and QCD non perturbative for lower 𝑝 𝑇 . In our case we are going to use this initial condition for our data sample: Simulation in PYTHIA 8.216 Proton-proton collision at 0.9 and 7 𝑇𝑒𝑉 energies 25,000,000 events (for each model) Soft and Hard events Charge particles Primary particles Final state Tunne Monash2013 (7 𝑇𝑒𝑉) September 15

Pseudorapidity and pT for Soft and Hard 𝑝 𝑇 spectra shape allow classify Hard and Soft QCD processes. Going from central to the fragmentation pseudorapidity region we are going from Hard to Soft processes. Hard processes has an enhancement in the central region Differences on pseudorapidity distributions means different kind of QCD processes September 15

Short and Long range correlations 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝑆𝑅𝐶 𝐿𝑅𝐶 ~𝑐𝑡𝑒 𝑆𝑅𝐶 𝐿𝑅𝐶 𝛿𝜂 𝛿𝜂 In central pseudorapidity 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 is harder that for fragmentation region. For Soft QCD process: Short and Long range correlation are scaled as function of 𝛿𝜂 , but not for the Hard. For Soft process we have stronger correlation than for Hard ones. September 15

Multiplicity vs nMPI Nucl.Phys. A941 (2015) 78-86 There is a relationship between nMPI and multiplicity, this indicate that the number of nMPI saturated. This result brings consequences in 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 The inelastic process produce and enchantment in multiplicity at lower nMPI. September 15

Correlations as function nMPI and energy 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 =𝑎+𝑐 log 𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 Higher nMPI produce a shift in the mean of multiplicity. Taking different range on nMPI, affect the multiplicity and consequent 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 . Higher nMPI ranges produce a little enhancement as function of the energy. 𝛿𝜂 September 15

Correlations and Colour Reconnection (nMPI-model) 𝑃( 𝑛 𝐶ℎ ) 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝐶𝑅 𝑛𝑜𝐶𝑅 𝛿𝜂 𝑀𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 The multiplicity is reduced by the influence of CR-nMPI. The effect of CR-nMPI increase as the energy does. The correlation decrease in not a linear way with the increase of CR. . September 15

Correlation and models of CR 𝑃( 𝑛 𝐶ℎ ) 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝑄𝐶𝐷−𝐺𝑙𝑢𝑜𝑛 𝑛𝑀𝑃𝐼 𝑄𝐶𝐷−𝐺𝑙𝑢𝑜𝑛 𝑛𝑀𝑃𝐼 𝑀𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝛿𝜂 The models for CR produce different multiplicity distribution. CR models produce different 𝑝 𝑇 . 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 is different for the three models, the main difference is at lower 𝛿𝜂. The most significant differences are between the Gluon and QCD models. September 15

SRC and LRC for CR models 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝑄𝐶𝐷,𝐺𝑙𝑢𝑜𝑛 𝑛𝑀𝑃𝐼 𝑄𝐶𝐷,𝐺𝑙𝑢𝑜𝑛 𝑛𝑀𝑃𝐼 𝛿𝜂 𝛿𝜂 CR-nMPI and CR-QCD models produce a 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 scale for the central pseudorapidity region. CR-nMPI and CR-Gluon models produce the same correlation at fragmentation region. September 15

Correlations from models vs data The results show that nMPI model of CR gets better agreement with experimental data. CR-QCD models produce higher 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 compared with data, while CR-Gluon produce lower values. 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝛿𝜂 September 15

Correlation for higher energy 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝛿𝜂 We can even make prediction for the correlation at higher energies. The scale of 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 for the different energy will not be lineal. CR range 1.4 is the best value (Tune Monash 1.8) to reproduce the data, along with all values of nMPI, within the range 0.3< 𝑝 𝑇 <1.5, and |𝜂|<0.9. September 15

Conclusions Using PYTHIA event generator, we have analyzed Soft and Hard QCD processes to compute the forward-backward multiplicity correlation ( 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 ) and the effects on it due to CR and nMPI. Soft QCD process are more correlated than the Hard ones. Correlation decrease as CR increase. ↑CR⇒ ↓𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 ⇒↓Collectivity? The CR models produce different shape of 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 , the larger discrepancy among them are about 20% Higher nMPI produce a higher multiplicity mean, however the correlation produce a small change on the shape of 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 . The correlation increase as the energy does, It just not at scaled. There is a relationship between 𝑁 𝑐ℎ , nMPI and CR, so measuring the first one and computing the 𝑏 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟 , one could extract physical information of 𝑝𝑝 events. September 15