Lunar Lander Propulsion System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Advertisements

Rocket Engines Liquid Propellant –Mono propellant Catalysts –Bi-propellant Solid Propellant –Grain Patterns Hybrid Nuclear Electric Performance Energy.
Hybrid Propulsion System Basics
Pistonless Dual Chamber Rocket Fuel Pump Steve Harrington, Ph.D Joint Propulsion Conference.
Heat Transfer Chapter 2.
Design Goals Saturn V Ariane 4 Pegasus Vanguard Bellerophon ? ? ?
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
Rocket Nomenclature EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Propellant Choice and Mass Estimates for the Translunar OTV Week 2 Presentation Thursday, Jan 22, 2009 Brad Appel Propulsion Group.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Hopper Trajectory February 26, 2009 [Alex Whiteman] [Mission Ops] [Lunar Descent] Page 1.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Main Engine 1.Overall system design 2.Performance Optimization 3.Jointly worked on thrust and CEA based script to allow.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Propulsion System 100g, 10kg and Large Payload cases Thaddaeus Halsmer Thursday, April 9, Lunar Lander propulsion.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Dana Lattibeaudiere February 7, 2008 New Code Developments.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lander Phase: Hybrid Propulsion System Propulsion System Sizing and Inert Mass Analysis Hopper and Rover Designs for 10kg Payload Hopper.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Preliminary propulsion system selection and design analysis Thursday, January 22, 2009 Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Translunar OTV (Orbital Transfer Vehicle) : Chemical Propulsion System Refined estimates: OTV WET Mass, Propellant Volume & Propellant.
Week 13 Presentation Thursday, April 9 th, 2009 Saad Tanvir Propulsion Group 1 Lunar Descent – Hybrid Propulsion System Propulsion System Inert Mass Finals.
Project M.E.T.E.O.R. P07109: Flying Rocket Team Andrew Scarlata, Geoff Cassell, Zack Mott, Garett Pickett, Brian Whitbeck, Luke Cadin, David Hall.
HTPB Fuel Grain Flow Rate, Sizing, and Thrust. Regression Rate Governs Size The faster the solid propellant is burned, the “fatter” the rocket must be.
1 Propulsion Overview MAE155A Dr. Nacouzi. 2 Agenda Introduction to Propulsion Propulsion Systems: Liquids, Solids, other Basic Propulsion Performance.
Scoping Study of He-cooled Porous Media for ARIES-CS Divertor Presented by John Pulsifer Major contributor: René Raffray University of California, San.
A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Ricky Hinton March 27 th, 2008 Propulsion Group Nozzle, Test Facility (back-up slides)
Hybrid Rocket Combustion Process & Nozzle John Chambers.
Student: C1C Tim Brown Advisor: Maj. Lydon Fast Burning Hybrid Fuels.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Parametric Study of Turbofan Engine Performance P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Time to think about fuel Economy……
Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Samara 2015 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OPTIMIZATION TRAJECTORY OF MOTION OF ELECTRIC PROPULSION SPACECRAFT.
36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
1 Air Force Chemical Equilibrium Specific Impulse (Isp) Code.
Parametric Cycle Analysis of Ideal Turbo Jet Engine
Dana Lattibeaudiere February 21, 2008 Propulsion Nozzle Design Injectors Assistance from Nicole Wilcox & Stephen Bluestone AAE 450 Spring 2008.
HYBRID ROCKET PROPULSION SYSTEMS BY: MCDOG SNIZZY ALLEN A.K.A SHAWN.
Analytical and Empirical Characterization of Hybrid Rocket Swirl Injection Presenters: Matt H. Summers Advisor: James K. Villarreal.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Main Engine Thaddaeus Halsmer Thursday, February 12, 2009 Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Propulsion System 100 g, 10 kg and Arbitrary payload cases Thaddaeus Halsmer Thursday, March 12, Propulsion System.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Slides Lunar Lander Structure April 9, 2009 Lunar Descent Phase Group [Ryan Nelson] [STRC] 1.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Ricky Hinton February 6 th, 2008 Propulsion Group Solid Propellant Research and Optimum Expansion Ratio Code Additional help from:
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lander Phase: Hybrid Propulsion System Propellant Tank Sizing and Pressure Analysis Thermodynamic analysis on Hydrogen peroxide Tanks.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Lander Volume and Mass 10kg, 100g, Arbitrary March 12, 2009 Lunar Descent Phase Group [Ryan Nelson] [STRC] 1.
WORK Work = Force x Distance POWER power = work done ÷ time taken ENERGY 1-POTENTIAL ENERGY (Potential Energy = Force x Distance ) 2-KINETIC ENERGY Energy.
Pistonless Dual Chamber Rocket Fuel Pump
THE TSIOLKOVSKY ROCKET EQUATION
Cost Comparison of Higher Parking Orbit Scale up for Arbitrary Payload
Liquid Rocket Engines Require many moving parts and plumbing.
Analysis of Multistage Rockets
Stephan Shurn 28 February 2008 Propulsion Thrust Vector Control
Rocket Engines Liquid Propellant Solid Propellant Hybrid Nuclear
Chapter 5 The First Law of Thermodynamics for Opened Systems
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Week 6 Presentation Thursday, Feb 19, 2009
Attitude, Lunar Transfer Phase
Lunar Descent Slide Suggestions & Questions
Lunar Descent Trajectory
Ricky Hinton January 24th, 2008 Propulsion Group Preliminary Analysis of Purdue Test Facilities at Zucrow Laboratories AAE 450 Spring 2008.
By: Josh Lukasak Attitude Group Lead Lunar Descent Phase Manager
Ricky Hinton February 21st, 2008 Propulsion Group CAD group Updated Altitude vs. Pressure Code and Nozzle CAD AAE 450 Spring 2008.
John Beasley 3/20/2008 Propulsion Group Contact: Black Boxes and Code Flowchart AAE 450 Spring 2008.
[Kara Akgulian] [Mission Ops]
MAE 5380: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Lunar Descent Trajectory Optimization
Week 4 Presentation Thursday, Feb 5, 2009
John Beasley 2/14/2008 Propulsion Group Contact: MAT Analysis and Hybrid Rocket Engine Profiles AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
Analysis & Selection of Design Space for Turbofan
Stephan Shurn 20 March 2008 Propulsion Final Slides Rail Guns and LITVC AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Lunar Lander Propulsion System 100g, 10kg and Large Payload cases Thaddaeus Halsmer Thursday, April 9, 2009 Lunar Lander propulsion system (final presentation slide) Lunar Lander Propulsion backup slides Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion

Radial Flow Hybrid Engine H2O2 Tank Helium Tank Radial Flow Hybrid Engine 3 ft. Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion

Payload case/Description Lunar Lander Propulsion – Engine Specifications Table 1 Engine performance parameters Engine No. Payload case/Description F_max/min [N] tb [s] 1 10 kg/hop engine 2x 192 (avg.) 134.5 2 100 g/main engine 1100/110 198.6 3 10 kg/main engine 1650/165 190.4 4 Arbitrary/main engine 27000/2700 250.2 (4) (3) (1) (2) Stick is 6.5 feet high, same as a standard doorway Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion

Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion Lunar Lander Propulsion –fluid system diagrams High Pressure Helium Tank HV01 High Pressure Helium Tank HV01 SV01 SV01 REG REG SV02 SV02 CK01 CK01 RV01 H2O2 Tank HV02 RV01 H2O2 Tank HV02 F01 F01 MOV CK02 MOV CK02 SV04 SV03 SV05 100g and Large payload cases 10kg payload case Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion

Lunar Lander Propulsion - Propellant/Propulsion system selection Selection Criteria: Thrust min/max throttling Dimensions Short and fat Mass – minimize Propellant storability Purchase/development costs High Reliability Figure X: Propellant mass vs. Isp trade Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion

Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion Lunar Lander Propulsion - Nozzle area ratio and mass optimization Used CEA to compute Isp for given nozzle area ratio All other inputs constant Empirical nozzle mass equation As area ratio, ε, increases Mnozzle increases, but Isp increases also As Isp increases Mprop decreases for a given thrust and burn time Wrote Matlab script that used Matlab CEA interface to compute multiple Isp’s for different area ratio’s and the corresponding Mprop and Mnozzle for a given thrust, and burn time Results: Area ratio for minimum mass occurred at ~150, however this nozzle would be very large and little is gained above ~100 Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion

Fuel grain dimension definitions Lunar Lander Propulsion – Isp analysis approach Fuel grain dimension definitions Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion

Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion Lunar Lander Propulsion – fuel grain and chamber sizing approach Choose Empirical value for initial fuel regression rate Initial O/F ratio for optimum Isp Initial propellant mass flow rate Compute required burn surface area Dimensions of fuel grains Diameter is derived from burn surface area found from values in step #1 and chosen fuel grain geometry Thickness is function of burn time and regression rate Compute Chamber dimensions a. Chamber dimensions approximated from fuel grain size and additional room for insulating materials Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion