IP-NNI Task Force – Phase 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
Advertisements

Presented by United Arab Emirates MID ATM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (MAEP) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
All-IP Transition Initiatives June 17, ATIS Board of Directors’ Meeting October 20, 2011 NANC Meeting June 17, 2014 IP Transition Work within.
TANDBERG Video Communication Server March TANDBERG Video Communication Server Background  SIP is the future protocol of video communication and.
Jackie Voss Manager, Global Standards Development ATIS All-IP Transition Initiatives December 9, 2014.
Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) Review Learning & Teaching Enhancement Unit | Computing Services | Corporate Information Services Upgrade or switch?
SIP-IMS CONFORMANCE TESTING STANDARDIZATION WORK PLAN VICE-CHAIRMAN OF ITU-T SG11 MARTIN BRAND.
Inter-Operator TMN & OSS Workshop Prague, March Technical Development and Support for European ATM Service Introduction John Boyles, PL.
ITU-T Study Group 13 Communications to IETF CCAMP Working Group Marco Carugi ITU-T SG13 Liaison Officer to IETF CCAMP
DOCUMENT #:GSC15-PLEN-48 FOR:Presentation SOURCE: ATIS AGENDA ITEM: PLEN 6.10 CONTACT(S): James McEachern
ATIS Critical Communications Activities since GSC-18
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
Jackie Voss Manager, Global Standards Development ATIS All-IP Transition Initiatives September 30, 2015.
Jackie Voss Manager, Global Standards Development ATIS All-IP Transition Initiatives December 1, 2015.
Fostering worldwide interoperabilityGeneva, July 2009 The Home Network: Where Convergence Takes Hold Tim Jeffries, VP Technology and Business Development,
NENA-IETF I3 Proposal No carrier presumed No carrier presumed Fixed, nomadic and true mobile clients supported Fixed, nomadic and true mobile clients supported.
1 Presented by Jim Nixon, Breakout Session Moderator December 15, 2005 Report from Breakout Session #2 Individuals/Organizations to Government.
S Postgraduate Course in Radio Communications. Application Layer Mobility in WLAN Antti Keurulainen,
Bearer Control for VoIP and VoMPLS Control Plane Francois Le Faucheur Bruce Thompson Cisco Systems, Inc. Angela Chiu AT&T March 30, 2000.
Jim McEachern Senior Technology Consultant ATIS July 8, 2015.
SAM Baseline Review Engagement
Timeline – Standards & Requirements
Stakeholders Meeting High-Level Update on the Forthcoming Consultations Incorporating ComFrame Text with Revised Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) La.
Creating or Enhancing Skills-Based Training Programs:
IP Telephony (VoIP).
ATIS Interoperability
draft-rescorla-fallback-01
Status Update -- ATIS Robocalling and Caller ID Initiatives
THIS IS THE WAY ENUM Variants Jim McEachern
Prime PSO: ATIS Presenter: Art Reilly
Report from Session #2: SDN/NFV
Workshop Discussion on Day-2
IP-NNI Joint Task Force Status Update
STIR WG / IETF 94 Yokohama, Nov 2015 Jon
Presented by United Arab Emirates
Timeline - ATIS Involvement
Status Update -- ATIS Robocalling and Caller ID Initiatives
NNI Definition, Service Interoperability, Business Model Definition
Creating or Enhancing Skills-Based Training Programs:
Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) 14
SHAKEN Governance Authority Criteria
L1VPN Working Group Scope
ATIS/SIP Forum IP NNI Task Force Tyson's Corner, VA November 7-8, 2017
ATIS Cybersecurity DOCUMENT #: GSC13-GTSC6-12 FOR: Presentation
Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) GSC-15
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Timeline - ATIS Involvement
IP-NNI Joint Task Force Status Update
SG-13 / SSG Information Sharing Session Geneva - 05 November 2002
Project Initiatives Identified by the CIA Project
Glenn Parsons, GTSC-9 Chair, ISACC
ATIS Interoperability
RFC PASSporT Construction 6.2 Verifier Behavior
ATIS Interoperability
1 Stadium Company Network. The Stadium Company Project Is a sports facility management company that manages a stadium. Stadium Company needs to upgrade.
IP Interconnection Profile
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Architecture and Protocols
ATIS Software-Defined Networking/ Network Functions Virtualization
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
Report from Session #2: SDN/NFV
Presenter: Richard Brennan, Vice-Chair TC TISPSAN
Status Report Cop Taskforce
Routing Considerations
Advancing the Next Generation Network
Glenn Parsons, GTSC-9 Chair, ISACC
Calling Party Identity
draft-ietf-stir-oob-02 Out of Band
ACSC 155 System Analysis and Design 4. Systems Design
Presentation transcript:

IP-NNI Task Force – Phase 2 IP-NNI Phase 1 focused on: Voice interconnection on the wire Documented routing alternatives and use or non use of numbering databases IP-NNI Phase 2 could: Security Secure caller-ID aka STIR Enhanced caller-ID aka CNAM + Services beyond voice: Video, RCS Further evaluation of routing alternatives to validate interworking approach and “narrow options”.

NNI Phase 2 Operationalize Phase 1 The NANC Fields in the NPAC need to be specified Document requirements for the NPAC Transition if needed.

IP-NNI Phase 2: Security IP-NNI Phase 1 “replicated PSTN Security”. Establish secure “encrypted tunnel” Media and signaling follow the same path PSTN assumptions do not hold for IP: Optimal media routing Local breakout for data NFV virtualizes functions in data center End-to-end analysis required to ensure security Secure caller-ID aka STIR Support across IP-NNI and within the ATIS Test bed At some point the key material needs to be defined

IP-NNI Phase 2: Enhanced Services Services beyond voice – potential candidates include: Video interconnect HD voice RCS - Enterprise integration aka SIPConnect 2.0? Enhanced Caller-ID: Actively being worked in PTSC IETF and SG 1 3GPP?? Text string and/or JSON Vcard Potential need to develop converged solution and where is he work done and the big one … what is the Header to be used Next steps: Identify role for IP-NNI TF

IP-NNI Phase 2: Routing Alternatives IP-NNI Task Force identified routing alternatives. Did not recommend a preferred approach Further evaluation could validate proposed approaches. Analysis of interworking between different approaches. Assess feasibility of interworking between approaches Assess need for interworking between approaches Identify use cases to test solutions. Potential to “narrow options”. Actual Testing of routing alternatives

NNI Phase 2 The Testbed What if anything do we want to say about that Where are the public keys going to go? The UA hint.. What is the device or UA we are contacting. What is is potential capability?

IP-NNI Phase 2: Next Steps Identify where others are doing similar work OVCC IMTC in Video? Assess overlaps, gaps and synergies Define clear objectives for IP-NNI TF Value for doing identified work in IP-NNI TF Identify why the IP-NNI TF is the best place to progress work.

IP-NNI Phase 2: Next Steps Video calling (Richard) Profile Routing (Jim) Coordinated input and testing Interaction with testbeds IETF Coordination Role Modern STIR Security (Jim) Whitepaper Implementable and deployable Focus on interconnection/NNI perspective Education process Message: “we’re working the issue” STIR Profile (Jim and Chris) Key discovery Alignment with routing Testbed CNAM Plus (Richard)

IP-NNI Phase 2: Timeline Draft Text: end of May Phase 2 agreement: end of June Initial virtual meeting: July Face-to-face meeting: August 6 Denver, CO