4 th order Embedded Boundary FDTD algorithm for Maxwell Equations Lingling Wu, Stony Brook University Roman Samulyak, BNL Tianshi Lu, BNL Application collaborators:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite Difference Discretization of Hyperbolic Equations: Linear Problems Lectures 8, 9 and 10.
Advertisements

Sigal Gottlieb, UMass Dartmouth: SAMSI workshop November 15, 2007 STRONG STABILITY PRESERVING RUNGE-KUTTA & MULTI-STEP TIME DISCRETIZATIONS Sigal Gottlieb,
Optimal transport methods for mesh generation Chris Budd (Bath), JF Williams (SFU)
Geometric Integration of Differential Equations 1. Introduction and ODEs Chris Budd.
Reduction of Temporal Discretization Error in an Atmospheric General Circulation Model (AGCM) Daisuke Hotta Advisor: Prof. Eugenia Kalnay.
(c) MSc Module MTMW14 : Numerical modelling of atmospheres and oceans Staggered schemes 3.1 Staggered time schemes.
Algorithm Development for the Full Two-Fluid Plasma System
Modelling techniques and applications Qing Tan EPFL-STI-IMT-OPTLab
Uniform Treatment of Numerical Time-Integrations of the Maxwell Equations R. Horváth TU/e, Philips Research Eindhoven TU/e Eindhoven, 27th June, 2002 Scientific.
5/4/2015rew Accuracy increase in FDTD using two sets of staggered grids E. Shcherbakov May 9, 2006.
EM Computations with Embedded Boundaries (cut cells) C. Nieter †, J.R. Cary †* (presenter), G.R. Werner *, D.N. Smithe †, P.H. Stoltz †, S. Ovtchinnikov.
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
“Assimilating” Solar Data into MHD Models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett SSL UC Berkeley HMI Team Meeting, Jan 2005.
Parallel Mesh Refinement with Optimal Load Balancing Jean-Francois Remacle, Joseph E. Flaherty and Mark. S. Shephard Scientific Computation Research Center.
Harvard University - Boston University - University of Maryland Numerical Micromagnetics Xiaobo TanJohn S. Baras P. S. Krishnaprasad University of Maryland.
Introduction to Numerical Methods I
Parabolic PDEs Generally involve change of quantity in space and time Equivalent to our previous example - heat conduction.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review March 16-17, 2006, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Computational.
Computational Fluid Dynamics I PIW Numerical Methods for Parabolic Equations Instructor: Hong G. Im University of Michigan Fall 2005.
Finite Difference Time Domain Method (FDTD)
Consortium for Metrology of Semiconductor Nanodefects Mechanical Engineering An Introduction to Computational Electromagnetics using FDTD R. E. Diaz.
Numerical Schemes for Advection Reaction Equation Ramaz Botchorishvili Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences Tbilisi State University GGSWBS,Tbilisi, July.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations
Applications of Frequency Extraction to Cavity Modeling Travis M. Austin* and John R. Cary*,¶ Tech-X Corporation*, University of Colorado-Boulder ¶ Collaborator:
Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
Most physically significant large-scale atmospheric circulations have time scales on the order of Rossby waves but much larger than the time scales.
22 July 2008 John Hart Toroid Field Parameterisation 1 Toroid Field Parameterisation An informal report to the RAL ATLAS meeting John Hart 22 July 2008.
A Novel Wave-Propagation Approach For Fully Conservative Eulerian Multi-Material Simulation K. Nordin-Bates Lab. for Scientific Computing, Cavendish Lab.,
Lecture 3.
A conservative FE-discretisation of the Navier-Stokes equation JASS 2005, St. Petersburg Thomas Satzger.
Lecture Objectives: Analyze the unsteady-state heat transfer Conduction Introduce numerical calculation methods Explicit – Implicit methods.
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 9 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Thermal-ADI: a Linear-Time Chip-Level Dynamic Thermal Simulation Algorithm Based on Alternating-Direction-Implicit(ADI) Method Good afternoon! The topic.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations Andrey Andreyev Advisor: James Baeder Mid.
7. Introduction to the numerical integration of PDE. As an example, we consider the following PDE with one variable; Finite difference method is one of.
Stable, Circulation- Preserving, Simplicial Fluids Sharif Elcott, Yiying Tong, Eva Kanso, Peter Schröder, and Mathieu Desbrun.
Rieben IMA Poster, 05/11/ UC Davis /LLNL/ ISCR High Order Symplectic Integration Methods for Finite Element Solutions to Time Dependent Maxwell Equations.
Funded by US-DOE grants DE-FG02-05ER84172,
1 1 What does Performance Across the Software Stack mean?  High level view: Providing performance for physics simulations meaningful to applications 
Presentation of the paper: An unstructured grid, three- dimensional model based on the shallow water equations Vincenzo Casulli and Roy A. Walters Presentation.
An Integrated Hydrodynamic Approach to River, Sewer and Overland Flow Modelling presented by Andrew Walker Innovyze Ltd.
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (AE 2402) Presented by IRISH ANGELIN S AP/AERO.
Modeling Electromagnetic Fields in Strongly Inhomogeneous Media
A Non-iterative Hyperbolic, First-order Conservation Law Approach to Divergence-free Solutions to Maxwell’s Equations Richard J. Thompson 1 and Trevor.
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 7 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Formulation of 2D‐FDTD without a PML.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
G. Penn UC Berkeley / LBNL CBP July, 2002 NuFact 02 Imperial College, London Boris Push with Spatial Stepping.
Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.
An Introduction to Computational Fluids Dynamics Prapared by: Chudasama Gulambhai H ( ) Azhar Damani ( ) Dave Aman ( )
In this work, we propose a novel local mesh refinement algorithm based on the use of transformation optics. The new algorithm is an alternative way to.
The Finite Difference Time Domain Method FDTD Haythem H. abdullah ERI, Electronics Research Institute, Microwave Engineering Dept.
Numerical Methods for Acoustic Problems with Complex Geometries Based on Cartesian Grids D.N. Vedder
Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.
______ APPLICATION TO WAKEFIELD ACCELERATORS EAAC Workshop – Elba – June juillet 2016 | PAGE 1 CEA | 10 AVRIL 2012 X. Davoine 1, R. Lehe 2, A.
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
Chapter 30.
Convergence in Computational Science
L Ge, L Lee, A. Candel, C Ng, K Ko, SLAC
Finite Volume Method for Unsteady Flows
Ordinary differential equaltions:
Thermal-ADI: a Linear-Time Chip-Level Dynamic Thermal Simulation Algorithm Based on Alternating-Direction-Implicit(ADI) Method Good afternoon! The topic.
Supported by the National Science Foundation.
Comparison of CFEM and DG methods
6th Lecture : Numerical Methods
Wei Choon Tay and Eng Leong Tan
Modeling Debye Dispersive Media Using Efficient ADI-FDTD Method
Presentation transcript:

4 th order Embedded Boundary FDTD algorithm for Maxwell Equations Lingling Wu, Stony Brook University Roman Samulyak, BNL Tianshi Lu, BNL Application collaborators: J. Cary, TechX

Research Goals Develop 4 th order accurate in both space and time embedded boundary FDTD algorithms Develop stable and accurate algorithm for coupling with particles Evaluate accuracy and performance of different versions of algorithms Assist in the implementation of the most promising algorithms in TechX EM software Motivation: Provide robust, accurate and scalable algorithms for the simulation of EM waves coupled to charge particles in geometrically complex RF cavities).

Advantages of High order Embedded Boundary Approach Simple approach to geometrically complex domains Avoids the generation of complex conforming FE meshes Improves the stability of unstructured schemes Preserves conservation properties Accuracy in coupling to particles Rapid convergence Scalability to 1000s processors

Main Ideas: Spatial Discretization Preserves the main simplification of the embedded boundary method: magnetic field is located in centers of the regular grid cells (even if cells are cut by the boundary) Fourth order spatial discretization of derivatives (3rd order one-sided derivatives near boundaries) Calculation of cell volume using curvature information Merge of small volume cut cells

4 th order symplectic time integrator using Yoshidas method based on three Leapfrog steps. In general Main Ideas: Temporal Discretization Preserves the symplectic property of the Leapfrog scheme For comparison, the Runge-Kutta integrator is not symplectic Smaller storage compared to RK4, Yoshida / RK4 =1 / 4 Minor reduction of CFL condition compared to RK4 Fixed T, operation time ratio is Yoshida / RK4=1.26 / 1

Current progress Performed rigorous theoretical analysis of various components of the algorithm Developed FDTD code prototype Fully implemented and tested: 2 nd order embedded boundary algorithm based on Leapfrog time stepping 4 th order Yoshida time integrator 4 th order FDTD scheme for regular geometries Implementation 4 th order embedded boundary algorithm is in progress

Future work Complete implementation of 4 th order embedded boundary algorithm Evaluate other versions of the algorithm (unconditionally stable) Develop and implement algorithm for coupling with particles Assist in the implementation of algorithms in TechX EM software

Evaluation of other versions of the algorithm Operator split techniques based on an implicit Crank–Nicolson discretization of elementary systems and Yoshidas time loop. Split the equations using the ADI idea and solve the split equations by Crank-Nicolson scheme and improve the order by Yoshida technique. ADI is first order for time and can be improved to 2 nd order by strang split and then improved to 4 th order by Yoshida technique. Crank-Nicolson is 2 nd order for space and unconditional stable. It also shows 2 nd order for time for the split equations. We can improve the spatial order by using longer stencil and keep the 2 nd order for time. This will allow us to avoid merging small cut cells in order to satisfy the stability condition. Merging small cells introduces error.

Thank you !